Connect with us

Economy

MEXC vs Kraken: Which Is Better for Trading RWA Assets?

Published

on

MEXC Kranken Logo

Key Takeaways

Here are the main points to consider when comparing these two exchanges for RWA trading.

  • MEXC often provides promotional zero-maker fees for RWA spot trading, while Kraken uses a tiered fee structure starting at 0.16% for makers and 0.26% for takers.
  • Both exchanges list certain RWA tokens like PACT, but access to tokenized equity is still limited and depends on user location.
  • The on-chain RWA market is valued between $10 billion and $15 billion in 2026, with estimates pointing to continued growth due to tokenized treasuries.
  • MEXC focuses on low trading costs and fast token listings, whereas Kraken prioritizes regulatory compliance and direct fiat currency access.

Understanding the basics of Real-World Assets (RWA) helps clarify their role in modern crypto portfolios.

RWA assets convert physical or traditional financial instruments, such as government treasuries and credit, into digital tokens on a blockchain. This connects traditional finance with cryptocurrency markets. The on-chain RWA sector has reached an estimated $10 billion to $15 billion in 2026, largely driven by institutional involvement. This comparison looks at MEXC and Kraken to see how they handle RWA trading in terms of fees, available tokens, and platform features.

What Are RWA Assets? Top Tokens 2026

Real-world asset tokens represent traditional financial items on a blockchain network.

The RWA sector digitizes traditional assets like government bonds for use within the crypto ecosystem. Tokenized treasuries currently lead this category. Protocols like Ondo provide tokens (such as USDY and OUSG) that offer yields backed by real-world financial reserves. Another notable example is the PACT token, which launched on both MEXC and Kraken in early 2026 to help transfer RWAs across different blockchain networks. The market has seen steady growth over the last two years, with tokenized credit and treasuries acting as the main drivers.

MEXC RWA Trading: Fees and Listings

MEXC attracts users by focusing on reduced trading costs and a fast listing process for new tokens.

MEXC offers a low-cost environment for RWA trading. It frequently runs promotions with 0% maker fees and 0.05% taker fees for spot trading. Futures trading fees are also low, typically at 0% for makers and 0.02% for takers. The platform supports several RWA pairs, including PACT/USDT, and tends to list early-stage projects quickly. This efficient listing process also includes other emerging digital assets like PI price today, providing users with early access to a diverse range of tokens. While it is highly suitable for active traders who want to minimize fees, direct access to tokenized equities remains limited.

Kraken RWA Trading: Features and Support

Kraken offers a structured trading platform with a strong emphasis on regulatory compliance and fiat integrations.

Kraken manages RWA trading using a tiered fee system based on 30-day trading volume. Base fees generally start at 0.16% for makers and 0.26% for takers, dropping as a user’s trading volume increases. The exchange provides access to crypto derivatives and regulated trading pairs, though direct tokenized equity is uncommon. Kraken maintains high liquidity, processing large daily trading volumes. It also features direct fiat on-ramps, making it practical for users who want to buy RWA tokens directly with traditional currency.

MEXC vs Kraken RWA Comparison Table

This table provides a direct comparison of the key features offered by both exchanges.

RWA Trading Feature MEXC Kraken
Spot Fees (Maker/Taker) 0% / 0.05% (promotional) 0.16% / 0.26% (tiered)
RWA Tokens Listed PACT, early RWA pairs Select derivatives, limited equities
Liquidity Volume Strong for newer altcoins High overall volume (market-dependent)
Regulation Focus on emerging markets Complies with multiple frameworks, MiCA positioning
Fiat Support P2P and third-party providers Direct regulated fiat on-ramps

RWA Security: MEXC vs Kraken Regulation

Security and regulatory compliance are critical factors when handling tokenized real-world assets.

Both exchanges implement standard industry security measures. Kraken holds operational licenses in multiple countries and adjusts its platform to meet regional regulations, including the MiCA framework in Europe. MEXC focuses on fund protection mechanisms designed for a high volume of new token listings. Both platforms use cold storage for the majority of user funds and conduct regular security audits to maintain platform integrity.

RWA Trading Fees Breakdown: MEXC vs Kraken

The fee structures on these platforms cater to different types of trading habits.

MEXC’s fee model benefits frequent retail traders through its promotional 0% maker and 0.05% taker fees. Users holding the MX token can further reduce these costs. Kraken uses a volume-based tiered system, which becomes more cost-effective for institutional or high-volume traders but starts higher for average retail users. For example, a standard $10,000 spot trade will generally incur lower direct fees on MEXC during promotional periods compared to Kraken’s base tier.

RWA Liquidity and Volume: MEXC vs Kraken

Adequate market liquidity ensures that traders can buy and sell tokens without causing large price changes.

Kraken maintains deep liquidity across its major trading pairs, processing high daily volumes that support stable execution during market fluctuations. MEXC also provides functional liquidity across its markets. Traders benefit from a reliable environment that mirrors the steady depth found in the BTC USDT order book, which helps ensure smooth trade execution for early-stage or lower-market-cap RWA tokens. As institutional money enters the RWA space, both exchanges are seeing increased trading volumes in these specific asset categories.

Best Exchange for RWA: User Tools Comparison

Both platforms offer additional tools to help users manage their RWA investments.

MEXC provides features like launchpools, which allow users to gain exposure to new RWA projects early. It also includes an active copy trading system within its application. Kraken focuses on advanced charting tools, detailed analytics dashboards, and educational resources aimed at intermediate to advanced traders. Both platforms provide functional interfaces, but they target slightly different user preferences.

Conclusion: Best RWA Trading Platform Choice

Choosing the right platform depends on individual trading priorities and regional availability.

MEXC is generally more suitable for traders looking for low transaction fees and early access to newly launched RWA tokens. Kraken is a better fit for users who prioritize regulatory compliance, direct fiat deposits, and advanced trading analytics. Both exchanges offer reliable entry points into the growing RWA market.

RWA Trading FAQ

Here are answers to common questions about trading RWA tokens on MEXC and Kraken.

Is MEXC Better Than Kraken for RWA Beginners?

Platform suitability for beginners depends on what features the user values most. MEXC’s lower fee structure can make it easier to start trading with small amounts. Kraken, however, provides a more regulated environment and comprehensive educational materials, which many new users find helpful.

MEXC vs Kraken: Supported RWA Tokens List?

Token availability differs based on the exchange’s listing strategy. MEXC frequently lists newer RWA pairs, including tokens like PACT. Kraken focuses on more established assets and select derivatives. Token lists on both platforms change regularly as the market develops.

Which Has Lower RWA Spot Trading Fees?

Fee differences are noticeable between the two platforms. MEXC generally has lower spot trading fees, frequently running promotions at 0% for makers and 0.05% for takers. Kraken’s base spot fees start at 0.16% and 0.26%, respectively, though they decrease for high-volume traders.

Are RWA Assets Safe on MEXC or Kraken?

Security is a standard priority for major cryptocurrency exchanges. Both platforms use industry-standard security practices, including holding the majority of assets in offline cold storage. Users should also implement personal security measures, such as two-factor authentication, to protect their accounts.

Can You Trade RWA with Fiat on Kraken vs MEXC?

Fiat funding options vary between the two exchanges. Kraken allows users to deposit fiat currency (like USD or EUR) directly through bank transfers. MEXC relies primarily on peer-to-peer (P2P) markets or third-party payment processors for fiat deposits.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

Nigeria’s Petrol Import Bill Plunges 96% in First Quarter of 2026

Published

on

Petrol Import Bill

By Adedapo Adesanya

Nigeria’s petrol import bill crashed further as the latest foreign trade statistics by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) indicated that about N87.401 billion was spent on the importation of fuel between January and March 2026.

A comparative analysis showed the figure plunged by 96.2 per cent or N2.184 trillion compared with the N2.271 trillion spent on fuel imports between January and March 2025.

The NBS data revealed that fuel did not feature among the top 19 traded products with the rest of the world, Africa, or West Africa during the review period.

The biggest factor is the ramp-up of production at Dangote Petroleum Refinery, which has significantly reduced Nigeria’s dependence on imported Premium Motor Spirit (PMS). As local supplies increasingly meet domestic demand, marketers have had less need to source petrol from overseas.

According to the data, the leading traded products included crude petroleum oils and oils obtained from bituminous minerals, gas oil, durum wheat, machines for reception, conversion and transmission of data, used vehicles, motorcycles, agricultural seeders, medicaments, aircraft parts, butanes, petroleum bitumen, sugar cane, herbicides and fuel additives.

The report read, “The value of total imports stood at N13,619.33bn in the first quarter of 2026, representing an 18.17 per cent decrease from the value recorded in the corresponding quarter of 2025 (N16,644.42bn) and a 21.05 per cent decrease compared to the value recorded in Q4 2025 (N17,250.93bn).

“Analysis of Nigeria’s import trade reveals that China remained the leading source of imports in the first quarter of 2026, followed by the United States of America, India, Germany, and the United Arab Emirates.

The most imported commodities during the quarter were petroleum oils and oils obtained from bituminous minerals (crude), gas oil, durum wheat, machines for the reception, conversion, and transmission of voice, images, or data, and used vehicles with diesel or semi-diesel engines.

“The value of other oil products imported in Q1 2026 stood at N748.10bn, reflecting an 85.05 per cent decrease from N5,005.22bn in Q1 2025 and an 81.38 per cent decrease from N4,018.31bn recorded in Q4 2025.

“Nigeria spent N2.694tn on petrol imports in the first quarter of 2022. The import bill declined by N661bn, or 24.5 per cent, to N2.033tn in the corresponding period of 2023.”

Continue Reading

Economy

Ripple Invests in Flutterwave to Accelerate African Stablecoin Payments

Published

on

Flutterwave Ripple

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

Leading provider of blockchain-based enterprise solutions, Ripple, has participated in Flutterwave’s Series E fundraising, which values the company at $3.2 billion.

Ripple’s strategic investment marks the definitive next phase of Flutterwave’s long-term stablecoin strategy, seamlessly connecting its existing cross-border settlement capabilities with enterprise-grade digital liquidity.

This will enable African businesses to bypass legacy frictions, ultimately bolstering Nigeria’s role as the primary hub for global digital asset trade and driving sustained economic resilience across the African continent.

This is because it will accelerate the adoption of digital asset infrastructure, bringing unprecedented speed, liquidity, and cost-efficiency to cross-border commerce throughout Africa.

The partnership is built on three core pillars: embedding RLUSD into Flutterwave’s payment rails and Send App remittance corridors as a primary settlement asset for high-volume channels; leveraging the XRP Ledger (XRPL) for faster transaction clearing; and deploying a unified API to seamlessly bridge Flutterwave’s domestic network with Ripple Payments, Ripple’s global payments network.

By merging traditional fiat payment methods, including local cards, mobile wallets, and bank transfers, with Ripple’s enterprise blockchain technology, the partnership eliminates the historical friction points of African cross-border payments, such as multi-day delays and inflated FX margins. Instead, businesses will experience guaranteed liquidity, predictable pricing, and real-time settlement.

By embedding RLUSD into its core ecosystem, the company is finalising a ‘stablecoin-first’ payment architecture that eliminates traditional bottlenecks. This unified approach delivers a consistent, scalable, and compliant liquidity stack that transforms how African enterprises interact with global markets, effectively cementing a new way for digital money acceptance that is both borderless and locally grounded.

Commenting on the development, the Managing Director of MEA at Ripple, Reece Merrick, said, “Flutterwave has built one of the most advanced payments networks in Africa, and as its infrastructure evolves, stablecoins are becoming central to that story.

“Our investment will establish RLUSD within that infrastructure, with Flutterwave driving stablecoin flows over the XRPL and deepening its role as a settlement layer for real-world payments across the continent.

“Together we also plan to bring Ripple Payments’ speed and efficiency to cross-border transactions in the region, opening up faster, lower-cost financial services to businesses and consumers at scale.”

On his part, the chief executive of Flutterwave, Mr Olugbenga ‘GB’ Agboola, said, “This investment marks a pivotal moment in our journey, enabling us to significantly scale our infrastructure and expand our stablecoin-enabled payments roadmap. By unlocking faster settlement and lower-cost cross-border payments, we are building a payment superhighway that connects African commerce directly to the global economy.

“This partnership is a catalyst for Nigerian and African sovereignty in the digital financial age, ensuring our markets are primary participants in the global digital asset revolution.”

With this capital and a deepened product alliance, Flutterwave will accelerate its goal to bridge traditional financial systems with next-generation digital asset infrastructure.

Building on its established scale – having raised over $500 million and processed over a billion transactions worth over $50 billion – Flutterwave is positioned to unlock massive economic potential for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) and global enterprises operating across Africa.

Continue Reading

Economy

FG Blames FX Volatility, Logistics Costs for Rising Cooking Gas Prices

Published

on

cooking gas

By Adedapo Adesanya

The federal government has blamed the rising prices of cooking gas, also known as Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), on market pressures from foreign exchange volatility and rising logistics costs.

In a statement, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Gas), Mr Ekperikpe Ekpo, expressed the government’s concerns about the pain caused by rising cooking gas prices, announcing moves to ensure adequate, reliable and affordable gas for households, industry and power generation.

To remedy the situation, the FG said it has ordered the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) to engage with cooking gas producers, marketers and other stakeholders to sustain supply and enhance market stability of the product.

“The recent price adjustments are driven largely by prevailing market realities such as foreign exchange volatility, rising logistics costs, infrastructure constraints and fluctuations in international LPG prices. These factors should not be misinterpreted as evidence of policy failure,” he stated.

According to him, the government’s commitment is reflected in the interventions designed to stabilise the domestic LPG market, including the directive that all LPG produced in Nigeria be prioritised for local consumption.

“This policy has already strengthened domestic supply, reduced dependence on imports and improved market resilience,” the statement said.

Business Post reports that residents in Lagos and Ogun States continue to face scarcity and high cost of LPG. For a few vendors with the product, the price ranged between N2,000 and N2,400. In early May, it was sold at N1,200.

Mr Ekpo said the commencement of LPG deliveries from the new Seplat gas facility in July will significantly boost national supply.

“The minister also confirms that no producer is exporting LPG volumes designated for the domestic market, as regulatory measures remain firmly in place to prioritise local needs.

“The outlook for LPG supply remains positive, and the Federal Government will continue to pursue measures that enhance availability, affordability and long-term energy security for Nigerian consumers,” the statement.

Continue Reading

Trending