Connect with us

General

Light Deprivation Greenhouse Systems in Controlled Agricultural and Industrial Operations

Published

on

tmg industrial

Controlled agriculture has expanded in Canada due to demand for reliable crop production and efficient land use. Climate variability and short growing seasons create challenges for agricultural producers and industrial cultivation facilities. A Light Deprivation Two Layer Cover Greenhouse Grow Tent provides a structured solution that allows operators to regulate light exposure, temperature, and environmental conditions. These systems are increasingly used in agricultural operations that require predictable crop cycles and controlled growing environments.

For warehouse managers, logistics planners, and agricultural equipment operators, greenhouse structures represent an important part of modern agricultural infrastructure. They help maintain consistent production schedules and support supply chain planning for agricultural products.

Role in Canadian Agricultural and Industrial Context

Canada has a diverse agricultural landscape that includes greenhouse farming, research facilities, and controlled cultivation environments. Because natural daylight hours change significantly across seasons, producers often rely on light management techniques to maintain predictable crop growth cycles. Light deprivation greenhouse systems allow operators to simulate shorter daylight periods when required.

These structures are used in several operational settings:

  • Commercial greenhouse farms
  • Controlled cultivation facilities
  • Agricultural research stations
  • Specialty crop production environments
  • Seed development programs

Technology and Operating Principles

Light deprivation greenhouses use layered covering materials to regulate sunlight exposure. The outer layer allows natural light to enter the structure during normal growing periods. A secondary blackout layer can be deployed to block external light and simulate night conditions when required for plant development cycles.

Manufacturers such as TMG Industrial design these systems to support environmental control while maintaining structural stability in outdoor conditions.

Key Structural Components

  • Steel support frame
  • Transparent greenhouse covering
  • Blackout light deprivation layer
  • Ventilation openings
  • Anchoring and structural support system

Operational Efficiency and Production Planning

Controlled greenhouse environments support predictable crop production schedules. By managing light exposure, producers can influence plant growth stages and improve crop consistency.

  • Extended growing seasons
  • Improved crop scheduling
  • Better environmental control
  • Reduced dependence on natural daylight patterns

These advantages can help agricultural operations maintain steady supply levels for distribution networks.

Technical Considerations for Installation

Successful greenhouse installation depends on several technical factors. Operators must evaluate site conditions, climate exposure, and environmental control requirements.

  • Ground stability and site preparation
  • Wind and weather exposure
  • Ventilation and airflow management
  • Water and irrigation access
  • Sunlight orientation and positioning

Safety and Operational Best Practices

Greenhouse structures must be installed and maintained carefully to ensure safe working conditions. Workers often operate equipment and perform crop management tasks within the structure.

  • Inspect structural connections regularly
  • Secure anchoring systems before operation
  • Maintain clear walkways for workers
  • Monitor ventilation to prevent heat buildup
  • Provide training for greenhouse equipment use

Supporting Equipment and Accessories

Greenhouse operations often require additional systems that support plant cultivation and facility management.

  • Irrigation systems
  • Climate monitoring sensors
  • Ventilation fans
  • Grow lighting systems
  • Plant support structures

Advantages and Limitations

Light deprivation greenhouse systems provide flexible cultivation environments that help improve agricultural productivity.

  • Control of plant light exposure
  • Improved production planning
  • Adaptability for different crop types
  • Protection from weather exposure

However, greenhouse structures require ongoing monitoring and maintenance. Environmental conditions such as wind or heavy snow may affect structural performance if proper installation procedures are not followed.

Operational Example from Controlled Agriculture

A greenhouse cultivation facility in British Columbia implemented a light deprivation system to improve crop scheduling. By controlling daily light exposure, the operation was able to create multiple harvest cycles within a single season. This adjustment improved production consistency and supported distribution planning for regional agricultural supply networks.

Conclusion and Future Industry Trends

Light deprivation greenhouse systems have become important tools for modern controlled agriculture. By enabling precise environmental control, these structures help producers maintain stable production levels and respond to market demand. As agricultural technology continues to evolve, future greenhouse systems may integrate automated environmental controls, advanced climate monitoring, and improved structural materials to support more efficient cultivation practices.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

General

SERAP Urges Tinubu to Probe Alleged N6.79bn Diversion in Police, Ministry

Published

on

SERAP

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged President Bola Tinubu to order a probe into the alleged diversion, disappearance and misapplication of more than N6.79 billion in public funds within the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) and the Federal Ministry of Police Affairs.

The grave allegations are documented in the latest Annual Report of the Auditor-General of the Federation published on September 9, 2025.

SERAP said, “Anyone suspected to be responsible—including contractors, companies and public officials implicated in the report—should be promptly prosecuted, while all missing public funds, firearms and ammunition should be fully recovered, secured and properly accounted for.”

In the letter dated August 1, 2026, and signed by SERAP deputy director, Mr Kolawole Oluwadare, the organisation said: “The Auditor-General’s findings suggest a grave betrayal of the public trust and raise serious concerns about corruption and the management of public funds, police exhibits, firearms and ammunition.”

SERAP said: “The report also raises serious concerns over missing firearms and ammunition, the unauthorised use and release of police exhibits, failures to properly account for exhibits, and the insecure storage of firearms, creating significant risks to public safety and national security.”

According to the group, “The diversion of funds meant for policing, abandoned security projects, missing firearms and ammunition, and the misuse of police exhibits undermine the operational effectiveness of the Nigeria Police Force, weaken public confidence and may contribute to Nigeria’s worsening insecurity.”

The letter, read in part: “The report documented numerous alleged financial irregularities within the Nigeria Police Force and the Federal Ministry of Police Affairs, including payments for projects that were never executed, abandoned contracts, inflated contract costs, and irregular procurement.”

“The report also documented unretired cash advances, unsettled insurance claims, payments for services allegedly not rendered, and other suspected diversion and misapplication of public funds amounting to over ₦6.79 billion.”

“The allegations also include missing firearms and ammunition, the unauthorised use and release of police exhibits, failures to properly account for recovered firearms and other exhibits, and the insecure storage of firearms, posing serious risks to public safety and national security.”

“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall consider appropriate legal action to compel your government to comply with our request in the public interest.”

Some of the others include: N499,875,500.00 for the construction of Police College Phase II, Bashar, Plateau State; N12,931,000.00 for the rehabilitation of Block B, Department of Logistics and Supply (Works) building, Garki; N111,635,864.64 for the construction of 12 one-bedroom transit camp units and rehabilitation of the administration block at the NPF Pre-retirement Skills Acquisition Centre, Kudana, Kaduna State; N4,011,627.89 inserted as taxes to inflate a contract; N1,938,299,452.00 for 14 ongoing projects that were abandoned; N5,050,000.00 in monetary exhibits released without proper authorisation; N112,026,424.00 for outstanding allowances paid to officers to cover 2020 liabilities; and N6,000,000.00 as annual payment to the Inspector General of Police’s Senior Special Assistant on Revenue and Tax Matters.

Others include N10,080,000.00 as cash advances for the provision of office equipment and accessories for the NPF Database Management Centre; N438,066,845.73 for the supply of bulletproof vests, ballistic helmets and procurement of a Styr Punch Vistar troop carrier; N18,000,000.00 for the training of women in cosmetology and provision of empowerment kits in Ondo Central Senatorial District, Ondo State; N258,989,999.75 for the procurement of 10 JAC patrol vehicles for NPF outpost stations in Kano State; N30,853,250.00 as security allowances for personnel attached to the Ministry of Police Affairs; N681,406,593.18 for the settlement of insurance claims through insurance brokers; N1,628,108,434.18 for outstanding insurance policy liabilities for 2020/2021; N57,484,515.30 for the procurement of video cameras, customised umbrellas, gift bags and customised towels for the Nigeria Police Force Public Relations Office; N7,760,409.56 in withholding tax and value added tax that was not deducted from contracts awarded.

Continue Reading

General

N68.7m Contract: Court Sentences ex-Reps Member With N50,000 Fine Option

Published

on

Onamusi Onadeko N68.7m contract

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

A former member of the House of Representatives, Mr Onamusi Onadeko, has been sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment with an option of a fine of N50,000.

The former lawmaker, who represented Ogun East Federal Constituency in the National Assembly from 1999 to 2003, was sentenced by Justice Chizoba Oji of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja on Thursday, July 30, 2026.

He was found guilty on count 11 and convicted for making inconsistent statements but discharged and acquitted on counts 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Mr Onadeko’s journey to the court started in 2017, when he was charged by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) for his alleged involvement in the award and execution of a N68.7 million contract.

The politician, according to a statement from the ICPC, was accused of using his private companies, Stanton Engineering Limited and Haines and Baines Limited, to execute several constituency projects while working as a Senior Legislative Aide to late Senator Buruji Kashamu, who represented Ogun East Senatorial District between 2015 and 2019.

The commission, had in the course of the eight years trial told the court that several contracts like buying of ambulance vehicles, supply of hospital equipment and drugs for Primary Health Centres, as well as construction of classrooms for some selected schools in six communities of Ogun East Senatorial District, were awarded to both Stanton Engineering Limited and Haines and Baines, where the convict doubles as a Managing Director and nominal Director, respectively, an action that violates Sections 12 and 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

ICPC also accused Mr Onadeko of making an inconsistent statement that contradicted the one previously made to the Commissioner for Oaths, where he stated that he is a Director of Haines and Baines Limited in an affidavit dated June 30, 20216, but subsequently wrote another statement while under investigation on May 5, 2017, that he is not a shareholder or Director of Haines and Baines Limited.

This action violates Section 25(1)(b) of the ICPC Act and, upon conviction, is liable to a fine not exceeding N100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both such fine and imprisonment.

However, Mr Onadeko, through his counsel, Mr Wahab Olatoyebi, argued in the course of the trial that his client was not a public officer as his appointment at that material time was on a short-term basis and non-pensionable, hence he, (Onadeko) did not fall within the category of those that could be tried under Sections 12 and 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000 which criminalize and punish abuse of office by public officers.

But this argument was rejected by Justice Oji, who stressed that based on the defendant’s letter of appointment as well as the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Federal Government of Nigeria v. Farouk Lawan, legislative aides are public officers and therefore could be prosecuted under the relevant provisions of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

Continue Reading

General

Makinde Inaugurates Judicial Panel to Probe Oriire School Abduction

Published

on

makinde oriire Judicial Panel

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Governor of Oyo State, Mr Seyi Makinde, has inaugurated a Judicial Commission of Inquiry to investigate the abduction of students and teachers from Esinele and Yawota communities in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State.

The governor formally inaugurated the commission at the Executive Council Chamber of the Governor’s Office, Secretariat, Agodi, Ibadan.

Speaking at the event, Governor Makinde said that although the successful rescue of the victims brought relief to the state, it did not provide complete closure.

He explained that the decision to set up an independent commission was not intended to undermine the efforts of security agencies but to ensure that every question surrounding the incident is thoroughly addressed and lessons are learnt to prevent a recurrence.

He charged members of the commission to conduct a thorough, impartial, and evidence-based investigation, assuring them of the state government’s full support. He also called on individuals and relevant institutions to cooperate fully with the panel.

Speaking on behalf of the commission, its chairman, Professor Mojeed Owoade, pledged that members would carry out the assignment with integrity, professionalism, and fairness. He added that the panel would seek an extension if necessary to complete its work.

Governor Makinde gave the commission four weeks to submit its report.

Earlier this month, the pupils and teachers abducted in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State regained their freedom after 56 days in captivity.

According to the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Mr Bayo Onanuga, eight of the kidnappers had been arrested, but the Federal High Court in Abuja on July 23 sentenced three suspects in the abduction to life imprisonment.

According to the court, the sentencing of Mr Abdulrazak Umar, known under the alias Abu Khalifa/Abu Khalid; Mr Yunusa Musa, alias Yunusa Bin Musa; and Mr Shamsu Adamu Sani, alias Abu Itisar, will start from the date of their arrest.

Before their sentencing by Justice Salim Ibrahim, counsel for the defendants pleaded with the court to sentence them on liberal terms, adding that they were first-time offenders and had pleaded guilty.

Continue Reading