Connect with us

World

Multidisciplinary Perspective of Association of Five Major Emerging Economies

Published

on

Brics Book Cover Multidisciplinary Perspective

By Kester Kenn Klomegah

The BRICS, an association of five major emerging economies Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, has a significant influence on regional affairs and is very active on the global stage.

All of them are members of the G20. While the group has received both praise and criticism from different corners of the world, BRICS is steadily working towards realizing its set goals, bilateral relations among them are also conducted on the basis of equality and mutual benefits.

In this exclusive interview for IDN, Dr Byelongo Elisée Isheloke, who is currently a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Cape Town and has scholarly researched some aspects of BRICS for the past ten years, spoke with Kester Kenn Klomegah about his latest book titled “BRICS and Economic Development: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” published in India. Here are the interview excerpts:

What are the driving reasons for writing the book on BRICS?

Interestingly, BRICS has opened the door to new academic research opportunities. As an academic, I have written four books but this is the first one devoted entirely to BRICS topic. I have also written a few articles on the BRICS aspects. I have researched on BRICS right from its creation. From day one, I believed that BRICS will shape the economic situation of the World and will have an impact on multilateralism.

The book is well received by academics in South Africa. I hope BRICS experts and researchers will continue debating on burning issues in the book. I still believe that while competition with the World Bank and IMF is inevitable, there still is a level of understanding and cooperation that must be upheld for stability and win-win engagements between the two blocs. Peace and stability in the world also depend on that.

My doctorate studies focused on BRICS interventions in the South African mining sector. I have a background in business studies and have embarked on research on industrial and economic issues for years.

As an academic, this has become another research area of specialization. It is a force to reckon with. I wrote the book or rather I co-authored it out of passion and conviction. It is also a research product of many contributors or co-authors. I thank them for working with me in this project.

What important key issues are raised or discussed in the book?

Important key issues raised include: First and foremost, BRICS is still important today but it faces a number of challenges: trade war, border conflicts, corruption, political issues, corona crisis and other socio-economic problems. Secondly, the current BRICS partnership is not sustainable, from its creation, the BRICS has changed in purpose and priorities. It will continue to change.

The third point here is the idea of BRICS Plus, or additional members to join the BRICS. That was a brilliant one. The organization should not be static. It has never been. Some European countries wanted to join but in vain, Africa is represented in the BRICS but South Africa should be supported. It is my opinion. The relationship between Russia and South Africa as a gateway to the rest of the continent is looked at. It is obvious that the people of Africa need more development than it is the case today.

The tigers suggested joining as emerging economies. I submit that the criteria to add countries based on whether they are emerging economies do not hold. Economics fluctuate and emerging economies today may struggle tomorrow.

If countries join based on merit or potential contribution, I will suggest African countries to join as observer countries first, and then when they are ready they may become effective members. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), for example, has a lot to offer as potential so also have other African countries.

We raised the issue of the knowledge economy as a priority, IT, port economics, BRICS banking effectiveness, language policy and many other issues. BRICS needs to coordinate their collective action towards solving the coronavirus crisis with the rest of the world. A “global” solution is needed, that means a global solution with local implications.

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are the important players of the emerging markets in the global economy and their innovation profiles matter for the economic growth of individual countries and the bloc.

The purpose of this book is to critically analyze and compare the international rankings in innovation outputs in terms of knowledge and technology outputs among the BRICS countries, in relation, to their economic growth in the last two years.

Using a variety of research conducted separately, this e-book discusses matters of economic substance from an African perspective. It identifies the negative scores of the BRICS as a partnership as it is faced with death and seeks to understand its rebirth, restructuring or re-engineering in the aftermath.

The study further assesses the strengths of BRICS and advises how to capitalize on these for a steady economic growth going forward. It looks at economic issues affecting the BRICS or its member countries with a focus on South Africa.

The issue of language policy in the partnership was not forgotten and possible solutions to language planning issues are proposed. On this aspect, the people of the BRICS member countries should be consulted. The book calls for a bottom-up approach in conjunction with the top-down approach that was promoted from the BRICS inception.

What critical challenges do you think still remain and what measures needed in order to realize fully the goals set by BRICS?

The BRICS must be open to others, better coordinate, better synergise their actions, democratise their institutions, to promote mineral beneficiation and foreign direct investment. More peacebuilding efforts and do more in creating a digital economy.

In addition, there will be areas where BRICS will compete, and this is healthy to any economy, but there must be more focus on what BRICS can do together to address abject poverty, growing unemployment and human rights abuses.

It is significant to note that there exist disparity and different strategic orientations of BRICS members. This disparity sometimes influences the implementation of decisions arrived at meetings. The book recommends to member countries to streamline individual economic situation in order to strengthen their cooperation.

It further encourages frequent interactions and exchange knowledge that is relevant to innovation and economic development. These are just part of the challenges and opportunities for this organisation.

What’s your assessment of BRICS contribution, particularly, to South Africa?

Starting as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) the partnership incorporated South Africa in 2010 to form the BRICS. As a partnership, first, as a political initiative it takes relatively long to transform into robust and ambitious economic challenges of the current world order. It takes time to evolve into an economic power bloc. There has been a tremendous achievement in this regard. Although some similarities in development exist, India portrays a slightly high prospect in innovation because of its information communication technology success, followed by Brazil and South Africa.

It is important to point that the size of the population is relevant to the level of development of these countries. In certain circumstances, demographics add to the challenges member countries face, especially in time of COVID-19.

One of the key factors is innovation strength in their system of higher education. South Africa needs the utilization of efficient local and global knowledge network in order to deliver the required innovation, and to sustain businesses and to boost economic development.

The major problem of South Africa is that it is not robust economically compared to its BRICS counterparts, and its economy has been performing badly since the 2008/2009 world’s economic crisis. This is why South Africa must be supported by other African countries in the context of BRICS. This is why the idea of an Africa-friendly BRICS Plus is campaigned for. BRICS have to deliver on capital-intensive infrastructure development, and the funding from the New Development Bank (BRICS) is critical in this regard.

With good policies in place, this will help the SADC region and the rest of Africa. It is great that the branch of this bank operates from Johannesburg in South Africa. This is an opportunity for major infrastructure projects to take place in Africa. All the sectors need to come together to solve problems like the COVID-19 pandemic that we are facing today. All the stakeholders, of course, have to work closely together. They need to cooperate with Europe, America and Australasia. The fact is that no one must be left behind.

In all these, can you assess the role of BRICS in Africa’s development?

BRICS has helped during the coronavirus crisis, in Africa. Now it needs to support FDI even more. Now it needs to support democracy and peacebuilding in Africa. Now it needs to prioritize exchange programs, education, trade and other viable areas of cooperation. I still hold to the fact that BRICS have to make collective efforts in coordinating with the rest of the world in addressing the coronavirus crisis.

Supporting African countries in debt relief efforts would help. A paradigm shift or change in that directions would mean Africa will have more liquidity to inject in economic development.

This interview was originally published in InDepthNews.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

PAPSS to Launch African FX Market Platform This Year

Published

on

adoption of PAPSS

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Pan-African Payments and Settlement System (PAPSS), a pan-African payments infrastructure provider designed to facilitate trade on the continent is piloting an African currency market platform to boost commerce across borders in the region.

According to its chief executive, Mr Mike Ogbalu, the service backed by 15 central banks on the continent, expects to add the platform later this year.

He said this will complement its payments infrastructure that it says is currently integrated with 150 commercial banks.

“The rates will be market driven, and our system is able to do a matching based on the rates offered by the different participants in our ecosystem,” the CEO of PAPSS, told Reuters in an interview from Cairo.

The Africa Currency Marketplace, as the platform will be known, will allow parties to exchange local currencies directly, Mr Ogbalu said.

Africa has faced challenges in its foreign exchange markets with challenges ranging around liquidity.

Already, South Africa and Nigeria dominate geographically and much of the wider trading centre around local and hard currency pairs. Those seeking other African currencies must typically secure Dollars first.

However, the region has also seen some major currency reforms with countries such as Nigeria, Egypt and Ethiopia pushing ahead with efforts to move to more market-based regimes.

There have been frequent case of companies not being able to repatriate their revenue from other countries in the region, whenever violence or economic problems cause Dollar shortages in markets like South Sudan or the Central African Republic.

Mr Ogbalu cited the example of an Ethiopian airline selling Naira-denominated tickets in Nigeria, which could then exchange its naira revenue with a Nigerian company trading in Ethiopia using the Birr.

“Our system will intelligently match them and then party A will get Naira in Nigeria and party B will get birr in Ethiopia. The transaction just completes without any third-party currency being involved at all,” Mr Ogbalu said.

He also noted that companies operating in the region have been forced to take a write down every financial year to account for currency revaluations in markets with volatile currencies.

He added that others have invested in assets like real estate to try to preserve the value of their assets in such markets.

There have been attempts to use cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin to get around that problem but their usage is still low, partly due to lack of legal frameworks to support their use in markets like Kenya.

“Those are some of the things we think that this African currency marketplace will unlock,” he said.

Continue Reading

World

Media Cooperation Between Russia and Africa: Stimulating Joint Projects

Published

on

Russia Africa Media Cooperation

By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh 

On March 6, 2025, the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation hosted the roundtable Information Bridge: Russia – Africa.

The event was organized by the Expert Council on Development and Support of Comprehensive Partnership with African Countries under the Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, Alexander M. Babakov, and the Afro-Russian Energy Association.

Representatives from the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, leading Russian and African journalists and editors, well-known bloggers, media company officials from both Russia and Africa, information security specialists, and representatives from analytical centers and research organizations participated in the roundtable.

The event was moderated by Nikolai Novichkov, a deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and Deputy Chairman of the Expert Council. The co-moderator was Yulia Berg, head of the Globus expert club and co-author of the GlobalInsights program on Pan-African television.

Participants of the discussion developed specific proposals and recommendations on using media and the blogosphere to promote Russian-African projects, initiatives, and to expand cooperation between Russia and African countries in the field of media communications.

The event was opened by Alexander Babakov, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and Chairman of the Expert Council on Development and Support of Comprehensive Partnership with African Countries. He emphasized that the issues in media communication between Russia and Africa cannot be resolved without state participation.

“We will certainly, at least within the framework of the State Duma, look for mechanisms that would primarily prioritize state influence and create conditions under which our state’s information agenda could be implemented. There are many institutes and resources available for this. We need to approach them very carefully and seriously today,” said Babakov.

Maria Zakharova, the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, highlighted the existing problems in the media field between Russia and Africa:

“The network of correspondents of Russian and African media has the potential to develop, but it is insufficient. There are no accredited African media in Russia. Interaction with local correspondents exists, but African journalists visit Russia episodically, mainly for major events. Against the backdrop of French and English-speaking media influence and a lack of Russian content, the African audience gets a distorted view of Russia and bilateral cooperation.”

Zakharova also proposed ways to resolve the issues in establishing media relations:

“It is important to continue contacts between Russian and African media. Strengthening cooperation through educational programs, press tours, and major media conferences is essential. Africa’s population is 1.5 billion, half of whom are under 20 years old. This is an age when people want to learn, set goals, and break into the world. Modern technologies create an information environment that cannot be overlooked. We have achievements, but we need more.”

Irina Abramova, Director of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, made several proposals to develop media relations between Russia and Africa:

“It is crucial for journalists to understand Africa to avoid mistakes. We are ready to give lectures and cooperate to improve literacy in covering African topics. In large countries, media should broadcast not only in capitals but also in provinces, addressing educational issues as 50% of Africa’s population is under 20 years old.”

“Furthermore, it is important to bring African bloggers to show the reality of Russia and unite efforts to expand the themes and understanding of mutual interests. Africa is young, open to new things, and should not be portrayed only as a poor and hungry territory,” concluded Abramova.

Louis Gowend, Chair of the Commission for African Diaspora Relations and Public Relations at the Russia-Africa Club of Lomonosov Moscow State University, expressed the viewpoint that Irina Olegovna Abramova’s idea of creating a unified information space between Russia and Africa should be implemented.

However, to achieve this, as emphasized by Artur Kureev, Editor-in-Chief of “African Initiative,” it is first necessary to unify all resources and media related to Africa to establish a cohesive agenda. Artur Sergeevich added that a comprehensive strategy and understanding are necessary to determine the most effective way to engage with the African audience. It’s also crucial to assist the African infrastructure and develop it on a Russian foundation, including technological projects for internet development.

Kinfu Zenebe, head of African diasporas, stated that collaboration with media should focus on African media representatives in the Russian Federation. He suggested that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs facilitate accreditation for representatives of African media in the Russian Federation. Through a mechanism, African countries should also be allowed to establish small bureaus in Moscow, which would serve as a strategic step towards strengthening strong diplomatic ties.

Cameroonian journalist and member of the Globus expert club, Clarissa Waidorven, highlighted the role of media in strengthening Russian-African ties, emphasizing that coverage of these relations in the global media landscape requires attention to both traditional and new media.

“Western media actively influence African narratives by enticing local bloggers. Russia should strategically use media platforms to advance its interests, creating a positive image through media diplomacy.”

Svyatoslav Shchegolev, Head of African Content Production at RT, emphasized the broadcasting challenges in delivering the Russian perspective to the audience:

“Today in Africa, they are finding new ways to convey information to viewers, sometimes in spite of Western pressure. There is a great deal of attention and willingness to cooperate directly from African media. In several countries, this includes state television channels.”

Victoria Smorodina, Editor-in-Chief of International Reporters, provided recommendations for France on “surviving” on the African continent:

“France needs to rethink its information warfare strategy in Africa, acknowledging the break from past influence. Instead of opposing pan-African demands, it should support the creation of an independent Africa by developing local media, culture, cinema, and theater.”

According to the Editor-in-Chief, this approach will help counter the influence of Turkey, the USA, and other powers.

“France’s defeat in the information sphere should stimulate the development of a new doctrine that combines cognitive sovereignty defense with offensive tools. Partnerships with private companies, a legal framework, and structures are needed to regulate information operations,” she argued.

Andrey Gromov, Executive Secretary of the Board of the African-Russian Energy Association (AREA), summarized the roundtable by presenting the resolution’s provisions containing specific recommendations on measures to stimulate Russian-African cooperation in the information sphere.

“We know of many business projects that simply fell apart because there wasn’t enough coverage. We didn’t understand from our side the contribution of the Russian Federation,” he stressed. Following the roundtable, recommendations were sent to the Government of the Russian Federation, in particular to develop and implement a comprehensive program to promote a positive image of Russia in African countries and to counteract the spread of disinformation about Russia in African media.

Continue Reading

World

Sugar, Dairy, Vegetable Oil Drive Global Food Prices Higher in February

Published

on

Importation of Refined Sugar

By Adedapo Adesanya

Global food prices rose in February 2025, driven by higher sugar, dairy and vegetable oil price, a report from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has revealed.

It was revealed that the FAO Food Price Index (FFPI) averaged 127.1 points in February 2025, up 2.0 points (1.6 per cent) from its revised January level.

While the meat price index remained stable, all other price indices rose, with the most significant increases recorded for sugar, dairy and vegetable oils.

The overall index was 9.7 points (8.2 per cent) higher than its corresponding level one year ago; however, it remained 33.1 points (20.7 per cent) below the peak reached in March 2022.

The FAO Cereal Price Index averaged 112.6 points in February, rising by 0.8 points (0.7 per cent) from January but remaining 1.2 points (1.1 per cent) below its February 2024 level.

Wheat export prices increased month-on-month, driven by tighter domestic supplies in the Russian Federation, which constrained export volumes and shifted demand to other suppliers, adding upward pressure on global prices.

Additional support to the price increases came from concerns over unfavourable crop conditions in parts of Europe, the Russian Federation and the United States of America.

World maize prices continued their upward trend in February, primarily due to tightening seasonal supplies in Brazil, worsening crop conditions in Argentina, and strong export demand for United States’ maize.

Among other coarse grains, world prices of barley and sorghum also increased. By contrast, the FAO All Rice Price Index declined by 6.8 per cent in February, as ample exportable supplies and weak import demand exerted downward pressure on prices.

The FAO Vegetable Oil Price Index averaged 156.0 points in February, up 3.0 points (2.0 per cent) from the previous month and as much as 35.1 points (29.1 per cent) above its level a year earlier. The increase in the index was driven by higher quotations across palm, rapeseed, soy and sunflower oils.

Meanwhile, global soyoil prices increased on firm global demand, particularly from the food sector. In the case of sunflower and rapeseed oils, prices were mainly supported by concerns over likely tightening supplies in the coming months.

The FAO Meat Price Index averaged 118.0 points in February, down marginally by 0.1 points (0.1 per cent) from January but remaining 5.4 points (4.8 per cent) above its level a year ago.

International poultry meat prices declined, driven by abundant global supplies primarily due to high export availabilities from Brazil, despite continuing avian influenza outbreaks in other major producing countries.

Similarly, pig meat prices softened, pressured by lower quotations in the European Union. While prices showed signs of stabilization, they remained below early January levels (before the outbreak of foot and mouth disease) due to a surplus caused by trade restrictions on German pig meat.

By contrast, ovine meat prices rose, underpinned by strong global demand. New Zealand’s export volumes declined due to lower production, but higher slaughter rates in Australia raised supply, limiting the price increases.

Meanwhile, bovine meat quotations strengthened, driven by rising Australian prices amid robust global demand, particularly from the United States of America.

However, the increase was partially offset by lower Brazilian bovine meat prices due to ample cattle supplies.

The FAO Dairy Price Index stood at 148.7 points in February, rising by 5.7 points (4.0 per cent) from January and standing 28.0 points (23.2 per cent) higher than its level a year ago.

The increase was driven by higher prices across all major dairy products. International cheese prices increased for the third consecutive month, rising by 4.7 per cent from January.

The rise was fueled by strong import demand, as recovering production in Europe was offset by seasonal output declines in Oceania. Quotations for whole milk powder also increased, up 4.4 per cent from January, underpinned by robust demand despite stagnating production in Oceania.

International butter prices rebounded, rising by 5.2 points (2.6 per cent) month-to-month, as declining milk output in Oceania, following seasonal patterns, coincided with strong domestic and international demand. Prices of skim milk powder registered a modest 1.8 per cent increase month-to-month, as seasonally higher production in Europe was offset by declining production in Oceania.

The FAO Sugar Price Index averaged 118.5 points in February, up 7.3 points (6.6 per cent) from January after three consecutive monthly declines. However, it remained 22.2 points (15.8 per cent) lower than its level in February of last year.

The increase in world sugar prices was driven by concerns over tighter global supplies in the 2024/25 season. Declining production prospects in India and concerns over the impact of recent dry weather on the upcoming crop in Brazil, which exacerbated the seasonal effect, underpinned the increase in prices.

Additionally, the strengthening of the Brazilian Real against the US Dollar, which tends to affect exports from Brazil, further contributed to the overall increase in global sugar prices.

Continue Reading

Trending