Banking
Court Flings Skye Bank Suit Against Centrespread Advertising
By Dipo Olowookere
The suit brought against Centrespread Advertising by Skye Bank at a Lagos High Court has been dismissed for lack of admissible evidence.
Skye Bank had filed a preliminary application for an order compelling Centrespread Advertising to pay N525 million as outstanding indebtedness to it.
In a motion for interlocutory injunction in suit No: LD/2362GCMW/16 in which Centrespread is challenging Skye Bank’s claim of its continued indebtedness, counsel to the lender, Mr Solomon Mbadiwe, had prayed the court rule that Centrespread had, in a letter dated June 16, 2015 and Claimant of Affidavit of June 22, 2016, admitted and proposed the payment of the sum of N525 million to Skye Bank as final settlement of the loan agreement between the two parties.
He had asked the court to compel Centrespread to make full payment of the stated sum to Skye Bank while hearing continues in the original suit.
But in his judgement on the application at the resumed sitting of the court in May, the trial judge, Justice A. M. Lawal, threw out the Skye Bank application on the ground that it was based on inadmissible evidence.
He held that, “The letter dated June 16, 2015, from the caption and the contents of the letter, it is written towards settlement of the dispute existing between the parties.
“Letters written towards settlement are classified as ‘without prejudice’ and the privilege that attends ‘without prejudice’ communication will not be denied to a document simply because it is not captioned without prejudice.
“As the letter of June 16, 2015 was written with proposals for the settlement of the loan dispute, such is not admissible and cannot be the foundation of an application for Judgment upon admission.”
The trial judge noted that the court was not unmindful that the figure of N525 million said to have been admitted by Centrespread are found at paragraphs 5, 6 and 16 of the Claimant’s pleadings and paragraphs 9, 11 and 13 of the Claimant Affidavit of June 22, 2016 filed in support of the motion of June 22, 2016 for Interlocutory Injunction.
He, however, added that ‘a readings of these traced the source of the said admitted figure of N525 million to no other source other than the letter of June 15, 2016”, adding that “since the letter is not admissible being covered by the ‘without prejudice’ privilege, the said paragraphs of the pleadings and Affidavit are also not admissible for the purpose of an application for judgment based on admission”.
In the Statement of Claim filed by Centrespread in the originating suit, the frontline advertising agency averred that while it is true that a transaction was carried out between it and Skye Bank Plc in 2007, it had made good on the terms of the agreement to pay back the principal borrowed loan which, according to the terms of agreement, would expire in the year 2020.
Centrespread further averred that a few years ago, when it felt that it was being subjected to exorbitant charges by Skye Bank, it employed the services of forensic financial analysts who confirmed its concerns as true.
Centrespread is therefore praying the Court to, among other reliefs, declare Skye Bank’s claim that it still owes the total amount declared in its record as null and void since, according to it, a substantial part of the figure being touted as standing against its name has been discovered to be illegal charges.
Alternatively, the Claimant is also praying the honourable court to compel Skye Bank to release the claimant’s loan account statement and for the loan account statement to be analyzed by a forensic analyst to be appointed jointly by both parties for the determination of the Claimant’s actual indebtedness to the defendant.
Further hearing in the matter was adjourned till August 12, 2017.
By Adedapo Adesanya
The chairman of First HoldCo Plc, Mr Femi Otedola, has affirmed plans to increase his 26 per cent holding in the organisation to 51 per cent, confirming a planned takeover of Nigeria’s oldest banking institution.
Mr Otedola spoke in an exclusive interview with Nairametrics published on Monday, giving a rare direction following recent speculations about the financial institution.
The milestone followed a series of share acquisitions, as Mr Otedola sought to tighten his grip as the company’s largest shareholder following the recent acquisition of additional shares worth N222.21 billion.
In the interview, the mogul said he has invested more than N600 billion of his personal wealth in First HoldCo, describing the move as a “long-term generational commitment” rather than another turnaround investment he would eventually exit.
Responding to speculation that he intends to consolidate his position in the group, Mr Otedola hinted that his investment journey is far from over.
“My investment threshold is always over and above 51 per cent,” he said. “One of my key investment principles is that firm shareholder control, with due regard for minority interest, is a key ingredient to executing reforms and restructuring to deliver value to all stakeholders.”
The businessman said the same strategy had guided his investments in African Petroleum Plc, later renamed Forte Oil Plc, where he gradually increased his shareholding from 28 per cent to 75 per cent before exiting the company in 2019.
He said he also increased his stake in Geregu Power Plc from 51 per cent to 95 per cent before reducing it to 77 per cent after the company’s public listing.
“I am on the same trajectory with First HoldCo Plc,” Mr Otedola said.
“To date, I have invested over N600 billion of my personal wealth in First HoldCo Plc — a figure that speaks not to speculation, but to unflinching confidence in the institution’s future, fundamentals and an unwavering personal commitment to its success.”
Mr Otedola said his decision to invest in First HoldCo came at a time when the institution was facing one of the most challenging periods in its history.
The billionaire steadily increased his investment in the group, accelerating his share purchases in 2026. His stake grew from 6.68 billion shares (15.95 per cent) in June 2025 to 8.06 billion shares by March 2026, then to 9.28 billion shares by June after acquiring about 1.22 billion shares in one quarter. A further purchase through Calvados Global Services last month lifted his holdings above 10 billion shares for the first time.
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
Nine persons linked to one of Nigeria’s biggest indigenous steel-and-manufacturing conglomerates, Western Metal Products Company (WEMPCO) Limited, could land in prison for allegedly defying an order of a Federal High Court protecting United Bank for Africa’s claim and disrupting the operations of a court-appointed receiver manager.
Justice Akintayo Aluko of the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos issued a stern Form 48 (Notice of Consequence of Disobedience to Order of Court), warning key directors and shareholders—including Lewis Shui Ngor Tung, Phillip Shui Che Tung, Robert Tung, Lawrence Tung, Taiwo Alli and others—that they face possible imprisonment for contempt of court after allegedly interfering with the Receiver/Manager appointed by UBA to take over key collateral assets.
The Form 48 notice, a formal warning under Nigerian civil procedure that precedes imprisonment for contempt, was published as a legal notice after personal service could evidently not be completed on the individuals, all listed at the same address: 18 Wempco Road, Ogba, Ikeja, Lagos (Federal High Court of Nigeria, Suit No. FHC/L/CS/555/26).
UBA is aggressively pursuing the recovery of syndicated and direct loan facilities amounting to about N61.5 billion (approximately $39 million) from WEMPCO and 16 related corporate entities.
Justice Aluko has already granted an Order of Mareva Injunctions freezing accounts belonging to the WEMPCO group across 27 commercial banks and fintechs.
According to MoneyCentral, UBA wants to recover the funds from 17 companies in the WEMPCO stable, from flagship Western Metal Products Company Limited down to Nigerian Enamelware Company Plc, Lagos Oriental Hotel Limited and Prime Nigeria Wood Products Co. Ltd. It disbursed the money to the firms under a Multicurrency Multiple Credit Facility Agreement dated September 30, 2019.
On April 2, 2026, the court granted UBA an interim Mareva injunction freezing up to N61.5 billion in WEMPCO-linked funds across 27 banks and fintech platforms, appointed a receiver-manager over WEMPCO’s unencumbered assets, and ordered the financial institutions to disclose any WEMPCO funds in their custody.
Anatomy of the Freeze
By the Order of April 2, 2026, Justice Aluko granted UBA ‘s Application filed on March 31, 2026. The Orders made were:
- Broad Asset Freeze (Mareva Injunction): The court restrained WEMPCO and 16 sister companies from operating accounts or transferring funds up to N61.5 billion. All 27 financial institution respondents—ranging from tier-1 banks to modern fintech processors like Moniepoint, OPay, and Kuda—must disclose and hold any balance standing to the credit of the defendants.
- Receiver/Manager Appointment: One Romeo Ese Michael, Esq., was appointed Receiver/Manager over WEMPCO’s assets not under the Multicurrency Multiple Credit Facility Agreement. This includes physical asset takeovers, such as two major Wärtsilä power generators.
Nine Names, One Address
The Form 48 lists nine individuals “to be committed” to prison for contempt, namely Lewis Shui Ngor Tung, Phillip Shui Che Tung, M.A. Ola Yusuf (Alh), Tung Lawrence Blake, Alli Aare Hadji Tokunbo, Paul Shui Po Tung, Tung Robert, Cl Ip, and Taiwo Alli.
Two names are independently identifiable in WEMPCO’s public corporate filings: Taiwo Alli is the sitting Managing Director/CEO of NGX-listed Nigerian Enamelware Company Plc — one of the 17 corporate defendants — while Robert Tung sits on that same board as a non-executive director and is one of the two brothers who built WEMPCO into its current scale.
That a sitting MD of a publicly listed Nigerian company now faces a documented risk of committal to prison over a corporate group’s unpaid debt underscores the reputational and governance stakes for WEMPCO’s listed arm, quite apart from the group’s privately held entities.
The Receiver and the 2019 Facility
The receiver-manager order points to the roots of the dispute: A Multicurrency Multiple Credit Facility Agreement dated 30 September 2019, under which UBA financed part of WEMPCO’s industrial build-out — the same period in which the group was completing major steel and power infrastructure investments.
The court’s specific mention of “two Wärtsilä engines (generators)… wherever they may be found” as receivership targets signals that WEMPCO’s captive power assets — critical to running energy-intensive steel and ceramics plants — are now squarely within the bank’s reach for recovery.
The Rise and Fall of WEMPCO Group
Few Nigerian conglomerates have as large a footprint with as little public profile as WEMPCO. The group was founded by the late Mr K.F. Tung, a Chinese-born entrepreneur who first visited Nigeria in 1967 and built an enamelware business before expanding into steel, ceramics, timber, agriculture and hospitality; he died in March 2019 at age 97, having led the group for more than five decades.
His sons, Lewis Tung and Robert Tung, subsequently took the business forward, growing it into one of Nigeria’s largest manufacturing employers, with more than 12,000-13,000 workers across 11-plus subsidiaries.
At its peak, WEMPCO was one of Nigeria’s largest diversified conglomerates, operating massive cold-rolled steel mills, enamelware plants, ceramic tile factories, nail production plants, and agricultural investments across Lagos and Ogun states.
The group owns high-profile real estate assets, including the 5-star Lagos Oriental Hotel on Victoria Island/Lekki, alongside industrial facilities spanning over 700,000 metric tonnes of steel capacity.
Over the past decade, however, severe foreign exchange shortages, cheap imported/smuggled alternatives, high energy overheads, tax defaults, and shifting government trade policies caused deep operational paralysis across WEMPCO’s 11+ subsidiaries.
As revenue collapsed, debt loads surged into hundreds of billions of Naira across the Nigerian financial sector, culminating in UBA’s enforcement actions to protect its balance sheet.
That scale is precisely why the case matters beyond the courtroom: WEMPCO is not a marginal borrower, but one of Nigeria’s largest indigenous industrial employers, and the outcome of this dispute carries direct implications for thousands of manufacturing jobs concentrated in Ogba and Ogun State.
Why This Matters: Depositor Money Is Not Free Money
The scale of UBA’s claim — N61.5 billion frozen pending trial, against a backdrop of a 2019 multicurrency facility likely running into the hundreds of billions of naira in total exposure across WEMPCO’s group structure — is a reminder of a basic truth in banking that is easy to lose sight of in a contentious court fight: the money banks lend to conglomerates like WEMPCO is not the bank’s own capital sitting idle.
It is depositors’ money — the savings of ordinary Nigerians, the working capital of small businesses, and the pension and insurance assets pooled through the banking system — recycled into loans that the bank is obligated to repay to its depositors whether or not the borrower repays the bank.
This is not an abstract concern in Nigeria’s current banking environment. The industry’s non-performing loans (NPL) ratio climbed to 8.03 per cent in January 2026 and to 9.85 per cent by February 2026, well above the Central Bank of Nigeria’s 5 per cent prudential threshold, after the CBN withdrew pandemic-era regulatory forbearance that had allowed banks to avoid classifying restructured loans as impaired.
Fitch Ratings has projected the ratio could fall back toward 5 per cent by year-end 2026, helped by fresh bank capital raised to meet the CBN’s new minimum capital requirements and by write-offs — but only if recoveries like UBA’s WEMPCO action succeed in converting non-performing exposures back into cash.
The CBN itself has warned that a stubborn rise in bad loans “could impair asset quality and weaken banks’ balance sheets,” posing systemic risk, and has pushed banks to deepen use of the Global Standing Instruction framework — precisely the kind of cross-bank fund-tracing mechanism reflected in UBA’s 27-institution Mareva order against WEMPCO — to improve recovery discipline.
Every naira UBA cannot recover from a defaulting borrower is a naira the bank must provision for out of its own capital and earnings — capital that could otherwise support new lending to other Nigerian businesses, or income that could otherwise be paid out as dividends to millions of Nigerian shareholders and pensioners with holdings in UBA stock.
Aggressive but lawful recovery action of the kind on display in the WEMPCO case is, in that sense, not simply a bank protecting its own balance sheet; it is a bank protecting the deposit base and credit capacity of the wider financial system.
Corporate Responsibility and the Nigerian Economy
Firms of WEMPCO’s scale carry an obligation that runs in both directions. On one hand, WEMPCO’s decades of investment in steel, enamelware, ceramics, wood products and hospitality have made it a genuine contributor to Nigeria’s industrial base and a major direct employer, with the group’s own account of its history stressing that it has “contributed immensely to the economy of Nigeria in particular and West Africa in general”.
On the other hand, that same scale means WEMPCO’s credit obligations were sized accordingly — a multicurrency, multi-billion-naira facility syndicated in 2019 — and the responsibility to service such facilities is inseparable from the privilege of accessing that scale of capital in the first place.
When large borrowers fall behind and resist enforcement, as UBA alleges is happening here, the costs are not confined to the bank’s shareholders.
Delayed recoveries constrain the credit banks can extend to other manufacturers, exporters and small businesses; they can pressure a bank’s capital adequacy ratios and, in aggregate across the industry, contribute to the kind of system-wide NPL pressure the CBN has flagged as a threat to financial stability.
Conversely, orderly and timely repayment — even when it requires restructuring or receivership rather than immediate cash settlement — protects the thousands of workers whose jobs depend on WEMPCO’s continued operation, preserves the bank’s capacity to keep lending into the real economy, and reinforces credit discipline across a banking sector the CBN is actively trying to strengthen after the post-forbearance clean-up.
It is worth noting that the reliefs UBA has obtained so far are interim measures granted pending a full hearing on the Motion on Notice, and that WEMPCO’s companies and the named individuals retain the right to contest the underlying claims in court.
The Bottom Line
UBA’s push to freeze N61.5 billion in WEMPCO-linked funds, install a receiver-manager over the group’s flagship steel unit, and now pursue contempt proceedings against nine individuals tied to the conglomerate marks one of the more aggressive corporate debt-recovery actions in Nigeria’s banking sector this year.
For a bank operating in an industry still working through the aftershocks of the CBN’s forbearance withdrawal and a near-10 per cent sector NPL ratio, recovering large legacy exposures is not optional housekeeping; it is central to protecting depositor funds, sustaining lending capacity and keeping Nigeria’s banking system stable.
The court’s enforcement action in UBA vs. WEMPCO marks a decisive moment for credit governance in Nigeria. With 27 financial institutions bound by court injunctions and corporate officers facing criminal contempt, UBA’s Receiver/Manager is positioned to realise underlying assets. Analysts say the outcome of this case will set a precedent for corporate debt resolution, financial system accountability, and the rule of law across Nigeria’s industrial landscape.
By Adedapo Adesanya
First Holdco Plc has commenced a public offer to raise about N1.4 trillion (approximately $1 billion) after securing approval from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
The offer, which opened on Monday, involves the sale of 10.4 billion ordinary shares, according to the chief executive of its banking subsidiary, First Bank of Nigeria Limited, Mr Olusegun Alebiosu.
The capital raise follows the company’s earlier plan to transfer about a quarter of its shares to RC Investment Management Ltd., which served as a bridge holder after Barbican Capital Limited exited its investment in the lender amid a prolonged ownership and leadership dispute.
First Holdco had previously indicated that the shares would eventually be offered to the investing public once the necessary regulatory approvals were obtained.
Speaking in an interview with Bloomberg, Mr Alebiosu said proceeds from the offer would strengthen the capital base of First Bank and support the holding company’s expansion strategy.
According to him, the group intends to diversify beyond banking by establishing an insurance underwriting business and a fintech services company.
“The sale is starting today — the reality here is that I am not sure it will stay more than one week based on the pressure we are getting,” Mr Alebiosu said, expressing confidence in strong investor demand.
Investors appeared to respond positively to the announcement, with First HoldCo’s shares climbing as much as 5.9 per cent to a record high during trading on Monday before easing to a 3.1 per cent gain at N133.60 by early afternoon in Lagos.
The lender has been one of the best-performing banking stocks on the Nigerian Exchange (NGX) Limited over the past year, with its share price rising more than fourfold since July 2025, when Barbican Capital’s stake was transferred to RC Investment Management.
The fresh capital injection comes as its largest shareholder, Mr Femi Otedola, continues to strengthen his stake in Nigeria’s oldest bank. With the billionaire holding around a 26 per cent stake in the company, analysts say he has his eyes set on full control once his equity crosses the 30 per cent mark.
