Auto
Tax Default: God is Good Motors Knocks FIRS, Demands Retraction
By Adedapo Adesanya
Nigeria’s leading transport franchise, God Is Good Motors (GIGM), has demanded the removal of its name from a published list of tax defaulters by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).
The firm said it has fully paid documented tax liability as demanded by the services, wondering how it could have defaulted after meeting all obligations.
It claimed that no prior demand notices were served on the firm in any of its branches nationwide as required by Sections 32 (d) and 33(1) of the FIRS Establishment Act before publication of its name among defaulters.
In a nine-point rejoinder dated August 21 signed by Finance Director of GIGM, Mr Joseph Osanipin, the firm described FIRS’ action as “totally unacceptable, unprofessional and unethical.”
It said the embarrassing development was ”negatively affecting our mutual business dealings with both our foreign and local partners,” urging the FIRS to reverse it with immediate effect.
The rejoinder titled: “Unpleasant and unlawful publication of our company name as tax defaulters on print and social media” reads: “Sequel to your publication of names of tax defaulters on Public Media, amongst which our Company’s name was maliciously included, we respond thus:
“Our Company; God is Good Motors Nigeria Limited is a duly registered Company in Nigeria with full compliance with the requirements of all relevant Government Agencies one of which is the Federal Inland Revenue Service.
“That the above stated Account name with Zenith Bank GOD IS GOOD MOTORS (VEHICLE SALESS A/C) is not a different Company nor a subsidiary of our company stated above, rather it is the same company but with a modified account name for ease of reconciling our transactions.
“We registered our Business with the Federal Inland Revenue Service as far back as 2010 with a Taxpayer Identification Number: 09568000-0001, with all documented tax liability fully paid up as demanded by the service.
“FIRS has carried out series of Tax Audits on our Company with the latest being May, 2018 vide a letter from your same head office dated 18th April, 2018 and signed by the Director of Tax Audit Department which I suppose you could verify from your internal records.
“We find it totally unacceptable, unprofessional, and unethical the manner in which our account name above was published on public media.
“This is a malicious attempt at smearing the good name and brand we have struggled to build over the years without even a demand notice served on us as stipulated in the FIRS Establishment Act Section 32 (d)….” the Service shall serve a demand notice upon the company or person in whose name a tax is chargeable and if payment is not made within one month from the date of the-service of such demand notice, the Service may proceed to enforce payment under this Act”
“Also Section 33(1) of the FIRS Establishment Act also states:…” Without prejudice to any other power conferred on the Board for the enforcement of payment of tax due from a company, where an assessment has become final and conclusive and a demand notice has, in accordance with the provisions of the relevant tax laws tax in the First Schedule to this Act, been served upon the taxable person or upon the person in whose name the taxable person is chargeable, then, if payment of the tax is not made within the time limited by the demand notice, the Board may in the prescribed form, for the purpose of enforcing payment of the tax due”
“Both sections of the FIRS Establishment act stated above clearly states that a demand notice must be served on the intended taxpayer before enforcement procedures are carried out, hence we find it very embarrassing that no demand notices were served on us or any of our branches/outlets yet our name was published on public media as delinquent and defaulting taxpayers
“The FIRS should look into her records to confirm our points as stated in 1. – 8 above and update our records with your Agency to avoid any future embarrassment of this nature as our organization takes issues like this as topmost priority.
“A counter publication should be made to expunge our Company name from the list of tax defaulters as this is negatively affecting our mutual business dealings with both our foreign and local partners.”
Auto
Mixed Reactions Over Nigeria’s Ban on Importation of Accidented Vehicles
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
Reactions have continued to trail the decision of the federal government to stop the importation of accidented vehicles into Nigeria by car dealers and others.
On Tuesday, the government declared that it would no longer accept the importation of vehicles without prior certification, noting that it was worried at the influx of substandard automobiles into the country.
The Minister of State for Industry, Trade, and Investment, Mr John Enoh, said the no certification, no entry policy tagged the Standard Organisation of Nigeria–National Automotive Design and Development Council Vehicle Conformity Assessment Programme was now fully implemented with immediate effect, noting that any vehicle that fails to meet the requirements would be denied entry into the country.
“I want to clarify again that this is not a proposal or a pilot. This has become government policy and takes immediate effect upon commencement,” he declared at a meeting in Abuja, stressing that vehicles coming into the nation must obtain pre-shipment certification.
“So, the endorsement integrates vehicle safety into Nigeria’s economic policy framework. It aligns fiscal instruments, foreign exchange import financing, and revenue systems with safety and standards objectives.
“It also strengthens the long-standing work of the Standard Organisation of Nigeria and NADDC within a coordinated whole-of-government approach.
“I think that with effect from the commencement of this SON-NADDC VehCAP, all new and used vehicles and automotive products entering Nigeria must obtain pre-shipment certification on that VehCAP before form M approval, before customs valuation, before power processing, before import clearance, and before market entry,” he stated.
“No vehicle or automotive product shall be imported, cleared, registered or licensed without valid certification. Any non-compliant import shall be subject to refusal of clearance, seizure, or sanctions under applicable laws,” he added.
Mr Enoh disclosed that, “We did not arrive here by accident. Too many Nigerians have died from accidents caused by vehicles that fell short of required standards. Nigeria deserves better, and this government is determined to deliver better.”
While he admitted that some Nigerians may not be able to afford new vehicles, the government cannot fold its arms and allow its citizens to die because of substandard cars.
“I think that without taking an extreme position, we must find a middle ground. There are economic challenges, there is purchasing power, and there is also the capacity of local assemblers to meet demand.
“But at the very minimum, if we adhere strictly to existing regulations, such as limits on the age of imported vehicles, our problem will not be nearly as bad as it is,” he said.
“A vehicle that is non-compliant at the federal level must not be registered at the state level. For the FCCPC, you are expected to treat VehCAP certification as a baseline for consumer protection enforcement for vehicles. State governments, because we run a federation with federal units, state governments are expected to align vehicle registration systems with VehCAP requirements. Most importantly, let me acknowledge the very profound role that was played by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, for approving the VehCAP initiative,” he warned.
While some Nigerians applaud this initiative, others believe citizens would be exploited by government officials and make the price of fairly used cars more expensive. Some dealers have been accused of bringing in accidented cars, refurbishing them and selling to unsuspecting customers at exorbitant prices.
Auto
LASPA Threatens Computer Village Touts Over Illegal Parking Extortion
By Aduragbemi Omiyale
Individuals and syndicates involved in illegal parking extortion at the Computer Village area of Ikeja have been warned to desist or face the full weight of the law.
This caution was given by the General Manager of the Lagos State Parking Authority (LASPA), Mrs Adebisi Adelabu, in a statement.
She said her organisation has uncovered a racket where fraudsters, working in collaboration with touts, are illegally collecting parking fees of up to N1,000 from motorists under false pretences.
Mrs Adelabu further revealed that some operatives of the Lagos Central Business District (CBD), in Ikeja, often clamp down on the illegally parked vehicles, either removing their number plates or arranging for the vehicles to be towed away, making vehicle owners pay a significant fine to recover both their vehicles and license plates.
She emphasised that the management and regulation of parking within the Ikeja business district, Computer Village and the entire state is not within the statutory purview of the CBD or any group of touts but rests exclusively with LASPA.
“We are aware of these fraudulent activities, and we want to make it clear that LASPA is the only government body legally mandated to oversee parking in Lagos State,” she said.
Continuing, the GM of LASPA condemned these illicit activities in the strongest terms, describing them as a disservice to the public and an embarrassment to the efforts of the state government at creating a seamless and orderly parking ecosystem.
The management of LASPA therefore urged all perpetrators engaged in illegal parking activities to stop immediately, adding that the Authority has revamped its monitoring and enforcement operations in the Computer Village and the State environs.
While stressing that anyone engaging in illegal parking activities will be arrested and prosecuted without leniency, Mrs Adelabu advised Lagos motorists and visitors to the Computer Village area to remain vigilant and patronise only LASPA-registered parking operators with valid identification and receipts.
The general public was also urged to report any suspected individuals or groups engaging in illegal parking operating in LASPA.
Auto
Passengers Lament as Uber, Bolt Drivers Strike in Lagos
By Dipo Olowookere
Rising operational costs and declining earnings have forced drivers of ride-haling platforms like Uber and Bolt to embark on a three-day warning strike in Lagos.
This situation has not gone down well with their customers in the metropolis, who have expressed frustration over the strike.
“Though I am not happy with the action of the drivers, I feel for them because they operate in a harsh environment,” a customer of Bolt, Mr Seyi Adeniji, said.
When Business Post checked the Uber app on Monday morning to book a ride from Egbeda to Megida Ayobo, both in the Alimosho Local Government Area of Lagos State, it was functional, but with fewer drivers available for pick-up, with prices ranging from N5,200 on Uber X to N7,400.
One of the drivers, who spoke with this newspaper but begged for anonymity, said efforts by them for improved packages have failed.
It was gathered that when nothing concrete came out from talks with operators of the platforms, drivers, under the aegis of the Amalgamated Union of App-Based Transporters of Nigeria (AUATON), Lagos State Chapter, decided to begin a warning strike from March 16 to 18, 2026, to further press home their demands.
They want an immediate review of ride fares to reflect current economic conditions. They also seek a cut in commission charges by ride-hailing companies, and want the introduction of a guaranteed minimum trip fare.
The drivers have asked for insurance coverage, an end to unjust deactivation of driver accounts without proper investigation, and greater transparency in how fares and commissions are calculated.
In addition, they want improved safety protections for drivers through better rider-verification systems, emergency panic buttons, and faster response mechanisms in cases of security threats.
According to a statement from the spokesman of the organisation, Mr Steven Iwindoye, many drivers are struggling to remain financially viable due to increasing fuel prices, vehicle maintenance costs, inflation and other living expenses, while fare structures on ride-hailing platforms have remained largely unchanged.
“Drivers operating on platforms such as Uber, Bolt, inDrive and Lagride continue to face rising operational costs, including the high price of fuel, vehicle maintenance, inflation and daily living expenses.
“Unfortunately, the fare structures and policies of these companies have not been adjusted to reflect these economic realities,” the statement said.
It was stressed that many drivers now work extremely long hours yet still struggle to earn a sustainable income, clarifying that, “This strike is not intended to punish commuters but to demand fair treatment, economic sustainability and safety protections for the drivers who power the ride-hailing industry.”
-
Feature/OPED6 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism10 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz3 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking8 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy3 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking3 years agoSort Codes of UBA Branches in Nigeria
-
Banking3 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports3 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn
