General
GenCos, NLC Trade Words Over N6.5trn Power Debt
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Association of Power Generation Companies (APGC), an umbrella body for power generation companies (GenCos), have traded words over the N6.5 trillion in power debt.
The labour union attacked the association over the payment of the N6 trillion as well as a proposed N3 trillion federal bailout, describing the move as a “heist” and an attempt to loot public funds.
The NLC accused the power firms of attempting to transfer the burden of their operational failures to Nigerians, insisting that electricity consumers and taxpayers must not be made to pay for what it called the “collapse of a flawed privatisation model.”
In a rebuttal, the APGC has warned the NLC to stop victimising the GenCos and refuted the allegation that the power sector has “institutionalised extortion.”
The chief executive of APGC, Mrs Joy Ogaji, said the group firmly rejects the NLC’s characterisation of the sector’s challenges, adding that labelling the legitimate operations of power firms as “robbery” and a “grand deception” is a simplistic and inflammatory narrative that ignores the complex realities of the industry.
“We view these allegations, which include claims of “institutionalised extortion” and a phantom subsidy, as a misrepresentation of the facts and a disservice to the ongoing efforts to stabilise Nigeria’s electricity supply industry,” said Mrs Ogaji.
The association also strongly refutes the insinuation that the proposed government support for the sector is a clandestine plan to “settle the boys” ahead of elections.
In a statement reacting to the recent press release by the APGC, the NLC rejected allegations that it lacked the competence to speak on power sector matters, maintaining that its members work within the industry and understand its dynamics.
“We categorically reject their self-serving narrative and misleading characterisation of our position. First, the NLC stands firmly by every word of its earlier statement. The privatisation of the power sector was, and remains, a grand deception that has shortchanged the Nigerian people. The APGC’s claims of “victimisation” cannot conceal the persistent failure that has defined the sector since privatisation.
“The core issue is simple and troubling. The entire power sector assets were reportedly sold for approximately N400 billion. Yet today, GENCOs are demanding N6 trillion, while the Federal Government is said to be considering a N3 trillion bailout for companies that have not demonstrably increased generation capacity beyond pre-privatisation levels.
“This contradiction raises fundamental questions. How can assets purchased for N400 billion become the basis for a bailout running into trillions of naira? It is neither sound economics nor responsible governance to socialise losses while privatising profits. Public funds belonging to workers, pensioners, and ordinary Nigerians must not be diverted to rescue private investors from the consequences of their own operational shortcomings. We challenge the APGC to address this contradiction transparently.”
“The NLC is not a bystander in the power sector. Our members work in generation plants across the country. Our affiliate, the National Union of Electricity Employees (NUEE), operates daily within the system. The NLC played a leading role in the national debate around privatisation and consistently warned that, without proper safeguards and capacity, the exercise would fail. Those warnings appear increasingly justified.
“Regarding our reference to “settling the boys,” our position remains clear: public funds must not be used to enrich a select few under the guise of policy intervention. Nigerians deserve transparency and accountability, not opaque financial arrangements.
“In the interest of openness, we call on the APGC to publish a comprehensive list of the beneficial owners of all GENCOs and associated power assets. Nigerians have a right to know who stands to benefit from this N6 trillion demand,” parts of the statement said.
It also criticised Nigeria’s power sector privatisation for failing to significantly improve electricity generation or service delivery despite rising tariffs, questioned the lack of measurable returns and dividends to the government, raised concerns over labour rights violations, and firmly rejected the proposed N6 trillion bailout as unjustified and contrary to public interest.
Business Post reports that the federal government disclosed plans in December to raise N1.23 trillion by the first quarter (Q1) of 2026 to settle verified arrears owed to generation companies and gas suppliers. On January 27, the government said it had successfully issued a N501 billion inaugural bond under the presidential power sector debt reduction programme (PPSDRP).
However, the APGC has said that this is inadequate, comparing the debt to “garri soaked in water.”
By Aduragbemi Omiyale
For the second consecutive month, Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals has become the largest supplier of jet fuel to Europe, outpacing the United States of America (USA).
Data from Kpler showed that in July 2026, the Lagos-based oil facility, which has the capacity to refine 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day, produced more than 400,000 tonnes of jet fuel.
In June 2026, the private refinery, owned by Mr Aliko Dangote, exported 466,000 tonnes to Europe, underscoring its growing influence on international fuel markets and highlighting Nigeria’s emergence as a strategic player in global refined petroleum trade.
The latest data indicated that Dangote Refinery accounts for approximately 20 per cent of Europe’s total jet fuel imports last month.
The sustained export performance marks a significant milestone for the refinery, demonstrating its ability to consistently supply one of the world’s most demanding fuel markets with aviation fuel that meets stringent international quality specifications. Europe imported approximately 2.06 million tonnes of jet fuel in July, with Dangote accounting for the single largest share of those imports, ahead of traditional suppliers from the United States and the Middle East.
Industry observers say the refinery is rapidly reshaping established Atlantic Basin fuel trade flows by offering a competitive alternative to long-standing suppliers. While European buyers have traditionally relied on refiners in the United States, the Middle East and Asia, Dangote’s strategic location on Nigeria’s Atlantic coast, combined with its scale, modern technology and export capability, has enabled it to become an increasingly important source of aviation fuel for European markets.
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
President Bola Tinubu on Thursday directed the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to vacate the court ordering the freezing of the bank account of the Osun Srate government.
In a statement today by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Mr Bayo Onanuga, the President said he’s “deeply embarrassed not by the EFCC’s exercise of its mandate backed by a court order” because of its timing, which is just a few days to the governorship election in the state next Saturday.
According to him, actions of an institution of State, especially at the Federal level, is always credited to me, as the President, even when I may not have had any prior knowledge of the action.
“Since assuming office, I have consistently maintained that anti-corruption and law enforcement agencies must be allowed to discharge their statutory responsibilities independently, professionally, without fear or favour, or political interference. I have therefore deliberately refrained from directing or interfering in the operational activities of the EFCC or any other investigative or prosecutorial agency because I firmly believe that strong democratic institutions, operating within the confines of the law, are indispensable to democratic good governance and the rule of law.
“As President, I am committed to allowing institutions of State to function and take any action they consider necessary in the interest of proper governance without the need for any prior approval. Indeed, that is why institutions are set up by law with clearly defined powers. While I am yet to be fully apprised of the facts which informed the action of EFCC in approaching the court to obtain the said order freezing the Osun State Government account, I am not in the slightest doubt that the timing of the action of EFCC is inauspicious, and therefore I feel compelled to intervene.
“Osun State is only a few days away from its gubernatorial election. Therefore, nothing ought to be done to give an impression that the EFCC or indeed any other agency of the federal government is being used to interfere with the election.
“Based on the foregoing premise, I am duty-bound to issue a directive on this issue in consonance with the overriding public interest in preserving public confidence and the integrity, credibility, and fairness of our democratic process.
“Accordingly, I have directed the EFCC to immediately proceed to the court to vacate the order and discontinue whatever action it has instituted against the Osun State Government in this regard,” the statement stated.
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has explained why it initiated a move to freeze the bank account of the Osun State government.
Earlier on Wednesday, the Governor of Osun State, Mr Ademola Adeleke, claimed that the anti-money laundering agency asked one of its bankers, First Bank, not to release funds to the state government.
According to the Governor, this was part of the strategies to frustrate his administration ahead of the August 15, 2026, governorship election in the state.
Reacting to the issue on Wednesday night, the EFCC, in a statement, said it has been investigating the state government since March 2026 over an alleged “fraudulent handling of Ecology Funds, Intervention Funds and Federal Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) account to the tune of N11.0 billion.
The organisation noted that some officials of the state government, especially the Accountant General of the State, have had interview sessions with investigators of the EFCC.
“These ongoing investigations of the state government would not have warranted any placement of Post No Debit order on its account but for the precipitate and unwarranted movement of funds from the accounts to different suspicious accounts since August 2, 2026.
“The commission noticed huge transfers of funds into different corporate entities and had to swiftly halt the trend by freezing the accounts from which such heavy funds are being moved,” parts of the statement said.
In the disclosure, the agency noted that its preventive mandate is a public-inclined framework of safeguarding public funds, assets and resources, stressing that it cannot “watch idly while a state government’s account is being pillaged.”
“While the commission is fully aware of the impending governorship election in Osun State, it has a responsibility to act in defence of the sanctity of the funds of the state. It will be uncharitable for the commission to allow an excuse of an upcoming election to fold its arms to perform its legally-assigned functions,” it pointed out.
The EFCC disclosed that it is “keeping watch over the finances of other states like Osun State. Many of these states are on the investigative radar of the commission to ensure accountability and probity. The commission has always pointed out that it is non-partisan and non-sectarian but always working in the overall interests of Nigerians. The Osun State government account was frozen to save public funds from being looted.”
The organisation urged the public “to ignore false narratives and deliberate demonisation of the works of the EFCC. The interests of all Nigerians are greater and will always be protected by the commission.”
