Connect with us

General

PHOTOS: 35 Lagos Lawmakers in Court to Back Speaker Meranda

Published

on

35 Lagos Lawmakers2

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

On Friday, February 28, 2025, 35 members of the 40-member Lagos State House of Assembly were at the Lagos State High Court for the hearing of a case brought against the parliament by the former Speaker, Mr Mudashiru Obasa.

On January 13, 2025, 36 members of the Assembly impeached Mr Obasa while he was in the United States of America (USA) and elected his deputy, Mrs Mojisola Meranda, to replace him.

Mr Obasa was not happy about this, filing a suit to challenge his removal from office because he claimed it was illegal.

On Thursday, he made his first appearance at the Lagos Assembly after his impeachment accompanied by heavily-armed security operatives.

At the hearing of his suit today, the 35 lawmakers loyal to Mrs Meranda were in court to show support for her.

In the application dated February 12, 2025, and filed by his lawyer, Mr Afolabi Fashanu (SAN), the plaintiff claimed that he was removed from his position on January 13, 2025, by 36 lawmakers while he was out of the country.

At the time of filing this report, the lawmakers had taken their seats in preparation for the hearing.

The new Speaker is being represented by Mr Tayo Oyetibo (SAN), Mr Olu Daramola (SAN), Mr Femi Falana (SAN), Mr. Muiz Banire (SAN), Mrs Abimbola Akeredolu (SAN), Dr Dada Awosika (SAN), Prof. Dayo Amokaye (SAN), Mr Mofe Oyetibo (SAN), Mr Olumide Oyewole and Mr Wunmi Okeremi.

Meanwhile, the House, through a statement issued by its spokesman, Mr Steve Ogundipe, on Friday, has condemned what it described as an invasion on Thursday, saying, “The Lagos State House of Assembly wishes to bring to the attention of Lagosians, Nigerians, and the global community an incident that occurred on Thursday, involving an unsanctioned attempt to convene a plenary session by the former Speaker, Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa, alongside three members.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the rules governing plenary sessions of the House are clear. A valid sitting requires a formal notice to all members, the presence of a quorum, an approved agenda, and the mace—an essential symbol of legislative authority.

“None of these procedural requirements was met during the purported session, with only 5 out of 40 members present, rendering it unconstitutional and without legislative effect.

The statement added that the House remains steadfast in upholding the integrity of the legislature and is committed to maintaining the highest parliamentary standards.

“As an institution dedicated to the progress and development of Lagos State, we shall continue to act within the confines of the law to protect and preserve democratic governance.

“Furthermore, we reaffirm our unwavering support for the leadership of the Speaker, Mojisola Lasbat Meranda, who continues to demonstrate dedication to the service of Lagosians. Any speculation suggesting her resignation is entirely unfounded. She remains firmly in office and enjoys the confidence and support of 36 colleagues,” the statement said.

The House said it aligns with the leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in working towards a constructive resolution of misunderstandings adding that the House will continue to work in the interest of Lagosians.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

General

Governors Reaffirm Support For State Police, Electricity Reforms

Published

on

governors forum

By Adedapo Adesanya

State governors have restated their commitment to the establishment of state police and reforms in the electricity sector.

The agreement was reached in a communiqué issued at the end of the 2nd meeting of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum on Wednesday.

During the meeting, the governors deliberated issues affecting the country, noting a dedicated consultation with the Attorneys-General to review the proposed constitutional amendments and frameworks for their decision.

“Governors emphasised the need for the State Police to be constitutionally sound and aligned with federalism and citizens’ rights.

“The Forum noted the collaborative effort and added that the consultation outcomes would strengthen the States’ collective position”, the statement said in part.

The group also received a presentation from the Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning on progress under the National Nutrition 774 (N-774) Initiative.

It reaffirmed the governors’ commitment to improving nutrition outcomes and reducing child malnutrition across Nigeria.

According to the statement, the governors noted the ongoing work on the National Nutrition Bill and encouraged continued engagement with relevant stakeholders to strengthen the legal and policy framework for nutrition governance.

The forum also received a briefing from the World Bank Country Office on the proposed Country Partnership Framework (CPF) for Nigeria covering the period FY2026–2032; the proposed Nigeria Sustainable Agricultural Value-Chains for Growth (AGROW) Programme, a results-based initiative designed to improve agricultural productivity, strengthen value chains, increase private sector participation, enhance food security, and Early Childhood Development (ECD).

The forum supported ongoing collaboration with the Federal Government, the World Bank, and other stakeholders to ensure successful implementation and deliver benefits to participating states.

They approved state-specific interventions and stressed the importance of better coordination across sectors like health, nutrition, education, water and sanitation, social protection, and family support.

On the National Solar Super-Grid (NSSG) Initiative, a proposal to expand electricity access through large-scale decentralised solar generation integrated with a national high-voltage transmission network, it noted the initiative’s potential to support industrialisation, improve energy security, strengthen state electricity markets, and accelerate economic growth.

The governors reiterated their commitment to ongoing power sector reforms and to strengthening collaboration among stakeholders to expand access to reliable and affordable electricity for Nigerians.

Continue Reading

General

London Jury Clears Diezani Alison-Madueke of Bribery Charges

Published

on

Diezani Allison-Madueke

By Adedapo Adesanya

Former Nigerian Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke, was on Wednesday found not guilty ​by a London jury of six bribery charges, after ‌five months of trial.

Mrs Alison-Madueke, an oil minister between 2010 and 2015 under then-president Goodluck Jonathan, stood trial ​charged with five counts of accepting bribes and a ​charge of conspiracy to commit bribery, which she denied.

Prosecutors ⁠alleged that the 65-year-old Mrs Alison-Madueke was given “a life of luxury” in London ​from oil and gas industry figures seeking lucrative contracts in Nigeria, ​which has long grappled with mismanagement and corruption.

The jury deliberated for more than 46 hours before reaching its verdict.

Mrs Alison-Madueke was charged by the UK’s National Crime Agency in 2023 over allegations she took £100,000 in cash as well as accepting flights on private jets, chauffeur-driven cars and luxury goods from Louis Vuitton and Harrods.

Other counts allege she received school fees for her son, products from high-end shops such as London’s Harrods department store and Louis Vuitton, and further private jet flights.

Mrs Alison-Madueke has been involved in numerous legal cases globally, including in the United States.

She has been on bail in Britain since she was arrested in October 2015.

In 2023, she was formally charged with accepting bribes, which she has denied.

Mrs Alison-Madueke stood trial alongside oil industry executive, Mrs Olatimbo Ayinde, 54, who was ​charged with one count of bribery relating to ​Alison-Madueke ⁠and a separate count of bribery of a foreign public official.

Also, her elder brother, Mr Doye Agama, 69, was charged with conspiracy to commit bribery ⁠with ​his sister relating to payments made to ​his church.

Both Mrs Ayinde and Mr Agama denied the charges against them and were also ​acquitted by the jury.

Continue Reading

General

Senate Committee Clears Customs of Unremitted N62.2bn Allegations

Published

on

Nigeria customs wale adeniyi

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Senate Committee on Public Accounts has cleared the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) of allegations that it failed to remit N62.2 billion into the Federation Account, as contained in the 2019 Audit Report of the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation.

The committee reached the decision on Tuesday during an investigative session with the Comptroller-General of Customs, Mr Adewale Adeniyi, over 77 audit queries raised against the agency in the 2019 and 2020 audit reports.

The committee, however, resolved to establish an ad hoc reconciliation panel to review the remaining 76 audit queries and report for further consideration.

At the hearing, representatives of the Auditor-General’s office informed lawmakers that while the Customs Service generated more than N691 billion in revenue in 2017, only about N629 billion was remitted to the Federation Account, leaving an outstanding balance of N62.2 billion.

Responding, the Customs CG explained that the amount in question consisted of levies collected on behalf of other government agencies and was therefore not meant for remittance into the Federation Account.

According to him, the figure was wrongly classified as under-remittance in the audit report.

Mr Adeniyi stated that while some levies collected by Customs are paid into the Federation Account, others, including certain levies on local production of wheat, textiles and wines, are designated for separate accounts.

He maintained that the disputed N62.2 billion fell into that category and should not have been recorded as unremitted revenue.

The Customs boss also provided explanations on the second and third audit queries, which members of the committee described as satisfactory.

Some lawmakers questioned why the issues had progressed to a Senate investigation, arguing that they should have been resolved during routine reconciliation between Customs officials and auditors.

In his response, Mr Adeniyi noted that the audit years under review coincided with a period of strained relations between the National Assembly and the Customs Service.

The reconciliation committee is expected to work with Customs officials and auditors to resolve discrepancies in the remaining audit queries before further legislative action is taken.

Continue Reading

Trending