Connect with us

Sports

How to Make a Premier League Team Profitable

Published

on

Premier League Team

Shockwaves rippled through the footballing world this week after it was confirmed Newcastle Football Club has been bought out in a £300m deal, ending owner Mike Ashley’s 14-year tenure.

The takeover leaves Newcastle in the hands of the Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund (PIF), which now owns 80% of the club. The other 20% is split evenly between Amanda Staveley and the Reuben brothers.

After years of frustration and disappointment, Newcastle fans are now full of hope for the future as their new owners are the wealthiest in the sport, worth an eye-watering £700bn. To put that into context, Manchester City previously had the wealthiest owners in the Premier League, who are worth £23bn.

That is not to say Newcastle is now worth £700bn, but they will now have a war chest which dwarfs all others, giving them the financial means to bring in big players.

This news might tempt you to check a major football betting site like 888Sport to see what Newcastle’s chances are of winning the Premier League this season, but their odds remain largely unchanged. City are still hot favourites to lift the trophy at odds of roughly 10/11.

So, besides a takeover from a wealthy consortium, how do Premier League clubs make their money? Their biggest revenue stream comes from television broadcast rights for the league.

The English top-flight is the most popular league in the world, in any sport; the viewing figures back this up. As such, the cost of domestic broadcast rights are astronomically high; they’re now in the billions.

Sky Sports and BT Sport are the two main contenders for this content, though Amazon Prime and the BBC also contribute.

Exactly half – 50% – of this revenue is split evenly between the 20 Premier League clubs. A further 25% is then distributed according to how many times a team is broadcast live (these are known as facility fees) and the final 25% is based on where a team places in the league (merit fees).

So, a team that is shown live on TV more often will receive a larger chunk of the facility fees, and likewise, a club that finishes high up in the league table will be rewarded with higher merit fees revenue.

This, in theory, should create more of a meritocracy and allow clubs to earn more money based on their performances. However, in reality, big clubs like Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United will always get more airtime and, thus, more money.

International broadcast rights revenue is split evenly between the 20 clubs, however, those that make it into the Champions League will get even more funds from TV rights. This is because of separate deals for this competition, and the amount they get largely depends on how far they go in the Champions League.

The TV rights battle only properly boomed over the past decade or so, leading to the staggering figures that are forked over by broadcasters nowadays, which only seem to keep growing.

A more traditional form of revenue for clubs are ticket sales. Clubs will charge each and every person that attends a game for their seat in the stadium, and these prices will vary depending on their position in the venue and the context of the game itself. A London derby between Chelsea and Tottenham will cost more to attend than a game against Aston Villa at Stamford Bridge.

Clubs will also make money from season ticket holders, who will pay a lump sum to have tickets in the same seats for every home game for their team.

On top of this, most Premier League clubs also offer exclusive hospitality and business packages to those willing to splash out on game day. These are particularly attractive to companies that want to impress clients or reward their colleagues. These packages cost a lot more than regular tickets and can be decent earners for Premier League clubs.

In a similar vein, major clubs provide tours of their stadiums outside of match days, charging people to look around and inside the venue to get a closer feel.

Aside from ticket sales, clubs will also be charging for food and drink inside the stadium, and these can generate huge sums of money when totalled up.

Then, of course, there is merchandise. Clubs will have their own shops and stalls on site that sell things like shirts and scarves, but they also have websites where fans can purchase these items as well.

Last, but certainly not least, are the shirt sponsor deals that Premier Clubs can command. Brands like Chevrolet and Yokohama pay tens of millions of pounds to have their logo featured prominently on the shirts of players, providing these teams with yet more income.

However, it isn’t all plain sailing, even for the world’s biggest football teams. Just look at FC Barcelona, who are facing the worst financial crisis in their long history. Their debt is over the £1bn mark, and they have a lot of work to do before they’re out of it.

A large part of their problems stem from player salaries which, according to club president Joan Laporta, represents 103% of their total income. Obviously, such a business model is not sustainable, particularly as they will have many other costs elsewhere.

Obviously, managing the finances of a major football club is no easy task and while it’s not possible to get a detailed look at exactly what has gone wrong at Barcelona, it’s clear that inflated salaries have been a huge issue.

Premier League clubs earn revenue from numerous streams, some of which aren’t wholly under their control but will still have a significant impact on their bottom line. Salaries will be their main outgoing so, as long as they can keep these in check, profits should come.

Dipo Olowookere is a journalist based in Nigeria that has passion for reporting business news stories. At his leisure time, he watches football and supports 3SC of Ibadan. Mr Olowookere can be reached via [email protected]

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

What You’ll Find in the GameZone Platform Games Library

Published

on

GameZone platform games

GameZone platform games operate within a regulated digital ecosystem that combines casino titles, slot-based formats, and Filipino card games under one structured platform.

Instead of being limited to a single developer, the system integrates multiple accredited studios alongside internally developed releases.

This setup allows the platform to expand its catalog while maintaining consistent technical and compliance standards across all titles.

Before any game becomes accessible, it undergoes a multi-layered review process. Internal checks focus on system performance, gameplay stability, and rule accuracy, ensuring that each title functions as intended.

These are followed by external compliance procedures aligned with Philippine regulations, including certified randomization systems and clearly defined mechanics.

This dual-layer validation ensures that games are not only operational but also transparent in how outcomes are generated.

The platform also emphasizes clarity in presentation. Each title includes provider information, allowing players to identify its source and review accredited partners.

This visibility supports informed decision-making and reinforces trust in the platform’s structure.

In addition to third-party contributions, GameZone develops its own titles based on Filipino play habits. These in-house games retain familiar mechanics while adapting them for digital use.

With all content following the same approval and monitoring process, the platform maintains a unified environment where different game types, whether traditional, casual, or themed, coexist without inconsistency.

Filipino Card Games as the Core of GameZone Platform Games

A central component of GameZone Platform Games is its collection of Filipino card game adaptations.

These titles are designed to reflect widely recognized formats while introducing controlled variations that adjust pacing and gameplay options.

By keeping the core mechanics intact, the platform ensures that players can easily recognize and transition into each game, even in a digital setting.

Tongits Series

Tongits Plus—A direct adaptation of traditional gameplay, focusing on drawing, discarding, and forming valid melds.

Tongits Joker—Incorporates Joker cards as wild elements, allowing expanded combinations and recovery strategies.

Tongits Quick—Uses a smaller deck and shorter rounds, making it suitable for faster sessions without removing strategic depth.

Tongits Jackpot—Retains standard mechanics while adding a pooled reward system linked to game outcomes.

Pusoy Series

The Pusoy lineup follows a similar structure, centered on arranging cards into three hands from front, middle, and back, all while maintaining proper ranking order.

Pusoy Plus—A standard format that closely mirrors traditional gameplay, requiring careful hand arrangement to avoid penalties.

Pusoy Wild—Introduces a limited adjustment phase, giving players a chance to refine their card placement before final submission.

Pusoy Jackpot—Maintains the same arrangement-based mechanics but includes a reward layer tied to round results.

These variations highlight the importance of decision-making in Pusoy, where correct sequencing and balance between hands determine the outcome.

The digital format helps minimize errors through guided systems while preserving the strategic depth of the game.

Pusoy Dos (Classic)
Another key title is Pusoy Dos (Classic), which follows a shedding format where players aim to discard all cards by beating previous combinations.

Unlike arrangement-based games, Pusoy Dos focuses on timing and card control, requiring players to decide when to release strong combinations.

Its simple objective and fast pacing translate effectively into digital play, making it accessible for both experienced and new users.

These adaptations highlight how traditional Filipino games can be preserved within a digital system. Automated rule enforcement ensures accuracy, while guided interfaces help players understand gameplay without requiring prior familiarity.

Accessible Formats and Themed Game Integration

GameZone Platform Games are not limited to complex card-based experiences.

The platform also includes simpler formats designed for quick sessions and straightforward interaction. These titles provide variety, allowing users to alternate between strategy-heavy gameplay and more immediate outcomes.

The Color Game represents this category, drawing inspiration from traditional fairground setups. Its structure remains familiar, but it incorporates certified randomness and transparent probability systems.

Each round is brief, making it a practical option for players seeking short, low-commitment gameplay sessions.

This mix of complexity levels reflects typical player behavior. Many users prefer switching between extended gameplay and quick rounds depending on time and preference.

By offering both within the same platform, GameZone maintains flexibility without fragmenting the experience.

The platform also introduces themed titles tied to recognizable figures such as Manny Pacquiao. These games extend cultural familiarity into digital formats while maintaining the same regulated structure.

Manny Punch operates as an idle-style system where players adjust difficulty levels that influence potential rewards. Higher settings increase possible returns but lower the likelihood of success.

Pacquiao Fortune follows a slot-style format, combining reel-based mechanics with themed visuals while relying on certified randomization.

Despite differences in gameplay style, all titles follow identical testing and compliance procedures, ensuring that accessibility and presentation do not compromise fairness or reliability.

Digiplus multiply the fun

System Consistency and Platform Transparency

GameZone Platform Games demonstrate how a diverse set of titles can function within a unified and structured environment.

The platform combines traditional card games, simplified formats, and themed releases while maintaining consistent standards across all categories.

Uniformity is a key principle. Each game undergoes the same internal evaluation and regulatory review process before release. This ensures that gameplay mechanics are correctly implemented and that outcomes follow certified systems.

As a result, players can move between different game types without encountering inconsistencies in how they operate.

Familiarity plays an important role in accessibility. Card games follow established rules that many players already understand, while variations provide flexibility in pacing and reward structures.

Simpler titles offer alternatives for shorter sessions, and themed games introduce recognizable elements without altering core systems.

Transparency further strengthens this structure. Provider labeling and accessible game details allow players to understand both the origin and functionality of each title. This reduces uncertainty and supports informed participation.

Rather than focusing solely on expanding its catalog, the platform prioritizes maintaining a stable and understandable system.

This ensures that growth does not affect usability or clarity. Players experience consistent mechanics, reliable performance, and transparent systems across all titles.

By aligning variety with structure, the platform creates a cohesive digital environment that supports long-term trust and ease of navigation.

FAQs

Q: What are GameZone Platform Games?
A: They are a collection of casino, slot, and Filipino games within a regulated digital platform.

Q: Are games tested before release?
A: Yes. Each title undergoes internal checks and regulatory compliance verification.

Q: What themed games are available?
A: Manny Punch and Pacquiao Fortune are included, along with possible collaborations.

Q: How do I register?
A: Sign up through the official platform using a valid ID and mobile number.

Q: Do card games follow traditional rules?
A: Yes. Core mechanics remain consistent, with optional variations for pacing and rewards.

Continue Reading

Sports

Senegal to Appeal AFCON Title Loss at Court of Arbitration for Sport

Published

on

senegal afcon 2025

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Senegalese Football Federation has said it would appeal against the decision of the Confederation of African Football (CAF)  to strip it of the 2025 AFCON trophy at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

It called the decision “an unfair, unprecedented and unacceptable decision which brings discredit to African football”.

CAF on Tuesday night declared Morocco champions, following a walkout staged by the Senegal team, but later returned to defeat Morocco 1-0.

CAF, in a statement yesterday, said “the Senegal national team is declared to have forfeited the match,” a 1-0 victory in the final, “with the result being officially recorded as 3-0” in favour of Morocco.

The Royal Moroccan Football Federation (FRMF) said in a statement “its action was never intended to contest the sporting performance of the teams participating in this competition, but solely to request the application of the competition regulations”.

During the final on January 18, with the scoreline 0-0, Congolese referee Jean Jacques Ndala gave a spot-kick in the eighth minute of added time.

Ndala was advised by the video assistant referee (VAR) to consult the pitchside monitor and review defender El Hadji Malick Diouf’s challenge on Diaz.

Senegal head coach Pape Thiaw, still incensed by Ndala’s decision a few moments earlier to disallow a Senegal goal from Ismaila Sarr, ushered his team off the field.

The decision follows an appeal by the Moroccan FA, which CAF said is “declared admissible in form” and was upheld.

CAF added that “through the conduct of its team”, Senegal infringed on Article 82 of the regulations of the Africa Cup of Nations, and as a result, Article 84 became applicable.

Article 82 states that if a team refuses to play or leaves the ground before the end of regulation time without the referee’s authorisation, it will be considered the loser and eliminated from the competition.

Article 84 complements this provision, stating that any team that violates Article 82 will be permanently eliminated and will lose the match 3-0.

Continue Reading

Sports

CAF Strips Senegal of 2025 AFCON Trophy, Gives Morocco

Published

on

host 2025 AFCON

By Dipo Olowookere

Senegal has been stripped of the 2025 TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) trophy it won on January 18, 2026.

In a statement on Tuesday night, the Confederation of African Football (CAF) said the trophy now belongs to Morocco, which hosted the tournament.

Senegal defeated Morocco by a lone goal to clinch the title in extra time after earlier leaving the pitch due to a penalty awarded to the host nation, which was later lost after a restart.

The penalty was awarded in the last minute of the match following a VAR check by Congolese referee, Jean-Jacques Ndala, after Brahim Diaz had been tugged to the ground by Senegal full back, El Hadji Malick Diouf.

The Senegalese team was not happy with the call because they had earlier been denied one against Morocco. The Teranga Lions’ coach, Pape Bouna Thiaw, ordered his players to leave the pitch in protest, but Sadio Mane persuaded them to return after a 14-minute delay, and when the spot kick was taken by Diaz, he played it into the hands of Édouard Mendy.

The game went into extra time, and in the 94th minute, Pape Gueye netted the only goal.

After the tournament, Morocco launched an appeal to void Senegal’s win, but lost as CAF said Articles 82 and 84 of the Regulations of the Africa Cup of Nations were not violated.

However, in a twist, the football governing body on the continent made a U-turn, declaring Morocco the 2025 AFCON champions.

It recorded the final match as 3–0 in favour of the Fédération Royale Marocaine de Football (FRMF), setting aside the earlier decision of the CAF Disciplinary Board.

CAF upheld “the appeal lodged by the Fédération Royale Marocaine de Football (FRMF)” and declared it “admissible,” agreeing that “Articles 82 and 84” were breached.

“The CAF Appeal Board further finds that the conduct of the Senegal team falls within the scope of Articles 82 and 84 of the Regulations of the Africa Cup of Nations,” a part of the statement read.

“In application of Article 84 of the Regulations of the Africa Cup of Nations, the Senegal team is declared to have forfeited the match, with the result recorded as 3–0 in favour of the Fédération Royale Marocaine de Football (FRMF),” it further announced.

Continue Reading

Trending