Connect with us

Economy

Sovereign Trust Insurance Raises Share Capital to Meet Tier-1 Requirements

Published

on

Sovereign Trust Insurance

By Dipo Olowookere

Few months ago, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) introduced a tier-based recapitalisation for insurance companies in Nigeria in three different categories depending on their capital base.

Under the new system, Tier 1 insurance companies are required to have minimum capital base of N9 billion for general insurance and N6 billion for life insurance, implying a composite capital base of N15 billion.

Tier 2 companies are divided into two categories, with N4.5 billion minimum capital base for general insurance and N3 billion for life assurance, meaning a composite insurance-general and life insurance will be required to have minimum capital base of N7.5 billion.

Tier 3 companies will continue to operate on the existing minimum capital base of N3 billion for general insurance and N2 billion for life insurance, implying a composite capital base of N5 billion for a composite tier 3 insurance company.

Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc, one of the 27 insurers on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), in order not to be caught napping, took a decision to raise its capital base by increasing its share capital.

The board of the firm had proposed to create an addition 5 billion ordinary shares of 50 kobo each to increase its authorised share capital to N10 billion from N7.5 billion, indicating an additional N2.5 billion share capital.

During the company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on Thursday, September 27, 2018 in Lagos, shareholders of Sovereign Trust Insurance gave the board the approval to make this happen.

According to Chairman of the insurance firm, Mr Oluseun Ajayi, this would make the company operate in the Tier-1 category.

“It is important to state our company’s resolve to adequately operate in the Tier- 1 category with the plan of increasing our capital base both organically and inorganically before the commencement of the Tier Based Minimum Solvency capital regime,” Mr Ajayi told shareholders at the meeting.

He expressed confidence that with the new share capital, Sovereign Trust Insurance would be able to compete favourably at the market with others.

According to the Chairman, the insurance sector, like every other sector of the economy in the last financial year, struggled to overcome the challenges posed by the lingering effects of the economic recession experienced in the previous year.

He said this left businesses in a stagnated position and eroded the purchasing power of the populace thereby slowing down their urge for insurance.

Giving an insight into the company’s performance in the 2017 financial year, Mr Ajayi said Sovereign Trust Insurance’s Gross Written Premium (GPW) hit N8.5 billion, representing a 33 percent rise over the N6.3 billion recorded in 2016.

According to him, the Net Claim Expenses (NCE) paid in the year under review was N1.3 billion, representing a 9.5 percent improvement over N1.44 billion paid in 2016, noting that the drop was as a result of efficient claims paid in 2016.

He said the company recorded a N202 million Profit before Tax in 2017 against N44 million recorded in 2016, representing over 351 percent increase, while the Profit after Tax stood at N157 million, a 569 percent increase when compared with the N23 million recorded in 2016.

Dipo Olowookere is a journalist based in Nigeria that has passion for reporting business news stories. At his leisure time, he watches football and supports 3SC of Ibadan. Mr Olowookere can be reached via [email protected]

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

Brent Settles at $95, WTI at $93 as Middle East Tensions Ease

Published

on

brent crude oil

By Adedapo Adesanya

The price of the crude oil benchmarks moderated by about 3 per cent on Thursday on investor hopes for an end to the ​United States-Israeli war with Iran that could reopen the Strait of Hormuz, following a ceasefire deal between Israel ‌and Lebanon.

Brent futures lost $2.78 ​or 2.84 per cent to trade at $95.03 per barrel, while the US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude declined by $2.98 or 3.1 per cent to close at $93.04 per barrel.

Israel and Lebanon said they have agreed to implement a ceasefire on Wednesday, raising hopes for a deal between the US and Iran. Iran has made any agreement conditional in part on an end to fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, an Iran-aligned group in Lebanon. However, Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon continued on Thursday.

Iran signalled that there has been “no tangible progress” in the talks with the Americans on a potential deal, while the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire announced by the United States overnight appears shaky.

“No tangible progress has been achieved in the negotiation process,” Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was quoted as saying by the semi-official Iranian news agency Tasnim.

The US and Iran have been exchanging messages on a framework proposal for a potential agreement for weeks. The oil market has reacted to each signal or hint of a breakthrough with sell-offs that sent Brent Crude prices to below $100 per barrel last week.

Despite the market hopes, the positions of the two sides appear to remain very distant, and a re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz is not imminent.

Earlier this week, Iran targeted civilian infrastructure in Kuwait and Bahrain, and alarms were raised at US military bases in Saudi Arabia, as Iran responded to the Israeli offensive in Lebanon.

The Republican-led US ‌House of ⁠Representatives approved a resolution to block President Donald Trump from continuing the war against Iran. To take effect, the resolution would need Senate approval and a two-thirds majority in both chambers to override an almost certain Trump veto.

The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) expects ⁠robust oil ​demand growth and is not changing its estimate, according to its Secretary General, Haitham Al Ghais, ​on Thursday.

Continue Reading

Economy

Dangote Refinery Raises Crude Oil Processing Capacity to 700,000bpd

Published

on

Fifth Crude Cargo Dangote Refinery

By Adedapo Adesanya 

Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals has increased its crude oil processing capacity to 700,000 barrels per day, exceeding its nameplate capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, reinforcing its position as the world’s largest single-train petroleum refinery.

The milestone was achieved during a performance test conducted by the refinery’s process licensors, highlighting the facility’s operational efficiency and ability to process additional feedstock while optimising output across its production units.

Vice President, Oil and Gas, Dangote Industries Limited, Mr Devakumar Edwin, said the increase forms part of a broader expansion strategy aimed at raising the refinery’s capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day within the next 30 months.

According to him, the planned expansion is expected to strengthen Nigeria’s energy security, eliminate dependence on imported refined petroleum products and position the country as a major regional export hub.

Mr Edwin noted that the refinery’s growth trajectory reflects ambitions that extend beyond meeting domestic demand, with a focus on establishing continental and global refining leadership.

The refinery, owned by billionaire Aliko Dangote, began fuel production in 2024 and has since scaled up output of petrol, diesel and jet fuel.
It supplies domestic markets and exports to African countries and Europe, ​including the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands, while also shipping products to the ​United States and Saudi Arabia.

The refinery has also supplied petrol (called gasoline) to the United States and jet fuel to Saudi Arabia, further expanding its global footprint.

Dangote Refinery’s growing output has strengthened its role in stabilising fuel supply across Africa, particularly amid disruptions linked to geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Industry observers say the facility has increasingly become a key source of energy security for several African nations.

Recall that Dangote Petroleum Refinery emerged as the world’s largest exporter of jet fuel in April, according to S&P Global Commodities.

The refinery has also contributed to reducing Nigeria’s dependence on imported fuel, easing pressure on foreign exchange reserves and supporting broader efforts to maximise value from the country’s crude oil resources.

Growing production levels have attracted interest from global crude suppliers and commodity trading firms, with the refinery sourcing feedstock from both domestic and international producers to sustain rising output.

Looking ahead, Dangote has outlined plans to transform the facility into the world’s largest refinery by 2028, with a targeted processing capacity of 1.4 million barrels per day.

The expansion is expected to generate significant economic benefits through increased industrial activity, job creation, export earnings and improved trade balances.

Beyond fuels, the refinery is also expected to strengthen downstream manufacturing through the supply of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), polypropylene and other industrial feedstocks used in the production of packaging materials, consumer goods and detergents. Future plans also include the production of Linear Alkylbenzene (LAB), a key raw material in detergent manufacturing.

Continue Reading

Economy

Monte Carlo Simulation for Trading Strategy Risk Assessment

Published

on

Most traders evaluate a strategy by looking at its historical performance.

Common metrics such as total return, win rate, profit factor, maximum drawdown, and Sharpe ratio provide valuable information about how a strategy performed in the past.

The problem is that historical performance tells only one story.

Financial markets are inherently uncertain. Even a strategy with an impressive backtest can experience very different outcomes once it encounters changing market conditions, unexpected volatility, or an unfavorable sequence of trades.

This is why professional traders, quantitative researchers, and portfolio managers increasingly rely on Monte Carlo simulation as part of their risk assessment process.

Rather than focusing on a single historical outcome, Monte Carlo analysis explores thousands of possible scenarios, helping traders understand what could happen—not just what already happened.

Why Historical Performance Is Only Part Of The Picture

Backtesting remains one of the most important tools in strategy development.

Platforms such as MetaTrader 5 provide sophisticated testing environments that allow traders to evaluate Expert Advisors and trading systems using historical market data.

A typical backtest may show:

Metric Result
Net Profit 35%
Win Rate 54%
Maximum Drawdown 12%

At first glance, these numbers appear encouraging.

However, every backtest contains one important limitation:

History occurred only once.

The strategy followed a specific sequence of winning and losing trades. If those same trades had occurred in a different order, the overall experience could have looked very different.

This is where Monte Carlo analysis becomes valuable.

Understanding Sequence Risk

One of the most important concepts in Monte Carlo simulation is sequence risk.

Consider a simple series of trades:

Trade Result
1 +3%
2 +2%
3 -1%
4 +4%
5 -2%

The overall result is positive.

However, if those same trades occurred in a different order:

Trade Result
1 -2%
2 -1%
3 +2%
4 +3%
5 +4%

the final return may remain similar while the path becomes significantly more difficult.

The trader may experience:

  • Larger drawdowns
  • Longer recovery periods
  • Increased psychological pressure
  • Greater capital requirements

The strategy itself has not changed.

Only the sequence has changed.

Monte Carlo simulation explores thousands of these alternative scenarios to estimate how different trade sequences may influence future performance.

Exploring Thousands Of Possible Outcomes

Monte Carlo analysis works by generating large numbers of alternative outcomes based on historical strategy behavior.

A simplified process looks like this:

Historical Trade Results
        ↓
    Randomization
        ↓
     Simulation
        ↓
Repeat Thousands of Times
        ↓
    Risk Analysis

Each simulation represents a plausible alternative version of history.

By repeating this process thousands of times, traders can estimate:

  • Potential drawdowns
  • Losing streak probabilities
  • Capital requirements
  • Performance variability
  • Confidence intervals

The objective is not to predict the future.

The objective is to understand uncertainty.

Looking Beyond Average Returns

Many traders focus heavily on expected returns.

Risk professionals often focus on worst-case outcomes.

Consider two strategies:

Metric Strategy A Strategy B
Average Return 20% 20%
Historical Drawdown 10% 10%

At first glance, they appear nearly identical.

Monte Carlo analysis may reveal a different story:

Risk Metric Strategy A Strategy B
Worst Simulated Drawdown 18% 35%
Probability of 20% Drawdown 5% 27%

Although historical results appear similar, future risk characteristics may differ significantly.

This is one reason why institutional investors rarely rely solely on traditional backtest statistics.

The Reality Of Losing Streaks

One of the most underestimated aspects of trading is the impact of consecutive losses.

Even profitable strategies can experience difficult periods.

For example:

Consecutive Trades
Loss
Loss
Loss
Loss
Loss
Loss

Such sequences are completely normal.

However, they often create emotional pressure and lead traders to abandon otherwise profitable systems.

Monte Carlo analysis helps estimate:

  • Expected losing streak lengths
  • Worst-case losing streaks
  • Probability of extended downturns
  • Recovery requirements

Understanding these possibilities allows traders to set more realistic expectations before real capital is exposed.

Position Sizing And Capital Preservation

Position sizing is one of the most important applications of Monte Carlo analysis.

Even profitable strategies can fail if risk per trade is too aggressive.

Monte Carlo simulations help answer questions such as:

  • How much capital is required?
  • What position size is sustainable?
  • What drawdown level is acceptable?
  • What is the probability of account depletion?

For example, a strategy may appear relatively safe at 1% risk per trade.

The same strategy may exhibit a significant probability of severe drawdowns when risk increases to 5% per trade.

Understanding these relationships often leads to better risk-management decisions.

Portfolio Risk And Diversification

Monte Carlo simulation is not limited to individual strategies.

Portfolio managers frequently use it to evaluate:

  • Multi-strategy portfolios
  • Multi-asset portfolios
  • Diversification effects
  • Correlation risks

A portfolio may appear well diversified based on historical data.

However, asset relationships can change unexpectedly during periods of market stress.

Monte Carlo analysis helps traders evaluate how portfolios may behave under alternative scenarios rather than relying solely on historical observations.

Randomness Plays A Bigger Role Than Most Traders Realize

One of the most important lessons of Monte Carlo analysis is that randomness influences results more than many traders expect.

A profitable strategy can experience:

  • Unfavorable timing
  • Extended drawdowns
  • Long losing streaks
  • Temporary underperformance

without any deterioration in the underlying strategy.

Understanding this distinction helps traders separate:

Normal Statistical Variation Genuine Strategy Problems
Temporary drawdowns Structural performance decline
Random losing streaks Broken trading logic
Short-term underperformance Changing market assumptions

This perspective is essential for long-term strategy management.

Monte Carlo As Part Of A Complete Validation Process

Monte Carlo analysis works best when combined with other research methods.

Many professional workflows follow a process similar to:

Step Process
1 Strategy Development
2 Historical Backtesting
3 Optimization
4 Monte Carlo Analysis
5 Forward Testing
6 Deployment
7 Ongoing Monitoring

The broader MetaTrader ecosystem supports many stages of this workflow through strategy testing, optimization, algorithmic development, and performance analysis tools.

The objective is not simply to find profitable strategies.

The objective is to understand how those strategies may behave when market conditions become less favorable.

Why Professional Firms Use Monte Carlo Analysis

Institutional investment firms focus on risk as much as return.

Their goal is not only to identify profitable opportunities but also to understand:

  • Capital requirements
  • Worst-case scenarios
  • Portfolio resilience
  • Survival probabilities

These considerations become increasingly important as capital allocations grow larger.

The same principles can benefit independent traders.

A strategy with slightly lower returns but substantially lower risk may ultimately prove more sustainable over the long term.

Understanding Risk Beyond The Backtest

Historical performance provides valuable information, but it tells only part of the story.

Monte Carlo simulation helps traders explore the uncertainty that exists beyond a single backtest result. By generating thousands of alternative scenarios, the technique provides insight into drawdowns, losing streaks, capital requirements, and portfolio resilience.

As algorithmic trading becomes increasingly sophisticated, risk assessment is becoming just as important as strategy development itself.

The most successful traders are often not those who find the highest returns.

They are those who understand the risks behind those returns and prepare for outcomes that may never appear in a traditional backtest.

In modern quantitative trading, understanding uncertainty can be just as valuable as identifying opportunity.

Continue Reading

Trending