Economy
A Look at Unstable Economies: What are the Weakest Currencies in 2025?
While people are mostly turning their heads at the most powerful currencies worldwide, it is always a good idea to glance at the weakest, to learn from their stories and mistakes. Every country worldwide wants to achieve economic stability, as this shows strength. Still, this objective has become challenging as we are dealing with a lot of problems worldwide, including political issues, inflation, and economic concerns.
Weak currencies have low buying power, and at the moment, the weakest currency in the world is the Lebanese pound. The Iranian Rial, the Laotian Kip, the Uzbekistani Som, the Syrian Pound, the Guinean Franc, and the Paraguayan Guarani follow this currency.
In this article, we will analyze the factors that can impact a currency’s strength and delve into the world’s weakest currencies. Keep reading to learn more.
What are the factors that impact the strength of fiat money?
Economic factors
Economic factors are among the most important aspects that can tell whether a currency is strong or weak. Ideally, a country should have a low inflation rate so that it can have better purchasing power over other currencies. On the other hand, countries with high inflation will experience a depreciation in their currencies, as this will also lead to high interest rates, which will impact the strength of a currency.
So, a combination of inflation, interest rates, and exchange rates determines whether a currency is strong or weak.
Political factors
Politics will also impact the strength or weakness of a digital coin. Unfortunately, many countries around the world are experiencing political issues, such as corruption or government changes, that can lead to currency devaluation. When important political events occur, like wars, citizens will be more inclined to exchange their money for another currency, which can create even more devaluation.
The collapse of the Lebanese pound is the result of poor political and economic management. Other countries dealing with weak currencies are North Korea and Iran, which have received many international sanctions over the years. Because of this, they have not been as open to global financial markets.
External factors
External factors can also determine whether a currency remains strong or weakens. When a high number of investors are interested in a coin, they can make it even stronger. Additionally, countries own a foreign exchange reserve, representing the holdings of a country of liquid assets and foreign currencies, which nations can use when they want to stabilize their currency. Of course, the ones with a high reserve can better protect themselves from financial shocks. The ones with a high reserve, like Switzerland and China, have the means to prevent currency depreciation.
On the other hand, those with little reserves, like Sri Lanka and Pakistan, are more inclined to devalue their currency. Additionally, a nation’s resources, such as gas, oil, gold, or agricultural goods, can also impact the value of a currency. In this regard, when the price of a commodity rises, a country can gain more revenue and strengthen the position of its currency. This also occurs in reverse.
What are the weakest currencies in the world?
Lebanese pound (LBP)
At the moment, the Lebanese pound is the weakest currency in the world. The fiat money of Lebanon has struggled to maintain a high position and has suffered significant depreciation. This is the result of massive economic challenges, political instability, hyperinflation, and crisis. The ones who have felt the disadvantages of this are the Lebanese, who now need to face the effects of currency devaluation. Corruption and the collapse of the banking sector are other reasons that have led to the devaluation of the currency.
Iranian Rial (IRR)
The second weakest currency title belongs to the Iranian rial, as a result of the heavy sanctions that were imposed on this country back in 2015. Then, the Iranian rial also depreciated because it went through new pressure due to the tensions in the Middle East. Because of the sanctions, Iran hasn’t been able to participate that much in international trade, and this is also accompanied by political instability and high inflation.
Laotian Kip (LAK)
The Laotian Kip was also a weak currency in 2015. It is in its current state because of many factors, among the most obvious ones being high inflation, foreign debt, and economic pressures. Trade imbalances, lack of industrialization, and limited foreign investment are other reasons for this.
Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
Uzbekistan has important gas and oil reserves, which is why some might say that this country has everything it needs for a high-value currency. However, this doesn’t apply to Uzbekistan, which has struggled to maintain a high currency value. Unfortunately, Uzbekistan didn’t recover from the Soviet era, and this can be seen in the high inflation and corruption.
Syrian Pound (SYP)
The Syrian pound has become a weak currency because of economic sanctions and the civil war, which has affected this country’s currency. Investors are not interested in investing in this currency, and residents are very inclined to move their money into other currencies to escape inflation.
Conclusion
Unfortunately, many countries around the world have unstable economies, which greatly impact currency devaluation. Unstable countries are synonymous with high inflation, which decreases a coin’s purchasing power. Unfortunately, not many countries recover from unstable economies, as this can create a vicious cycle that, in the end, will impact currency value.
Investors are less likely to risk putting their money in unstable economies, where countries are dealing with corruption and high inflation. The political instability can lead to even more losses in the value of a currency, and this has been seen in numerous examples over the years.
By Adedapo Adesanya
The National Pension Commission (PenCom) has defended its decision to allow Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs) to invest in the parent companies of their custodians, insisting that adequate safeguards are in place to protect contributors’ funds.
The director-general of the pension regulator, Ms Omolola Oloworaran, speaking on Tuesday during the Meet the Press Briefing at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, said the commission’s decision to relax the investment restriction followed a comprehensive risk assessment that found minimal conflict of interest.
She explained that under PenCom’s investment regulations, PFAs are only permitted to invest pension assets in carefully selected instruments that meet stringent criteria, including profitability, strong credit ratings and proven track records.
According to her, the commission regularly reviews its investment regulations, conducts routine examinations and spot checks on PFAs to ensure strict compliance with established risk management guidelines.
“PFAs cannot just go into the stock market and buy any kind of stock. There are strict guidelines. Companies must demonstrate profitability, have a proven track record and satisfy other criteria before pension funds can invest,” she said.
Ms Oloworaran noted that each PFA also operates under the oversight of a board, an investment committee and a risk management committee, providing additional layers of governance to safeguard contributors’ funds.
She said PenCom recently issued a circular allowing PFAs to invest in the parent companies of their custodians after determining that the potential conflict of interest was negligible.
The PenCom boss explained that the parent companies involved are largely Tier-1 banks, including First Bank, United Bank for Africa (UBA) and Zenith Bank, which she described as A-rated institutions with strong financial foundations.
She said the policy was intended to widen investment opportunities for pension funds without compromising safety.
Using Stanbic IBTC as an example, Ms Oloworaran explained that if its custodian is Zenith Bank, the previous restriction prevented the pension administrator from investing in Zenith Bank shares despite the bank’s strong performance.
“We reviewed the risks and any potential conflict of interest and found the risks to be very low. That is why we opened that investment window,” she said.
By Aduragbemi Omiyale
Analysts at Meristem Research have predicted that the inflation rate for June 2026 in Nigeria should marginally rise to 15.95 per cent on a year-on-year basis from the 15.93 per cent reported in May 2026.
The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) is expected to release inflation numbers for last month later today, Wednesday, July 15, 2026.
In its report sighted by Business Post, Meristem Research said it expects inflationary pressures to re-emerge across key economies in the near term, as the re-escalation of the US-Iran conflict has reignited upward pressure on global oil prices.
It disclosed that this marks a sharp reversal from most of June, when the ceasefire between the two countries helped drive oil prices lower, raising expectations of some relief on the inflation front.
With conflicts now flaring up again, oil prices are likely to increase again, and the anticipated easing in energy-driven inflation may not materialise as broadly as earlier envisaged.
“Nonetheless, some relief is likely from the food segment, where robust supply conditions across major producing regions and softening demand should continue to ease food price pressures,” it stated.
The team also explained that it projected a 15.95 per cent inflation rate because of the lingering effects of persistent food price pressures.
“However, we expect core inflation to moderate as the sharp reversal in energy prices begins to filter through to transportation, distribution, and other energy-related costs, easing underlying price pressures.
“On a month-on-month basis, the combined effect of lower petrol prices, a relatively stable Naira, and the gradual pass-through of reduced energy costs across the supply chain should exert further downward pressure on inflation.
“Based on our assessment, food inflation is expected to remain the key swing factor, as seasonal pre-harvest supply constraints are likely to offset some of the gains from lower logistics costs,” it said.
By Adedapo Adesanya
The duo of Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS) Plc and Afriland Properties Plc weakened the NASD Over-the-Counter (OTC) Securities Exchange by 1.61 per cent on Tuesday, July 14.
CSCS Plc saw its stock value drop N9.08 to close at N82.40 per share compared with the preceding session’s N91.48 per share, and Afriland Properties Plc slid by 17 Kobo to sell at N15.00 per unit versus N15.70 per unit.
The losses recorded by the two securities pulled back the market capitalisation by N41.64 billion to N2.546 trillion from N2.587 trillion, and cracked the NASD Security Index (NSI) by 69.36 points to 4,242.31 points from 4,311.67 points.
It was observed that the exchange witnessed two price advancers during the session, led by FrieslandCampina Wamco Nigeria Plc, which gained N1.37 to end at N151.37 per share compared with the previous day’s N150.00 per share, and Food Concepts Plc chalked up 5 Kobo to settle at N2.50 per unit versus N2.45 per unit.
The volume of securities traded by market participants surged by 50.7 per cent to 13.7 million units from the previous 9.1 million units, while the value of securities went down by 79.7 per cent to N65.2 million from N320.4 million, and the number of deals crashed by 3.6 per cent to 27 deals from the previous session’s 28 deals.
At the close of transactions, Great Nigeria Insurance (GNI) Plc remained the most traded stock by value on a year-to-date basis, with the sale of 3.4 billion units for N8.4 billion, trailed by Infrastructure Credit Guarantee (Infracredit) Plc, which exchanged 2.3 billion units valued at N6.5 billion, and CSCS Plc with 73.9 million units transacted for N5.2 billion.
GNI Plc also closed the trading day as the most traded stock by volume on a year-to-date basis, with 3.4 billion units worth N8.4 billion, followed by Infracredit Plc with 2.3 billion units traded for N6.5 billion, and Resourcery Plc with 1.1 billion units valued at N415.7 million.
