Connect with us

Feature/OPED

Christianity: Possible Contributions of Solomon to Greek Sophists, Philosophy

Published

on

bust of Aristotle

By Nneka Okumazie

There have been all kinds of kingdoms and empires through history. They had their languages, architecture, education, entertainment, wise men, gods, magicians, etc.

Some prominent ones were ancient Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greek and Roman. There were others around them that got to the peak of power – at some point.

Different kingdoms represent different strides to history. But the Greeks seem to be the most prominent in terms of knowledge – diverging towards science, math, philosophy, astronomy, etc.

The Greeks were so influential that it took many centuries to match and exceed their prowess.

But the Greeks had help, and historical advantage.

It is unlikely that all the knowledge put forth by them were originally conceptualized. There were lots of direct and indirect contributions to what they did. There were loose references as well as lost ones.

It was said that some of the math and astronomy [knowledge] of the Greeks came from Babylon and ancient Egypt. Some also said it could have come from other kingdoms, near or far, before their time.

However, one of the major philosophers, Socrates was thought to be a sophist, but he refuted.

Sophists were more or less itinerant teachers of wisdom, excellence, possibly motivational speakers, etc.

They would have used logic, metaphors, observations, etc. in showing their value. Some taught math, other subjects, but wisdom – was their flashpoint.

It is possible to separate sophistry from mainline philosophy, but the eminence of philosophy in that era would probably not have been possible without [several disguised] additions from sophistry.

Sophists liked to charge fees. The philosopher hated them for it. They liked to advice leaders. It is possible some liked pomp, bombast and were ostentatious.

Maybe the philosophers didn’t follow their style, but there are links between many of the schools of thought in those early philosophy and Greek sophistry.

But where did their sophistry come from?

King Solomon of the United Kingdom of Israel reportedly died around 500 years before the prominence of leading Greek sophist, Protagoras.

There were reports of sophists two hundred years before that time in Greece.

But before that time too, where could their sophistry have come from?

King Solomon was an extraordinary class wise man. He taught. He probably wrote much. He displayed wisdom and had rare intellect.

He received gifts. He had visitors. He had all kind of wives and concubines from all kinds of cultures and worship.

The Book of Proverbs has lots of wisdom, lots of philosophy, lots of psychology, sociology, metaphor, superior logic, etc.

There would have been other biographers of Solomon among his women, or their relatives who came from other places.

There would also have been lots of frequent trips between Israel and other places, for people who wanted their people or place to emulate that kind of diverse success.

Some of the wisdom would have been adapted to take advantage, or for other unintended purposes.

The mention of God in his sayings may have been changed to gods – or one of, when taken to other places.

But it is very likely that Greece from, or after the time of King Solomon benefitted greatly from his knowledge.

Assuming Israel remained together after his death, or assuming he died much later without turning away from the Lord, there probably would have been external kings after him to refer to his greatness.

Scholarship would probably have made references to him – saying the Great King Solomon, of Israel.

But he didn’t end so great [in perfect heart with the Lord] neither did the Kingdom stand subsequently, so there were probably no incentives to give him credit, outside of Jewish – and Christianity history.

Alexander the Great tutored [from age 13 – 16] by Aristotle, conquered Israel during his reign, many centuries after King Solomon, when sophistry, philosophy, science, etc. were already established in Greece.

It is unlikely [the rulers] would not have known or heard about King Solomon or Israel, even if wars or conflicts of that era may be direct, indirect, strategic or stochastic.

Sophists – in general – were so similar to Solomon that it would have been impossible for them to succeed without the influence of Solomon.

A few hundred years between existences interlinks knowledge beyond any doubts. There so many contemporaneous knowledge that were established from actions or writing five centuries ago.

Those saying it now may not know, or acknowledge, or somethings may be lost from the recent people they read or heard, but knowledge gets passed on, even faster, especially one that strikes certain people of certain interest in a society.

So, if Greek sophistry – and by extension, their philosophy came from Solomon, or Israel, isn’t that additional evidence that God, a spirit, exists?

Ancient Greeks are highly regarded in modern science, but maybe they were also deficient in major citations, outside their people.

Maybe they were so interested in their individual or group influence that they needed to be seen as starters, or obsessed with delivering new and original knowledge.

There were lots of ancient Greek historians referenced and famous at that time, but they mostly wrote about wars, their gods, and other places like Egypt – with story in the scriptures. It doesn’t seem their historians sought the [source of knowledge] for Greek philosophy or sophistry, outside Greece.

There were lots of Roman era writings that referenced the Greeks properly.

What else could the Greeks have benefited for advantage to their civilization that we may never know?

It is important to also see how the world works, or has been from the Greeks.

Same way certain prominent scientists – of recent centuries, would have been inspired by the church, the sparks of wisdom and magnificence of heaven but turned against as they started achieving glory.

There were some Greek sophists that were atheists – probably to their own gods, or maybe to Jehovah.

It was also said that some Greek playwrights or poets mocked the gods of the Greeks, so Plato wanted, or wished they’d be banished, or censored.

So, scholars or people of knowledge have direct and indirect sources they respect, or were inspired by or from, or sources they also come to hate, or antagonize.

And just like science has succeeded for years in criticizing Christianity, conspiracy theory has come against science and technology to bring down its progress faster than can be anticipated.

Conspiracy theories and propaganda are common everywhere, but with advances, there are now many credible conspiracy theories, showing reports, evidence, of people or places in a situation that seem convincing and believable, but are an absolute sham – able to inflict unprecedented damage.

Science has evidence that the world existed outside Bible history, but modern science was inspired by the Greeks whose philosophy and sophistry was far inspired by King Solomon, son of another King, a man after God, the creator’s, heart.

Science and technology people around the world are yet to understand the problem they have with conspiracy theories. It may seem like nothing, but the wave of conspiracy theories that is ahead is more dangerous than any witnessed disasters or diseases in history.

Already, there’s a pandemic, some people and leaders saying it’s a hoax are instigating rebellion against caution. The consequences cannot be estimated for now. Still, worse conspiracy theories are ahead.

There are all kinds of psychology problems around the world, and people who need Christianity are against it because of what some atheist said. Atheist, atheists, limited by what they can see, think, understand or how long they can live, said God, the King of kings, did not create this world.

The greatest philosophy is likely the philosophy of death – which everyone or anything ends.

Jesus, the Saviour, already conquered – death and hell.

Everything may seem important, but the valuable treasures are true love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, self-control.

[Isaiah 40:28, Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the Lord, the creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no searching of His understanding.]

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature/OPED

Nigeria’s Bold Strides Towards a Sustainable Future

Published

on

Alex Oware YP4T

By Alex Oware

President Bola Tinubu has firmly established Nigeria as a proactive and visionary leader in the global pursuit of climate action and sustainable development. Recognising that environmental stewardship is intrinsically linked to economic prosperity, his administration has moved beyond viewing climate change as a mere ecological concern, positioning it instead as a pivotal economic opportunity ripe for exploration and investment.

President Tinubu’s emphatic pronouncements at the 2025 Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week and during a high-level virtual dialogue underscored Nigeria’s unwavering commitment to international collaboration, emphasising the critical need for a unified global response to the escalating climate crisis. He astutely highlighted that the realisation of a truly sustainable future necessitates robust global interconnectedness and a shared sense of responsibility amongst all nations.

Nigeria’s comprehensive strategy for tackling the multifaceted challenges of climate change rests upon three fundamental pillars: a decisive shift towards clean energy transition, the building of robust climate resilience, and an overarching commitment to sustainable development. To translate these core principles into tangible realities, the current administration is actively implementing a range of key initiatives designed to wean the nation off its reliance on traditional fossil fuels.

A significant aspect of this endeavor involves the substantial expansion of infrastructure to support the widespread adoption of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and electric vehicles. Simultaneously, the government is strategically focusing on harnessing Nigeria’s abundant solid mineral resources to provide crucial materials for the burgeoning green energy sector.

Complementing these efforts are the implementation of climate-smart agricultural practices, aimed at simultaneously enhancing national food security and minimising detrimental environmental impacts.

Furthermore, the newly introduced National Clean Cooking Policy seeks to promote clean energy solutions at the household level, promising significant environmental, health, and socio-economic benefits for Nigerian citizens.

These ambitious endeavors are meticulously designed to deliver palpable value and positive impact directly to the lives of Nigerians. The diversification of energy sources holds the promise of cleaner air and a significantly healthier environment for communities across the nation.

The active promotion of CNG as a viable alternative fuel is strategically aimed at mitigating the economic and social hardships that have arisen from the removal of fuel subsidies, offering a more affordable and sustainable energy option for transportation and domestic use. The widespread adoption of climate-smart agriculture is paramount for bolstering food security, ensuring a stable and reliable food supply, and safeguarding vulnerable local communities from the increasingly severe adverse effects of climate change, such as droughts and floods.

Moreover, the deliberate expansion of the green energy sector is projected to generate a wealth of new employment opportunities and empower local entrepreneurs, particularly in rural communities that are gaining access to reliable and sustainable electricity for the first time.

In a demonstrably bold move that underscores the administration’s commitment to these overarching goals, President Tinubu’s government has put forward a significant N10 billion solar power project specifically for the Aso Rock Presidential Villa. This ambitious initiative is presented as a crucial step towards establishing a more sustainable and dependable energy future for the entire nation, starting from the highest levels of governance.

Proponents of the project persuasively argue that it aligns seamlessly with global best practices, drawing parallels with the increasing adoption of solar energy in key government institutions worldwide. The Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN) has vigorously defended the project, asserting that it is fully in line with President Tinubu’s broader reforms aimed at fundamentally transforming Nigeria’s energy landscape and decisively tackling the persistent and crippling energy debt crisis.

The ECN further emphasises that solar energy offers inherent efficiency, provides a crucial shield for Nigerians against the volatility of rising tariffs on conventional energy sources, and has the potential to significantly ease the immense pressure currently burdening the national electricity grid.

While the project has understandably sparked public debate and scrutiny regarding its substantial cost and prioritisation in the face of other pressing national needs, the government strategically positions it as an innovative approach that demonstrates leadership by example and a profound commitment to integrating clean energy solutions at the very apex of Nigerian governance.

Beyond these crucial domestic initiatives, President Tinubu has actively and strategically sought robust international collaboration and support for Africa’s complex transition towards a green economy, fully acknowledging that the necessary investments are inherently capital-intensive.

Nigeria has already demonstrated commendable leadership on the continental stage by being the first African nation to successfully launch Sovereign Green Bonds, specifically designed to finance environmentally sustainable projects across various sectors.

Furthermore, the country is actively in the process of developing a comprehensive Global Climate Change Investment Fund, with the primary aim of attracting substantial further investment in critical green infrastructure and innovative clean energy initiatives.

Nigeria remains steadfast in its commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by the ambitious target year of 2060 and is actively engaged in the crucial process of updating its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the esteemed UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The recent finalisation of the Nigeria Carbon Market Activation Policy in March 2025 is projected to unlock a substantial potential of up to $2.5 billion in valuable carbon credit investments by the pivotal year of 2030. This influx of capital is expected to further bolster climate-aligned economic growth and create new avenues for sustainable development.

Moreover, Nigeria is actively collaborating with various United Nations agencies to develop a comprehensive guideline for a just transition towards a fully decarbonised economy. This crucial collaboration ensures that the inevitable shift towards clean energy and climate-resilient solutions is implemented in a manner that leaves no community or economic sector behind, prioritising the creation of green jobs, the development of essential skills, and comprehensive capacity-building initiatives across the nation.

President Tinubu’s overarching strategy underscores a holistic and integrated approach that seamlessly weaves climate action into Nigeria’s broader development agenda, recognising it not as a separate concern but as a fundamental strategic imperative for sustained economic growth and comprehensive national transformation.

By diligently pursuing these comprehensive and interconnected strategies, Nigeria aims not only to effectively address the urgent and pressing challenges posed by climate change but also to unlock significant and lasting economic and social benefits for all its citizens, paving a clear and sustainable pathway towards a resilient, equitable, and prosperous future for generations to come.

Alex Oware is the Regional Director for YP4T

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

Navigating the Maze: Solutions for Nigeria’s Flourishing Foodtech Industry

Published

on

Diana Tenebe food security challenges in Nigeria

By Diana Tenebe

Nigeria’s foodtech sector holds immense promise to transform our nation’s food production, distribution, and consumption systems. However, this burgeoning industry currently navigates a complex maze of challenges that could significantly hinder its progress.

While innovation and entrepreneurial drive are abundant, a confluence of infrastructural deficits, economic headwinds, technological disparities, and logistical complexities casts a shadow on the sector’s long-term viability.

Understanding and addressing these multifaceted hurdles is paramount for foodtech companies aspiring to thrive and contribute meaningfully to Nigeria’s food security.

One of the most significant impediments to the foodtech sector’s advancement is Nigeria’s persistent infrastructural weaknesses. The unreliable power supply, a well-known constraint for businesses nationwide, directly threatens food preservation, increasing spoilage risks and driving up operational costs for companies reliant on refrigeration and consistent processing.

Similarly, the often-deteriorated state of our road networks complicates logistics and transportation, hindering the efficient movement of goods from farms to consumers and across the supply chain.

Furthermore, limited access to clean water exacerbates operational challenges, particularly for maintaining food processing and hygiene standards. Collectively, these infrastructural shortcomings inflate operational expenses and introduce vulnerabilities throughout the food supply chain.

Economic constraints add another layer of intricacy. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates create instability in pricing and procurement, especially for businesses dealing with imported technologies or ingredients. Persistent inflation erodes consumer purchasing power and increases the cost of essential inputs, squeezing profit margins for startups.

Moreover, limited access to credit and investment capital makes it difficult for emerging foodtech companies to secure the necessary funding to invest in crucial technology, infrastructure, and expansion efforts. This financial constraint can stifle innovation and prevent promising ventures from reaching their full potential.

The digital divide also poses a unique challenge for foodtech companies aiming to leverage online platforms and digital solutions. While mobile phone usage is widespread in Nigeria, disparities in digital literacy and access to reliable internet connectivity can restrict the widespread adoption of online food ordering and delivery services, particularly in rural and underserved communities. This necessitates creative and inclusive strategies to bridge the digital gap and reach a broader consumer base.

Inefficiencies within the supply chain represent a critical bottleneck in the Nigerian food system. Fragmented agricultural supply chains, characterised by numerous intermediaries and a lack of transparency, contribute to alarmingly high post-harvest losses.

Inadequate storage facilities and inefficient transportation infrastructure further compound these issues, leading to significant waste and price volatility. Addressing these systemic weaknesses is crucial for ensuring a stable and affordable food supply for all Nigerians.

Navigating Nigeria’s regulatory landscape can also be a daunting task for foodtech businesses. The presence of multiple regulatory agencies, coupled with often bureaucratic and time-consuming processes for obtaining licenses and permits, can create significant hurdles for startups. Clear, consistent, and streamlined processes within the regulatory framework are essential to foster a more enabling environment for innovation and growth.

Building consumer trust and acceptance for new food technologies requires overcoming inherent skepticism and unfamiliarity. Concerns regarding food safety, quality, and the security of online transactions can hinder the adoption of novel food products and digital platforms. Transparent communication, robust quality control measures, and consistent consumer engagement are vital for building confidence and fostering widespread acceptance.

Finally, a notable talent gap exists within the Nigerian foodtech ecosystem. A shortage of professionals possessing specialised skills in food science, technology, business management, and logistics can limit the growth and innovation capacity of companies in this sector. Addressing this skills deficit through targeted training and development initiatives is crucial for long-term success.

Despite these significant challenges, promising pathways forward can be forged through innovative and context-specific approaches. Investing in localised infrastructure solutions, such as independent power generation and efficient localised logistics networks, can mitigate the impact of broader infrastructural deficiencies.

Exploring diverse funding avenues beyond traditional banking, including angel investors, government grants, crowdfunding, and revenue-based financing, can alleviate financial constraints.

Adapting to the digital divide by leveraging basic mobile technology and employing offline strategies like local agent networks can expand reach and inclusivity. Building resilient supply chains through direct farmer relationships, investing in aggregation centres, and utilising technology for farm management offer tangible solutions to logistical inefficiencies.

Proactive engagement with regulatory bodies and advocating for clearer, more supportive policies are crucial for navigating the regulatory landscape effectively. Building consumer trust necessitates transparent sourcing practices, clear communication about product benefits and safety, and active engagement with consumer feedback.

Finally, investing in talent development through collaborations with educational institutions and in-house training programs can bridge the critical skills gap.

Foodstuff Store is emerging as a business with a clear vision to directly confront several of these challenges. We are actively developing a decentralised network of businesses supported by strategically located distribution hubs across target states. This approach will directly address the limitations imposed by poor road networks, ensuring more localised access to our food products.

Furthermore, the establishment of regional storage facilities, including a state-of-the-art solar-powered cold storage, directly tackles infrastructural deficiencies related to food preservation and ensuring a consistent supply.

Foodstuff Store’s ambition for end-to-end management of the food supply chain, encompassing in-house production, direct sourcing, advanced storage solutions, and efficient distribution, offers a powerful solution to existing supply chain inefficiencies.

This integrated approach promises enhanced quality control, significant reductions in post-harvest losses, and a more reliable supply of both perishable and non-perishable goods for our customers.

Our aspiration to become the “Amazon for Food Products” is a clear and ambitious goal underpinned by a technology-driven approach to all aspects of our operational management. Foodstuff Store’s vision underscores a business model strategically designed to overcome significant hurdles within the Nigerian foodtech sector, offering a beacon of potential and a pathway to a more secure and efficient food system in a challenging yet remarkably promising landscape.

By Diana Tenebe is the Chief Operating Officer of Foodstuff Store

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

President’s Katsina State Visit Exposes Disconnect from People’s Needs

Published

on

tinubu in katsina

By Abba Dukawa

The recent visit by the President Bola Tinubu to Katsina State has sparked concerns about the disconnect between the government’s priorities and the people’s needs. The visit exposed the hypocritical approach to the need of their people, states and the northern Nigeria as whole. The quality of leadership in the region has been questioned, with allegations of self serving  interest, ineptitude, and a lack of vision.

This is in spite of the fact that northern Nigeria as a whole faces numerous challenges that threaten its stability and development. Some of the key issues include insecurity, poverty, education, economic hardship, inequality and social and cultural challenges. The visit has been seen as an opportunity missed to engage with the state’s residents, listen to their concerns, and chart a way forward for development.

While the visit was marked by displays of pageantry and entertainment, the state’s pressing issues such as insecurity, poverty, and economic hardship, seemed to take a backseat.  Critics argue that the government’s focus on superficial events rather than addressing the root causes of the state’s challenges is a clear indication of a disconnect from the people’s needs.

The introduction of Rarara’s wife to the President by the Katsina State Governor, contravening cultural and religious norms, raise questions about leaders’ priorities and values.

Current leaders in the north seem more focused on personal interests and political survival than advocating for the northern Nigeria improvement.

Regardless of the challenges in the region the Governors  keep  praise for the President’s economic reforms, notwithstanding the region’s struggles, is concerning. economic reforms should lift people out of poverty, create jobs, and stimulate growth. If not yielding tangible benefits, they need reevaluation.

The north needs leaders prioritizing regional development and working towards a brighter future. Leaders understanding our region’s problems and committed to tackling them head-on are crucial. It’s time for a shift in approach, prioritizing people’s needs over personal interests.

As we move forward, we must demand more from our leaders. We need leaders who will stand up for the north and work tirelessly to find solutions. Anything less is a disservice to the region and its people.

We need leaders who cultivate a culture of good governance, prioritizing accountability and transparency to address insecurity and promote development.

The north needs a visionary leaders who prioritize all citizens’ needs, regardless of tribe or religion, are crucial for unity and stability.

Leaders who accelerate economic development, create jobs, and provide essential services like education and healthcare can reduce poverty and insecurity.

We require leaders who will combat corruption and promote social justice, reducing inequality and fostering stability.

In northern Nigeria, effective security reforms are necessary, including modernizing security agencies, enhancing intelligence gathering, and addressing insecurity’s root causes to ensure public safety.

To bridge the gap between the government and the people, there is a need for leaders who understand the intricacies of the state’s problems and are committed to tackling them head-on. By prioritizing the people’s needs and working towards sustainable development, the government can build trust and foster a sense of ownership among its citizens

May God guide Nigeria towards true development and prosperity.

Dukawa, a concerned Nigerian, can be reached at abbahydukawa@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Trending

https://businesspost.ng/DUIp2Az43VRhqKxaI0p7hxIKiEDGcGdois8KSOLd.html