Banking
TTB/Union Bank: A Call for Transparency By Investigators
By Azubike Ugwu
In the last three days, we have seen a storm of allegations regarding the ownership of Titan Trust Bank Limited (TTB) and Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (“Union Bank”), and this has captured public attention.
These claims, reportedly stemming from a report submitted to the President by a Special Investigator, Mr Jim Obaze, have initiated a critical discussion around transparency.
However, the lack of access to the report begs for an open dialogue to clarify the unfolding narrative.
The core accusation revolves around the former Central Bank Governor’s alleged use of intermediaries in acquiring Union Bank and doubts about whether Titan Bank met the reported purchase price. To understand the gravity of these claims, it’s imperative to grasp the financial magnitude of the investors steering these banks.
TGI Group, with assets exceeding N3.75 trillion and 2022 revenues surpassing N1.74 trillion, emerges as a financial powerhouse. To underscore this, the sale of its subsidiary “Chivita” to Coca-Cola Group companies in 2020 for more than $500 million, a figure nearly three times the alleged equity element in the Union Bank acquisition, speaks volumes about the group’s financial robustness. TGI Group’s financial resilience, underscored by concrete figures, paints a picture of stability.
Contrary to these allegations, documents availed necessary parties indicate that payment for Union Bank shares was indeed made, raising questions about the accuracy of claims suggesting non-payment and highlighting the importance of verifying such financial transactions.
Titan Trust Bank’s chairman, Mr Tunde Lemo, has strongly refuted the allegations made by the special investigator, providing details and names that can confirm the transparency and integrity of the transaction. Drawing parallels, it’s akin to questioning a transaction’s legitimacy while the receipts stand as concrete evidence.
The news of Mr Lemo being summoned by the special investigator once again has been making waves in the business community. The investigator has written a letter in reaction to the rebuttal made by Titan Trust Bank. The letter stated that Mr Lemo and TTB’s rebuttal was offensive.
The letter is filled with many allegations, and it has raised questions about the independence and bias of the investigation. Many wonder whether Mr Obaze is singling out Mr Lemo for unknown offences or if the investigation is truly unbiased and objective.
It is important to note that Mr Lemo is a respected figure in the business community, and many have lauded his efforts. He has always been known for his dedication and hard work. Therefore, the allegations made against him have come as a surprise to many.
The scrutiny extends to Luxis and Magna, the UAE-based holding companies accused of lacking a physical presence in Dubai. Yet, in the global business landscape, such corporate structures are commonplace.
TGI’s financial fortitude backing these entities accentuates their credibility, emphasising the need for context in evaluating business practices. TGI, in its statement, categorically affirmed that “the entire transaction was managed by highly reputed global financial institutions, including Rothschild and Citibank. And like most major acquisitions, the process took years to complete.
A $300 million loan was sourced from the African Export-Import Bank (Afrexim), and the rest of the capital was sourced from the proceeds of TGI’s sales of its Chi Ltd business to Coca-Cola, all to finance the acquisition of Union Bank.”
Another layer to the controversy involves a “mysterious shareholder” supposedly providing interest-free long-term loans. Examination of the financial records reveals that these loans were granted within the TGI
Group, illustrating a standard business practice.
Parallels can be drawn to global corporate scenarios, where loans within a closely-knit business ecosystem are considered normal.
The allegations surrounding Mr Cornelius Vink, the founder of TGI Group, necessitate a balanced perspective. As a distinguished Dutch national, his cooperation in providing requested documents to the investigator showcases a commitment to transparency. Analogously, it mirrors other reputable figures in international business who willingly subject themselves to scrutiny.
Turning our attention to the alleged recommendation for the government to take over Union Bank, the financial stability of Union Bank and Titan Bank, coupled with the investigator’s apparent lack of statutory powers for such recommendations, raises questions about the credibility of this assertion.
It’s akin to questioning the legitimacy of a referee’s call beyond the established rules of the game. Mr Obaze lacks the necessary statutory powers to make such calls and appears once again to be arrogating powers to himself that are not legal. Perhaps we should remember and question his many ‘allegations’ against corporate entities and individuals that were just him bloviating.
Amidst this uncertainty, the call for transparency echoes louder. TGI Group’s financial resilience, fortified by concrete evidence, underscores the importance of a candid dialogue to address the swirling allegations surrounding the Union Bank/Titan Trust Bank transaction. The figures presented and the parallels drawn serve as signposts guiding the need for clarity in this complex financial tapestry.
The business community eagerly awaits the outcome of this investigation and hopes the truth will come out. Until then, these questions must be answered.
- Why did the Special Investigator go to the media instead of taking the usual investigative or legal route?
- Is this an attempt to create negative publicity for the Banks, TGI and personalities involved without presenting any evidence?
- If the Special Investigator believes that Mr Godwin Emefiele owns the bank as he has alleged, why hasn’t he provided any evidence after such a lengthy investigation?
- Why is he specifically targeting and harassing legitimate business owners and professionals?
- Is the Special Investigator suggesting that the government is willing to face significant consequences by seizing private investments, especially when the nation is actively trying to attract foreign investments?
It is prudent for Mr Obaze to remember that rather than this media trial that he has embarked on, “affirmanti non neganti incumbit probation” – the burden of proof lies on him, who asserts.
By Adedapo Adesanya
Ratings agency, Moody’s, has placed the ratings of Bidvest Bank on review for downgrade, raising worries of Access Bank to properly fund the bank amid takeover plans.
Access Bank Plc, the banking subsidiary of Access Holdings Plc, entered into a binding agreement for the acquisition of 100 per cent equity stake in Bidvest Bank Limited in December.
The deal for the 24-year-old South African lender is due to be completed in the second half of 2025, upon regulatory approval.
However, in its new rating, Moody’s flagged the capacity of the Nigerian lender to fund the bank, in comparison with that of its owner, the Bidvest Group.
Bidvest, valued at R88 billion on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) in December announced Access Bank as the preferred buyer of its banking unit, Bidvest Bank, in a deal worth R2.8 billion subject to the usual regulatory approvals.
The Bidvest Bank book, which mainly consists of leased assets, loans and advances, totalled R6 billion in December, funded by deposits of R8 billion.
Bidvest Bank generated a trading profit of R371 million and an operating income of R377 million in its most recent financial year.
After the finalisation of the acquisition, Bidvest Bank will be merged with Access Bank’s existing South African subsidiary to create an enlarged platform to anchor the regional growth strategy for the SADC region.
However, Moody’s has placed Bidvest Bank on review for downgrade to the following ratings: the Ba2 domestic-currency long-term issuer rating; the Aa2.za national scale domestic-currency long-term issuer rating; the P-1.za national scale short-term issuer rating; the ba3 Adjusted Baseline Credit Assessment (Adjusted BCA); and the b2 BCA.
The main reason for the potential downgrade is that Access Bank’s rating (long-term deposit ratings of Caa1 positive, Baseline Credit Assessment of caa1) is far lower than Bidvest Bank’s current rating (long-term Corporate Family Ratings of Ba2 stable).
Access Bank’s Caa1 rating is judged as poor quality and very high credit risk.
“The review for downgrade on the domestic-currency long-term issuer rating and the Adjusted BCA of Bidvest Bank will primarily focus on assessing the progress in the acquisition process, including the obtention of regulatory approvals, and the likelihood of the acquisition being completed,” said Moody’s.
“A successful completion of the acquisition by Access Bank could lead to a multi-notch downgrade of Bidvest Bank’s issuer rating due to the loss of two of the notches of parental support uplift from Bidvest Group.”
“This is because the potential new shareholder, Access Bank, has both a lower capacity than Bidvest Group to support the bank, as indicated by the lower rating of Access Bank in comparison to that of Bidvest Group; and a lower rating than Bidvest Bank itself.”
Moody’s said that Bidvest Bank’s current Ba2 domestic-currency long-term issuer rating benefits from two notches of uplift from its b2 BCA. This reflects the high chance of affiliate support from Bidvest Group if the need arises.
The Bidvest Group is expected to safeguard the bank’s financial health and operational stability despite the impending divestment.
The review for downgrade on the bank’s standalone BCA looks at the uncertainties regarding the future strategic direction of the bank post-disposal.
Moody’s said that this “includes the potential disruption to its activities during the disposal process as well as the bank’s post-acquisition financial fundamentals, which will depend on how it is combined with Access Bank’s existing South African operations.”
It added that the review will also assess whether the current positioning of Bidvest Bank’s b2 standalone BCA two notches above Access Bank’s caa1 standalone BCA would remain appropriate in case of successful completion of the acquisition.
Moody’s said a parent entity’s creditworthiness can directly and indirectly affect the credit standing of its bank subsidiaries.
“The bank’s b2 BCA reflects the bank’s solid capitalisation, high liquidity and improving profitability, underpinned by solid niche franchises in the fleet finance and management segment, as well as in the foreign exchange segment,” said Moody’s
“These strengths are moderated by the bank’s weak asset quality and relatively modest deposit-gathering franchise.”
“There is limited upside potential on the ratings given the review for downgrade.”
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
In its determination to help the government achieve a $1 trillion economy by 2030, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has introduced two account packages for Nigerians in the Diaspora.
The central bank tagged these account options as the Non-Resident Nigerian Ordinary Account (NRNOA) and the Non-Resident Nigerian Investment Account (NRNIA).
In a circular signed by its acting Director for Trade and Exchange Department, Dr W.J. Kanya, the apex bank stated that the NRNOA allows account holders to remit their foreign earnings to the country and manage funds in both foreign and local currencies, while the NRNIA gives them the opportunity to invest in assets in Nigeria in either foreign or local currencies.
It explained that account holders may maintain both a foreign currency account of a local currency account or both to carry out their transactions or partake in diverse investment opportunities.
It stated that Nigerians abroad will have the opportunity to won any of the accounts from January 1, 2025, subject to meeting KYC requirements.
The CBN said it came up with these account products to improve access for non-residents to opportunities in the Nigerian economy and increased contribution of Diaspora community to the socio-economic developments of Nigeria.
According to the circular, account holders can use their accounts to participate in the country’s Diaspora bond and other debt instruments issued locally, specifically targeted at the Nigerian Diaspora or available to the investing public.
It said the accounts would also serve as a conduit for them to manage their funds directly in a safe and secure environment and reduce the reliance on third parties in meeting local commitments and obligations.
By Adedapo Adesanya
Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO) Plc recently completed the raising of N209 billion out of its targeted N400.5 billion public offer in the ongoing recapitalisation efforts directed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to create resilient banks amid rising external shocks in the global environment.
Speaking on this development, the chief executive of the firm, Mr Segun Agbaje, said the equity capital raising has set a strong foundation for accelerated development.
“We extend our sincere appreciation to our new and existing shareholders, as well as the regulatory authorities, for their unwavering support during this initial phase of our equity capital raise.
“The strong participation and successful capital verification exercise and allotment process reaffirm the confidence investors have in our fundamentals and execution capabilities.
“This sets a solid foundation for accelerating our strategic roadmap, which aims to pivot the Group for transformational growth and unlock greater value across the Group’s Banking and Non-Banking businesses,” the banker stated.
GTCO had launched a public offer of 9.0 billion ordinary shares of 50 Kobo each at N44.5 per share, with N209.41 billion realized, representing 52.3 per cent of the total offer size.
The offer garnered substantial interest from domestic retail investors, raised a total of N209.41 billion from 130,617 valid applications for 4.706 billion ordinary shares, fully allotted.
“This milestone concludes the first phase of GTCO’s phased equity capital raise programme, which is structured on a balanced allocation strategy based on an equal split between institutional and retail investors. This balanced approach aligns with GTCO Plc’s commitment to fostering a well-diversified and robust investor base,” GTCO stated.
The announcement followed completion of the capital verification exercise conducted by the CBN and the approval of the basis of allotment of the offer by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
-
Feature/OPED5 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism8 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz2 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking7 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy2 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking2 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports2 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn
-
Technology4 years agoHow To Link Your MTN, Airtel, Glo, 9mobile Lines to NIN