Connect with us

General

Oyegun Replies Tinubu

Published

on

tinubu-oyegun

By Ebitonye Akpodigha

National Chairman of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Mr John Odigie-Oyegun, has described allegation of fraud made against him by the national leader of the party, Mr Bola Tinubu, as a “reckless falsehood.”

In his formal response to the letter issued from Mr Tinubu’s Media Office, the APC chairman said all he did was to be fair to all members of the party.

Mr Oyegun admitted that the outcome of the party’s 2016 Ondo State governorship primary has led to issues in the APC.

Below is Mr Oyegun’s reply to Mr Tinubu’s letter.

THE FACTS – 2016 ONDO STATE APC GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION PRIMARIES

The outcome of the All Progressives Congress (APC) 2016 Ondo State Governorship Primary Election has led to disagreements among some Party stakeholders in the state and at the national level. The ripples from the controversy over the election have unfortunately dragged our great party on to the front pages of newspapers for the wrong reasons.

Recently, the media office of Bola Tinubu falsely and recklessly accused me of corruption, rigging the outcome of the 2016 Ondo State APC governorship election primaries and overruling the Party’s National Working Committee (NWC) “vote” on the 2016 Ondo State APC Governorship Primary Election Appeal Committee Report.

In view of the misinformation and false reports that have been fed to the media and that have pervaded the public space, there is need to set the records straight. Below are factual responses to the salient points and allegations made by the media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu in its statement.

ALLEGATION

The media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu in its statement alleged that I overruled the NWC’s vote of “six against five” in favour of cancelling the primary election results and conducting another primary.

FACT

According to the minutes of the 18th emergency meeting of the APC NWC held from Monday 19th September 2016 to Thursday 22nd September, 2016 at the Party’s National Secretariat in Abuja, there was absolutely no meeting which I chaired that voted in the manner alleged. Clearly, the report on which the media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu acted was a figment of someone’s wild imagination.

On Thursday 22nd September, 2016 being the final day for submission of candidate by Political Parties, the NWC discussed the possibility of voting having finished deliberation on the2016 Ondo State APC Governorship Primary Election Appeal Committee Report because members in support of cancelling the Primary results were still strident in their position.

A member of the NWC however drew the attention of the meeting to its previous decision in which the report of the Primary Election Committee was adopted while the Appeal Committee was set aside. The implication of this decision he reasoned was that a decision to submit the name of the winner of the primary election was already taken unless the NWC will now wish to reconsider its earlier decision.

I agreed with this and ruled that the previous decision of the NWC be upheld.

ALLEGATION

The media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu in its statement also alleged that the names of “over 150 valid delegates were excised to make room for an equal number of impostors”.

FACT

The Ondo State approved delegates list was compiled in strict compliance with the Party’s constitution. Only qualified delegates were included in the list. Moreso, none of the aspirants or the Appeal Committee has submitted to NWC a list of delegates who were not qualified to be included in the delegates list but were listed as delegates or presumed qualified delegates who were not included in the delegates list used for the Primary.

ALLEGATION

The media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu in its statement alleged that I used a “prayer interlude” which I initiated to “secretly excuse” myself from the NWC meeting to submit the name of Rotimi Akeredolu, SAN, to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as the candidate of the Party.

FACT

The allegation is high fiction and an insult to the intelligence and sensibility of the respected NWC members present at the meeting. We do not and have never engaged in prayer interludes/sessions outside the usual opening and closing prayers. The prayer that is being referred to must be the closing prayer for the meeting.

ALLEGATION

The media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu in its statement accused me of bribery and corruption over the outcome of the Ondo State APC governorship election primaries.“Oyegun has dealt a heavy blow to the very party he professes to lead. It is an awful parent who suffocates his own child for the sake of a few naira.” The statement issued by media office of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu read.

FACT

This reckless and baseless corruption allegation levelled against me is unfortunate and an insult to my person and my hard-earned reputation which I have strongly maintained. Nobody has the kind of money that can buy my conscience or make me do injury to an innocent man. In all the primaries conducted under my watch as National Chairman, I have strived to ensure a free, fair, transparent and credible process. The 2016 Ondo State APC Governorship Primary Election was not an exception. There must be internal democracy in the Party and our constitution must be respected by all.

APPEAL COMMITTEE REPORT

The Party’s NWC decision to reject the 2016 Ondo State APC Governorship Primary Election Appeal Committee Report was taken on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 in executive session after careful and exhaustive deliberations. The minutes and rejection were confirmed by the NWC on Thursday, September 22, 2016.

The NWC in its four-point resolution rejected the Appeal Committee’s recommendation on the grounds that the report was fundamentally and fatally flawed. The NWC observed that the Appeal Committee contradicted itself when it admitted in its report, “In making the above recommendations one is not unmindful of the fact that there may have been substantial compliance in the conduct of the exercise.” but still proceeded to recommend the nullification of the Primary election.

The NWC in its four-point resolution faulted the failure of the Appeal Committee to invite the National Secretariat as the custodian, to authenticate or otherwise the source of the disputed delegates list. Also, the Appeal Committee did not invite the Chairman or members of the Ondo State Governorship Primary Election Committee to clarify issues relating to the allegation of manipulation of the accreditation process. The Appeal Committee rather relied totally on unsubstantiated evidence(s) in the petitions it received to recommend the nullification of the Primary. This is against the principle of natural justice and fair hearing.

The NWC equally observed a serious contradiction in the Appeal Committee’s report in respect of the number of the accredited delegates. Whereas the Primary Election Committee’s report indicated that 2,774 delegates were accredited, the Appeal Committee’s report erroneously recorded it as those who voted in the election, thereby acting under the false impression that there was over voting in the exercise. The actual total number of votes cast was 2,754, as clearly recorded in the Primary Election Committee’s report.

The issue of fresh primaries did not arise as NWC had already rejected the Appeal Committee’s report in view of the stated flaws and upheld the election. In any case, any fresh primary was already time barred. By the timetable released by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), all governorship primaries and issues related ended on September 19, 2016.

Also, voting on the issue became unnecessary and never took place in view of the NWC’s rejection of the Appeal Committee’s report.

The foregoing are facts backed by the minutes approved by all NWC members that attended the meetings held in respect of 2016 Ondo State APC Governorship Primary Election Appeal Committee Report.

It needs to be stated categorically that the NWC is confident that the Chairman of the Ondo State APC Governorship Primary Election Committee, Abubakar Badaru, Executive Governor of Jigawa State conducted a credible and exemplary exercise. We indeed commend the Governor and his team for their transparency and the free and fair manner the primaries was conducted.

Going forward, I appeal very passionately to leaders and members of the Party at all levels to explore internal dispute resolution mechanisms in addressing their perceived grievances instead of resorting to the media to vent their spleen.

There are enormous challenges in delivering on the Party’s 2015 election promises to Nigerians. On the immediate horizon is the task of winning the governorship election in Ondo state. We cannot afford to be distracted by the present contentions.

I wish to assure Party members that despite the media attention that has been generated by the disagreements in the aftermath of the 2016 Ondo State Governorship Primary Election, the Party is focused on the task ahead and we urge our Party leaders and teeming supporters to also remain calm. The Party has already commenced wide consultations with stakeholders with a view to resolving the political differences that still exist. Hurling brickbats cannot help the cause of the party in any way.

The APC national leadership remains united and solidly committed to the task of winning the Ondo state governorship election to save the people of the state from the misrule of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Dipo Olowookere is a journalist based in Nigeria that has passion for reporting business news stories. At his leisure time, he watches football and supports 3SC of Ibadan. Mr Olowookere can be reached via dipo.olowookere@businesspost.ng

General

FG Calls for Alternative Energy Sources to Drive Nigeria’s Maritime Industry

Published

on

Adegboyega Oyetola

By Adedapo Adesanya

The federal government has called for the adoption of alternative energy sources in the maritime industry to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, warning that Africa could face severe economic impacts if left behind in the global transition.

The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Mr Adegboyega Oyetola, made this call in Abuja while declaring open the African Strategic Summit on Shipping Decarbonization.

He cautioned that the ongoing shift to low-emission shipping fuels could increase transport costs for Africa, disproportionately affecting developing nations.

“With over 90 per cent of global trade relying on maritime transport, reducing GHG emissions is not just an environmental necessity but an economic imperative,” Mr Oyetola stated.

He stressed the need for Africa to have a strong voice in shaping global policies. “As the IMO advances its regulatory framework on decarbonization, Africa must ensure its interests are safeguarded, as we rely heavily on imports and contribute less than 2 per cent to the global fleet,” he said.

Highlighting the potential benefits of the transition, Mr Oyetola urged African nations to leverage the shift towards cleaner energy to boost industrialization.

“With 38 coastal nations, Africa can use this transition to develop its ports as launch pads for economic growth by engaging the Global North in strategic partnerships,” he added.

The Minister emphasized the need for a just and equitable transition, ensuring that no African nation is left behind.

“While we recognize the urgency of climate action, developing economies face challenges such as limited access to technology, energy poverty, and food insecurity. The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities must guide our approach,” he said.

Also, Director General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, NIMASA, Mr Dayo Mobereola, reinforced the urgency of decarbonization.

“The shipping industry contributes about 3 per cent of global emissions. This summit is a platform for Africa to shape a strategy that ensures sustainable maritime development without being disadvantaged,” he noted.

Continue Reading

General

JUST IN: Ayobo-Ipaja LCDA Chairman Bolatito Shobowale Dies

Published

on

bolatito shobowale Ayobo-Ipaja LCDA

By Dipo Olowookere

The Chairman of Ayobo-Ipaja Local Council Development Area (LCDA), Mrs Bolatito Shobowale, has died, Business Post has confirmed.

She passed away on Friday after a prolonged battle with illness and three days after her deputy, Mr Ladi Oluwaloni, was asked to become the acting chairman of the council due to her long absence from work.

Mrs Shobowale had been away from her office for about six months, preventing the presentation of the 2025 budget to the council lawmakers for approval.

There had been underground grumbling within the LCDA until Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu stepped in and approved the appointment of Mr Oluwaloni as the acting chairman.

Recent council activities had been carried out without the deceased, including the welcoming of the Governor Advisory Council (GAC) led by Mr Femi Pedro and the presentation of work tools to some residents who completed an empowerment programme sponsored by the state government.

Reacting to the death of Mrs Shobowale, the chairman of Alimosho Local Government Area, Mr Jelili Sulaimon, said she would be missed.

Mr Sulaimon, in a statement signed by his media aide, Mr Babatunde Yusuf, described the deceased, fondly called Mama Show, as a mother to all and a good administrator who is ever willing to see Ayobo-Ipaja LCDA progress positively.

According to him, Mrs Shobowale, elected into office in 2021, committed herself to the growth and development of council until her death.

Continue Reading

General

Expert Guidance And Legal Support: How Legallypass Simplifies Citizenship Applications

Published

on

Legallypass

Legallypass is a legal advisory firm that treats citizenship applications as a strategic process rather than just paperwork, recognizing that every detail can influence the outcome. As global mobility becomes a priority for many, the demand for second passports is rising. Yet, despite this growing interest, obtaining citizenship is rarely straightforward – each country has its own legal intricacies, shifting policies, and procedural hurdles that can complicate the process.

Those exploring Legallypass reviews are often looking for more than just guidance; they want solutions that anticipate challenges and prevent costly delays.Therefore, we encourage you to find out whether it is possible to get such help by cooperating with this migration company.

Why legal support matters in citizenship applications

Many assume that following official instructions is enough to secure approval, but Eurostat statistics tell a different story. For example, in Germany, around 30% of citizenship requests were denied in recent years due to insufficient language skills, lack of financial stability, or incomplete paperwork. In France, the rejection rate fluctuates between 10-15%, with many cases failing due to missing documents or failure to demonstrate sufficient integration into society.

This highlights a critical issue – EU citizenship applications are often more than just formalities. Each country has its own evolving criteria, and even minor mistakes can lead to delays or outright denial of documents. This is howLegallypass reviews showhow professional help can make the difference between approval and rejection.

Handling complex cases: How Legallypass helps where clients struggle

Legallypass provides structured assistance for cases that demand extra attention, ensuring clients meet official criteria without unnecessary delays. Below are some of the key services available for applicants facing procedural or legal complexities:

  • Assistance with retrieving documents for repatriation – researching archival records to confirm ancestral ties and provide legally recognized proof of heritage.
  • Legal representation for document submission – a company lawyer can either accompany the client to immigration offices or submit the paperwork on their behalf under a power of attorney.
  • Certified translation and notarization services – preparing official documents in the required language and verifying authenticity through notarization.
  • Support in obtaining internal documents – helping clients secure identification such as an internationally recognized driver’s license, if they already hold a valid permit.

Legallypass reviews often highlight the firm’s role in resolving non-standard cases where conventional approaches may not be sufficient.

Legallypass citizenship applications

Legallypass reviews: What clients say about their experience

Legallypass reviews frequently mention how the company structures the citizenship application process to minimize confusion. Many clients highlight clear communication, noting that responses are timely and provide concrete steps rather than generic advice. Others appreciate the transparency in pricing, as unexpected fees can be a common concern in the industry.

Another key theme in Legallypass reviews is the firm’s adaptability. Some applicants faced sudden document requests or shifting policies but found that the company quickly adjusted their application strategy to meet new requirements.

Beyond efficiency, Legallypass reviews also emphasize the value of delegating administrative work. Clients describe how legal representatives handle official submissions, reducing their need for direct involvement. While every citizenship application is unique, the consistent feedback suggests that professional support eases the process, especially when complications arise.

Ultimately, the Legallypass reviews suggest that clients value not just the final result. Most often, the emphasis is onhow the firm overcomes challenges along the way.

Continue Reading

Trending