Business Post Contributor
By Nneka Okumazie
What should the real survival of the fittest look like? If in early times, really small groups had to survive the severest conditions, what should survival mean, when there’s lots of population and it is easier to really survive?
There is something about the spectacle of death. The nothingness of irreversibly laying – plain or otherwise, as matter that has lost things that defined it, but remains with one aspect that doesn’t matter anymore.
Though life has its branches, consciousness can be said to be a possession of the living.
It may be possible that some consciousness is of more quality than others. It may also be possible that certain kinds of rare consciousness possess some, different from widely available. It is also possible that there is group consciousness at some time, so excellent; it raises those in that group higher. There is also a chance that the difference between a place of ancient glory and a present slump is the absence of the group consciousness of bloom.
Though consciousness is passed on to offspring, the kinds of quality that makes a difference – are rare, cultivated or natural.
If rare consciousness is the accomplishment and matters like the sun, the efforts for comfort to flesh that would decay or excesses to the body may be the continuous fail of existence.
That extraordinary consciousness is of low [finding] precedence, and that closeness to it may be of low reward keeps the world at risk of hurt.
For example, life should also be about doing the impossible or adding to what to solve the impossible, so even if it doesn’t work, whatever is already possible can be done better.
Also, seeking to do the impossible is a higher step that may guarantee some progress, since things often go wrong, towards the impossible may compensate for when things do.
But the kind of consciousness that seeks the impossible is not compatibly germinated with the capitalistic economic system of unapologetic ruin [to many] dead or a living dud.
The superiority of capitalism not of consciousness is the ultimate zero-sum collapse.
Capitalism gives the flesh the best and optimizes most consciousness towards it: and most of the time opposes progress – since the prevalent form is too uniform, too unrestricted, too prioritized, unfitting for some populations and most impure.
It may be difficult to cure [the spreadable] tiny excellence consciousness or to adjust from a yielded one to capitalism.
The highest paths of consciousness may be the real survival, not the body, or the power of a safe body.
Capitalism continues to be preserved. Consciousness some way, also, but the ratio is disadvantageous.
Consciousness and capitalism can be compared to the old and new debates.
New things can offer longer life, be refreshing and exciting, but does not make them automatically more valuable than the old.
Consciousness grows fast – and ages longer than capitalism predicated on the trendiest.
Preserved consciousness from the past, for people ahead, who are of no match for it, could go useless.
[Job 21:26, They shall lie down alike in the dust, and the worms shall cover them.]
