Economy
Why Seplat Sacked Avuru as Non-Executive Director
The investing public may not have heard details of the main reasons why Austin Avuru, a former chief executive officer of Seplat Energy Plc who later became a Non-Executive Director was sacked from the board of the energy company.
Seplat Energy Plc had on Thursday, December 23 notified the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) that its board has terminated the contract of appointment of Austin Avuru as a Non-Executive Director.
Seplat Energy told the NGX that Avuru’s appointment was terminated on December 22, 2021, “due to breaches of the Company’s corporate governance policies and his fiduciary duties.”
Shortly after SEPLAT hammer fell on Avuru, Perchstone & Graeys, the law firm representing the sacked Non-Executive Director said the allegations levelled against him (Avuru) by Seplat Energy Plc were aimed at “damaging his hard-earned reputation” based on “fictitious allegations” even though the same statement accepted that their client (Austin Avuru) had taken “an ill-advised action”.
The law firm had said this in a statement issued last week and signed by Osaro Eghobamien and Folabi Kuti, its lawyers.
However, the emerging facts seem to bear serious consequences.
Under the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020 (CAMA), directors have a duty to exercise their powers and discharge their duties honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the company. They are also expected to exercise that degree of care, diligence and skill which a reasonably prudent director would exercise in comparable circumstances.
It was learnt that following an enquiry by the Board of Directors of SEPLAT, Avuru had allegedly on December 1, 2020, admitted his conflict of interest in connection with SEPLAT’s business and more particularly its proposed acquisition of some Nigerian assets in which ExxonMobil Corporation has interests.
Avuru also admitted that he had on that date been appointed the Chairman of Chappal Petroleum Development Company Limited (Chappal) and that Chappal had been invited by ExxonMobil Corporation for discussions and possible access to their database in respect of the assets.
Further enquiries by SEPLAT Board revealed that Avuru had already acquired an interest in Chappal over nine months earlier, as far back as March 2020, whilst he was still CEO of Seplat Energy.
More revealing was that the incorporation documents of Chappal as shown at the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) revealed that Avuru was and remained both a founding shareholder and director of Chappal, but he failed to disclose his interests in Chappal to the Board in December 2020.
It was further learnt that prior to December 1, 2020, Avuru was much aware, but failed to disclose that Chappal had put in a bid for the said oil and gas assets.
SEPLAT Board after completing the process of its review was satisfied that Avuru failed or refused to disclose a conflict of interest as soon as he acquired an interest in and was appointed a director of Chappal and became aware that Chappal was bidding for the assets.
Avuru knew that SEPLAT which he was a Non-Executive Director was also interested in the assets and he had participated in SEPLAT’s Board discussions relating to SEPLAT’S bid for the assets.
These findings seemed to have affirmed for Board of SEPLAT that Avuru by his actions clearly breached his fiduciary duties and obligations as a director as stipulated under the existing Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance (NCCG) as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Code of Corporate Governance to which Avuru’s appointment was subject.
Avuru as then Non-Executive Director had a duty to notify SEPLAT of his appointment onto the board of Chappal, bearing in mind that he was the CEO of SEPLAT at the time and both companies operate within the same industry.
SEPLAT Energy has a standard listing on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange (LSE), therefore the company is publicly committed to comply voluntarily with and to abide by the United Kingdom’s Code of Corporate Governance (UK Code).
In accordance with the UK Code provisions, Board directors are not only expected to act in a manner consistent with their duties under company law, but also to uphold the highest standards of integrity.
Prior to appointment into the Board, directors are expected to disclose their significant commitments to the board (together with an indication of the time involved) and additional external appointments are not to be undertaken by directors without prior approval of the board.
By not notifying the SEPLAT board of his appointment to the board of Chappal in March 2020, at a time when Avuru was the CEO of SEPLAT, and not seeking prior approval from the SEPLAT board to take on this new appointment, Avuru acted in a manner that was inconsistent with the provisions of the UK Code and the guidance.
It was further learnt that Avuru also failed to disclose his appointment as a director of Chappal when he accepted the role of a Non-Executive Director (NED) of SEPLAT.
No doubt, prompt and timely disclosure of this board appointment was particularly key in allowing SEPLAT Board to assess the risk of any conflict of interest arising and to take appropriate measures to manage a potential conflict.
Considering the statutory requirement from directors, Avuru had a duty to exercise good faith and a reasonable degree of care and prudence in how Avuru handled the potential conflict.
He failed to exercise his duty of care to SEPLAT by being forthright in disclosing the conflict or likelihood of conflict of interest to SEPLAT, before or promoting/ incorporating Chappal in March 2020.
By failing to promptly disclose his directorship in Chappal, Avuru placed himself in a position where his duties as a director of SEPLAT conflicted with the concurrent opportunities he pursued as founding shareholder and director of Chappal and SEPLAT in a position where it was temporarily unable to take prompt action to manage the potential conflict of interest and to comply with the provisions of CAMA as well as the principles of the NCCG, SEC and UK codes.
For almost one year, Avuru’s attention was said to have been fully with Chappal as against SEPLAT, a situation that was most unfair to SEPLAT, its shareholders and other stakeholders.
Economy
Dangote Refinery Ramps Up Petrol, Urea Exports to African Markets
By Adedapo Adesanya
The owner of the $20 billion Dangote Refinery, Mr Aliko Dangote, said on Monday that the facility has increased exports of premium motor spirit (PMS), otherwise known as petrol, and urea to African countries hit by supply disruptions caused by the Iran war.
Speaking during a tour of the refinery on the edge of commercial capital Lagos, Mr Dangote said the refinery, which is operating at its maximum capacity of 650,000 barrels a day, had helped cushion the full impact of the crisis both in Nigeria and across the continent.
“What I can do is assure Nigerians … and most of West Africa, Central Africa, and East Africa, we have the capacity to supply them,” he said, as per Reuters.
The businessman further said the facility had shipped some 17 cargoes of gasoline to other African nations, and exports of urea fertiliser had also recently risen, as buyers sought alternative sources of supply.
“In the last couple of days, we’ve been looking to mostly African countries, which we were not doing before,” he said, referring to the fertiliser shipments, without giving figures.
The refinery has the capacity to produce up to 3 million metric tons of urea annually, most of which is typically exported to the United States and South America, officials say.
Mr Dangote said the refinery hoped to get more crude cargoes to help curb rising fuel costs under the Crude-for-Naira initiative of the Nigerian government.
Last week, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited allocated seven May cargoes for the refinery, up from five in previous months.
The majority of Nigeria’s crude production is tied to Joint Venture (JV) contracts, which constrain the optimal supply of crude oil to the Dangote Refinery. This increase in crude allocations to the 650,000 barrel per day refinery could curb volumes of Nigerian crude available for export at a time when the Iran war has drastically cut supply from the Middle East.
The company is still purchasing crude at international benchmark prices from Brazil, Equatorial Guinea, Angola, Algeria, and the US, among others.
Economy
CPPE Projects Naira Stability in Q2, Flags Volatility Risks
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has projected relative stability for the Naira exchange rate in the second quarter of the year, supported by improved foreign reserves and liquidity, but cautioned that volatility risks remain.
In its Q1 2026 Economic Review and Q2 Outlook: Macro Stability Gains Amid Persistent Cost Pressures and Rising Geopolitical Risks report released on Sunday, the think-tank’s chief executive, Mr Muda Yusuf, said exchange rate conditions also improved significantly as the Naira, which experienced substantial volatility during the reform transition period, stabilised within a relatively narrow band of about N1,340–N1,430 per Dollar in the official market during Q1 2026.
“This stability has helped to moderate imported inflation and restore a measure of business confidence. External reserves strengthened considerably, rising above $50 billion in early 2026,” he stated.
The group said that the Nigerian economy in the first quarter of 2026 reflected a blend of improving macroeconomic stability and persistent structural constraints.
It said that proof of a more stable macroeconomic environment is increasingly evident, underpinned by the cumulative gains from foreign exchange reforms, a sustained period of monetary tightening, and the gradual normalisation of key economic indicators.
However, it noted that these improvements continue to coexist with significant headwinds, adding that the country’s economic growth will remain positive in the next three months, but the pace of expansion may slow due to mounting downside risk
The report also warned of a growing risk of stagflation, as persistent cost pressures combine with fragile growth conditions. It added that rising political activities ahead of the 2027 general elections could weaken reform momentum and distract from economic management.
The CPPE noted that rising global crude oil prices, triggered by the ongoing Middle East conflict, pose a major threat to Nigeria’s fragile disinflation process. While higher oil prices could boost export earnings and government revenue, the think tank stressed that the domestic impact would be adverse.
“The cost pass-through effect poses a significant threat to the fragile disinflation process, potentially reversing recent gains in price stability, weakening real incomes, and further exacerbating the cost-of-living pressures facing households and businesses,” the organisation said.
Highlighting monetary policy concerns, CPPE said the current inflationary trend is largely driven by structural and cost-related factors rather than excess demand, observing that, “Additional monetary tightening would have limited effectiveness in addressing the underlying drivers of inflation, while potentially exacerbating constraints on investment, credit expansion, and overall economic growth.”
The CPPE further raised concerns over the implementation of the proposed N68 trillion 2026 budget, citing weak revenue performance, delays in capital releases, and growing political influence on spending priorities.
“As political pressures intensify, there is a risk of weakening fiscal discipline, with greater emphasis on recurrent and politically expedient spending,” the group stated, advising businesses to shift focus towards resilience and efficiency, urging firms to prioritise cost containment, adopt alternative energy sources, and strengthen foreign exchange risk management strategies.
It also called on policymakers to take urgent steps to safeguard economic stability and protect vulnerable groups.
“Policy priorities should therefore focus on consolidating macroeconomic stability, addressing structural bottlenecks, and implementing targeted measures to protect vulnerable populations,” it noted.
The CPPE concluded that while macroeconomic stability gains recorded in the first quarter of 2026 are notable, the outlook for the second quarter remains cautiously positive but increasingly uncertain due to geopolitical tensions, fiscal risks, and domestic political dynamics.
Economy
OPEC+ Boost Output by 206kb/d as Iran War Limits Production
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (OPEC+) agreed to raise its oil output quotas by 206,000 barrels per day for May.
Eight members of OPEC+, comprising Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, the UAE, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria, and Oman, agreed to the increase in May quota at a virtual meeting on Sunday, OPEC+ said in a statement.
However, the rise will be in theory, as its key members are unable to raise production due to the US-Israeli war with Iran, which has affected production.
The war has effectively shut the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important oil route, since the end of February and cut exports from some OPEC+ members, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Iraq. These are the only countries in the group which were able to significantly raise production even before the conflict began.
Besides the disruptions affecting Gulf members, others, such as Russia, are unable to increase output due to Western sanctions and damage to infrastructure inflicted during the war with Ukraine. For Nigeria, even as Africa’s largest producer, it has not been able to keep production quotas steady.
The OPEC+ quota increase of 206,000 barrels per day represents less than 2 per cent of the supply disrupted by the Hormuz closure, but it signals readiness to raise output once the waterway reopens.
Also meeting on Sunday, a separate OPEC+ panel called the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC), expressed concern about attacks on energy assets, saying they were expensive and time-consuming to repair and so have an impact on supply.
May’s OPEC+ increase is the same as the eight members had agreed for April at their last meeting held on March 1, just as the war began to disrupt oil flows.
A month later, the largest oil supply disruption on record is estimated to have removed as many as 12 to 15 million barrels per day or up to 15 per cent of global supply.
The eight OPEC+ members have raised production quotas by about 2.9 million barrels per day from April 2025 through December 2025, before pausing increases for January to March 2026. The sub-group holds its next meeting on May 3.
Market analysts have warned that oil prices could hit $150 per barrel if the closure of the strait is prolonged and continues, due to damage to energy assets across the critical Middle East region.
As of the time of this report, Brent crude is trading at $108 per barrel, below the US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude at $109 per barrel.
-
Feature/OPED6 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism10 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz3 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking8 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy3 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking3 years agoSort Codes of UBA Branches in Nigeria
-
Banking3 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports3 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn

2 Comments