Connect with us

Sports

Manchester City Banned From Champions League 

Published

on

Manchester City

By Adedapo Adesanya 

– Handed €30m Fine

– May also face point deduction in the English Premier League.

– To be Absent from 2020/21 and 2021/22 Tournaments

Current English Premier League champions, Manchester City Football Club, have been banned from competing in the European competitions, including the prestigious UEFA Champions League for two years.

The decision was made by the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), which also asked the footballing outfit to pay a fine of €30 million (£25 million or $33 million) for breaching Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules.

Following an investigation, the Adjudicatory Chamber of UEFA’s Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) found the Premier League club guilty of overstating its sponsorship revenue between 2012 and 2016.

UEFA’s said in a statement that, “The Adjudicatory Chamber, having considered all the evidence, has found that Manchester City Football Club committed serious breaches of the UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations by overstating its sponsorship revenue in its accounts and in the break-even information submitted to UEFA between 2012 and 2016.

“The Adjudicatory Chamber has also found that in breach of the regulations the Club failed to cooperate in the investigation of this case by the CFCB.

“The Adjudicatory Chamber has imposed disciplinary measures on Manchester City Football Club directing that it shall be excluded from participation in UEFA club competitions in the next two seasons (ie. the 2020/21 and 2021/22 seasons) and pay a fine of €30 million.”

However, a response from Manchester City claimed that UEFA made the decision even before the investigation had started.

“Manchester City is disappointed but not surprised by today’s announcement by the UEFA Adjudicatory Chamber.

“The Club has always anticipated the ultimate need to seek out an independent body and process to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence in support of its position.

“In December 2018, the UEFA Chief Investigator publicly previewed the outcome and sanction he intended to be delivered to Manchester City, before any investigation had even begun.

“The subsequent flawed and consistently leaked UEFA process he oversaw has meant that there was little doubt in the result that he would deliver. The Club has formally complained to the UEFA Disciplinary body, a complaint which was validated by a CAS ruling.

“Simply put, this is a case initiated by UEFA, prosecuted by UEFA and judged by UEFA. With this prejudicial process now over, the Club will pursue an impartial judgment as quickly as possible and will therefore, in the first instance, commence proceedings with the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the earliest opportunity,” the club, which currently trails Liverpool on the EPL log, said on its website on Friday.

With this, Manchester City are now also facing a possible Premier League points deduction, as their punishment for serious breaches of UEFA Financial Fair Play also represents a breach of the domestic competition’s regulations.

The issue comes because any club has to supply true information to get a Premier League licence, and that information will have had to have matched that supplied to UEFA.

Adedapo Adesanya is a journalist, polymath, and connoisseur of everything art. When he is not writing, he has his nose buried in one of the many books or articles he has bookmarked or simply listening to good music with a bottle of beer or wine. He supports the greatest club in the world, Manchester United F.C.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

UEFA, CONCACAF, AFC Begin Talks on Rival FIFA Tournaments

Published

on

UEFA Club Competitions

By Adedapo Adesanya

European, North and Central American, and Asian football governing bodies have begun preliminary discussions on organising rival international tournaments to those run by the Federation of International Football Association (FIFA).

According to Bloomberg, the talks involve the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), the Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF), and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC).

The proposed rival competitions represent the latest challenge to FIFA president Gianni Infantino, following his failed plan to spin off the organisation’s commercial operations in a deal involving JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Such tournaments could threaten FIFA’s lucrative international competition circuit, including the World Cup, which generated more than $9 billion during the 2026 edition, a record for the tournament.

UEFA, whose members are home to some of the richest domestic leagues in the world, has led efforts to pressure Mr Infantino to leave office. Despite shelving the plan to further commercialise FIFA’s operations, the European body is still considering a boycott of the World Cup and other FIFA competitions if Infantino remains president.

The first major tournament that could be affected by any boycott is the 2027 Women’s World Cup in Brazil, although several youth competitions are scheduled to take place in the coming months.

According to one of the people familiar with the discussions, the proposed alternative competitions could provide players with opportunities to participate in international tournaments if a disruption to FIFA competitions occurs.

The three confederations also demanded an independent review of Infantino’s World Cup proposal in an open letter issued on Monday.

They argued that, as president of Switzerland-based FIFA, Mr Infantino has a responsibility to act in the best interests of the organisation.

“When trust is broken through deception, when an individual places himself above the collective that entrusted him with authority, that duty has been abandoned,” UEFA, Concacaf and the AFC said in the letter.

The three confederations called for a fully ⁠independent review into the stake sale proposal.

“Football’s strength has ⁠always been its unity,” the statement concluded. “We call for that unity to ‌be honoured now, for leadership that serves football, not ‌seeks ‌to command it.”

FIFA comprises more than 200 national associations organised under six regional confederations. Besides UEFA, CONCACAF and the AFC, the other confederations are the Confederation of African Football (CAF), South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL) and Oceania Football Confederation (OFC).

The next FIFA presidential election is scheduled for March, with Mr Infantino planning to seek a third four-year term, which would be the final term permitted under the organisation’s rules.

Continue Reading

Sports

Can South Africa’s Provincial Gambling Model Work in Nigeria?

Published

on

nigeria gambling framework

South Africa is not new to gambling legislation and regulatory affairs. As opposed to relying on one singular gambling regulator, like the UK and Malta, South Africa opts for a provincial licensing system, meaning it allows state provinces to regulate gambling, with the model supported by a national legislation. As Nigeria continues to shape and reform its gambling industry, questions are arising.  Can Nigeria use South Africa’s provincial gambling model as a blueprint to monitor online gaming?

South African Gambling Model explained

South Africa monitors gambling both via its national gambling laws along with provincial regulators. Online gaming laws are outlined by the government on a national level, with each province in charge of licensing, compliance and enforcement within each region.

Although widely debated, the current South African market allows sports betting sites to operate legally, yet casino gambling is still regarded as illegal.  Having said that, sports betting sites do offer games of chance such as slot games, table games and quick games via their platforms.

Whilst the main legislation is laid out by the South African government, respective provinces are in charge of the following gambling elements with the region:

  • License bookmaker sites
  • Monitor games with fixed odds offered by platforms
  • Tracks legal compliance and regulations
  • Collects gambling taxes that are generated
  • Promotes responsible gambling practices.

Nigeria’s current gambling framework

Just like South Africa, Nigeria has ample potential in the gambling industry. Currently, the country does not have any licensing procedures in place to legally operate an online casino. Having said that, no laws forbid Nigerian players to join offshore online gambling sites and tempt their luck at gambling.

Sports betting sites in Nigeria are legal. This means, players have the option to go online, register at a sports site and place bets. The National Lottery Regulatory Commission is in charge of the legal framework, with many states developing their own licensing bodies, or in the process of.

Latest court cases in Nigeria and South Africa are giving more power to provinces and states to outline gambling laws, with the government ready to support new laws and licensing bodies.

Could South Africa’s decentralized provincial system serve as a blueprint?

Nigeria and South Africa are very much alike in terms of territories. The latter has 9 provinces, with Nigeria having 36 states and the Central Federal Territory. The constitutional infrastructure of both aligns, with states and provinces having their own gambling territories to monitor. Both countries have a love for sports, with both participating in major sporting events such as the African Cup, Boxing and major athletic competitions. Several provinces in Nigeria have already established a foothold in the gambling market with Lagos being a major player. In recent years, we have seen many live events shown on DAZN, TNT and ESPN happening live from Nigeria. Can the country capitalise from that?  Having Nigerian provinces and regions regulate their own gambling laws just like South Africa will see the market grow, flourish and hopefully see also online casinos or fixed odds games being available to enjoy online.

South Africa’s sportsbetting sites have been working with legislators to officially legalize online casinos. Currently, South African players can register as betting sites and enjoy online games. In theory, they are the everyday online games we grew to love at online casinos, but they are called ‘ fixed odds games’ which in the eyes of South African lawmakers, this is not illegal to do.

Having Nigeria states set the gambling regulations for the region, will see the country move forward in terms of progress, and will also please many online punters. Each state can look at the numbers generated by the state and adapt laws and regulations in line with the customer’s gaming needs. Nigeria, can benefit massively from applying South Africa’s decentralized system as a model of excellence or blueprint.

How will Nigeria benefit from developing State gambling laws and regulations?

Having control of gambling within the state is an important factor to consider. The Nigerian states can develop laws based on customer feedback, activity and state needs. Currently, Nigeria players are allowed to visit offshore sites, register and play, so why not have the possibility of doing so within the state?  Nigeria would benefit massively by doing so, and here is what each state can obtain by legalising online casino gaming:

Revenue Opportunities

  • Licensing Fees paid by each online casino / sportsbook site
  • Collecting of taxes and contribution to the state’s GDP
  • Vast employment opportunities for Nigerians
  • Economic development by investing tax money into State development.
  • Better control on gambling activities happening within the state
  • Licensing online casinos will see operators flock to grow in a new and flourishing market.

Things to consider if Nigeria adopts the South African provincial model

Adopting the South African model of provincial licensing can also pose some challenges for Nigeria. With 36 states, 36 licensing bodies would need to be established, with a centralised body overseeing and setting national gambling standards. Whilst each state can opt to have different technical standards, Nigeria needs to find a way to adopt a compliance stronghold. Each license would need to be monitored, and this could be done adopting the South African model of a national legislation. Operators would need to have a closer look at each state, and ultimately decide on which license to acquire. The good news is that states will deal with licensing requirements at a state level, and thus the process would be easier from an operator standpoint.

Responsible Gambling regulations can be outlined at a national level, with each state having to abide by RG. Centralised RG rules will see Nigeria dealing and tackling illegal and problematic gambling, with states having a blueprint of how to help gamblers in need.

Next Steps for Nigeria

With sporting markets and gambling opportunities everywhere, Nigeria could adopt the South African model or go for a hybrid model of provincial gambling. A national gambling authority would set the minimum regulatory standards. Technical infrastructure and requirements can also be standard across all Nigeria. Ultimately, each state would be responsible in issuing licenses, and operators upholding their part by complying to compliance rules set by licensing states.

The above model can mirror South African’s model, improve enforcement and also attract new operators to Nigeria’s markets. Success is achieved when national standards are clearly set, promoting discussion and cooperation amongst Nigerian states.

Success would depend on creating clear national standards, promoting cooperation among state regulators, and ensuring consistent consumer protections across all jurisdictions. Online Gambling is indeed a growing market, with Nigeria benefitting massively by adopting a standard regulatory system within each state collaborating.

Continue Reading

Sports

Super Falcons’ 2027 World Cup Hopes Alive Despite WAFCON Exit

Published

on

Super Falcons WAFCON 2026

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Super Falcons can still qualify for the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup despite losing to Cameroon in the quarter-finals of the 2026 Women’s Africa Cup of Nations (WAFCON) on Sunday.

Nigeria, the 10-time African champions, were beaten 1-0 by the Lionesses after conceding an early free-kick goal, ruling them out of contention for one of Africa’s four automatic tickets to next year’s World Cup in Brazil.

However, the Super Falcons still have another opportunity to secure a place at the tournament, albeit through a longer qualification route.

The Nigerian side will join the three other quarter-final losers — South Africa, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire — in the continental play-offs.

Following their defeat to Cameroon on Sunday, the Super Falcons will quickly regroup to face South Africa on Thursday.

A victory over Banyana Banyana will earn Nigeria one of the two available continental play-off tickets.

The two teams that emerge from the continental play-offs will then advance to the global play-off tournament, where they will battle for the final remaining places at the 2027 Women’s World Cup.

According to FIFA, the first phase of the global play-off tournament will take place in November and December 2026 at a centralised venue and will feature six teams — two from the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), two from the Confederation of African Football (CAF), one from the South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL) and one from the Oceania Football Confederation (OFC).

“Using a format which will be confirmed at a later date, two teams will qualify for the final play-off phase,” FIFA stated on its website.

The final play-off phase will be held at a centralised location in February 2027, with the two qualifiers from the first phase joined by two teams from Concacaf, one from CONMEBOL and one from UEFA.

The six teams will be drawn into three paths, with a direct knockout match in each path determining the final three teams to qualify for the World Cup. Teams from the same confederation will not be drawn in the same pathway.

This means only three teams from the global play-off tournament will ultimately secure places at the World Cup in South America next year.

The Super Falcons, therefore, have little room for error if they are to maintain their record of appearing at every edition of the Women’s World Cup since the tournament was introduced in 1991.

At the 2023 World Cup, Nigeria reached the Round of 16 before losing to eventual finalists England on penalties.

Continue Reading