Connect with us

Economy

Best Prop Trading Firms in Nigeria 2026

Published

on

Prop Trading Firms nigeria

A typical trader’s risk appetite often increases once they’ve scored a few wins. The reasoning is that, if I take bigger risks, I may go home with a bigger paycheck. But risk appetite alone doesn’t increase the chances of higher earnings; you also must invest a lot more money.

This need for higher trading capital is a gap that prop trading firms seek to plug. They give skilled traders capital and then agree on how to split the gains. The tradeoff for you as a trader is that you often pay upfront fees for evaluation or instant funding, operate under strict guidelines, and may lose access if you violate risk limits. And this is why you must choose a firm with which you can have a healthy relationship. This article presents the top options in Nigeria.

List of best prop trading firms in Nigeria 2026

  1. OneFunded – the fastest growing prop firm in 2026, with easy and transparent trading rules.
  2. FundedNext – prop firm offering trader-friendly challenge models
  3. FTMO – prop firm known for strict rules and structured evaluations
  4. Topstep – a futures prop firm focused on discipline and risk control
  5. Take Profit Trader – a prop firm with simple evaluations and clear rules

1. OneFunded

OneFunded Prop

Year founded 2024
Headquarters London, England, UK
Funding model Evaluation/challenge
Max capital $200,000
Profit split range 80% default, 90% after purchasing add-on
Primary markets Forex, crypto, indices, and metals
Trading platforms cTrader, TradeLocker, MT5

Challenge Structure

OneFunded’s funding model is exclusively challenge-based. That is, traders access a funded account with a simulated trading environment after passing the evaluation. You can choose between a 1-step and 2-step challenge and pay a one-time fee, which is also refundable. The table below shows a detailed summary of the firm’s challenge structure.

1-Step Challenge 2-Step Challenge 1F Limited Challenge
Phases 1 2 2
Account sizes available $2,000, $5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000, $200,000 $2,000, $5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000, $200,000 $2,000, $5,000, $10,000, $25,000
Profit targets 10% 8% (Phase 1) 5% (Phase 2) 7% (Phase 1) 4% (Phase 2)
Drawdown limits Daily: 4% Maximum: 6% Daily: 5% Maximum: 10% Daily: 5% Maximum: 11%
Minimum trading days 5 days 3 days (per phase) 2 days (per phase)
Trading period Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Entry fees (per account size) $2K: $29; $5K: $56; $10K: $107; $25K: $143; $50K: $215; $100K: $395; $200K: $699 $2K: $23; $5K: $45; $10K: $89; $25K: $125; $50K: $195; $100K: $361; $200K: $650 $2K: $25; $5K: $49; $10K: $92; $25K: $135

Payouts and Trader Support

This prop trading firm processes payouts on a 14-day cycle after requests, but you can shorten this period with a seven day add-on. And the available methods are cryptocurrency (USDT) for payouts below $1,000 and bank transfer for higher amounts.

According to our research, users find OneFunded as quite reliable. For example, the firm has a 4.4-star rating from 141 Trustpilot reviews. Most reviewers praise the firm for transparent payouts and fair trading conditions. Support is also quite responsive. We established that your queries will be addressed within 24 hours.

Strengths and Ideal Users

Our research established that OneFunded has a high pass rate, which could be due to its no-pressure environment. The unlimited challenge durations allow traders to strategize without time constraints. Also, the firm provides all the details on its website regarding trading rules, fees, and payout processes. OneFunded is best for Nigerian traders seeking accessible and supportive platforms with flexible conditions.

2. FundedNext

FundedNext prop

Year founded 2022
Headquarters Ajman, United Arab Emirates
Funding model Evaluation with progression to a funded account; Instant funding
Max capital $200,000
Profit split range Starts at 15% in challenge accounts, progresses to 90% in FundedNext accounts
Primary markets Forex, indices, and commodities
Trading platforms MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader, and Match-Trader. TradingView for analysis

Challenge Structure

FundedNext offers two categories of funded trading programs, one for CFDs and the other for futures. The CFDs one is the broadest in terms of paths to funded status; there is Evaluation (2-step), Express (1-step with high target), Stellar 1-Step, Stellar 2-Step, and Stellar Lite (2-step). The table below summarizes the key features of these programs:

Stellar 1-Step Stellar 2-Step Stellar Lite (2-Step) Stellar Instant
Account sizes available $6k, $15k, $25k, $50k, $100k, $200k $6k, $15k, $25k, $50k, $100k, $200k $5k, $10k,  $25k, $50k, $100k, $200k $2k, $5k, $10k, $20k
Profit targets 10% 8%(Phase 1) 5%(Phase 2) 8%(Phase 1)

4%(Phase 2)

N/A
Drawdown limits Daily: 3% Maximum: 6% Daily: 5% Maximum: 10% Daily: 4% Maximum: 8% Daily: N/A

Maximum: 6%

Minimum trading days 2 days 5 days (per phase) 5 days (per phase) N/A
First withdrawal 5 days 21 days 21 days On demand
Performance reward 15% 15% 15% Up to 80%
Entry fees $6k: $66; $15k: $130;

$25k: $220; $50k: $330; $100k: $570; $200k: $1,100

$6k: $60; $15k: $120; $25k: $200; $50k: $300; $100k: $550; $200k: $1,100 $5k: $33; $10k: $60; $25k: $140; $50k: $230; $100k: $400;

$200k: $799

$2k: $60; $5k: $150, $10k: $300; $20k: $600
Refundable fee Full price for all account sizes Full price for all account sizes Full price for all account sizes N/A

For the FundedNext Futures product, the firm offers two regular challenge models (Rapid and Legacy), and one limited-time exclusive challenge called Bolt. Below are the key features:

Rapid (1-Step) Legacy (1-Step) Bolt (1-Step)
Account sizes available $25k, $50k, $100k $25k, $50k, $100k $50k
Profit target(s) $25K: $1,500; $50K: $3,000; $100K: $5,000 $25K: $1,250; $50K: $2,500; $100K: $6,000 $3,000
Drawdown limits Maximum (Trailing): $25K: $1,000; $50K: $2,000; $100K: $2,500;

Daily: N/A

Maximum (Trailing): $25K: $1,000; $50K: $2,000; $100K: $3,000;

Daily: N/A

Maximum: $2,000

Daily: $1,000

Entry fee  $25k: $110; $50k: $200; $100k: $280 $25k: $80; $50k: $150; $100k: $250 $100
Reset fee $25k: $97; $50k: $176; $100k: $247 $25k: $70; $50k: $132; $100k: $220 $88

Payouts and Trader Support

Our investigation found that FundedNext processes payouts within five to 24 hours. In fact, the firm offers an extra $1,000 compensation for each delayed payout. First payouts vary depending on the challenge and market. For CFDs models like Stellar 2-Step and Stellar Lite, the initial withdrawal is available 21 days after funding; it comes down to five days for Stellar 1-Step, and on-demand for Stellar Instant. And when the process is successful, you can receive funds via RiseWorks, Confirmo, and crypto (USDT).

Trustpilot reviews, 54,551 at writing, give the firm a strong 4.5/5 rating. Most users commend FundedNext for fast and reliable payouts. And regarding customer support, most users state that it is professional and responsive. Our research can confirm this, and add that the chat function on the website worked better.

Strengths and Ideal Users

FundedNext offers the most comprehensive funded trader programs in Nigeria. Add to that performance rewards during challenges, unlimited time for evaluations, and news trading allowance. The firm also has flexible trading guidelines and the support is professional. The firm is best for forex and futures traders seeking high profit shares, news/event strategies, and rapid scaling without time pressure.

3. FTMO

FTMO

Year founded 2014
Headquarters Prague, Czech Republic
Funding model Two-step evaluation process
Max capital $200,000
Profit split range Up to 90%
Primary markets Forex, crypto, indices, and commodities
Trading platforms MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader, and DXtrade

Challenge Structure

Unlike OneFunded, FTMO has only one challenge, the FTMO Challenge. This is a two-phase evaluation process that leads to a funded FTMO Account. You must know that the funded account operates in a simulated environment, which means that the funds are fictitious but the profit splits are real money. The table below presents the key features:

FTMO challenge account size $200,000 $100,000 $50,000 $25,000 $10,000
Profit target STEP 1: 10% STEP 2: 5% STEP 1: 10%

STEP 2: 5%

STEP 1: 10%

STEP 2: 5%

STEP 1: 10% STEP 2: 5% STEP 1: 10% STEP 2: 5%
Max. daily loss 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Max. loss 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Min. trading days 4 days 4 days 4 days 4 days 4 days
Trading period Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Refund Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes 100%
Entry fee €1,080 €439 (offer) €345 €250 €89

Payouts and Trader Support

FTMO allows on-demand payouts after a minimum of 14 days from the first trade on funded accounts. It processes the payouts within 1-2 business days via bank wire, Skrill, cryptocurrencies, or instant card transfers like Visa Direct (up to $20,000). The firm doesn’t charge a cent on its platform during this process.

We established that FTMO’s customer support channels operate 24/7 in 20 languages. There is also plenty of community features, including a 100k+ member Discord, and a 400k-subscriber YouTube channel. The firm also offers plenty of educational material via FTMO Academy.

Strengths and Ideal Users

FTMO has one of the longest running trader funding programs in the sector. This speaks to its tenacity and relevance. Other strengths include robust educational resources and advanced analytics tools (e.g., Account MetriX, Trading Journal, etc.). We also learned through Reddit that the firm is reliable, operates transparently, and traders experience minimal slippage issues despite strict rules.

FTMO is best for experienced traders seeking a reputable, resource-rich platform with high capital access and scaling opportunities in Nigeria.

4. TopStep

TopStep

Year founded 2012, rebranded from TopStepTrader to TopStep in 2020
Headquarters Chicago, Illinois, USA
Funding model Evaluation with progression to a live funded account
Max capital $150k in challenges; $750k across five Express Funded Accounts
Profit split range 50% to 100%
Primary markets CME Foreign Exchange Futures, CME Equity Futures, CME Agricultural Futures, CME NYMEX Futures, CME CBOT Agricultural Futures, CME CBOT Financial/Interest Rate Futures, and CME COMEX Futures
Trading platforms TopStepX, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, TradingView

Challenge Structure

TopStep takes prospective traders through a primary challenge phase; the evaluation is called Trading Combine. Those who pass this stage proceed to the Express Funded Account. This is funded account that uses fictitious funds to hone traders’ skills. And the upside that you receive rewards for every successful trade. If the team and TopStep are satisfied with your skills, you may be called upon to operate a Live Funded Account.

The table below summarizes the account sizes you can choose at the Trading Combine stage; the structure is the same up to the Live Funded Account. Note that you can choose the “No activation fee” path or the “Standard” path.

Path Account Size (Buying Power) Profit Target Monthly Price Max Loss Limit Max Position Size Activation Fee
No Activation Fee $50k $3,000 $89 $2,000 5 contracts Free
No Activation Fee $100k $6,000 $139 $3,000 10 contracts Free
No Activation Fee $150k $9,000 $189 $4,500 15 contracts Free
Standard $50k $3,000 $49 $2,000 5 contracts $129 (one-time, after passing)
Standard $100k $6,000 $99 $3,000 10 contracts $129 (one-time, after passing)
Standard $150k $9,000 $149 $4,500 15 contracts $129 (one-time, after passing)

Payouts and Trader Support

TopStep starts rewarding traders at the Express Funded Account (XFA) stage. The first payout requires at least five winning days of $150 or more in profits, and you can request up to four withdrawals in a month. The firm processes payouts daily with instant deductions for quick access, though specific channels like bank transfers or other methods are handled via the platform with dedicated support.

Also, the firm offers robust educational resources such as in-depth strategy courses, daily TopStepTV broadcasts featuring expert insights, and personalized Coach T analytics. There is also a vibrant community through a large Discord chatroom with over 150,000 members and coaches, plus a Facebook group for networking and accountability. Customer support is accessible via 24/7 chat, weekday phone assistance, SMS, WhatsApp, and email options for prompt help.

Strengths and Ideal Users

TopStep specializes in the futures market, and, according to information on its website, it has funded more than 10,000 traders into live accounts for over 12 years. The Trading Combine feature is also a standout program that offers a streamlined single-rule path to a live funded account. Traders also enjoy features like TopStepX, a proprietary trading platform tailored for futures traders. As such, the firm is best for futures traders needing structure and coaching.

5. Take Profit Trader

Take Profit Trader

Year founded 2021
Headquarters Windermere, Florida, USA
Funding model Subscription-based evaluation with progression to a live account
Max capital $150,000
Profit split range 80% for PRO Accounts; 90% for PRO+ Accounts
Primary markets Futures and options contracts across Equity Indices, Energy, Metals, Currencies, Agriculture, Crypto, and Treasuries
Trading platforms NinjaTrader, TradingView, Tradovate, Quantower, R Trader, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5

Challenge Structure

Take Profit Trader uses a single-step evaluation process and upon passing, traders move to a funded PRO account. Traders get a test account at the evaluation phase, where they trade in a simulated environment. They don’t get a live environment until they graduate to the PRO+ account. The table below summarizes some of the key features of the different account types:

Feature TEST PRO PRO+
Trading environment Simulated Simulated Live
Withdrawals None Day one Day one
Profit split None 80/20 90/10
Maximum withdrawal amount None No max No max​
Buffer rules None Yes None
Drawdown End of Day Intra day End of Day
Consistency rule Yes None None
Scaling rule None None None
Broker rates $5/$0.50 RT $5/$0.50 RT Broker rates​

And, you can choose a trading account from $25,000 to $150,000, the maximum allocation. The table below details the parameters of each account size:

Account Size Monthly Subscription Profit Target Max Position Size Daily Loss Limit EOD Trailing Drawdown
$25,000 $150 $1,500 3 contracts/

30 micros

Removed $1,500
$50,000 $170 $3,000 6 contracts/

60 micros

Removed $2,000​
$75,000 $245 $4,500 9 contracts/

90 micros

Removed $2,500
$100,000 $330 $6,000 12 contracts/

120 micros

Removed $3,000
$150,000 $360 $9,000 15 contracts/ 150 micros Removed $4,500

Payouts and Trader Support

Once you graduate to the PRO account, Take Profit Trader offers payouts starting from day one. But your account balance must exceed the buffer zone (equal to max drawdown). You will get an 80% share of profits with a PRO account and 90% on PRO+ after 60 trading days. Our investigation showed that the firm processes payouts in 24-36 hours via Plaid (US banks), PayPal, or Wise. You can request withdrawals as many times as possible, and payouts are free over $250, and a $50 fee under that. And, KYC verification is required before first withdrawal using standard ID documents.

However, Tak Profit Trader does not offer educational resources such as those available at competitors. Instead, you’ll have to rely on help articles for rules and a Discord community for peer discussion. Customer support operates via live chat, email, and Discord.

Strengths and Ideal Users

Take Profit Trader’s single-step evaluation makes it stand out, especially for traders looking for an expedited path to funded accounts. It’s pricing is also competitive, and even the broker fees are affordable. However, a lack of educational resources makes the firm best for risk-tolerant and experienced futures traders only.

Comparative Analysis of the Best Prop Firms

Firm Max Allocation Profit Split Evaluation Steps Best Feature Trustpilot Rating
OneFunded $200,000 Up to 90% Multiple paths (1-Step & 2-Step) Unlimited challenge duration with a high pass rate 4.4/5
FTMO $200,000 Up to 90% Two-Step Challenge Robust educational resources and advanced analytics tools 4.8/5
FundedNext $200,000 (CFDs); $100,000 (Futures) Up to 90% Multiple paths (1-Step & 2-Step; Instant) Most comprehensive funded trader programs with news trading allowance. 4.5/5
TopStep $150,000 50%–100% Single-step Trading Combine Futures specialization with coaching, community, and proprietary trading platform. 3.6/5
Take Profit Trader $150,000 80% (PRO); 90% (PRO+) Single-Step Evaluation Day-one withdrawals on funded accounts 4.4/5

Strategies for Selecting a Prop Firm in Nigeria

1. Align Challenge Rules with Your Trading Timeframe

Choose a firm whose evaluation period structure matches your typical position-holding duration. If you trade slowly or prefer no time pressure, opt for firms offering unlimited challenge durations. Ensure the minimum trading day requirement fits your natural trading frequency to avoid forced, suboptimal trades.

2. Calculate Your True Cost to Profitability

Look beyond the initial evaluation fee. Factor in the potential costs of multiple attempts, since most traders do not pass on the first try. Include all associated expenses such as platform fees, data costs, and reset charges to accurately compare the total investment required across different firms.

3. Verify Withdrawal Track Record

Conduct independent research on payout reliability. Check reviews on platforms like Trustpilot, Reddit, and trading forums for consistent patterns of praise or complaints regarding withdrawals. Pay attention to how firms respond to and resolve payment issues.

4. Test Rules Against Your Actual Trade History

Audit your past trading performance against a firm’s specific rules. Review your last 50-100 trades to see if your largest losses would violate daily or maximum drawdown limits. Confirm that your typical position sizes comply with the firm’s lot or contract limits.

5. Prioritize Rule Clarity Over Generous Splits

Select firms with explicitly documented and transparent trading guidelines. Avoid any with vague terminology like “reasonable trading” or rules subject to discretionary interpretation, as these can be used to disqualify you regardless of a high profit share percentage.

6. Evaluate Support Before You Pay

Proactively test the firm’s customer service before purchasing a challenge. Send pre-sales questions to gauge response time and quality. Explore available support channels like live chat, email, and community forums to assess their usefulness and the general sentiment among funded traders.

FAQs

  1. How difficult is it to pass a prop firm’s evaluation challenge?

Passing rates vary, but most traders do not succeed on their first attempt due to psychological pressure and strict risk limits. Firms like OneFunded report higher pass rates, often attributed to their no-pressure, unlimited-time evaluation structure.

  1. What are the most common reasons traders fail prop firm challenges?

The primary reasons are violating daily or maximum drawdown limits and failing to meet profit targets within the required minimum trading days. Emotional trading under time pressure and over-leveraging are also frequent causes of failure.

  1. Can I trade with multiple prop firms simultaneously?

Yes, most firms allow it, but you must manage separate accounts and adhere to each firm’s specific rules. However, ensure you can handle the psychological and operational complexity of juggling multiple evaluation criteria and risk limits.

  1. How quickly can I scale my account after getting funded?

Scaling policies vary. Some firms offer scaling plans based on consistent profitability, often increasing your capital by 25% to 50% after meeting specific profit milestones over a set period.

  1. Are profits from prop trading taxable?

Yes, payout profits are generally considered taxable income. However, tax treatment depends on your country of residence and the firm’s structure. It is advisable to consult with a local tax professional to understand your specific reporting obligations.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

NECA DG Warns of Growing Pressure on Businesses, Households

Published

on

NECA Adewale Smatt-Oyerinde

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

The Director General of the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA), Mr Adewale-Smatt Oyerinde, has run to the rooftop to warn of the negative impact of rising crude oil prices on businesses and households in the country.

In a statement on Monday, he said the Middle East crisis was pushing up domestic energy costs, placing pressure on businesses and eroding the purchasing power of citizens, warning that without urgent intervention, the situation could escalate.

According to him, fuel prices have risen sharply in recent days, with petrol exceeding N1,300 per litre in some locations and diesel approaching N1,800 per litre, reflecting the impact of global oil price movements.

He stressed that energy costs sit at the heart of Nigeria’s economy, and energy is the engine of production and distribution, noting that businesses, particularly in manufacturing, agriculture, and logistics, are already under significant pressure. “What we are witnessing is Nigeria’s oil paradox. Rising crude oil prices are pushing up domestic energy costs, squeezing businesses and worsening the cost of living for citizens.

“Once fuel prices rise, the effects are immediate and widespread: transport costs increase, food prices rise, and the overall cost of doing business escalates.

“For many firms that rely on diesel for operations, current price levels are becoming increasingly difficult to sustain. Profit margins are shrinking, and businesses are being forced to either pass on costs or scale down operations,” Mr Oyerinde stated.

The NECA DG further noted that global oil prices have surged amid geopolitical tensions, with Brent crude rising above $110 per barrel, intensifying cost pressures across energy markets.

He clarified that while the Middle East conflict has contributed to the rise in oil prices, the impact is exposing deeper structural weaknesses, underinvestment, weak infrastructure, and inefficiencies in Nigeria’s energy value chain.

“This situation is not only driven by external factors, but it is also reflecting ongoing constraints within the energy value chain, including supply inefficiencies and infrastructure limitations,” he disclosed.

“The government must act swiftly to ease supply constraints, stabilise prices, and provide targeted relief to critical sectors, he declared, emphasising that, “If this trend continues unchecked, we risk business closures, job losses, and a deeper cost-of-living crisis.”

On the long-term outlook, Mr Oyerinde emphasised the need for structural reforms. Nigeria’s resilience will not be determined by oil prices, but by how effectively we manage them. This is a moment to strengthen institutions, improve transparency, and invest in sustainable energy solutions.

He concluded with a caution that if properly managed, “this could strengthen our economy. If not, the gains from rising oil prices will be completely eroded by inflation and economic hardship.”

Continue Reading

Economy

NAICOM Rules Out Extension of July 31 Recapitalisation Deadline

Published

on

NAICOM

By Adedapo Adesanya

The National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) has stressed that it has no intention of extending the deadline of the ongoing insurance recapitalisation exercise fixed for July 31, 2026.

The Commissioner for Insurance, Mr Olusegun Omosehin, at a high-level media briefing in Lagos, emphasised that “The 31 July deadline is sacrosanct.”

Mr Omosehin rationalised that NAICOM said it was not worried by the sluggishness of some underwriting companies towards the exercise.

“It is embedded in the law, and as a regulator, we do not have the powers to alter a date set by an Act of the National Assembly,” he explained, noting that the timeline is a statutory requirement under the Nigeria Insurance Industry Reform Act of 2025.

“We would not be drawn into a last-minute rush or entertain pleas for extensions,” Mr Omosehin warned, adding that any adjustment to the schedule would require a formal amendment of the Act by the National Assembly and subsequent presidential assent, a path he stated the commission is not prepared to take.

He further noted that while 20 insurance companies have officially stepped forward to begin their capital verification process, the level of urgency across the board does not match the requirements of the law.

“We want a stronger, more resilient industry that can support Nigeria’s target of a $1tn economy,” the Commissioner added, stressing that the ultimate goal is not just capital but the capability to underwrite large risks and protect policyholders.

“Capital alone is not the goal; it is about the capability to underwrite large risks,” he reiterated, while urging operators who may lack the “stand-alone stamina” to meet the new requirements to consider mergers and acquisitions immediately rather than waiting.

“We warn against ‘emergency marriages’ concluded at the eleventh hour, as such ad hoc arrangements often lead to lingering liabilities and post-merger integration crises,” Mr Omosehin said.

The NAICOM chief also confirmed that the regulator is currently scanning all operating firms and will soon make the results of this regulatory assessment public.

While re-emphasising the July 31 deadline, he warned that all funds raised must be deposited in designated escrow accounts.

Continue Reading

Economy

BudgIT Raises Alarm Over Poor Transparency in Nigeria’s Local Government Budgets

Published

on

BudgIT 40-year bonds

By Adedapo Adesanya

Governance transparency platform, BudgIT, has expressed worry that only 10 states provided publicly accessible budget information for their Local Government Areas (LGAs).

The report, titled The Missing Tier: Mapping Local Government Budget Transparency in Nigeria, found that while six states offer partial or outdated disclosures, as many as 18 states do not publish any LGA budget data at all.

Despite the existence of these budgets at council secretariats nationwide, BudgIT noted that access remains largely restricted, particularly online.

“For most of Nigeria’s 774 local governments, those budgets are not publicly accessible online,” the report stated.

Among the states assessed, Ekiti emerged as the top performer, with a comprehensive system that includes detailed, up-to-date budget documentation for its councils.

Other states identified as making LGA budget information available include Ebonyi, Osun, Kebbi, Kogi, Enugu, Kaduna and Yobe.

However, the report cautioned that even among these states, data quality remains inconsistent, with several budgets either incomplete, outdated, or poorly structured.

BudgIT highlighted notable examples of improved accountability practices.

Ekiti State, for instance, publishes individual 2026 budgets for all its LGAs and LCDAs, accompanied by signed documents, consultation records, and standardised financial templates.

Cross River State also stood out for releasing individual council budgets, audited accounts, and quarterly performance reports.

Similarly, Borno State was commended for maintaining a consolidated 2025 budget alongside supporting financial documents, suggesting a structured and functional reporting system.

The report identified six states with limited transparency, providing only fragmented or outdated information.

Kano State, for example, publishes quarterly performance reports but lacks full-year approved budgets.

In Imo State, no LGA budgets were found, although a financial statement from the Accountant-General was available.

Ondo State reportedly released documents for only a portion of its LGAs, while Anambra published an appropriation law without detailed breakdowns. Ogun State, meanwhile, only provided data for 2024.

BudgIT further disclosed that a large number of states fail entirely to make LGA budgets public.

These include Abia, Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Benue, Delta, Edo, Gombe, Jigawa, Katsina, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Oyo, Plateau, Rivers, Sokoto, Taraba, and Zamfara.

According to the organisation, the issue is not the absence of budget documents but the lack of public access to them.

“Yet for most of Nigeria’s 774 local governments, those budgets are not publicly accessible online,” the civic tech firm said.

BudgIT stressed that improving transparency at the local government level does not require complex reforms but rather a deliberate policy decision.

“Since state governments already publish their own budgets online, extending the same standard to local councils is neither complex nor costly; it is a matter of institutional choice,” the organisation said.

It added, “This choice is a critical one; Nigeria’s post-1999 experience with democracy has not had Local Governments with significant autonomy. Be that as it may, LGAs still have the opportunity to make public what they budget, what they spend and what they earn.”

Highlighting the benefits of openness, the report noted that transparency enables citizens to track public spending and hold officials accountable.

“Where they are withheld, accountability stops at the state level, leaving the tier closest to citizens financially opaque,” BudgIT said.

Continue Reading

Trending