Banking
Customers Slam N7bn Suit on Adam Nuru-led FCMB
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
Two customers of First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Sunlek Investment Limited and Sunsteel Industries Limited, have slammed a N7 billion suit on the lender headed by Mr Adam Nuru.
The companies accused the financial institution of breach of contract concerning credit facilities they obtained from the bank some years ago.
In a report by Global Excellence Magazine, it was stated that in a 126-paragraph statement of claim accompanied by another 27 paragraphs of a witness sworn to on oath and filed before a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos by a Lagos lawyer, Mr John Olusegun Odubela (SAN), the two firms claimed they operated loan accounts with FCMB upon which disbursement was made for all letters of credit/loan facility granted to them by the bank for the importation of raw materials.
However, since May 23, 2013, when the bank entered into an agreement to grant them loan and open a loan facility account for them till date, they have not been given the particulars of the loan facility account or has any statement of account of this loan account been made available to them.
The plaintiffs further alleged that by commitment letter dated May 23, 2013 and the term sheet for facility duly signed/executed by the two parties, FCMB committed and undertook to fund on fully-underwritten basis the debt finance of $1.5million and N422.5million Thereafter, other loans facilities were granted to the companies by the bank.
It was stated that the total amount of the letters of credit opened by the bank in favour of the companies were $8.0 million out of which said sum the companies contributed 10 percent based on the terms of the grant of the various offer for facility utilized to open letters of credit from March 22, 2013 to September 2017. The loans facilities were well secured.
The plaintiffs contended that from the available records available to them, it was reflected that they have fully repaid their indebtedness to the bank.
However, the companies said they were surprised when they received the bank’s letter that their indebtedness to the bank as at March 14, 2019 was in the sum of N1.13 billion and that the debt should be liquidated within 14 days, despite the fact that they have fully repaid the loan they took from the bank.
As a result of this, they engaged the services of an accounting firm to audit their account. They claimed that their letter and their solicitor’s letter requesting for statements of accounts of the loan accounts from the FCMB were not responded to and that from the forensic analysis of their accounts, it was observed that they were not in any way indebted to the bank in the sum of N1.13 billion as claimed by the lender.
The plaintiffs said from the forensic audit report, it was discovered that there were two transactions carried out on letter of credit, wherein substantial volume of the product was damaged. The value of items purchased by the letters of credit was in the sum of $1,999,965 for the importation of cold rolled steel strips, galvanized steel strips and Zinc wire from Chemetals (HK) limited Unit 1105H/F Lippo Center 89, Queens Way Hong Kong.
The companies said FCMB was solely and unilaterally liable to undertake all the risk insurance policy Clause A for the consignment/raw material to be imported by virtue of the letter of credit.
According to them, the bank solely negotiated insurance policy obtained for the products purchased and appointed Mansard Insurance Plc to provide insurance cover Clause C for the importation of the consignment.
It said upon taken delivery of the consignment after payment of custom duties and port charges, it was discovered that a large volume of the said consignment was in various forms of damaged conditions.
The plaintiffs claimed they informed the bank about the damaged consignment and the need to pursue insurance claim for the damage consignment and that FCMB requested for documents from the officers of the plaintiffs, which were sent to them to pursue the claim.
In the statement of claim, the plaintiffs said however, the agent of the bank sent a report to them saying from the nature of damages to some of the products, the insurance policy, being a Clause C policy as undertaken by the bank, was not sufficient to cover the loss from the said damages to the products.
The total value of the consignment damaged was in the sum of $628,386.23 and N336.14 million.
The plaintiffs said FCMB ought to have undertaken an all risk insurance policy cover with the insurance company. As a result of the damages to the consignment, they were not fit for use and could not be refined in the plaintiffs’ machine and remained in their factory as junk or waste material.
The plaintiffs averred that they have suffered financial loss as a result of the breach of contract in the sum of N884.9 million which has negatively affected their business operation since 2014 till date.
They also averred that they are entitled to claim damages for breach of contract against the bank who had by its various acts of breaches of the various letters of offer for facility caused great loss to their business. Consequently, the plaintiffs claim against FCMB jointly and severally are as follows:
“General damages in the sum of N5 billion.
“A declaration that the plaintiffs are not indebted to the bank in any sum premised on the fact that they have settled all their indebtedness on the facilities granted to them by the bank.
“A declaration that the bank breach the terms of letter of credit and is liable for the loss of the letters of offer on importation, in the sum of $1,999,865.
“A declaration that the bank is liable to refund to the plaintiffs N884.9 million being the losses uncured on the damaged consignment purchased through letters of credits and failure and refusal of the bank to obtain an all risk insurance policy for the shipment of the said consignment.
“An order for the payment of N826,996,135.00 being the total sum wrongly debited on the plaintiffs account by the bank.
“An order of the court restraining FCMB from appointing and or registering any instrument of appointment of an official receiver or any instrument whatsoever made for the purpose of enforcing the security for the payment of alleged indebtedness in the sum of N1.13 billion being allegedly claimed against the plaintiffs by the bank and a cost of litigation assessed at N250 million.”
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) says it has paid the insured deposits of about 700,000 customers of the defunct Heritage Bank and has commenced the reimbursement of depositors of 46 microfinance banks (MFBs) whose operating licences were recently revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
The chief executive of NDIC, Mr Oludare Sunday, made this known on Wednesday during a retreat for members of the House of Representatives Committee on Insurance and Actuarial Matters in Lagos.
He said the corporation immediately began settling the insured deposits of customers after the CBN revoked the licences of the 46 microfinance banks and appointed the NDIC as their provisional liquidator.
“We are working on those. The CBN revoked the licences, and we were appointed as the provisional liquidator. We have started paying depositors of those banks, and gradually we intend to cover all the insured depositors,” he said.
Mr Sunday explained that the NDIC’s responsibility extends beyond paying insured deposits to recovering outstanding loans owed to the failed institutions and disposing of their assets to generate funds for the settlement of uninsured depositors.
“Our function as liquidator involves the payment of guaranteed sums. Thereafter, we go after those who owe the institutions and have not paid. We also ensure that we sell the available assets and realise their investments towards paying the uninsured portion of the deposits. So, we have started paying the guaranteed deposits. What we are doing now is also realising the assets of those institutions,” he stated.
Although he declined to disclose the exact number of depositors of the failed microfinance banks who had been reimbursed, Sunday said the Corporation was working with the Nigerian Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS) to identify depositors through their Bank Verification Numbers (BVN) to ensure seamless payments.
“So, the more accounts we discover, the more payments we make,” he added.
Providing an update on the liquidation of Heritage Bank, the NDIC chief said about 700,000 depositors had already received their insured deposits, while efforts were ongoing to trace other customers whose identities could not be verified from available records.
He attributed the challenge to legacy accounts created before the introduction of the BVN system, as well as incomplete customer records inherited from banks that were later merged into Heritage Bank.
“If you know Heritage Bank, you know it is an amalgamation of several banks, including the acquisition of Enterprise Bank in 2014. So, if you think of banks like Guardian Express and Spring Bank, they are all part of Heritage Bank.
“There are depositors we have not been able to trace, and this is an opportunity for them to come forward. I am sure many of us did the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) and may have left some money in an account, but there was no BVN then.
“Even the addresses we had were sometimes things like ‘opposite filling station.’ How do you trace such a person? Once they come forward, and for those we have been able to identify from the institution’s database, we have been paying them,” he explained.
Mr Sunday added that the Corporation would continue to recover outstanding loans and dispose of Heritage Bank’s assets to generate funds for the payment of liquidation dividends to depositors whose balances exceeded the insured limit.
Earlier in his remarks, he described the NDIC as a critical pillar of Nigeria’s financial safety net, stressing the need for stronger collaboration between regulators and the National Assembly as the banking sector responds to recapitalisation efforts and rapid financial technology developments.
According to him, while the ongoing banking recapitalisation programme has strengthened the resilience of financial institutions, it must be complemented by sound corporate governance, effective risk management, strict regulatory compliance and robust supervision to safeguard long-term financial system stability.
He also disclosed that more than 98 per cent of depositors, representing over 281 million accounts across insured financial institutions, are fully protected under the NDIC’s deposit insurance scheme.
By Adedapo Adesanya
Zenith Bank Plc is investigating an incident involving unauthorised access to customers’ data, noting that the breach does not involve financial information and has not compromised its banking services or digital channels.
In an email sent to customers on Wednesday, the bank stated that the incident was part of a broader global cyberattack affecting multiple international organisations across various sectors.
The lender stated that it immediately activated its incident response protocols and intensified its cybersecurity and remediation efforts upon discovering the incident.
“This incident is part of a broader, global cyber-attack targeting multiple international organisations across various sectors. Upon discovery, we promptly activated our incident response protocols, cybersecurity actions and remediation efforts,” the bank said.
The bank reassured customers that its banking services and digital channels remain secure and fully operational.
As a precautionary measure, Zenith Bank advised customers to remain alert to potential phishing attempts and other forms of social engineering.
“As a precaution, we encourage our customers to remain vigilant against phishing emails, text messages, or phone calls, and never to disclose their password, PIN, One-Time Password (OTP), or other security credentials to anyone,” the bank said.
The incident is the latest in a series of cybersecurity challenges facing Nigerian financial institutions, with banks in recent months suspending their social media operations over impersonation and other fraudulent activities.
Earlier in April, the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) said it was investigating alleged data breaches involving Sterling Bank, Remita and the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).
Nigerian banks have long been prime targets for cybercriminals because of the vast amounts of customer data and financial transactions they handle every day.
While many attacks have traditionally sought to steal funds, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting personal information, which can be used for identity theft, phishing schemes, account takeovers and other forms of financial fraud.
Cybersecurity threats have increasingly targeted Nigerian banks in recent years. In 2025, Union Bank of Nigeria warned customers about fraudulent websites and phishing campaigns designed to steal login credentials and personal information by impersonating the bank.
In August 2024, Guaranty Trust Bank experienced a domain-related security incident that temporarily disrupted access to its official website, although the lender assured customers that their deposits and banking services remained secure while it resolved the issue.
By Adedapo Adesanya
The chairman of First HoldCo Plc, Mr Femi Otedola, has affirmed plans to increase his 26 per cent holding in the organisation to 51 per cent, confirming a planned takeover of Nigeria’s oldest banking institution.
Mr Otedola spoke in an exclusive interview with Nairametrics published on Monday, giving a rare direction following recent speculations about the financial institution.
The milestone followed a series of share acquisitions, as Mr Otedola sought to tighten his grip as the company’s largest shareholder following the recent acquisition of additional shares worth N222.21 billion.
In the interview, the mogul said he has invested more than N600 billion of his personal wealth in First HoldCo, describing the move as a “long-term generational commitment” rather than another turnaround investment he would eventually exit.
Responding to speculation that he intends to consolidate his position in the group, Mr Otedola hinted that his investment journey is far from over.
“My investment threshold is always over and above 51 per cent,” he said. “One of my key investment principles is that firm shareholder control, with due regard for minority interest, is a key ingredient to executing reforms and restructuring to deliver value to all stakeholders.”
The businessman said the same strategy had guided his investments in African Petroleum Plc, later renamed Forte Oil Plc, where he gradually increased his shareholding from 28 per cent to 75 per cent before exiting the company in 2019.
He said he also increased his stake in Geregu Power Plc from 51 per cent to 95 per cent before reducing it to 77 per cent after the company’s public listing.
“I am on the same trajectory with First HoldCo Plc,” Mr Otedola said.
“To date, I have invested over N600 billion of my personal wealth in First HoldCo Plc — a figure that speaks not to speculation, but to unflinching confidence in the institution’s future, fundamentals and an unwavering personal commitment to its success.”
Mr Otedola said his decision to invest in First HoldCo came at a time when the institution was facing one of the most challenging periods in its history.
The billionaire steadily increased his investment in the group, accelerating his share purchases in 2026. His stake grew from 6.68 billion shares (15.95 per cent) in June 2025 to 8.06 billion shares by March 2026, then to 9.28 billion shares by June after acquiring about 1.22 billion shares in one quarter. A further purchase through Calvados Global Services last month lifted his holdings above 10 billion shares for the first time.
