Connect with us

Banking

TTB/Union Bank: A Call for Transparency By Investigators

Published

on

TITAN TRUST BANK LOGO

By Azubike Ugwu

In the last three days, we have seen a storm of allegations regarding the ownership of Titan Trust Bank Limited (TTB) and Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (“Union Bank”), and this has captured public attention.

These claims, reportedly stemming from a report submitted to the President by a Special Investigator, Mr Jim Obaze, have initiated a critical discussion around transparency.

However, the lack of access to the report begs for an open dialogue to clarify the unfolding narrative.

The core accusation revolves around the former Central Bank Governor’s alleged use of intermediaries in acquiring Union Bank and doubts about whether Titan Bank met the reported purchase price. To understand the gravity of these claims, it’s imperative to grasp the financial magnitude of the investors steering these banks.

TGI Group, with assets exceeding N3.75 trillion and 2022 revenues surpassing N1.74 trillion, emerges as a financial powerhouse. To underscore this, the sale of its subsidiary “Chivita” to Coca-Cola Group companies in 2020 for more than $500 million, a figure nearly three times the alleged equity element in the Union Bank acquisition, speaks volumes about the group’s financial robustness. TGI Group’s financial resilience, underscored by concrete figures, paints a picture of stability.

Contrary to these allegations, documents availed necessary parties indicate that payment for Union Bank shares was indeed made, raising questions about the accuracy of claims suggesting non-payment and highlighting the importance of verifying such financial transactions.

Titan Trust Bank’s chairman, Mr Tunde Lemo, has strongly refuted the allegations made by the special investigator, providing details and names that can confirm the transparency and integrity of the transaction. Drawing parallels, it’s akin to questioning a transaction’s legitimacy while the receipts stand as concrete evidence.

The news of Mr Lemo being summoned by the special investigator once again has been making waves in the business community. The investigator has written a letter in reaction to the rebuttal made by Titan Trust Bank. The letter stated that Mr Lemo and TTB’s rebuttal was offensive.

The letter is filled with many allegations, and it has raised questions about the independence and bias of the investigation. Many wonder whether Mr Obaze is singling out Mr Lemo for unknown offences or if the investigation is truly unbiased and objective.

It is important to note that Mr Lemo is a respected figure in the business community, and many have lauded his efforts. He has always been known for his dedication and hard work. Therefore, the allegations made against him have come as a surprise to many.

The scrutiny extends to Luxis and Magna, the UAE-based holding companies accused of lacking a physical presence in Dubai. Yet, in the global business landscape, such corporate structures are commonplace.

TGI’s financial fortitude backing these entities accentuates their credibility, emphasising the need for context in evaluating business practices. TGI, in its statement, categorically affirmed that “the entire transaction was managed by highly reputed global financial institutions, including Rothschild and Citibank. And like most major acquisitions, the process took years to complete.

A $300 million loan was sourced from the African Export-Import Bank (Afrexim), and the rest of the capital was sourced from the proceeds of TGI’s sales of its Chi Ltd business to Coca-Cola, all to finance the acquisition of Union Bank.”

Another layer to the controversy involves a “mysterious shareholder” supposedly providing interest-free long-term loans. Examination of the financial records reveals that these loans were granted within the TGI

Group, illustrating a standard business practice.

Parallels can be drawn to global corporate scenarios, where loans within a closely-knit business ecosystem are considered normal.

The allegations surrounding Mr Cornelius Vink, the founder of TGI Group, necessitate a balanced perspective. As a distinguished Dutch national, his cooperation in providing requested documents to the investigator showcases a commitment to transparency. Analogously, it mirrors other reputable figures in international business who willingly subject themselves to scrutiny.

Turning our attention to the alleged recommendation for the government to take over Union Bank, the financial stability of Union Bank and Titan Bank, coupled with the investigator’s apparent lack of statutory powers for such recommendations, raises questions about the credibility of this assertion.

It’s akin to questioning the legitimacy of a referee’s call beyond the established rules of the game. Mr Obaze lacks the necessary statutory powers to make such calls and appears once again to be arrogating powers to himself that are not legal. Perhaps we should remember and question his many ‘allegations’ against corporate entities and individuals that were just him bloviating.

Amidst this uncertainty, the call for transparency echoes louder. TGI Group’s financial resilience, fortified by concrete evidence, underscores the importance of a candid dialogue to address the swirling allegations surrounding the Union Bank/Titan Trust Bank transaction. The figures presented and the parallels drawn serve as signposts guiding the need for clarity in this complex financial tapestry.

The business community eagerly awaits the outcome of this investigation and hopes the truth will come out. Until then, these questions must be answered.

  1. Why did the Special Investigator go to the media instead of taking the usual investigative or legal route?
  2. Is this an attempt to create negative publicity for the Banks, TGI and personalities involved without presenting any evidence?
  3. If the Special Investigator believes that Mr Godwin Emefiele owns the bank as he has alleged, why hasn’t he provided any evidence after such a lengthy investigation?
  4. Why is he specifically targeting and harassing legitimate business owners and professionals?
  5. Is the Special Investigator suggesting that the government is willing to face significant consequences by seizing private investments, especially when the nation is actively trying to attract foreign investments?

It is prudent for Mr Obaze to remember that rather than this media trial that he has embarked on, “affirmanti non neganti incumbit probation” – the burden of proof lies on him, who asserts.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Banking

Zedvance Eyes Disbursement of N250bn to Commercial Businesses in 2026

Published

on

Zedcrest Adedayo Amzat

By Modupe Gbadeyanka

A leading provider of consumer and business financing solutions in Nigeria, Zedvance Finance Limited, intends to increase its lending to commercial entities in the country by 160 per cent in 2026.

Last year, it provided N96 billion loans to support enterprises across key sectors of the economy, including oil and gas, automotive, logistics, renewable energy, fintech, e-commerce, trade distribution value chains, agri-businesses and others.

This year, Zedvance, a subsidiary of Zedcrest Group, plans to push this amount higher to N250 billion across key economic sectors, including off-grid power, smart devices and home equipment, vehicle dealerships and mobility platforms, agribusiness and manufacturing, consumer and industrial goods distribution and hospitality.

This expansion reinforces its mission to accelerate enterprise growth by providing faster and broader access to credit across Africa.

“We are proud of our accomplishments so far, especially the impact we’ve made in sectors that are critical to economic development,” said the Managing Director of Zedcrest Group, Mr Adedayo Amzat.

“Through solar and asset on-lending, we have helped to expand energy access and improve income opportunities for gig workers by financing mobility asset platforms across Nigeria.

“Because our customers are at the heart of our business, we were intentional about designing our flagship product, Liquidity Solutions, to allow businesses to unlock faster credit delivery across all high-growth sectors. This has proven impactful as we continue to witness our clients record great successes,” Mr Amzat further said.

Leveraging its 11-year legacy, Zedvance’s Commercial Solutions business, launched in 2025, has in just one year become a major driver of credit expansion, achieving one of the highest loan disbursement rates among financial institutions, empowering thousands of local enterprises and boosting economic growth.

Through offerings such as working capital, invoice/PO financing, equipment and trade finance, and ecosystem-based solutions, Zedvance enables access to liquidity for buy-now-pay-later providers, asset acquisition, and cross-border credit lines for imports & exports, aiding business expansion and strengthening operational resilience in a dynamic economic environment.

On his part, the acting executive director for Commercial Solutions, Mr Ayooluwa Oladimeji, said Zedvance leverages technology, product innovation, deep sector expertise and risk-moderated structures to deploy diverse funding solutions, including multi-currency credit lines, BNPL facilities, and equipment financing across automotive, renewable energy, manufacturing, fintech, and trade distribution sectors.

“In 2025 alone, Zedvance Commercial Solutions business recorded tremendous growth, driven by strong partnerships and a rapidly expanding portfolio. We are proud to have supported a range of businesses, including Shekel Mobility, Tradegrid, Sapphire, CredPal and other ecosystem partners.

“Beyond these successes, our focus remains on strengthening credit access across Africa’s commercial ecosystems to enable businesses to scale with confidence and resilience,” he said.

Continue Reading

Banking

FCMB Concludes Fund Raising for Recapitalisation

Published

on

FCMB_Logo

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

The capital raise programme of FCMB Group Plc for the recapitalisation of its banking subsidiary, First City Monument Bank Limited, and its pension business, FCMB Pensions Limited, has been concluded.

The financial services group confirmed this development in a statement filed with the Nigerian Exchange (NGX) Limited on Monday.

In the notice signed by the chief executive of the organisation, Mr Ladi Balogun, it was disclosed that the requisite approvals have been received from the relevant regulatory authorities.

These regulators include the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the National Pension Commission (PenCom), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The banking segment of FCMB Group operates with an international licence and is required to have a capital base of N500 billion.

In the disclosure today, FCMB said it has met this minimum capital requirement of the central bank after getting N231.8 billion through a public offer in 2025.

It stressed that as of December 31, 2025, the lender, based on verified eligible capital (paid-up share capital and share premium), had N266.5 billion.

The company further disclosed that it raised an additional N11.0 billion from the minority divestment of approximately 10 per cent of the issued share capital of FCMB Pensions Limited.

“Together, the public offer and minority divestment provide sufficient capital for the bank to meet the revised N500 billion minimum capital requirements for an international banking licence. This is based on verified eligible capital (paid-up share capital and share premium) of N266.5 billion as at December 31, 2025.

“FCMB Group expresses its sincere appreciation to the regulatory authorities, investors, and other stakeholders for their continued support in achieving this important milestone,” parts of the statement read.

Continue Reading

Banking

Nigeria’s Money Supply Falls to N123.36trn in January as Liquidity Tightens

Published

on

money supply naira

By Adedapo Adesanya

Nigeria’s broad money supply (M3) dropped to N123.36 trillion in January 2026, from N124.4 trillion in December 2025, signalling a modest contraction in system liquidity amid intensified tightening measures by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

According to the latest money and credit statistics from the CBN, marginal declines were recorded in currency outside the banking system and total currency in circulation, reflecting easing cash demand after the year-end festive surge.

Currency held outside banks dropped 3.66 per cent to N5.21 trillion in January from N5.41 trillion the previous month. Total currency in circulation similarly moderated to N5.73 trillion from N5.732 trillion, underscoring stable but adjusting liquidity conditions at the year’s start.

These shifts highlight Nigeria’s persistent reliance on physical cash, especially in the informal sector, even as the CBN ramps up efforts to sterilise excess liquidity through Open Market Operations (OMO) and Treasury bill issuances. Broad money supply (M3)—encompassing currency in circulation, demand deposits, savings, time deposits, and foreign currency deposits—reflects these policy actions aimed at curbing inflation and stabilising the foreign exchange market.

A deeper look at components shows different outcomes. For instance, net foreign assets plunged to N29.6 trillion, driven by reduced foreign currency holdings, while net domestic assets rose to N93.76 trillion, buoyed by domestic credit growth.

The January dip follows a familiar seasonal trend. Cash outside banks spiked to N5.41 trillion in December 2025 from N4.91 trillion in November, mirroring the N5.13 trillion surge from November 2024’s N4.65 trillion amid festive spending and informal sector activity.

Earlier in 2025, the trend fluctuated but stayed elevated: N4.65 trillion in October, N4.46 trillion in August (after July’s N4.42 trillion), N4.49 trillion in June, N4.63 trillion in May, N4.57 trillion in April, N4.60 trillion in March, N4.51 trillion in February, and N4.74 trillion in January.

Total currency in circulation echoed this, climbing to N5.26 trillion in November 2025 from October’s N5.06 trillion, with relative stability in the third quarter (N4.95 trillion in September, N4.92 trillion in August and July) and second quarter (N4.92 trillion in June, N5.01 trillion in May).

First-quarter figures hovered around N5 trillion: N5.01 trillion in April, N5 trillion in March, N5.03 trillion in February, and N5.04 trillion in January.

Continue Reading

Trending