General
Runners-Up Reject 2024 NBA Election Results
By Adedapo Adesanya
Following the declaration of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr Afam Osigwe, as the president-elect of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), his opponents in the exercise have questioned the integrity of the process and called for an audit.
The first runner-up, Mr Tobenna Erojikwe, who reportedly polled 10,998 votes as against Mr Osigwe’s 20,435 votes, said he has “reasonable and well-informed basis to believe that the electoral process and the election were not credible or satisfactory”.
In a statement dated July 21, 2024, and personally signed by him, Mr Erojikwe noted that at three different times before the polls, he had cause to write to the Electoral Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association (ECNBA) to express concerns and highlight certain breaches and irregularities surrounding the election.
“My initial complaint centred on the opaqueness of the selection process for the election service providers and the lack of information to enable us to make a fully informed assessment of the shortlisted service providers. This call led to the ECNBA carrying out a fresh bidding exercise that resulted in the selection of Election Buddy”.
“By another letter dated 4 June 2024, I raised concerns about the provisions of the guidelines for the election set out in the NBA Constitution 2015 (as amended) which the ECNBA had obeyed in disobedience including the failure to provide voting guidelines and a voters’ list within the timeframe stipulated by the NBA Constitution.
“I repeated this call in my last letter of 19 July 2024, and it was not until 4 hours before the commencement of polls that the ECNBA published the full list of eligible voters in defiance of the provisions of Paragraph 9 of Part V of Second Schedule to the NBA Constitution which provides in mandatory terms that the ECNBA shall publish the full list of voters at least 45 (forty-five) clear days before the date of the election,” he noted.
Mr Erojikwe said if the breaches and irregularities were restricted to the process leading up to the elections, and the election was conducted in a credible manner, it might have been easier to overlook them.
He detailed about five areas where according to him the conduct of the election fell far short of expected technical standards and the spirit/intendment of the NBA Constitution including issues with live viewing of the election results, tallying errors, technicalities with a novel platform, data manipulation, and an extension in voting deadline.”
“The foregoing and more have demonstrated that the fears that I expressed in the build-up to the elections were not unfounded and the election process might have been manipulated to achieve a predetermined outcome,” he added.
Mr Erojikwe said for the above reasons, he is unable to accept the election result announced by the ECNBA and instead seeks an official audit of the election result in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 8(c), Part 2, Second Schedule of the NBA Constitution.
He said this step has become necessary to ensure full faith and confidence in the electoral process within the NBA.
Similarly, Mr Chukwuka Ikwuazom (SAN), who was said to have polled 9,018 votes to emerge as the second runner-up, has requested access to critical information and documents related to the elections.
In a letter he signed and addressed to ECNBA chairman, Mr Oluseun Abimbola (SAN), Mr Ikwuazom said his request is “prompted by several concerning anomalies and irregularities observed during the electoral process”.
Mr Ikwuazom who had sensationally pulled out of the race during the elections, said he and his team observed four anomalies namely; identity theft of voters & potential double voting, Discrepancies in Vote Display and Update, Suspicious Vote Increase Patterns and Discrepancies in Vote Patterns.
He, therefore, made a formal request to be provided within 48 hours with full access to the server and application log files used during the election period, complete database records, including voter information and voting transactions among other information.
General
Salary Benchmarking To Ensure Competitive Compensation
Salary benchmarking is the systematic process of comparing an organization’s pay rates, bonus programs, and total rewards against market standards. This article walks through why benchmarking matters, how to prepare and run an analysis, the best data sources and tools, and how to turn findings into defensible pay structures and ongoing processes.
Why Salary Benchmarking Matters For Online Businesses And Agencies
Without benchmarking, organizations risk three costly outcomes: underpaying (leading to high turnover and loss of institutional knowledge), overpaying (inflating fixed costs and reducing agility), or misallocating compensation across roles (creating internal inequities and morale problems).
For agencies that pitch retainer-driven services, predictable labor costs tied to market rates enable healthier margins and clearer pricing decisions. For in-house ecommerce teams, benchmarking supports workforce planning when launching new product lines or scaling paid acquisition efforts.
Finally, benchmarking is not only financial: it signals professionalism to candidates.
Key Data Sources And Tools For Accurate Benchmarks
High-quality benchmarking blends public data, commercial platforms, and human intelligence.
Public Government And Aggregated Salary Data
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) or national equivalents provide reliable occupational wage ranges, useful for baseline comparisons and compliance checks.
Industry Surveys, Salary Platforms, And Niche Reports
Platforms such as Payscale, Glassdoor, LinkedIn Salary, and specialized reports for marketing and tech roles give role- and location-specific distributions.
Recruiter Intelligence And Peer Networks
Recruiters and hiring agencies provide real-time insight into candidate expectations and accepted offers. Professional networks, Slack communities, and agency owner peer groups can also offer current market anecdotes that databases miss.
Internal Payroll Data And Turnover Metrics
Historical payroll, hiring velocity, offer-acceptance rates, and exit interview themes help normalize market data against internal realities. Using multiple inputs helps find a defensible midpoint.
How To Conduct A Benchmark Analysis Step By Step
A repeatable process keeps benchmarking actionable and defensible.
- Gather data from at least three sources: one government/aggregate, one commercial salary platform, and one recruiter/peer input.
- Normalize data for location and experience. Convert salaries to equivalent cost-of-living or remote-adjusted values if the company has distributed teams.
- Adjust for total compensation. Include expected bonus, commissions, equity, and benefits to compare total rewards, not just base pay.
- Build a comparison table with target percentiles (25th, 50th, 75th) for each role and highlight gaps vs. current pay.
- Prioritize changes. Use a matrix that weighs business impact, retention risk, and budget feasibility to recommend immediate, near-term, and deferred adjustments.
This framework produces a clear narrative: where pay is behind, how much closing the gap will cost, and which adjustments will most protect revenue and client delivery.
Translating Benchmark Results Into Pay Structures And Budgets
Benchmark results must become predictable pay structures.
Normalize Data For Location, Experience, And Role Level
Apply consistent location multipliers and level definitions (junior, mid, senior, lead) so internal fairness stands up to scrutiny.
Build Pay Bands, Ranges, And Target Percentiles
Create bands with minimums, midpoints, and maximums tied to the chosen target percentiles. Bands help managers make consistent offer decisions and reduce bias.
Model Total Cost Of Hire And Budget Impact
Factor in employer taxes, benefits, onboarding costs, and ramp time. Present scenarios that show both absolute costs and return-on-investment when a higher-paid senior reduces client churn or improves campaign ROI.
Design Salary Bands, Bonus Structures, And Noncash Benefits
Consider sales- or performance-linked bonuses for account managers and revenue-attributed roles. Align Compensation To Performance, Retention, And Career Paths
Tie movements within bands to objective competency milestones (e.g., “strategic link acquisition that improves DR by X points” or “reduced time-to-rank for client cohort”), creating transparent merit progression that drives retention.
Communicating, Implementing, And Ensuring Pay Equity
Change management is as important as the numbers.
Gain Leadership Buy-In And Set Change Management Steps
Present benchmarking findings with clear ROI scenarios and phased implementation options. Leadership will respond to cost/benefit clarity, show how targeted raises stabilize revenue-generating roles.
Communicate Changes To Employees And Handle Pushback
Be transparent about methodology and timelines. Provide managers with scripts explaining why adjustments are happening and how employees can progress to higher bands.
Document Compliance, Pay Equity, And Recordkeeping Practices
Maintain audit-ready records of data sources, decision rationales, and salary matrices. Regularly run pay-equity checks by gender, race, and tenure to avoid legal and moral risks.
Thoughtful communication reduces rumors and ensures raises are seen as strategic investments, not arbitrary rewards.
Ongoing Monitoring: KPIs, Review Cadence, And Market Adjustments
Benchmarking isn’t a one-off. It requires monitoring and simple KPIs.
Track Competitive Positioning, Turnover, And Time To Fill
KPIs should include average comp vs. market percentile, voluntary turnover by role, offer-acceptance rate, and time-to-fill for critical positions. These metrics signal when the market has shifted.
Schedule Regular Reviews And Trigger-Based Market Rechecks
A typical cadence is an annual formal benchmark with quarterly spot checks for priority roles. Trigger-based rechecks, when turnover spikes, when offer-acceptance drops below a threshold, or when the market is disrupted, keep pay competitive between formal cycles.
With a small set of KPIs and a clear review cadence, agencies and online businesses can avoid reactive panic hires and keep compensation aligned with strategy and market reality.
Conclusion
Salary benchmarking equips online businesses and agencies to hire and retain the right talent without sacrificing profitability. When done well, benchmarking clarifies where to invest, makes offers defensible, and reduces turnover among roles that materially affect client outcomes and rankings.
General
BPP Confirms N1.1trn Savings from Procurement Reforms in 2025
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Bureau of Public Procurement(BPP) said the ongoing procurement reforms saved the federal government over N1.1 trillion between January and December 2025.
The Director-General of the bureau, Mr Adebowale Adedokun, revealed this while defending the agency’s 2026 budget before the Senate Committee on Public Procurement in Abuja on Thursday.
The bureau also reported reduced contract approval timelines, additional cost savings, and tougher sanctions imposed on erring contractors and non-compliant government officials.
Mr Adedokun appealed for increased budgetary allocation in 2026 to enhance service delivery, create jobs, and strengthen institutional capacity for procurement oversight.
He further revealed that the bureau received N4.032 billion in 2025 and sought higher funding to reinforce anti-corruption efforts under the administration of President Bola Tinubu.
Earlier, the Chairman of the Senate Committee, Mr Olajide Ipinsagba, a lawmaker from Ondo North, underscored the bureau’s strategic role in driving socioeconomic development and promoting fiscal discipline.
Mr Ipinsagba assured the agency of legislative support while urging strict accountability and prudent utilisation of public funds allocated for its operations.
BPP reforms were committed to deepening transparency, compliance, and efficiency in Nigeria’s public procurement system. Some of them include adherence to a 21-day timeline, as mandated by the Public Procurement Act 2007. Also, the BPP is required to review cases, issue a written decision within 21 working days of receiving the complaints, and state the corrective actions, reasons for rejection, or remedies granted.
There are also plans to streamline approval processes, standardise documentation, and automate workflows to ensure timely and transparent procurement decisions.
General
FCT Council Elections: Police Impose 12-Hour Curfew
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Command of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) has announced a 12-hour restriction on movement across Abuja and its environs ahead of the council elections scheduled for Saturday, February 21, 2026.
In a statement, the Police Public Relations Officer of the FCT Command, Mrs Josephine Adeh, said the movement will be restricted to ensure security and the smooth conduct of the polls.
“The Commissioner of Police, FCT Command, Miller G. Dantawaye, psc., has announced a restriction of movement across the Federal Capital Territory from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM on Saturday, 21st February, 2026, in view of the scheduled Area Council Elections,” the statement read.
The police clarified that the restriction will apply to all residents, except essential service providers and duly accredited election officials.
The command also called on residents to remain peaceful and cooperate with security agencies.
“The FCT Police Command urges residents to remain peaceful, law-abiding, and cooperate with security agencies to ensure a safe, free, and credible electoral process,” the statement added.
Meanwhile, the FCT Minister, Mr Nyesom Wike, declared Friday a work-free day ahead of the council elections.
In a broadcast, Mr Wike said the decision, approved by President Bola Tinubu, is to enable residents to travel to their communities to vote.
In contrast to the police announcement, the minister declared a separate restriction of movement across the FCT from 8:00 p.m. on Friday to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, directing security agencies to ensure compliance.
Mr Wike urged residents to turn out in large numbers and conduct themselves peacefully, expressing optimism that the polls would produce leaders who would promote development and stability in the territory.
In the meantime, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) says preparations for the elections are at an advanced stage, with strong voter participation recorded during the PVC collection exercise.
INEC disclosed that 1,587,025 Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) have been collected across the FCT, representing a 94.4 per cent collection rate out of the 1,680,315 registered voters.
Security agencies have assured residents of adequate deployment across the territory to maintain order, as authorities emphasise the need for a peaceful, free, and credible electoral process.
-
Feature/OPED6 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism10 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz3 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking8 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy3 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking3 years agoSort Codes of UBA Branches in Nigeria
-
Banking3 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports3 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn










