Connect with us

World

Great-Power Rivalry Reawakening Russia to Geopolitical Realities in Africa

Published

on

Russia Geopolitical Realities in Africa

By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh

With heightening geopolitical situation, a new wave is entirely blowing from Russia to Africa, fortifying the emerging multipolar world with emphasis on Africa and the Global South. Russia’s policy approach toward Africa is increasingly changing, incorporating most the areas and spheres as ready instruments for consolidating the scale of current bilateral relations. For the first time in the post-Soviet history, a press tour for journalists of African news agencies “TASS – Africa: the Path of Friendship” took place from November 16 to 24 in Moscow, Kazan and St. Petersburg.

The TASS news agency intends to establish news bureaus in all African countries, replicating its presence during the Soviet era, Director General Andrey Kondrashov said. His statement was based on the fact that Africa is becoming “one of the most important areas of focus.” The biggest apparent challenge is how to create an extensive media outreach and maintain a significant information footprint, a replica which was witnessed during Soviet times.

Chairman of the State Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin, meeting with African ambassadors, indicated clearly that Russia is competing with foreign players in Africa. But, as Russia continues invariably working on its long-term cooperation, it has “to move away from intentions to concrete actions.” Russia has a distinctive feature in comparison with other countries: it has always spread to the people of the African continent good things, model-solutions for development problems.

During a meeting with African ambassadors in the State Duma, the issue of greater representation of Russian media in Africa was raised, which ambassadors responded with applause. “It is necessary to take certain steps together for the Russian media to work on the African continent,” Volodin noted before arguably comparing that “the Russian media provide broadcasting in various languages, they work in many countries, although it is certainly impossible to compare this presence with presence of the media of the United States, United Kingdom and Germany.”

Notwithstanding the geopolitical obstacles, Russia has sound instruments for media cooperation. Yet, officials desperately complain over anti-Russian media campaign perpetuated by the western media in Africa. The continent’s biggest challenge among political elite and entrepreneurs is to access opportunities in the Russian Federation for cooperation, yet these vital element has been missing. There is dearth of adequate information on economic and tourism developments between Russia and Africa.

For creating a sustainable partnership—the first in Africa—would require sprawling educational campuses, frequent exchange of specialists and students, promoting visa-free tourism, as well as media practitioners’ engagement with ordinary Russians, visiting interesting tourism spots across the Russian Federation.

And while China, for instance, has granted 53 African nations duty-free access to its market, Russia would simply not just as it does consider it necessary to permit African reporters inside the country. Noticeably, Africans are showing high interest in leveraging their relationships with Russia. On the other side, Russian rules and regulations are restricting Africans, and as result, rather continue balancing their strategic relationship—with varying degrees of success with the United States and Europe.

Experts have consistently argue that lack of two-way media representation exacerbates misunderstanding between Russia and Africa. As a result, African leaders and corporate business executives often rely on Western media for information about Russia, leading to a one-sided view that often reflects Western biases.  As Africa’s middle class estimated at 280 million (twice Russia’s population) continues to grow, representing a vibrant information market, the need for a balanced and comprehensive media coverage from both sides becomes increasingly crucial. The low representation does not reflect the growing diplomatic and economic ties between Russia and Africa. Analysis further shows both realism and symbolism, and Africa repetitive attempts to turn symbolism into real substance at this stage of shifting developments.

Artem Kozhin, is now Russia’s ambassador to Seychelles. During the Russia-Africa Summit, Artem Kozhin, who represented the Foreign Ministry’s Information and Press Department, at the panel discussion on media, explained in an indepth report that some 300 news bureaus from 60 countries were operating in Russia, including 800 foreign correspondents and 400 technical personnel in the Russian Federation. According to his interpretation, this extremely low representation of African media hardly meets the level of current dynamically developing relations between Russia and Africa. “We invite all interested parties to open news bureaus and expand media cooperation with Russia,” Kozhin said at the gathering, inviting Africa media to Moscow.

Professor Alexey Vasiliev, the first Special Representative of Russian President for Relations with Africa (2006-2011) and currently the Head of the Center for African and Arab Studies at the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, told the audience in Sochi: “Africa is largely unaware of Russia, since African media mainly consumes information the Western media sources and then replicates them. And all the fake news, the Rusophobia and anti-Russian propaganda, spread by the western media, are repeated in the African media.”

“Measures are needed to enable us to better understand each other,” suggested Professor Vasiliev, who regularly advises the Presidential Administration, the Government of the Russian Federation, both chambers of the Federal Assembly, and the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Critiques have since emerged regarding the level of discrimination in accrediting foreign media. In a parallel plane, policy researchers say Africa’s media absence in the Russian Federation is alarming. In short, Africa Studies Institute’s Director, Professor Irina Abramova has reiterated, at several conferences including at State Duma roundtable discussion, and now at TACC conference with the media group from 10 Francophone African countries, the extremely low of African media presence in the Russian Federation.

She emphasized that Russia’s image is formed by African audiences, influenced by the media, often diverges significantly from reality. The director noted that receiving first-hand information is the foundation for mutual understanding and cooperation. “Information, today, has become a powerful productive force, capable of shaping objective reality. Under the current conditions, the role of journalists is extremely important, because the nature of Russian-African relations, largely depends on how given facts are presented,” Professor Abramova stated, while urging African media practitioners to actively establish their presence in the Russian Federation.

Professor Abarmova regrettably underlined that not a single African news agency has permanent accreditation in the country. The speakers discussed expanding cooperation in the information sphere, pointed to the importance of expanding Russian media offices on the African continent.

For decades, cooperation with Africa has been in line with Moscow’s policy aimed at strengthening media ties. And now, by inviting these African media practitioners, more or less, marked one step toward teaming up, at starting level, to fight anti-Russian propaganda, and the spread of fake information. In addition, Professor Abramova underscored the critical fact that the Africa Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has to work up to an appreciable expectations, discard uncollaborative approach to issues relating to Africa.

For Africa, officials of the Department for Partnership with Africa at the Russian Foreign Ministry should rather show enthusiasm in facilitating the rules and regulations, among others, in addressing promptly the necessary obstacles hindering bilateral media cooperation. Professor Abramova unreservedly suggested, for example, the significance of establishing Russia-Africa Press Exchange Programme to encourage and promote exchanges and regular visits between Russian and African media.

Tatyana Dovgalenko, Director of the Department for Partnership with Africa at the Russian Foreign Ministry, said that Moscow counts on the active participation of its partners from Africa. In this context, she reiterated the Russia-Africa summits held in October 2019 and July 2023, have described as a true breakthrough by Russian President Vladimir Putin. “These events served as a powerful starting-point for what is commonly referred to as the revival of Russia-Africa relations. And today, Russian-African ties are steadily growing,” Dovgalenko said at the conference dedicated to the launch of the press tour. “It is important that our African friends view Russia as a reliable friend and a partner, capable of acting to protect its own sovereignty and supporting others to do the same.”

“These events served as a powerful starting-point for what is commonly referred to as the revival of Russia-Africa relations. And today, Russian-African ties are steadily growing,” Dovgalenko said at the conference dedicated to the launch of the press tour. “It is important that our African friends view Russia as a reliable friend and a partner, capable of acting to protect its own sovereignty and supporting others to do the same.”

The media initiative was as a follow up to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s discussions about rolling out a comprehensive roadmap for a more integrated cooperation and to find ways of improving public diplomacy in Africa.

On May 16, Sergey Lavrov chaired the Foreign Ministry Collegium meeting on the theme titled “Concept of the Russian Federation on Cooperation with African Media” which stresses the need to cooperate with African media as Russia looks forward to strengthening relations and intends to share its strategic interests with Africa. According to the MFA report: “the Russian Federation is implementing programmes of cooperation with various African countries which include the media, education, culture, art, and sport.”

In order to overcome these longstanding challenges mentioned above in the article, both Russia and Africa have to take concrete steps toward building a more collaborative media landscape. This includes creating opportunities for African journalists in Russia and increasing the presence of Russian media in Africa. In mid-November 2025, media representatives invited from 10 Francophone African countries, visited key landmarks, museums, and universities, and held meetings with representatives of academic institutions and media.

World

Trump Picks Kevin Warsh to Succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve Chair

Published

on

Kevin Warsh

By Adedapo Adesanya

President Donald Trump has named Mr Kevin Warsh as the successor to Mr Jerome Powell as the Federal Reserve chair, ending a prolonged odyssey that has seen unprecedented turmoil around the central bank.

The decision culminates a process that officially began last summer but started much earlier than that, with President Trump launching a criticism against the Powell-led US central bank almost since he took the job in 2018.

“I have known Kevin for a long period of time, and have no doubt that he will go down as one of the GREAT Fed Chairmen, maybe the best,” Mr Trump said in a Truth Social post announcing the selection.

US analysts noted that the 55-year old appear not to ripple market because of his previous experience at the apex bank as Governor, with others saying he wouldn’t always do the bidding of the American president.

If approved by the US Senate, Mr Warsh will take over the position in May, when Mr Powell’s term expires.

Despite having argued for reductions recently, “Warsh has a long hawkish history that markets have not forgotten,” one analyst told Bloomberg.

President Trump has castigated Mr Powell for not lowering interest rates more quickly. His administration also launched a criminal investigation of Powell and the Federal Reserve earlier this month, which led Mr Powell to issue an extraordinary rebuke of President Trump’s efforts to politicize the independent central bank.

Continue Reading

World

BRICS Agenda, United States Global Dominance and Africa’s Development Priorities

Published

on

Vsevolod Sviridov BRICS Agenda

By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh

Donald Trump has been leading the United States as its president since January 2025. Washington’s priority is to Make America Great Again (MAGA). Trump’s tariffs have rippled many economies from Latin America through Asian region to the continent of Africa. Trump’s Davos speech has explicitly revealed building a ‘new world order’ based on dominance rather than trust. He has also initiated whirlwind steps to annex Greenland, while further created the Board of Peace, aimed at helping end the two-year war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and to oversee reconstruction. Trump is handling the three-year old Russia-Ukraine crisis, and other deep-seated religious and ethnic conflicts in Africa.

These emerging trends, at least in a considerable short term, are influencing BRICS which has increased its geopolitical importance, and focusing on uniting the countries in the Global East and Global South. From historical records, BRICS, described as non-western organization, and is loosing its coherence primarily due to differences in geopolitical interests and multinational alignments, and of course, a number of members face threats from the United States while there are variations of approach to the emerging worldwide perceptions.

In this conversation, deputy director of the Center for African Studies at Moscow’s National Research University High School of Economics (HSE), Vsevolod Sviridov, expresses his opinions focusing on BRICS agenda under India’s presidency, South Africa’s G20 chairmanship in 2024, and genegrally putting Africa’s development priorities within the context of emerging trends. Here are the interview excerpts:

What is the likely impact of Washington’s geopolitics and its foreign policy on BRICS?

From my perspective, the current Venezuela-U.S. confrontation, especially Washington’s tightened leverage over Venezuelan oil revenue flows and the knock-on effects for Chinese interests, will be read inside BRICS as a reminder that sovereign resources can still be constrained by financial chokepoints and sanctions politics.  This does not automatically translate into BRICS taking Venezuela’s side, but it does strengthen the bloc’s long-running argument for more resilient South-South trade settlement, diversified energy chains, and financing instruments that reduce exposure to coercive measures, because many African and other developing economies face similar vulnerabilities around commodities, shipping, insurance, and correspondent banking. At the same time, BRICS’ expansion makes consensus harder: several members maintain significant ties with the U.S., so the most likely impact is a technocratic push rather than a loud political campaign.

And highlighting, specifically, the position of BRICS members (South Africa, Ethiopia and Egypt, as well as its partnering African States (Nigeria and Uganda)?

Venezuela crisis urges African members to demand that BRICS deliver usable financial and trade tools. For South Africa, Ethiopia, and Egypt, the Venezuela case is more about the precedent: how quickly external pressure can reshape a country’s fiscal room, debt dynamics, and even investor perceptions when energy revenues and sanctions compliance collide. South Africa will likely argue that BRICS should prioritize investment, industrialization, and trade facilitation. Ethiopia and Egypt, both debt-sensitive and searching for FDI, will be especially attentive to anything that helps de-risk financing, while avoiding steps that could trigger secondary-sanctions anxieties or scare off diversified investors.

Would the latest geopolitical developments ultimately shape the agenda for BRICS 2026 under India’s presidency?

India’s 2026 chairmanship is already framed around “Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability,” and Venezuela’s shock (paired with broader sanction/market-volatility lessons) will likely sharpen the resilience part. From an African perspective, that is an opportunity: South Africa, Ethiopia, and Egypt can press India to translate the theme into deliverables that matter on the ground: food and fertilizer stability, affordable energy access, infrastructure funding. India, in turn, has incentives to keep BRICS focused on economic problem-solving rather than becoming hostage to any single flashpoint. So the Venezuela episode may function as a cautionary case study that accelerates practical cooperation where African members have the most to gain. And I would add: the BRICS agenda will become increasingly Africa-centered simply because Africa’s weight globally is rising, and recent summit discussions have repeatedly highlighted African participation as a core Global South vector.  South Africa’s G20 chairmanship last year explicitly framed around putting Africa’s development priorities high on the agenda, further proves this point.

Continue Reading

World

Afreximbank Terminates Credit Relationship With Fitch Amid Rating Tension

Published

on

Afreximbank

By Adedapo Adesanya

African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) has has officially terminated its credit rating relationship with Fitch Ratings, indicating friction between both firms.

According to a statement on Friday, the Cairo-based African lender said the decision follows a review of the relationship, and its firm belief that the credit rating exercise no longer reflects a good understanding of the bank’s Establishment Agreement, its mission, and its mandate.

“Afreximbank’s business profile remains robust, underpinned by strong shareholder relationships and the legal protections embedded in its Establishment Agreement, signed and ratified by its member states,” the statement added.

Business Post reports that Fitch had cut Afreximbank’s credit rating to one notch above ‘junk’ Status last year and currently has it on a ‘negative outlook’, which is a rating agency’s terminology for another downgrade warning.

Lower rating means higher borrowing costs for Afreximbank, which could directly impact its ability to lend and the low rates at which it does so.

Recall that Fitch in its report published in June 2025, had estimated Afreximbank’s non-performing loans at 7.1 per cent by the end of 2024, exceeding Fitch’s 6 per cent “high risk” threshold.

The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) contested Fitch’s assessment and argued that Fitch confused loan restructuring requests from South Sudan, Zambia, and Ghana by considering them as defaults, claiming this was inconsistent with the 1993 treaty establishing Afreximbank.

African policymakers have raised worries about the ratings by foreign rating agencies like Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P among others. This has increased call for an African focused agency, which is expected to have commenced but continues to face delays.

Continue Reading

Trending