By Adedapo Adesanya Uber is set to face a deluge of compensation claims as the United Kingdom\u2019s Supreme Court ruled on Friday that drivers must be treated as workers rather than self-employed. The decision could mean thousands of Uber drivers are entitled to minimum wage and holiday pay, a move that could hurt its business model in one of its biggest markets. The ruling from the apex court means the ride-hailing giant will start seeing a deluge of compensation claims, which analysts have said would have serious impacts on the gig economy. The Supreme Court disagreed with Uber\u2019s stance that it is a technology provider and was a booking agent for drivers who are approved by Uber London. It also ruled that drivers were deemed to be working when they were looking for passengers and not just driving them. According to court documents, \u201cThe Supreme Court also holds that the employment tribunal was entitled to find that time spent by the claimants working for Uber was not limited (as Uber argued) to periods when they were actually driving passengers to their destinations, but included any period when the driver was logged into the Uber app within the territory in which the driver was licensed to operate and was ready and willing to accept trips.\u201d The long-running case was originally brought in 2016 by drivers James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam in an employment tribunal. The court considered several elements in its judgement. It stated that Uber set the fare which meant that they dictated how much drivers could earn and sets the contract terms and drivers had no say in them. It added that request for rides is constrained by Uber, which can penalise drivers if they reject too many rides. It also considered that Uber monitors a driver's service through the star rating and has the capacity to terminate the relationship if after repeated warnings this does not improve. Speaking on the decision, Mr Jamie Heywood, Uber\u2019s regional general manager for Northern and Eastern Europe, said: \u201cWe respect the court\u2019s decision which focused on a small number of drivers who used the Uber app in 2016. Since then, we have made some significant changes to our business, guided by drivers every step of the way. \u201cThese include giving even more control over how they earn and providing new protections like free insurance in case of sickness or injury. "We are committed to doing more and will now consult with every active driver across the UK to understand the changes they want to see.\u201d The establishment added that the verdict does not reclassify all UK drivers as workers. The judgement only focused on the group of drivers who brought the claim at a 2016 employment tribunal, many of whom no longer drive on the app. It also said a worker is not an employee. Employee status was not claimed in the litigation and so this ruling does not find the claimants to be employees. This comes just months after Uber won an appeal allowing it to continue to operate in London over concerns about its safety practices.