Connect with us

Economy

NEZA Seeks Constructive Dialogue on Impact of Tax Reforms on Nigeria’s Free Zones

Published

on

neza Nigeria

By Modupe Gbadeyanka

The need for critical stakeholders to have a constructive dialogue on the impact of the tax reforms on the free zones in the country has been emphasised by the Nigeria Economic Zones Association (NEZA).

In a statement signed by the executive secretary of NEZA, Toyin Elegbede, it was pointed out that certain provisions of the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 and the Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025 affect Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and Free Trade Zones (FTZs), posing significant risks to Nigeria’s investment climate.

It was noted that without careful engagement and strategic interventions, these reforms risk eroding investor confidence, jeopardising over 100,000 jobs, triggering capital flight to competing African countries, and increasing costs for Nigerian consumers.

At a time when Nigeria should be consolidating its leadership under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), policies that weaken the free zone scheme could inadvertently shift competitive advantage to neighbouring economies.

The new tax provisions affecting SEZ and FTZ operators have created deep uncertainty among investors and for the first time, have created a situation where even companies that export 100 per cent of their products from the free zone can be subject to taxation, completely undermining the free zone scheme and making Nigeria’s free zones one of the least attractive and competitive on the continent, a part of the note made available to Business Post stated.

NEZA said investors may choose to relocate to other African countries with more favourable free zone regimes, while still benefitting from duty-free access to the Nigerian market under AfCFTA rules, depriving Nigeria of the very investments, skills transfer, and employment opportunities the zones were designed to secure.

It stressed that by taxing domestic sales from the zones, the reforms risk raising the cost of goods in the customs territory, undermining competitiveness for Nigerian businesses and places additional burdens on consumers.

“The perception that the FTZs operating with 100 per cent export orientation or complying with the 75 per cent export outside the custom territory would be exempt has been nullified by Section 57 of the Nigeria Tax Law, 2025 which stipulates that every company meeting these conditions will still be subject to taxation. It is concerning especially as FTZs have been beneficiaries of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and thereby including more entities irrespective of the exemptions stated in the second schedule.

“The unprecedented minimum effective tax rules that will apply to multinationals or companies generating above a certain revenue threshold within the free zones significantly harm these companies by effectively stripping them of their key tax incentives, even for those who do not sell into Nigeria.

“Although aimed at increasing tax collection, the reforms could shrink Nigeria’s overall revenue base if zones collapse or investors shift operations to more favourable environments, resulting in long-term losses that outweigh short-term gains,” it stated.

The group stated that these risks are not hypothetical; current and prospective investors are already expressing concerns and actively reassessing Nigeria’s competitiveness relative to other countries in the region.

“Contrary to the pronouncements of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, the Nigeria Tax Law, 2025 made fundamental and adverse changes to the Enabling Acts of the Free Zones Regulatory Authorities (NEPZA & OGFZA). Despite repeated assurances, the Nigeria Tax Law provisions are not consistent with the Enabling Acts; instead for the first time, free zone enterprises who do not sell into Nigeria custom territory will be subject to taxation in an unparalleled and aggressive encroachment into Nigeria’s free zones.

“Again, contrary to perceptions that Free Zones deprive government of revenue, the reality is that zones already make substantial contributions to Nigeria’s economy and fiscal system. Under the supervision of the Regulatory Authorities, free zone operators pay an average of $100,000 per zone (25 fully operational zones under NEPZA and 8 under OGFZA) annually in Operating Licence (OPL) renewal fees excluding additional renewals by FZEs, and pay an additional $100,000 per zone annually in container examination charges.

“In 2024 alone, free zones contributed over N100 billion in customs duties and remitted over N2 billion in PAYE taxes on behalf of employees. They also meet numerous other obligations, including immigration fees, authority administrative fees, and levies.

“These figures do not even begin to capture the broader economic impact of Nigeria’s free zones including infrastructure investments, deepening supply chain linkages, skills development of local talent, and the creation of over 100,000 direct jobs. Beyond fiscal contributions, world-class infrastructure is the backbone of any successful free zone programme. A compelling example is Morocco’s Tanger Med Free Zone, a state-led public-private partnership (PPP)-driven complex where total investment reached about $11.2 billion by 2022 ($ 4.3 billion from public sources and $ 6.9 billion from private investors).

“In 2023, the port handled 8.61 million TEU, with its industrial zones hosting about 1,200 companies, generating 110,000 jobs and $15 billion in exports. It is now on track to exceed its nominal capacity of 9 million TEU. This is what strategic, coordinated investment combined with policy stability can deliver. Nigeria has the potential to replicate and even surpass such success, but only if the free zone framework is protected and strengthened, not undermined,” it stated.

NEZA warned that if Nigeria weakens its Free Zone scheme, investors may simply relocate to these competitor economies, produce there, and still export duty-free into Nigeria under AfCFTA. This would not only erode Nigeria’s investment attractiveness but also expose domestic manufacturers to greater external competition, the very concern MAN has raised.

The solution, therefore, is not to stifle or weaken the free zone scheme but to establish fair and transparent rules that balance the interests of manufacturers in the customs territory with the export-driven mandate of FZEs. With proper consultation and policy design, both can thrive creating a more diversified, competitive Nigerian economy.

It posited that the recent tax reforms were introduced with insufficient engagement with key zone stakeholders, limiting the depth required for a holistic, workable and balanced outcome. This lack of structured dialogue risks creating policy misalignment, where the reforms may inadvertently erode the very industrialisation, job creation, and export diversification objectives that government seeks to achieve.

NEZA reaffirmed its unwavering commitment to supporting operators across Nigeria’s SEZs and FTZs. We remain dedicated to working collaboratively with the government to ensure that the reforms achieve their goals of transparency, fairness, and revenue assurance without destabilising a scheme that has generated billions in revenue, created thousands of jobs, and helped positioned Nigeria as an investment destination.

It called on President Bola Tinubu, the Federal Inland Revenue Service, NEPZA, OGFZA, and other key stakeholders to engage in a structured and inclusive dialogue with operators.

NEZA urged the government to consider a moratorium on the implementation of the new tax provisions for FZEs. A phased approach, whether through a transition period, a temporary extension of existing incentives, or the “grandfathering” of enterprises already operating under earlier frameworks, will provide investors the certainty needed to protect jobs, honour financing commitments, and complete long-term projects. This will also give government the necessary space to conduct impact assessments and design an orderly framework that balances revenue objectives with Nigeria’s trade and economic competitiveness.

Modupe Gbadeyanka is a fast-rising journalist with Business Post Nigeria. Her passion for journalism is amazing. She is willing to learn more with a view to becoming one of the best pen-pushers in Nigeria. Her role models are the duo of CNN's Richard Quest and Christiane Amanpour.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: Parts of New Tax Laws Not Good for Nigeria’s Investment Climate—NEZA – PRIMA NEWS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

Distributors Kick Against Plans by Lagos to Tackle Egg Glut

Published

on

egg glut

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Eggs Sellers and Distributors Association of Nigeria (ESDAN) has kicked against the proposed plan involving the production of egg powder to tackle the glut of eggs.

The National President of ESDAN, Mrs Olaide Graham, made the position clear in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) this week.

Egg glut occurs when egg production exceeds consumer demand, resulting in a surplus that often forces farmers to sell at reduced prices to avoid spoilage.

The Lagos State Government recently announced plans to establish an egg powder processing facility as part of efforts to address seasonal egg glut in the poultry sector.

Mrs Graham described the initiative as a welcome development but maintained that it would not address the fundamental challenges facing the industry.

“The establishment of an egg powder factory in Lagos to address the egg glut situation will have a positive impact if it is properly implemented and the product meets market standards.

“It could help reduce waste and, to some extent, stabilise prices temporarily.

“However, egg powder may not be widely accepted as a substitute for fresh eggs in this part of the country because of differences in taste, texture and consumer perception.

“Many consumers still regard fresh eggs as more nutritious,” she said.

According to her, the major issue is identifying and addressing the root causes of the egg glut rather than focusing solely on processing surplus eggs.

“We have a population of over 200 million people. Why should there be an egg glut?

“We need to examine what farmers, distributors and other stakeholders are not getting right and provide the necessary support.

“Egg powder is not the cure for egg glut in Nigeria. Stakeholders should come together to identify sustainable solutions,” she said.

Mrs Graham noted that egg powder could serve as a raw material for the production of other goods, but should not be viewed as a long-term remedy for the challenge.

She emphasised the need for improved distribution systems across the egg value chain.

“Effective distribution can go a long way in addressing the problem.

“We should remember that Lagos distributes not only eggs produced within the state but also eggs brought in from other parts of the country.

“In every challenge, there is always a solution, but egg powder is not the major solution to egg glut,” she said.

The ESDAN president also dismissed concerns that egg distributors could be negatively affected by the proposed factory.

“Distributors have nothing to fear because Nigerians are accustomed to consuming fresh eggs.

“The number of consumers who will continue to prefer fresh eggs will still be higher.

“Even if egg powder production affects access to fresh eggs, there will still be ways to address that challenge.“If the purpose of producing egg powder is to reduce glut, then that is why distributors have joined the conversation,” she said, according to the news agency.

Continue Reading

Economy

Oyedele Advocates Domestic Resource Mobilisation Over Foreign Aid

Published

on

taiwo oyedele tax reform

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr Taiwo Oyedele, says that reliance on aid and concessional finance was neither sustainable nor sufficient.

He said this at the opening of a high-level capacity-building session in Abuja on Wednesday, noting that Nigeria needs to strengthen local funding sources, a message that also guided discussions during a visit by an Ethiopian delegation to learn about Nigeria’s Integrated National Financing Framework (INFF).

“Domestic Resource Mobilisation remains the most critical pillar of any credible financing framework”, he said. “Our objective is not to increase the burden on citizens. Our objective is to create a fairer, more efficient and growth-oriented revenue system that supports development, encourages enterprise and strengthens voluntary compliance.”

The minister presented Nigeria’s INFF as a practical, evolving response to the continent’s widening financing gap for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Agenda 2063.

He outlined the process that had produced the framework — a Development Finance Assessment, a multi-stakeholder steering committee and a Financing Strategy aligned with the Medium-Term National Development Plan.

He also cited concrete reforms such as expanded digitalisation of tax administration, deeper engagement with international capital markets through green and sustainability-linked instruments and institutionalised accountability mechanisms.

“These are not merely technical outputs,” Mr Oyedele said. “They are the instruments by which we mobilise, align and deploy financing to turn plans into services — schools, clinics, roads and social protection for our people.”

He insisted the INFF was “a living framework” that would continue to adapt as Nigeria sought to deepen private-sector participation, mobilise climate finance and strengthen subnational financing architecture.

The minister’s emphasis on sovereign revenue came with a direct appeal to state actors, urging states to pursue reforms that would increase the tax-to-GDP ratio without unduly burdening households.

Mr Oyedele positioned the INFF as the mechanism to reduce external dependence by aligning public, private, domestic and international finance with national priorities.

“This is not cause for despair”, he said of Africa’s financing gap. “Rather, it is an opportunity to rethink how development is financed and to ensure that every available source of capital is aligned with national priorities.”

Addressing the Ethiopian delegation directly, Mr Oyedele framed the engagement as mutual learning, stating: “Nigeria does not claim to have all the answers. Rather, we offer our experience in the spirit of partnership, transparency and mutual learning. Ask difficult questions. Challenge assumptions. Share your innovations and experiences.”

In her remarks, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on SDGs, Mrs Adejoke Orelope-Adefulire, told delegates that the capacity of states to effectively mobilise, manage and deploy financial resources directly influenced the quality of life of millions of Nigerians.

She stressed that states must carry constitutional responsibility for primary healthcare, basic education, water and sanitation and other frontline services.

She also warned that current revenue and institutional weaknesses at the subnational level threatened service delivery across the country.

“The fiscal realities confronting many sub-national governments — rising expenditure pressures, limited internally generated revenue, growing infrastructure deficits, climate-related vulnerabilities and global economic uncertainties — are battering state finances,“ Mrs Orelope-Adefulire said. “Addressing these issues requires innovative thinking, bold reforms and stronger collaboration among all key stakeholders.”

On her part, UNDP Resident Representative, Ms Elsie Attafuah, echoed the call for domestic solutions while emphasising the value of peer learning.

“The Sustainable Development Goals are ultimately delivered in states, provinces, cities and communities,” she said. “This is why strengthening fiscal capacity at the state level is not simply a revenue issue. It is fundamentally a development issue.”

Ms Attafuah commended Nigeria’s reform agenda and stressed that South-South cooperation, exemplified by the Ethiopia–Nigeria exchange, could accelerate progress, noting, “No single country has all the answers. Yet every country has lessons that can help others move further and faster.”

Continue Reading

Economy

Nigeria Launches EMERGE to Unlock $750bn Mineral Wealth

Published

on

map of nigeria

By Adedapo Adesanya

Nigeria has launched the Early-Stage Mineral Exploration and Research Grant Endowment Program (EMERGE), a new initiative aimed at accelerating early-stage mineral exploration, strengthening geological research and advancing local value addition.

The programme is part of moves to unlock Nigeria’s $750 billion worth of untapped mineral deposits under broader efforts to diversify its economy beyond oil.

Nigeria has outlined plans to expand mineral exploration and production, identifying 44 strategic mineral deposits and is seeking developers with the requisite capital and technological expertise to invest.

The government has also sought to increase mining’s contribution to GDP to 10 per cent in 2026. However, unlocking these opportunities will require stronger geological data, greater technical capacity and increased investment in early-stage exploration.

The introduction of the EMERGE initiative aims to address these gaps. The programme is centred around three areas of focus: science-backed exploration, critical minerals development and research and development.

The exploration stream targets early-stage geological insights to generate reliable mineral data, the critical minerals stream targets minerals required for the energy transition, while the research and development stream integrates science and innovation across the value chain.

Driven by the Solid Minerals Development Fund, the programme is designed to position Nigeria as a major player in the global minerals value chain. It also builds on a rising wave of international partnerships aimed at modernising Nigeria’s exploration infrastructure through digitisation and enhanced capacity building.

Nigeria and Turkey formalised a partnership agreement in May 2026, aimed at strengthening cooperation in mining technology, exploration and investment.

Nigeria has also entered geological mapping and exploration cooperation agreements with South Sudan and South Africa, aimed at advancing geological and technical expertise while facilitating greater investment flows across the exploration sector.

Recent mineral ambitions are being backed by global finance. In March 2026, Nigeria secured $1.3 billion from the Africa Finance Corporation (AFC) to fund its mineral exploration programs as well as the construction of an alumina refinery, advancing its national mineral production and domestic beneficiation strategy.

Also, late last year, the federal government allocated over $600 million for geoscientific exploration and nationwide mapping, highlighting Nigeria’s commitment to de-risk the sector through access to modern geological data and accelerated exploration activities.

Continue Reading

Trending