Connect with us

Banking

TTB/Union Bank: A Call for Transparency By Investigators

Published

on

TITAN TRUST BANK LOGO

By Azubike Ugwu

In the last three days, we have seen a storm of allegations regarding the ownership of Titan Trust Bank Limited (TTB) and Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (“Union Bank”), and this has captured public attention.

These claims, reportedly stemming from a report submitted to the President by a Special Investigator, Mr Jim Obaze, have initiated a critical discussion around transparency.

However, the lack of access to the report begs for an open dialogue to clarify the unfolding narrative.

The core accusation revolves around the former Central Bank Governor’s alleged use of intermediaries in acquiring Union Bank and doubts about whether Titan Bank met the reported purchase price. To understand the gravity of these claims, it’s imperative to grasp the financial magnitude of the investors steering these banks.

TGI Group, with assets exceeding N3.75 trillion and 2022 revenues surpassing N1.74 trillion, emerges as a financial powerhouse. To underscore this, the sale of its subsidiary “Chivita” to Coca-Cola Group companies in 2020 for more than $500 million, a figure nearly three times the alleged equity element in the Union Bank acquisition, speaks volumes about the group’s financial robustness. TGI Group’s financial resilience, underscored by concrete figures, paints a picture of stability.

Contrary to these allegations, documents availed necessary parties indicate that payment for Union Bank shares was indeed made, raising questions about the accuracy of claims suggesting non-payment and highlighting the importance of verifying such financial transactions.

Titan Trust Bank’s chairman, Mr Tunde Lemo, has strongly refuted the allegations made by the special investigator, providing details and names that can confirm the transparency and integrity of the transaction. Drawing parallels, it’s akin to questioning a transaction’s legitimacy while the receipts stand as concrete evidence.

The news of Mr Lemo being summoned by the special investigator once again has been making waves in the business community. The investigator has written a letter in reaction to the rebuttal made by Titan Trust Bank. The letter stated that Mr Lemo and TTB’s rebuttal was offensive.

The letter is filled with many allegations, and it has raised questions about the independence and bias of the investigation. Many wonder whether Mr Obaze is singling out Mr Lemo for unknown offences or if the investigation is truly unbiased and objective.

It is important to note that Mr Lemo is a respected figure in the business community, and many have lauded his efforts. He has always been known for his dedication and hard work. Therefore, the allegations made against him have come as a surprise to many.

The scrutiny extends to Luxis and Magna, the UAE-based holding companies accused of lacking a physical presence in Dubai. Yet, in the global business landscape, such corporate structures are commonplace.

TGI’s financial fortitude backing these entities accentuates their credibility, emphasising the need for context in evaluating business practices. TGI, in its statement, categorically affirmed that “the entire transaction was managed by highly reputed global financial institutions, including Rothschild and Citibank. And like most major acquisitions, the process took years to complete.

A $300 million loan was sourced from the African Export-Import Bank (Afrexim), and the rest of the capital was sourced from the proceeds of TGI’s sales of its Chi Ltd business to Coca-Cola, all to finance the acquisition of Union Bank.”

Another layer to the controversy involves a “mysterious shareholder” supposedly providing interest-free long-term loans. Examination of the financial records reveals that these loans were granted within the TGI

Group, illustrating a standard business practice.

Parallels can be drawn to global corporate scenarios, where loans within a closely-knit business ecosystem are considered normal.

The allegations surrounding Mr Cornelius Vink, the founder of TGI Group, necessitate a balanced perspective. As a distinguished Dutch national, his cooperation in providing requested documents to the investigator showcases a commitment to transparency. Analogously, it mirrors other reputable figures in international business who willingly subject themselves to scrutiny.

Turning our attention to the alleged recommendation for the government to take over Union Bank, the financial stability of Union Bank and Titan Bank, coupled with the investigator’s apparent lack of statutory powers for such recommendations, raises questions about the credibility of this assertion.

It’s akin to questioning the legitimacy of a referee’s call beyond the established rules of the game. Mr Obaze lacks the necessary statutory powers to make such calls and appears once again to be arrogating powers to himself that are not legal. Perhaps we should remember and question his many ‘allegations’ against corporate entities and individuals that were just him bloviating.

Amidst this uncertainty, the call for transparency echoes louder. TGI Group’s financial resilience, fortified by concrete evidence, underscores the importance of a candid dialogue to address the swirling allegations surrounding the Union Bank/Titan Trust Bank transaction. The figures presented and the parallels drawn serve as signposts guiding the need for clarity in this complex financial tapestry.

The business community eagerly awaits the outcome of this investigation and hopes the truth will come out. Until then, these questions must be answered.

  1. Why did the Special Investigator go to the media instead of taking the usual investigative or legal route?
  2. Is this an attempt to create negative publicity for the Banks, TGI and personalities involved without presenting any evidence?
  3. If the Special Investigator believes that Mr Godwin Emefiele owns the bank as he has alleged, why hasn’t he provided any evidence after such a lengthy investigation?
  4. Why is he specifically targeting and harassing legitimate business owners and professionals?
  5. Is the Special Investigator suggesting that the government is willing to face significant consequences by seizing private investments, especially when the nation is actively trying to attract foreign investments?

It is prudent for Mr Obaze to remember that rather than this media trial that he has embarked on, “affirmanti non neganti incumbit probation” – the burden of proof lies on him, who asserts.

Banking

OneDosh Raises $3m to Build Stablecoin-Powered Infrastructure for Cross-Border Payments

Published

on

OneDosh $3m

By Adedapo Adesanya

OneDosh, a fintech company focused on stablecoin-powered payments, has raised $3 million in pre-seed funding to develop infrastructure aimed at improving how individuals and businesses move money across borders.

The firm, co-founded in February 2025 by the trio of Mr Jackson Ukuevo, Mr Godwin Okoye, and Mr Babatunde Osinowo, was shaped by the founders’ firsthand experiences navigating blocked cards, frozen accounts, delayed international transfers, and currency restrictions while living and travelling globally. These challenges highlighted a consistent gap between the demand for seamless global payments and the systems available to support them.

Now, OneDosh operates in the United States and Nigeria, two active remittance corridors with strong demand for faster and more flexible payment solutions. Through our platform, users can transfer funds from the U.S. to Nigeria, hold value in stablecoins, and spend using stablecoin-powered cards compatible with Apple Pay and Google Pay, subject to network and regional availability.

Commenting on OneDosh’s mission, Mr Ukuevo said, “Millions of people are locked out of efficient cross-border payments because legacy systems are slow, expensive, and restrictive. OneDosh is building the infrastructure to change that, starting with the U.S.-Nigeria corridor and expanding from there. This funding helps us turn stablecoins into practical payment solutions for real people and businesses.”

“Beyond our current consumer-facing products, we are building payment infrastructure designed to connect wallets, cards, and markets into a single programmable system. Our approach focuses on enabling compliant, real-world use cases for stablecoins, particularly in regions where traditional cross-border payment systems remain costly or inefficient,” he added.

OneDosh’s founding team brings experience from organisations such as ZeroHash, Plaid, and Amazon, with backgrounds spanning payments infrastructure, compliance operations, and large-scale product development.

The pre-seed funding will be used to expand into additional payment corridors, deepen liquidity partnerships, and support senior team hires. These efforts are intended to boost capacity to support cross-border spending and settlement use cases as adoption of digital payment technologies continues to grow.

With the increasing interconnectedness of global commerce, OneDosh aims to contribute infrastructure designed to support faster, more accessible cross-border payments using stablecoins as a settlement layer.

Continue Reading

Banking

EFCC Accuses Banks of Aiding N18.7bn Investment, Airline Discount Scams

Published

on

EFCC Banks N18.7bn Investment Scams

By Modupe Gbadeyanka

One new generation bank and six financial technology (fintech) and microfinance banks have been accused of aiding fraudsters in defrauding Nigerians through fraudulent schemes.

This allegation was made by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) while addressing the media in Abuja on Thursday.

The Director of Public Affairs of the EFCC, Mr Wilson Uwujaren, said these schemes involved about N18.7 billion fraudulent investment and airline discount scams.

He disclosed that in the airline discount fraud, fraudsters lure their victims to lose their hard-earned money by involving “a string of carefully devised airline discount information that any unsuspecting foreign traveller will fall for.”

“What they do is to advertise a discount system in the purchase of flight tickets of a particular foreign carrier. The payment module is designed in such a way that their victims would be convinced that the payment is actually made into the account of the airline. No sooner the payment is made than the passenger’s entire funds in his bank account are emptied,” he narrated to newsmen.

According to him, over 700 victims have fallen into the trap of fraudsters through the scheme with a total loss of N651.1 million to them.

Though the commission succeeded in recovering and returning N33.6 million to victims of the scam, Mr Uwujaren cautioned Nigerians to be more vigilant as foreign actors involved in the scheme are converting their illicit sleaze into cryptocurrency and moving them into safer destinations through Bybit.

Narrating the second scheme, the EFCC spokesman said it involved a company named Fred and Farid Investment Limited, simply called FF investment, which lured Nigerians into bogus investment arrangements.

He said over 200,000 victims have been defrauded in this regard, with about N18.1 billion raked in through nine companies offering diverse investment packages.  .

In all, more than 900 Nigerians have been fleeced by fraudsters through the connivance of banks.

Mr Uwujaren claimed foreign nationals are behind the schemes, with three Nigerian accomplices who have been arrested and charged to court.

On the specific role of banks and fintechs in the schemes, two other directors of the EFCC, Abdulkarim Chukkol in charge of Investigations, and Mr Michael Wetcas in charge of Abuja Zonal Directorate, explained that, “a new generation bank and six fintechs and microfinance banks are involved in this. The financial institutions clearly compromised banking procedures and allowed the fraudsters to safely change their proceeds into digital assets and move into safe destinations”

“A total of N18,739, 999,027.35 had been moved through our financial system without due diligence of customers by the banks. It is worrisome that investigations by the commission showed that cryptocurrency transactions to the tune of N162 billion passed through a new generation bank without any due diligence. Investigations also showed that a single customer maintained 960 accounts in the new generation bank and all the accounts were used for fraudulent purposes.”

The EFCC called on regulatory bodies to bring financial institutions to compulsory compliance with regulations in the areas of Know Your Customers (KYC), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) and others.

The agency charged regulatory bodies that Deposit Money Banks (DMBs), fintechs, MFBanks found to be aiding and abetting fraudsters should be suspended and referred to the EFCC for thorough investigation and possible prosecution.

It also warned that negligence and failure to monitor suspicious and structured transactions by banks would no longer be allowed, assuring that it will continue its work against money laundering by fraudulent actors.

Mr Uwujaren also tasked financial institutions to firm up their operational dynamics and save the nation from leakages and compromises bleeding the economy.

Continue Reading

Banking

Nigeria Records Significant Decline in Payment Fraud Losses

Published

on

Payment Methods for Gambling Business5

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) Plc has disclosed that electronic payment fraud losses declined significantly in 2025 due to coordinated actions by regulators, security agencies and industry operators.

Speaking at the 2026 Nigeria Electronic Fraud Forum (NeFF) Technical Kick-Off Session in Lagos, attended by regulators, banks, payment service providers, identity agencies and law enforcement agencies, the chief executive of NIBSS, Mr Premier Oiwoh, said the development showed the need to strengthen collaboration to sustain recent declines in electronic fraud and support deeper digital inclusion.

“The reduction in electronic payment fraud losses was recorded despite rising transaction volumes.

“We can only attribute this improvement to interventions by CBN, the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), security agencies and enhanced monitoring across the payments ecosystem,” he disclosed, noting, however, that internet banking and e-commerce remained the main fraud channels, with social engineering and insider-assisted fraud emerging as dominant trends.

The NIBSS boss said the gains recorded could only be sustained through stricter controls, stronger regulatory compliance and industry-wide collaboration.

He stressed zero tolerance for non-reporting of fraud, warning that weak reporting, poor identity verification and abuse of transaction limits continued to expose the system to risks.

Mr Oiwoh pointed out that the effective Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and Know-Your-Device (KYD) processes, supported by real-time validation of NIN and BVN, were critical to curbing fraud.

He added that stronger reporting requirements, joint industry action and a central “Persons of Interest” database—covering over 13,000 individuals—had improved detection and prevention.

He disclosed that the NIBSS was working with the CBN and other stakeholders on advanced AI-driven monitoring tools and a new national payment infrastructure to further strengthen fraud prevention and deepen financial inclusion.

Also speaking, the Deputy Governor, Financial System Stability, CBN, Mr Philip Ikeazor, said sustained cooperation under NeFF since 2011 had strengthened the resilience and security of Nigeria’s payments system.

Mr Ikeazor, represented by Mr Ibrahim Hassan, Director, Development Finance Institutions Supervision Department, said the sustained cooperation had reduced fraud losses in spite of rapid growth in digital transactions.

He highlighted industry achievements, including migration to EMV chip-and-PIN cards, two-factor authentication, enhanced transaction monitoring, centralised fraud reporting, and the integration of the Bank Verification Number (BVN) with the National Identification Number (NIN).

“Emerging threats such as social engineering, SIM-swap abuse, insider compromise and Authorised Push Payment (APP) scams require faster, integrated and proactive responses.

“The industry is committed to reducing fraud response times to under 30 minutes and to adopt enterprise-wide fraud management systems leveraging real-time analytics and shared intelligence,” the deputy governor said.

On her part, Mrs Rakiya Yusuf, Director, Payments System Supervision Department, CBN, and Chairman, Nigeria Electronic Fraud Forum (NeFF), urged continued coordinated action by regulators, banks, payment providers and law enforcement agencies.

Mrs Yusuf highlighted gains such as EMV chip-and-PIN migration, two-factor authentication, and improved identity management.

She warned that emerging threats required standardised frameworks, faster response times, and proactive use of ISO 20022 and analytics to sustain fraud reduction, expressing confidence that the forum’s deliberations would reinforce the foundations for a safer and more trusted digital financial ecosystem in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Trending