Connect with us

Banking

TTB/Union Bank: A Call for Transparency By Investigators

Published

on

TITAN TRUST BANK LOGO

By Azubike Ugwu

In the last three days, we have seen a storm of allegations regarding the ownership of Titan Trust Bank Limited (TTB) and Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (“Union Bank”), and this has captured public attention.

These claims, reportedly stemming from a report submitted to the President by a Special Investigator, Mr Jim Obaze, have initiated a critical discussion around transparency.

However, the lack of access to the report begs for an open dialogue to clarify the unfolding narrative.

The core accusation revolves around the former Central Bank Governor’s alleged use of intermediaries in acquiring Union Bank and doubts about whether Titan Bank met the reported purchase price. To understand the gravity of these claims, it’s imperative to grasp the financial magnitude of the investors steering these banks.

TGI Group, with assets exceeding N3.75 trillion and 2022 revenues surpassing N1.74 trillion, emerges as a financial powerhouse. To underscore this, the sale of its subsidiary “Chivita” to Coca-Cola Group companies in 2020 for more than $500 million, a figure nearly three times the alleged equity element in the Union Bank acquisition, speaks volumes about the group’s financial robustness. TGI Group’s financial resilience, underscored by concrete figures, paints a picture of stability.

Contrary to these allegations, documents availed necessary parties indicate that payment for Union Bank shares was indeed made, raising questions about the accuracy of claims suggesting non-payment and highlighting the importance of verifying such financial transactions.

Titan Trust Bank’s chairman, Mr Tunde Lemo, has strongly refuted the allegations made by the special investigator, providing details and names that can confirm the transparency and integrity of the transaction. Drawing parallels, it’s akin to questioning a transaction’s legitimacy while the receipts stand as concrete evidence.

The news of Mr Lemo being summoned by the special investigator once again has been making waves in the business community. The investigator has written a letter in reaction to the rebuttal made by Titan Trust Bank. The letter stated that Mr Lemo and TTB’s rebuttal was offensive.

The letter is filled with many allegations, and it has raised questions about the independence and bias of the investigation. Many wonder whether Mr Obaze is singling out Mr Lemo for unknown offences or if the investigation is truly unbiased and objective.

It is important to note that Mr Lemo is a respected figure in the business community, and many have lauded his efforts. He has always been known for his dedication and hard work. Therefore, the allegations made against him have come as a surprise to many.

The scrutiny extends to Luxis and Magna, the UAE-based holding companies accused of lacking a physical presence in Dubai. Yet, in the global business landscape, such corporate structures are commonplace.

TGI’s financial fortitude backing these entities accentuates their credibility, emphasising the need for context in evaluating business practices. TGI, in its statement, categorically affirmed that “the entire transaction was managed by highly reputed global financial institutions, including Rothschild and Citibank. And like most major acquisitions, the process took years to complete.

A $300 million loan was sourced from the African Export-Import Bank (Afrexim), and the rest of the capital was sourced from the proceeds of TGI’s sales of its Chi Ltd business to Coca-Cola, all to finance the acquisition of Union Bank.”

Another layer to the controversy involves a “mysterious shareholder” supposedly providing interest-free long-term loans. Examination of the financial records reveals that these loans were granted within the TGI

Group, illustrating a standard business practice.

Parallels can be drawn to global corporate scenarios, where loans within a closely-knit business ecosystem are considered normal.

The allegations surrounding Mr Cornelius Vink, the founder of TGI Group, necessitate a balanced perspective. As a distinguished Dutch national, his cooperation in providing requested documents to the investigator showcases a commitment to transparency. Analogously, it mirrors other reputable figures in international business who willingly subject themselves to scrutiny.

Turning our attention to the alleged recommendation for the government to take over Union Bank, the financial stability of Union Bank and Titan Bank, coupled with the investigator’s apparent lack of statutory powers for such recommendations, raises questions about the credibility of this assertion.

It’s akin to questioning the legitimacy of a referee’s call beyond the established rules of the game. Mr Obaze lacks the necessary statutory powers to make such calls and appears once again to be arrogating powers to himself that are not legal. Perhaps we should remember and question his many ‘allegations’ against corporate entities and individuals that were just him bloviating.

Amidst this uncertainty, the call for transparency echoes louder. TGI Group’s financial resilience, fortified by concrete evidence, underscores the importance of a candid dialogue to address the swirling allegations surrounding the Union Bank/Titan Trust Bank transaction. The figures presented and the parallels drawn serve as signposts guiding the need for clarity in this complex financial tapestry.

The business community eagerly awaits the outcome of this investigation and hopes the truth will come out. Until then, these questions must be answered.

  1. Why did the Special Investigator go to the media instead of taking the usual investigative or legal route?
  2. Is this an attempt to create negative publicity for the Banks, TGI and personalities involved without presenting any evidence?
  3. If the Special Investigator believes that Mr Godwin Emefiele owns the bank as he has alleged, why hasn’t he provided any evidence after such a lengthy investigation?
  4. Why is he specifically targeting and harassing legitimate business owners and professionals?
  5. Is the Special Investigator suggesting that the government is willing to face significant consequences by seizing private investments, especially when the nation is actively trying to attract foreign investments?

It is prudent for Mr Obaze to remember that rather than this media trial that he has embarked on, “affirmanti non neganti incumbit probation” – the burden of proof lies on him, who asserts.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Banking

Ecobank Floats $450m Nature Bond for Sustainable Agric Businesses, Others

Published

on

Ecobank Back2School loans

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

The world’s first ICMA commercial bank-issued Nature Bond has been launched by Ecobank Group to mobilise global capital for the protection of Africa’s natural ecosystems.

The debt instrument, up to $450 million, will be tradable on the London Stock Exchange (LSE), creating a new route for international and African capital to ​protect Africa’s biodiversity.

The bond will ​support African farmers, sustainable agriculture businesses and water systems,​ protecting some of the planet’s most important ecosystems.

Africa is home to some of the world’s most important natural capital, including arable land, tropical forests, freshwater systems and biodiversity across hundreds of millions of hectares. But, until now, private nature capital has not flowed to Africa at the scale the continent’s ecological significance warrants​ in global ecological resilience. Despite hosting 25 per cent of global biodiversity, Africa receives less than 3 per cent of nature finance​.

Ecobank’s Nature Bond​ is a direct response to this gap. It​ will support smallholder farmers adopting sustainable agricultural practices, agri-processors with verified deforestation-free supply chains, and water infrastructure protecting freshwater ecosystems relied upon by millions of people.

Unlike many conservation-focused financing vehicles, Ecobank’s Nature Bond channels capital directly through Africa’s real economy — financing businesses and communities whose day-to-day activities shape environmental outcomes at scale.

The investments will be made in 24 markets, with significant deployment in biodiversity-priority countries such as Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso and Ghana. Importantly, 81 per cent of the eligible lending pool is allocated to countries where agricultural land-use change is the primary driver of biodiversity loss, helping direct capital to the areas where it can have the greatest environmental impact.

The framework also incorporates independent monitoring and verification mechanisms, including deforestation screening and supply chain traceability requirements, helping ensure that financed activities deliver measurable nature-positive outcomes. Every eligible loan carries seven independently verified sustainability conditions.

A Nature Bond, under the ICMA secondary designation,​ requires proceeds to actively contribute to nature-positive outcomes, including transforming economic activities to reduce the drivers of nature loss at scale.

The Nature Bond was designed to reach those that conservation-focused instruments were not designed to serve – farmers, agri-processors and water operators whose daily activities collectively determine ecosystem outcomes.

While green bonds typically finance a broad range of environmental objectives, the Nature Bond designation focuses the use of proceeds specifically on nature-related outcomes, including biodiversity, sustainable agriculture, land use and water infrastructure.

“This transaction is a defining moment for African sustainable finance. Investors did not just support this bond. They demanded more of it, allowing us to increase the size and tighten pricing.

“We are not a bank that simply labels bonds. We have spent four years building the systems, governance and accountability needed to make nature finance credible and scalable in Africa.

“This bond is ultimately about the farmers, cooperatives and communities whose livelihoods depend on healthy ecosystems,” the chief executive of Ecobank Group, Mr Jeremy Awori, stated.

On her part, the Head of Sustainability and ESRM at Ecobank Transnational Incorporated, Ms Rachael Antwi, said, “Nature finance will only scale in Africa if it is practical, measurable and connected to the real economy. This bond is designed to do that by linking international capital to eligible lending for sustainable agriculture and water infrastructure across 24 countries. It reflects the systems and standards Ecobank has built to ensure nature finance supports both environmental resilience and the communities whose livelihoods depend on healthy ecosystems.”

Business Post gathered that the $450 million bond was priced following strong investor demand, with the final orderbook exceeding $1.36 billion, almost 400 per cent of the original target size. The strength of demand enabled Ecobank to increase the transaction by $100 million and tighten pricing by 50 basis points.

The transaction attracted support from both international and African investors, demonstrating Ecobank’s unique ability to mobilise capital across global and African markets.

Continue Reading

Banking

Abbey Mortgage Bank Gets Green Light to Switch to Commercial Banking

Published

on

Abbey Mortgage Bank

By Adedapo Adesanya

One of Nigeria’s real estate lenders, Abbey Mortgage Bank Plc, has secured approval from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to convert into a regional commercial bank, marking a shift from its current status as a primary mortgage institution.

The development was disclosed in a regulatory filing, signalling a strategic change that will see the bank expand into broader commercial banking activities beyond housing finance.

The conversion is expected to take effect later this year, subject to the completion of regulatory and operational requirements, including system upgrades and restructuring.

The move comes amid ongoing changes in Nigeria’s banking sector, where institutions are seeking to strengthen capital bases and diversify operations in response to evolving regulatory and market conditions.

At its recent Annual General Meeting (AGM), its board gave approval to raise N100 billion in additional capital aimed at helping the company achieve its next growth phase.

Shareholders authorised the lender to raise the funds through various funding instruments, including shares, bonds, commercial papers, loans, and other securities, subject to regulatory approvals.

The directors were also allowed to raise fresh equity capital of up to N65.547 billion by way of private placement of 26,562,647,265 ordinary shares of 50 Kobo each at N2.43 per share, subject to regulatory approvals.

In addition, shareholders approved the increase in the company’s issued share capital from N5,076,923,077 divided into 10,153,846,154 of 50 Kobo each to N18,358,246,709.50 by the creation of up to 26,562,647,265 ordinary shares of 50 Kobo each, such new shares to rank pari passu in all respects with the existing ordinary shares in the capital of the bank.

Continue Reading

Banking

CBN Scraps Form A for Domiciliary Account Remittances

Published

on

CBN Form A Form M Form Q

By Adedapo Adesanya

In a significant easing of foreign exchange (FX) procedures, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has exempted domiciliary account holders from obtaining Form A before making eligible foreign remittances.

The provision is contained in the newly issued Forex Manual (4th Edition), which took effect on June 1, 2026. Under the new framework, customers using funds already held in their domiciliary accounts can make remittances without processing Form A.

The change is expected to shorten processing times for legitimate foreign transfers and reduce paperwork for banks and customers.

Form A remains relevant for certain transactions involving the purchase of foreign exchange through the official market.

The broader manual introduces new measures covering imports, exports, travel allowances, trade finance, and foreign remittances as the CBN seeks to improve transparency and efficiency in the forex market.

The apex bank said the reforms are intended to strengthen market discipline, improve data accuracy, and support confidence in Nigeria’s foreign exchange framework.

Under the revised framework, all import transactions must be backed by a valid Form ‘M’, with strict timelines imposed for the submission of shipping and exchange control documents.

Importers are required to ensure that all documentation is genuine, verifiable, and routed through authorised banking channels, as part of efforts to eliminate trade-based money laundering and illicit capital flows.

The apex bank also standardised the exchange rate for import duty payments, directing that duties be calculated using the prevailing Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market (NFEM) rate published daily by the CBN.

In a move to limit capital flight, the manual caps advance payments for imports at 30 per cent of transaction value and places a ceiling on interest rates for trade-related credit at 0.5 per cent above the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), with a maximum tenor of 180 days.

On the export side, the CBN has made it mandatory for all exporters to process Form NXP, regardless of the value of goods.

Export proceeds must be repatriated within 180 days for non-oil exports and 90 days for oil and gas shipments, reinforcing efforts to boost foreign exchange inflows.

The guidelines also introduce stricter inspection requirements, mandating pre-shipment verification and the issuance of Clean Certificates of Inspection before goods can be exported.

Exporters are further required to pay the Nigerian Export Supervision Scheme (NESS) levy, set at 0.5 per cent for non-oil exports and 0.12 per cent for oil and gas exports.

In addition, the manual strengthens oversight of insurance-related forex transactions, restricting foreign currency-denominated policies for residents and requiring regulatory clearance for certain offshore payments.

Continue Reading

Trending