Economy
5 Insurance Firms in Trouble over Huge Management Expenses, Shareholders React
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
The inability to curtail their management expenses which surpasses their premium income may lead at least five insurance companies operating in the country into trouble.
According to Leadership Newspaper, the industry regulator, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) is not happy with the development because it had been persuasive in its approach to insurance companies to cut down on their management expenses and if this act affects their solvency margin, which would make them deep hands into their shareholders’ funds to run the affairs of the respective firms, NAICOM would be left with no other option than to sanction the affected insurers.
According to data sourced from the umbrella body of operators, the Nigerian Insurers Association (NIA), NICON Insurance Company Limited, in its 2016 financial year, generated N92 million gross premium and spent N453.7 million, translating to 4.93 percent on management expenses, while Old Mutual Life Assurance Company Limited had N1.30 billion gross premium and spent N1.83 billion, representing 1.41 percent on management expenses.
SpringLife Assurance Plc, on its part, had N32 million premium income and spent N105.2 million on its management in the same financial year, UNIC Insurance Plc had N38.7 million gross premium income and spent N244.9 million with Investment & Allied Insurance Plc having N4.3 million gross premium and spent N169.4 million on its management.
The regulatory body had earlier placed the likes of International Energy Insurance(IEI) Plc, Industrial and General Insurance(IGI) Plc, among others, on financial restriction, after it was observed that the companies deep hands into their shareholders’ funds, and would not hesitate to do same to these five insurers, if found culpable.
NAICOM had earlier said, from the observation made on financial accounts submitted by some companies, those with huge expenditure profiles have been mandated not to spend beyond certain limits.
The decision, according to the Commissioner for Insurance, Mr Mohammed Kari, was taken to ensure companies do not spend unnecessarily to the extent that they would not be able to attend to claims settlement.
He expressed his sadness over the continuous increase in management expenses of underwriting firms across the country, stating that, this is affecting their ability to give good returns on investment to their investors.
When contacted by Leadership, spokesperson of NAICOM, Mr Rasaaq Salami, said the regulatory body was unhappy over the consistent increase in management expenses of the insurance industry, but that, the regulatory body has adopted a persuasive approach to tell them to cut down on their management expenses.
According to him, “Of course, it’s their business, but where we have issue is if it affects their solvency margin and they deep hands into their shareholders’ fund.
“But the board of these companies are expected to curtail the spending of their respective management to ensure that they continue to give values to their shareholders.”
He also said NAICOM was working to address the issue of overriding commission which is also part of the expenses.
Earlier, President of Progressive Shareholders Association of Nigeria (PSAN), Mr Boniface Okezie, said most insurance companies have yet to give good returns on investment to shareholders and investors, partly due to incurring huge management expenses as well as payment of huge fines to the regulatory bodies for default in the submission of their financial accounts.
He said shareholders react to the results a company releases, its dividend payout, its future prospect, saying insurance companies have failed in all these.
He believes insurance firms are the architect of their misfortune, saying, the money they use to pay fines and spend on management expenses on a yearly basis can comfortably give meaningful dividend to shareholders.
But the national coordinator, Independent Shareholders Association of Nigeria (ISAN), Sir Sunny Nwosu, felt otherwise, believing that the huge expenses are duly incurred in a bid to get good hands.
According to him, any company that wishes to attract best hands and retain them should be ready to pay.
He noted that the acclaimed huge management expenses is often incurred in a bid to engage capable personnel to drive affairs of organisations, stressing that good services are not cheap anywhere in the world and that organisations that want to be at the top should be ready to pay for the services of professionals.
“If you want the best you have to pay for it. If any regulator is coming to take up an executive job, in some of these companies, you need to know how much such person would earn and the salary becomes personal to that person.
“The regulator cannot just be in its cosy office and say management expenses are high. Go and ask for the regulators audited accounts, you would see certain things that you would not believe,” he said.
Meanwhile, most of the affected companies have been battling for survival owing to breakdown of corporate governance, while some are under regulatory intervention.
Economy
CBN Bars Loan Defaulters from New Credit, Banking Facilities
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has moved to tighten credit discipline across the banking sector, directing all financial institutions to deny additional loans and banking facilities to large borrowers whose existing loan obligations are classified as non-performing.
The directive, issued in a circular dated March 12, 2026, was signed by Mrs Olubukola Akinwunmi, Director of Banking Supervision, and addressed to all deposit money banks operating in the country.
Under the new policy, any borrower whose loan facility is recorded as non-performing in the Credit Risk Management System (CRMS), the CBN’s centralised credit database, or flagged by any licensed private credit bureau, will be immediately ineligible for new credit.
The measure takes effect without transition, applying across all banks simultaneously.
The apex bank’s restrictions extend beyond direct lending. Affected borrowers will also be denied access to contingent banking facilities, including bankers’ confirmations, letters of credit, performance bonds, and advance payment guarantees, instruments commonly used in trade finance and large-scale commercial transactions.
Banks have additionally been directed to obtain further realisable collateral from affected obligors to adequately secure their existing exposures.
The apex bank did not specify a timeline within which this additional collateral must be obtained.
The CBN defines large-ticket obligors as borrowers whose combined exposures across all banks exceed the Single Obligor Limit, or whose outstanding obligations materially affect a bank’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) or otherwise pose systemic risks to the broader financial system.
The policy is grounded in Clause 3.2(d) of the Prudential Guidelines for Deposit Money Banks.
The identification of such obligors will be based on data captured in the CRMS and reports from licensed private credit bureaus, according to the circular.
In issuing the directive, the CBN cited the heightened risk that large non-performing obligors pose to individual banks and the wider financial system.
The regulator stated that the new framework is designed to limit contagion risks and reinforce responsible lending practices across the sector.
The move reflects a broader regulatory effort to address the rise in non-performing loans (NPLs) within Nigeria’s banking sector and to ensure that institutions with significant credit exposures to distressed borrowers are not further endangered by extending new facilities to the same counterparties.
Compliance is expected from all deposit money banks with immediate effect.
The CBN did not outline specific sanctions for non-compliance in the circular, though supervisory penalties under the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 2020 would ordinarily apply.
Economy
Rise in Petrol, Diesel Prices in Nigeria Caused by FG’s Failure to Plan—Peter Obi
By Aduragbemi Omiyale
The presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 general elections, Mr Peter Obi, has blamed the federal government for the high energy costs in Nigeria.
In a post, the former Anambra State Governor said if the central government, led by President Bola Tinubu, had planned for the future, Nigerians would not be paying through their nose for premium motor spirit (PMS), otherwise known as petrol, and Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), also known as diesel.
Disruption in the supply of crude oil on the global market has caused consumers to pay more for petrol and diesel in the country.
The United States and Israel waged war against Iran, killing its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, about two weeks ago in airstrikes.
This has triggered tension in the Middle East, with Iran firing missiles at its neighbours, and closing the Strait of Hormuz, a small water path between Iran and Oman, where one-fifth of global crude oil supply passes through.
Before the crisis, PMS was selling at N835 per litre and crude oil was below $90 per barrel. But oil rose above $100 per barrel, causing the price of petrol in Nigeria to hit over N1,200 per litre.
Reacting to the development, Mr Obi said Nigeria felt the shock despite not being attacked because the government failed to plan.
“Many people wonder why any adverse development in the global economy quickly impacts Nigeria. A recent example is the tension involving Iran, which led to an increase in global oil prices and, subsequently, a rise in petroleum prices in Nigeria.
“A few weeks ago, petrol was selling for less than N1,000 per litre, but today it costs over N1,200 per litre. Diesel, which was also priced below N1,000 per litre, is now over N1,500 per litre. These rapid increases illustrate how quickly external shocks can affect the Nigerian economy.
“The reason for this is straightforward: most countries, whether they are oil-producing or non-oil-producing, maintain strategic petroleum reserves to cushion against supply or price shocks. This means that when there is a disruption in the global oil market, they can release part of these reserves to stabilise supply. However, Nigeria lacks such a buffer, so the impact is felt almost immediately.
“The underlying issue is a lack of planning. Countries that engage in planning create buffers against shocks, while those that do not remain vulnerable to them. The old maxim remains true: when a country fails to plan, it has already planned to fail,” he wrote.
Earlier this week, the Minister of Finance, Mr Wale Edun, said the country’s economy was strong enough to absorb external shocks, saying the over 4 per cent growth in the gross domestic product (GDP) in the fourth quarter of last year was a testament to that.
Economy
New Tax Regime to Ease Burden on Workers, Small Businesses—Tegbe
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Chairman of the National Tax Policy Implementation Committee (NTPIC), Mr Joseph Tegbe, has reiterated that Nigeria’s new tax regime is designed to ease the burden on workers and small businesses while strengthening the country’s fiscal sustainability and economic competitiveness.
Speaking at the BusinessDay Tax Reform Conference 2026, themed “Navigating the New Tax Regime: What It Means for Your Wallet,” Mr Tegbe described the reforms as the most comprehensive overhaul of Nigeria’s tax architecture in decades, aimed at simplifying taxation, improving fairness, and encouraging economic growth.
According to him, the reforms, anchored on four landmark legislations: the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025, Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025, Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025, and the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, 2025, introduce targeted reliefs for individuals and small businesses.
Under the new framework, individuals earning less than N800,000 annually will pay no personal income tax, while workers can claim rent relief of up to 20 per cent, capped at N500,000, among other reliefs.
He also said small businesses will benefit significantly, with companies earning below N100 million in annual revenue and with assets under N250 million exempted from Company Income Tax (CIT), while nano-enterprises earning below N12 million annually are exempted from income tax.
He, however, underscored the importance of proper documentation of earnings and subsequent filing of returns, even for those who fall within the threshold exempted from income tax.
“These reforms are designed to make taxation simpler, fairer, and more predictable for Nigerians,” he said, adding that “For most workers and small businesses, the new regime means paying the same or even lower taxes while operating within a more transparent system.”
The reforms also strengthen Nigeria’s tax administration through improved coordination among key institutions, including the Nigeria Revenue Service, the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria, the Tax Appeal Tribunal, and the Office of the Tax Ombudsman, while accelerating the digitalisation of tax processes.
Mr Tegbe noted that beyond improving revenue efficiency, the reforms aim to create a tax system that supports enterprise, investment, and long-term economic growth.
“The ultimate objective is to build a tax system that works for both government and citizens, one that supports development while protecting the pockets of ordinary Nigerians,” he concluded
-
Feature/OPED6 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism10 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz3 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking8 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy3 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking3 years agoSort Codes of UBA Branches in Nigeria
-
Banking3 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports3 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn












