Connect with us

Feature/OPED

Adada State: A Dream Deferred, A Justice Demanded

Published

on

Comrade James Ezema Adada State

By James Ezema

“Justice too long delayed is justice denied,” Martin Luther King Jr. once declared. In the rolling hills and fertile valleys of the old Nsukka Division, this maxim is more than an aphorism—it is a living testament to the generations who have watched their hopes for equitable development wither under decades of neglect.

The call for Adada State is not a fleeting political gambit but a deeply rooted cry for fairness that began in earnest with a formal proposal to the National Assembly in 1983. The moment of triumph was almost within reach, only to be snatched away by the military coup of December that year, consigning the people’s dreams to another round of constitutional limbo.

When the old East Central State split into new entities, the seven local government areas of what is now the proposed Adada—Nsukka, Udenu, Igbo-Eze North, Igbo-Eze South, Igbo-Etiti, Uzo-Uwani, Isi-Uzo—found themselves sorely underrepresented.

Despite accounting for over half of Enugu State’s population, these communities have suffered an abysmal shortage of infrastructure, roads riddled with potholes, clinics starved of equipment, and schools forced to operate under tin roofs or in borrowed classrooms. Their neglect stems from a late embrace of Western education during the colonial era and successive administrations that prioritized other zones, leaving the Nsukka people to harness community spirit if they were to see even a single secondary school.

Time and again, panels and commissions—most notably the Mbanefo Panel in 1996—heard the case for Adada. Each time, the logic was unassailable: geographic contiguity, a shared cultural tapestry, unanimous local support. Yet political expediency led to the creation of Ebonyi State, a reuniting of northern Igbo communities whose own historical argument was based on reunification of old Afikpo and Abakaliki provinces. It was a compelling narrative, but one that sidelined an equally compelling plea from the Nsukka Division. Government at the time chose symmetry over equity, yielding a State that served one narrative of justice while leaving another to wait.

Fast forward to March 2006, when the South East caucus of the National Assembly convened a 10-member committee under Senator Ifeanyi Ararume in a hall in Owerri, surrounded by governors, traditional rulers, ethnic leaders, and academics, four state creation proposals vied for supremacy: Aba, Adada, Njaba, and Orashi. When the votes were tallied, it was Adada that emerged with a clear majority. These lawmakers, including Chief Achike Udenwa who hosted the gathering, recognized that the old Nsukka Division’s case transcended parochial interests and embodied the founding principle of bringing government closer to the people. Yet that parliamentary nod never translated into constitutional amendment.

Every subsequent forum reaffirmed the singularity of Adada’s claim. The 2005 Political Reform Conference called by President Obasanjo explicitly recommended an additional state in the South East. The 2014 National Conference under Justice Idris Kutigi reiterated that only Adada had met the stringent criteria laid out in Section 8(1) of the 1999 Constitution, which demands clear geographic boundaries, unified local support, and demonstrable viability. But between nods and inked resolutions, the corridors of power remained unmoved.

On a balmy afternoon in Enugu, during the Senate’s South East Zonal Public Hearing on constitutional review, Chief John Nnia Nwodo stood before senators and dignitaries, every word honed by decades of advocacy. In a presentation hailed as masterful, he unfolded stacks of endorsements from local government chairmen, councillors, state lawmakers, and federal legislators—all affirming unified support for Adada’s creation. He reminded the august gathering that the people of Nsukka are not asking for charity; they are demanding justice as laid out in the nation’s supreme law. Every clause of Section 8(1) has been scratched off, every signature secured, every demographic study accounted for.

He painted a portrait of political disenfranchisement: a lone senator representing a constituency larger than those of his two counterparts combined, LGAs split across senatorial zones by arbitrary redistricting, and a sense that no matter how vociferous the petition, the machinery of state would churn on without pause. He contrasted this travesty with the reality that every other geopolitical zone in Nigeria boasts six states, while the South East limps behind with five. A sixth state is not a luxury—it is the missing piece of a national jigsaw.

Sceptics who question Adada’s viability have never set foot in its communities. They would miss how community-driven initiatives have spurred the construction of scores of secondary schools, clinics, rural electrification projects, and water boreholes. They would fail to see the potential of its rich oil and gas fields, its fertile farmlands stretching toward the Cross River tributaries, and the international reputation of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, as a cradle of enlightenment. These are not backwaters awaiting rescue but vibrant hubs ready to govern themselves effectively.

Support has coalesced across party lines and social strata. Enugu State Governor Peter Mbah has pledged unwavering support, while his predecessor and Igbo political titans like Chief James Ugwu—who traces the first formal plea to 1970, when a youthful committee petitioned General Gowon—underscore the breadth of this pursuit. Even the Enugu State House of Assembly, in a unanimous resolution of April 2008, lent its voice to the chorus. All that remains is for the National Assembly to take up its constitutional duty.

The path forward is indeed simple: amend the 1999 Constitution to insert Adada State as the sixth member of the South East. Transmit the bill in accordance with legislative procedure, channel it to INEC for a referendum among the affected communities, and upon ratification, and recognise Adada as a full-fledged federating unit. No new legal theory is required. No fresh political philosophy must be invented. The Constitution provides the mechanism. The people have supplied the political will.

History will judge the lawmakers who rise to this occasion. They can choose to perpetuate an illsuited status quo that has for too long marginalized the heartland of northern Igbo land, or they can seize this moment to affirm that Nigeria’s promise lies in balancing its diversity, not in perpetuating imbalances.

Adada State is more than lines on a map. It is a symbol of renewed faith in democratic equity, of government returned to the governed, and of a people whose only crime has been an unyielding demand for what they rightfully deserve.

As the National Assembly concludes ongoing public hearing on constitution amendments, let the Senate and the House of Representatives remember that when justice is delayed beyond reason, it is indeed justice denied. Adada has waited for its day in the sun. Today, that day beckons.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature/OPED

NNPC’s $1.42bn, N5.57trn Debt Write-Off and Test of Nigeria’s Fiscal Governance

Published

on

bayo ojulari nnpc

By Blaise Udunze

When the federal government approved the write-off of about $1.42 billion and N5.57 trillion in legacy debts owed by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) to the Federation Account, it was rightly described as a landmark decision. After years of disputes, reconciliations, and contested figures, Nigeria’s most important revenue institution was, at least on paper, given a cleaner slate.

The approval, contained in a report prepared by the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) and presented at the last year November meeting of the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC), effectively wiped out 96 percent of NNPC’s dollar-denominated obligations and 88 percent of its naira liabilities accumulated up to December 31, 2024. It resolved long-standing balances arising from crude oil liftings, joint venture royalties, production-sharing contracts, and related arrangements.

Judging it critically, the decision carries both promise and peril, but can be viewed from the perspective of a country desperate to restore confidence in public finance management. It offers an opportunity to reset relationships, clean up accounting records, and move forward under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA). Yet, it also exposes deep structural weaknesses in Nigeria’s oil revenue governance, weaknesses that, if left unaddressed, could turn today’s debt relief into tomorrow’s fiscal regret.

Context matters. The debt write-off comes not during a period of revenue abundance, but at a time when Nigeria’s upstream revenue performance is under severe strain. According to the same NUPRC document, the commission missed its approved monthly revenue target for November 2025 by N544.76 billion, collecting only N660.04 billion against a projected N1.204 trillion.

Royalty receipts, the backbone of upstream revenue, tell an even starker story. It is alarming that against an approved monthly royalty projection of N1.144 trillion, only N605.26 billion was collected, leaving a shortfall of N538.92 billion. Cumulatively, by the end of November 2025, the revenue gap stood at N5.65 trillion, with royalty collections alone falling short by N5.63 trillion. These figures underscore how fragile Nigeria’s fiscal position remains, even as trillions of naira in historical obligations are being written off.

To be fair, the debts forgiven were not incurred overnight. They are the product of years of disputed remittances, lacking transparent accounting practices, and overlapping institutional roles, particularly under the pre-PIA regime. As petroleum economist Prof. Wumi Iledare has repeatedly observed, the former Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation combined regulatory, commercial, and operational functions, making revenue reconciliation cumbersome and frequently contested.

That legacy continues to haunt the system, as witnessed with the ongoing dispute between NNPC Ltd and Periscope Consulting, the audit firm engaged by the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, over an alleged $42.37 billion under-remittance between 2011 and 2017, which illustrates how unresolved the past remains. Though NNPC insists all revenues were properly accounted for as claimed, Periscope maintains that significant gaps persist, forcing FAAC to mandate yet another reconciliation exercise. This recurring pattern of audits, counterclaims, and stalemates has weakened trust in the federation revenue system and eroded confidence among states that depend on oil proceeds for survival.

Crucially, the debt write-off does not mean NNPC has turned a corner financially. Statutory obligations incurred between January and October 2025 remain on the books, amounting to about $56.8 million and N1.02 trillion. Although part of the dollar component was recovered during the period under review, the accumulation of new liabilities so soon after reconciliation raises uncomfortable questions about whether old habits are being replaced with genuine fiscal discipline.

More troubling still is what NNPC’s own audited financial statements reveal about its internal financial health. Despite recording a profit after tax of N5.4 trillion on revenues of N45.1 trillion in 2024, the company’s inter-company debts ballooned to N30.3 trillion, representing a 70 per cent increase within a single year. This is not debt owed to external creditors but largely obligations between NNPC and its subsidiaries, effectively the company owing itself.

Records show that of 32 subsidiaries, only eight are debt-free, and the rest, particularly the refineries, trading arms, and gas infrastructure units, remain heavily indebted to the parent company. There was a recurring cycle where profitable units subsidise chronically underperforming ones, and accountability steadily erodes because cash that should fund maintenance, expansion, and efficiency improvements is instead trapped in internal receivables.

The refineries offer a stark illustration whereby the Port Harcourt Refining Company alone owed N4.22 trillion in 2024, more than double its 2023 figure, while Kaduna and Warri refineries followed closely, with debts of N2.39 trillion and N2.06 trillion respectively. Despite the repeated failed turnaround maintenance with many years of rehabilitation spending, none have operated sustainably at commercially viable levels. Their continued dependence on financial support from the parent company highlights the cost of postponing difficult restructuring decisions.

And, for this reason, international observers have long warned about these structural weaknesses. One of the critics, the World Bank, has repeatedly flagged NNPC as a major source of revenue leakages. It further noted that the persistent gaps between reported earnings and actual remittances to the Federation Account. Even after the removal of petrol subsidies, the bank observed that NNPC remitted only about 50 per cent of the revenue gains, using the rest to offset past arrears. Such practices, while perhaps defensible in internal cash management terms, undermine fiscal transparency and weaken Nigeria’s macroeconomic credibility.

This is why the central issue is not the debt write-off itself, but what follows it because debt forgiveness is not reform. Without firm safeguards, it risks entrenching the very behaviours that created the problem in the first place. As Prof. Omowumi Iledare has warned, the scale and pace of the inter-company debt build-up represent a governance test rather than a mere accounting anomaly. Allowing subsidiaries to operate indefinitely without settling obligations is incompatible with the idea of a commercially driven national oil company.

The fact remains that if NNPC wants to function as a true commercial holding company under the PIA, it must enforce strict settlement timelines, restructure or divest non-viable subsidiaries, while clearly separating legacy debts from new obligations. With this, it holds subsidiary leadership accountable for cash flow and profitability. Independent, real-time audits and transparent reporting must become routine features of governance, not emergency responses triggered by controversy.

There is also a broader national implication. At a time when Nigerians are being asked to accept higher taxes, reduced subsidies, and fiscal tightening, large-scale debt write-offs without visible accountability risk undermining the legitimacy of the entire revenue system. Citizens cannot be expected to bear heavier burdens while systemic inefficiencies in the country’s most strategic sector persist.

Of a truth, the cancellation of NNPC’s legacy debts could mark a turning point in Nigeria’s fiscal governance, but only if it is not treated as its conclusion but the beginning of reform.

If discipline, transparency, and commercial accountability follow, the decision may yet help reposition NNPC as a profitable, credible, and PIA-compliant institution. If not, today’s clean slate will simply defer the reckoning until the next reconciliation, the next audit dispute, and the next fiscal crisis.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

Taxation Without Representation

Published

on

Austin Orette Taxation Without Representation

By Dr Austin Orette

The grandiosity of Nigerians when they discuss events and situations can be very funny. If the leaders use this kind of creativity in proffering solutions, we may be able to solve some of the problems that plague Nigeria perennially.

There seems to be a sublime affectation for new lingos when the system is being set to punish Nigerians. It is a kind of Orwellian speak.

Recently, there was no electricity throughout the country. The usual culprit and government spoke; people came out to tell us the power failure was due to the collapse of the National grid. Does it really matter what is collapsing? This is just an attempt by some government bureaucrats to sound intelligent.

Intelligence is becoming a borrowed commodity from the IMF or World Bank. What does it mean when you tell Nigerians that the national grid collapsed? Is that supposed to be a reassurance, or it is said to give the assurance that they know something about the anemic electricity, and we should get used to the darkness. This is a language that is vague and beckons the consumer to stop complaining. Does that statement mean anything to Nigerians who pay bills and don’t see the electricity they paid for? If they see it, it comes with an irregular voltage that destroys their newly purchased appliances. Just tell or stay quiet like in the past.

Telling us that a grid collapse is a lie. We have no national grid. Do these people know how silly their language sounds? Nigeria produces less than 10,000 megawatts of electricity for a population of 200 million people. How do you permutate this to give constant electricity to 200 million people? It is an insult to call this low output a national grid. What is so national about using a generator to supply electricity to 200 million people? It is simple mathematics. If you calculate this to the minute, it should not surprise you that every Nigerian will receive electricity for the duration of the blink of an eye. They are paying for total darkness, and someone is telling them they have an electricity grid.

If you can call the 10,000-megawatt national grid collapsed, it means you don’t have the mind set to solve the electricity problem in Nigeria.

To put it in perspective is to understand the basic fact that the electrical output of Nigeria is pre-industrial. Without acknowledging this fact, we will never find solutions as every mediocre will come and confuse Nigeria with lingos that make them sound important.

It is very shameful for those in the know to always use grandiose language to obfuscate the real issues.

South Africa with a population of sixty million produces about 200,000 megawatts of electricity daily. Nigeria produces less than 10,000 megawatts. Why South Africa makes it easy to lift the poor from poverty, Nigeria is trying to tax the poor into poverty.

The architects of the new tax plan saw the poor as rich because they could afford a generator.

A non-existent subsidy was removed, and the price of fuel went through the roof. Now the government says they are rich. What will they get in return for this tax extraction? Why do successive Nigerian governments always think the best way to develop Nigeria is to slap the poor into poverty? What are the avenues for upward mobility when youth corps members are suddenly seen as rich taxpayers? Do these people know how difficult it is to start a business in Nigeria?

After all the rigmarole from Abuja to my village, I cannot get a government certificate without a-shake down from government bureaucrats and area boys. The government that is so unfriendly to business wants to tax my non-existing businesses. Are these people in their right state of mind? Why do they think that taxing the poor is their best revenue plan? A plan like this can only come from a group of people who have no inkling of what Nigerians are going through. People can’t eat and the government is asking them to share their meager rations with potbellied people in Abuja.

Teach the people how to fish, then you can share in their harvest. If an individual does what the government is doing to Nigerians, it will be called robbery, and the individual will be in prison. When the government taxes people, there is a reciprocal exchange. What is being done in Nigeria does not represent fair exchange.

Nigerians have never gotten anything good from their government except individual wealth that is doled out in Abuja for the selected few.

The question is, will Nigerians have a good electricity supply? NO. Will they have security of persons and properties? No. Will they have improved health care? NO. Will there be good roads? No. Will they have good schools and good education? No.

Taxation is not good governance. A policy like this should never be rushed without adequate studies. Once again, our legislators have let us down. They have never shown the people the reason they were elected and to be re-elected. They are not playing their roles as the watchdog and representatives of the people. Anyone who voted for this tax bill deserves to lose their positions as Senators and Members of the House of Representatives.

We are not in a military regime anymore. Nigerians must start learning how to exercise their franchise. This taxation issue must be litigated at the ballot box. The members of the National Assembly have shown by their assent that they don’t represent the people.

In a normal democracy, taxation without representation should never be tolerated. They must be voted out of office. We have a responsibility and duty to use our voting power to fight unjust laws. Taxation without representation is unjust. Those voted into power will never respect the citizens until the citizens learn to punish errant politicians by voting them out of office. This responsibility is sacred and must be exercised with diligence.

Dr Austin Orette writes from Houston, Texas

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

Why GOtv Continues to Shape Nigeria’s Home Entertainment Culture

Published

on

GOtv Logo

For many Nigerian families, GOtv has become more than a television service. It is part of the daily routine. It is what people unwind with after a long day, what keeps children entertained on quiet weekend mornings, and what brings households together during football matches, movie nights, and festive celebrations. Over the years, GOtv has blended naturally into these everyday moments, shaping the way Nigerians enjoy entertainment at home.

Here are some of the reasons GOtv continues to stand out.

1. Local Content That Feels Like Home

Nigerians love stories that reflect their lives, and GOtv delivers this consistently. With Africa Magic, ROK, and other local channels, viewers enjoy Nollywood movies, relatable dramas, reality shows, and lifestyle programming that speak their language. These are familiar faces, familiar stories, and familiar experiences. GOtv understands the value of cultural connection and continues to invest in the content viewers care about.

2. Affordable Packages That Work for Real Families

GOtv has built its reputation on affordability. With packages designed for different budgets, families can enjoy quality entertainment without financial pressure. Some of the affordable packages on GOtv include GOtv Jinja, GOtv Jolli, GOtv Max, GOtv Supa, GOtv Supa Plus. This balance of good content at a comfortable price is a major reason GOtv remains a trusted household name across Nigeria.

3. A Channel Lineup That Has Something for Everyone

The beauty of GOtv is its range. Children enjoy their cartoons and animated shows, parents relax with movies and telenovelas, sports lovers stay connected to live games and highlights, and music and lifestyle channels keep the energy lively. Whether it is catching up on the news, finding something light after work, or choosing a family movie for the weekend, GOtv fits naturally into everyday Nigerian life.

4. Programming That Matches Our Daily Rhythm

GOtv understands the way Nigerians watch television. Weeknights come with easy to follow entertainment, weekends offer longer movies and marathons, and festive seasons arrive with special programming that brings everyone together. The schedule is practical, familiar, and aligned with the pace of Nigerian homes.

5. Easy Access Across the Country

From major cities to smaller communities, GOtv remains reliable and easy to use. Installation is straightforward, navigation is simple for both adults and children, and the service works seamlessly across the country. Even when life gets busy, GOtv makes it easy to stay connected, subscribers can pay and reconnect instantly without long processes or penalties, picking up right where they left off.

With relatable content, pocket-friendly pricing, and a channel lineup built around real Nigerian lifestyles, GOtv has earned its place in homes across the country. As the entertainment landscape evolves, GOtv continues to grow with its viewers, shaping how Nigerians watch, share, and enjoy moments together every day.

Continue Reading

Trending