Connect with us

Technology

NDPC Seeks Dismissal of Meta’s Suit Against $32.8m Fine

Published

on

Meta Cambridge Analytica

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) has asked a Federal High Court (FHC) in Abuja to dismiss, in its entirety, a suit filed by Meta Platforms Incorporated challenging the fine it imposed on the organisation.

The NDPC had on February 18, 2025, imposed a remedial fee of $32.8 million and eight corrective orders against the social media giant, which operates Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram.

The American multinational technology company was alleged to have violated the fundamental privacy rights of its Nigerian users with respect to behavioural advertising on Facebook and Instagram.

Dissatisfied with the action, Meta Platforms, in a motion ex-parte dated and filed on February 26, dragged the regulatory agency to court as sole respondent.

In the motion ex-parte marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/355/2025 and moved by Mr Fred Onuofia (SAN) on March 4, Justice James Omotosho granted one of the two orders sought.

The judge had granted leave to Meta to commence proceedings by way of judicial-review seeking, inter alia, an order of certiorari quashing the compliance and enforcement orders dated February 18 issued by NDPC against the company, “and all other investigations, proceedings and actions taken by respondent against the applicant leading to the Final Orders.”

He, however, refused to grant Meta’s relief seeking a stay of the proceedings of all matters relating to the “Final Orders” issued by NDPC against it, pending the hearing and determination of the judicial review proceedings.

Instead, the judge made an order of accelerated hearing of the suit.

The firm, in its originating summons filed by the lead counsel, Mr Gbolahan Elias, wants the court to determine whether NDPC’s investigative process and ensuing compliance and enforcement orders (the Final Orders) issued on February 18 were invalid, null and void.

Meta, in its application dated and filed March 19, hinged the question on the allegation that the commission failed to provide it with adequate notice or an opportunity to be heard on alleged violations of the NDP Act prior to issuing the Final Orders.

Meta argued that such action violated its due process rights, including its right to fair hearing under Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), among other reliefs.

But NDPC, in a preliminary objection to Meta’s suit, told the court that the suit is incompetent and the court lacks the jurisdiction to entertain same.

The regulatory agency, in its application dated April 10 and filed April 11 by its lawyer and the head, Alpha & Rohi Law Firm, Mr Adeola Adedipe (SAN), urged the court to either strike out or dismiss the case.

Mr Adedipe, in two grounds of argument, submitted that the originating summons filed by the company is incompetent for non-compliance with the mandatory provision of Order 34 Rule 6(1) of the FHC (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019.

He also argued that the suit, as presently constituted, is grossly incompetent and academic, the reliefs sought therein, not being capable of activating the jurisdiction of the court.

“The suit is liable to be struck out/dismissed, in limine,” Mr Adedipe argued.

The NDPC, in the affidavit attached to the preliminary objection, stated that by an ex-parte motion, Meta Inc. filed the case.

The commission said that the company had filed the suit, seeking leave to apply for judicial review against the decision of the respondent taken on February 18.

It averred that there was a statement made pursuant to Order 34 of the Rules of the court, supporting the said application, containing the company’s two reliefs.

It said the court granted permission on March 4 for Meta to commence the proceeding, by way of judicial review.

According to the respondent, the originating summons filed by the plaintiff was commenced on 19th March, 2025, 15 days after leave was granted for the judicial review proceedings to be commenced.

NDPC, however, contended that the reliefs contained in the originating summons were completely different from the reliefs contained in the statement filed to support the ex-parte application for judicial review.

The commission also said it would be in the interest of justice for its objection to be sustained.

Also, in a counter affidavit deposed to by NDPC ‘s staff, Mr Osunleye Olatubosun, in opposition to the originating summons filed by Meta on March 19, he said the suit was brought under the judicial review procedure, primarily, to contest the decision of his office against Meta.

Mr Olatubosun averred that in the NDPC‘s decision, Meta was sanctioned after a protracted and thorough process of investigation.

He said the investigative power of the commission was activated by a petition written by an organisation, the Personal Data Protection Awareness Initiative (PDPAI).

The PDPAI had alleged that the company breached the data protection rights of users of Facebook and Instagram.

He averred that in the said petition, the plaintiff was alleged to be engaging in behavioural advertising without obtaining explicit consent of data subjects (users).

He said compelling evidence were provided in support of the petition, revealing Meta’s private policy showing that it conducted behavioural advertising, without obtaining consent from the data subjects.

Mr Olatubosun said during investigation, NDPC drew the company’s attention to some very disturbing violations in this regard, especially as to non-consensual data processing activities.

He said these included the disclosure of sensitive personal data of minors relating to their sex lives; sensitive personal data of minors involving drug use; and sensitive personal data of minor pupils in school, involving erotic dancing.

He said it also revealed sponsored advertisements on gambling, involving the manipulated personal data of a female journalist on TVC; sponsored advertisement on gambling involving the manipulated personal data of a male journalist on Channels TV; and manipulated personal data of public figures, conspiring to commit a felony; explicit video of a woman delivering a child, with her genitals in full display, etc.

He said Meta was, therefore, found in breach of certain provisions of the Nigeria Data Protection (NDP) Act, and that its promotion of debasing images outside the expectation of concerned data subjects offended the principles of fairness, lawfulness, transparency, accountability and duty of care.

Besides, the officer said failure of the company to file a compliance audit with the commission for the year 2022, was a breach of the NDP Act.

He equally said that cross border transfer of data by Meta, contravened mandatory requirements under the NDP Act.

Mr Olatubosun, who said that it was wrong for the plaintiff to process the data of its non-users of it platforms, added that Meta’s privacy policy violates relevant provisions of the NDP Act.

Against these development, the officer said the commission ordered the firm to, henceforth, “seek express consent of data subjects in Nigeria, where their personal data for behavioural advertising will be process.

“Carry out Data Processing Impact Assessment, taking into account the democratic development of Nigeria; update its privacy policy; cease and desist from transferring data out of Nigeria without approval of the commission, in line with the NDP Act.

“Create an appropriate icon link for educative videos, on the dangers of manipulative, unlawful and unfair data processing; put in place sufficient measures for the protection of data privacy on its platforms; and payment of 32, 800, 000 USD.”

Mr Olatubosun said that the case lacks merit, praying the court to dismiss it.

Meanwhile, other reliefs sought by Meta in the main suit, include whether NDPC’s initiation of its investigation, based on a petition submitted by an organisation, rather than on a complaint filed by a “data subject” (as defined under Section 65 of NDPA), invalidates the investigation and the Final Orders.

It also prayed the court for an order of certiorari, quashing the investigation, all proceedings constituted thereby, as well as the ensuing Final Orders issued by the commission against it.

It equally sought an order of injunction restraining NDPC from enforcing or taking steps to enforce any or all of the orders and/or intimidating, harassing or coercing the applicant to pay the purported remedial fee as contained in the Final Orders.

However, Meta, in a motion on notice filed on April 23, sought to amend its statement attached to the ex-parte application, having seen through the notice of preliminary objection which was filed by Mr Adeola Adedipe, SAN, on behalf of the commission.

Mr Onuofia while adopting all their processes, said the motion sought an order granting leave to the company to amend its statement pursuant to Order 34, Rule 3(2)(a) of the FHC rules.

He said it also sought an order deeming the amended statement, which had already been filed and served on NDPC as having been properly filed and served.

Giving grounds why his application should be grated, Mr Onuofia said on March 4, the court heard and granted their motion ex-parte for leave.

He said, thereafter, Meta filed it originating summons on March 19.

The lawyer, however, told the judge that the firm sought to amend the wording of the reliefs and grounds set out in the statement to replicate the wording used in the originating summons.

He said the decision was to ensure efficiency and the full and fair hearing of the issues arising in the originating summons.

According to him, the proposed amended statement highlights the amendments that the applicant seeks permission to make to the statement.

Mr Onuofia said the requested amendment would not cause any injustice to NDPC.

On his part, Mr Adedipe opposed Mr Onuofia’s prayer seeking an amendment, urging the court to dismiss the application.

The senior counsel told the court that a counter affidavit was filed on May 2 in opposition to the motion and argued that the application was presumptuous and misleading.

He submitted that an amendment of a process is not as of right, but entirely at the discretion of the court, where such is practicable and lawful to do so.

Justice Omotosho adjourned the matter until October 3 for consolidated ruling on the preliminary objection and motion to amend.

Adedapo Adesanya is a journalist, polymath, and connoisseur of everything art. When he is not writing, he has his nose buried in one of the many books or articles he has bookmarked or simply listening to good music with a bottle of beer or wine. He supports the greatest club in the world, Manchester United F.C.

Technology

Fibre Cuts: Expert Blames Road Construction for 60% of Network Outages

Published

on

Fibre cuts

By Modupe Gbadeyanka

The chief executive of Dimensions Data Limited, Mr Gbenga Olabiyi, has blamed road construction for 60 per cent of network outages caused by fibre cuts.

Speaking recently at the National Dig-Once Policy Forum, which marked the 8th Policy Implementation Assisted Forum (PIAFo), he drew attention to the gap between the infrastructure Nigeria has and what it can actually deliver if a coordinated framework is adopted.

“Nigeria currently has about 35,000 kilometres of fibre in the ground, yet only 16 per cent of Nigerians are connected to it. Broadband penetration stands at 45 per cent. Lagos alone has a penetration rate of over 70 per cent,” Mr Olabiyi said.

He emphasised that the failure to address the missing fibre link over the years has led to saturation of connectivity in urban centres, while the hinterlands are left either unconnected or poorly served.

At the same programme, convened by Mr Omobayo Azeez, stakeholders in the telecommunications sector called for the adoption of the dig-once policy to lower the costs of fibre deployment, reduce infrastructure damage, improve safety, and shorten rollout timelines.

Quoting the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), it was noted that of the 50,000 fibre cut incidents recorded in a year, about 30,000, which represents 60 per cent, occurred during road construction and rehabilitation.

Stakeholders thus called for a review of existing road construction and building codes to accommodate the installation of fibre conduits in the original design standard of the infrastructure planning.

“What Dig-Once offers is an opportunity to correct this,” the president of the Association of Telecommunication Companies of Nigeria, Mr Tony Emoekpere, stated.

He added that even operators frequently damage one another’s cables during repeated digging, thus increasing repair costs and service disruptions.

The Deputy Director of Strategic Business Initiatives at ipNX Nigeria Limited, Mr Segun Okuneye, said under the dig-once policy, road contractors should install ducts during construction.

He said the repeated excavation of the road leads to incessant destruction of existing infrastructure and triggers service blackouts with operators bearing additional costs of repair of replacing the fibre.

Also, the chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), Mr Gbenga Adebayo, said operators should focus not just on digging once but on eliminating unnecessary digging altogether by sharing existing infrastructure and jointly replacing legacy cables.

“Early fibres laid 15 to 20 years ago are now ageing, and the industry needs a plan to replace them without everyone digging the same routes again,” he said.

Continue Reading

Technology

How to Level Up Customer Support Automation Today

Published

on

Customer Support Automation

One of the most powerful ways to modernize a support team is by optimizing support operations with AI automation.

When implemented thoughtfully, automation doesn’t replace human agents—it elevates them.

Less duplicated work‚ resolving issues faster‚ and providing a consistent experience on different channels․

Since there are many content formats in the current content environment‚ the most effective formats for guidelines are those that are structured‚ practical‚ and focused on “what you can actually do,”‚ as opposed to abstract theory․

This article follows that same intent‚ and seeks to document the journey to better customer support automation‚ without mentioning brand names or links․

1. Automate first‑contact triage with smart workflows

One of the common entry points into support automation is to respond to end customers’ requests as soon as they are received‚ rather than making them wait for a human agent to pick up a chat channel or email, as is customary․

This is done through clever workflows that ask a few questions‚ qualify and classify the issue, and recommend a next best action․

This can mean transferring to a human agent‚ directing the user to a specific help article‚ or beginning a guided self-service flow right within the chat․

It reduces the friction to get started and shows customers they are being heard from the first message․

It reduces the burden on agents because they only see tickets that require human judgement․

In the best implementations‚ the bot feels like a helpful assistant and not a hindrance to the customer reaching a resolution․

2. Route tickets with intelligence, not just speed

Responsiveness is still important‚ but smart routing is what takes automation from simple ticketing to responsive‚ scalable support․

Instead of shuffling tickets to the agent available‚ the system can route based on the subject‚ difficulty‚ language‚ or even expected resolution

This way, billing problems are routed to billing experts‚ complaints about product setup are routed to technical experts‚ and routine status inquiries are routed to agents who can handle volume․

For example‚ clever routing could send high-touch or high-stakes tickets to a more senior agent or tickets that ask the same question repeatedly to agents specialized in a specific workflow․

It’s this kind of intelligence that allows teams to be faster and happier when they are thinking of routing-based automation beyond simple round robin distribution․

3. Turn FAQs into self‑service journeys

Another area the current content focuses on is changing the format of FAQs into more interactive self-service experiences that guide customers through flows‚ checklists, or conversational search‚ as opposed to serving them a long list of links‚ making it easier to discover a solution․

This reduces the need to create tickets in the first instance and reduces the support workload by focusing on more high-value ‚ complex interactions․

An organized help center can examine common patterns in failed searches and proactively suggest the most appropriate articles or troubleshooting steps․

It can also serve as the backbone for mini-chatbots that can guide the user through setup‚ configuration‚ or troubleshooting paths without opening a ticket․

When teams invest in AI automation to better support their operation‚ a self-service capability is often one of the first investments made․

4. Automate routine follow‑ups and escalations

In modern ticketing systems‚ the entire life cycle of the ticket from its creation can be automated․

Instead of relying on agents to remember to do a status update‚ a satisfaction survey‚ or an escalation‚ rules can be set up to automate these processes․

For example‚ if a ticket has been placed in the “pending customer reply” state for a specified period of time‚ a notification to the customer can be sent out to remind them‚ or if a complaint has not been resolved within any specified period‚ the ticket can be escalated to a manager․

The result is processes that are always followed‚ never missed SLAs‚ less manual work‚ and agents are freed up from the tedious tracking of time and sending reminders to focus on resolving problems․

A mix of automation and human intervention is often the optimal solution for a better experience for customers and agents alike․

5. Use AI to draft and summarize responses

AI-assisted writing has become the norm to scale support teams‚ with the tool helping staff draft an initial response‚ summarize long email threads‚ and suggest templated replies which agents personalize․

It is especially useful in high-volume or multi-language support environments‚ where replies to common questions must be timely and consistent

This type of automation doesn’t replace agents‚ but acts as a force multiplier for them‚ ensuring that baseline questions are answered correctly and on-brand‚ while still enabling subtlety and empathy in less obvious situations․

Some teams use AI to translate or simplify support communications for different audiences‚ enabling them to support global customers without needing to hire additional staff․

6. Automate onboarding and welcome communications

Automation can also play an important role in onboarding‚ by providing an automated welcome sequence for new customers to help them get set up‚ implement best practices‚ and learn about key features and resources․

These sequences can incorporate email‚ in-app messages‚ and chat prompts to create a cross-channel experience

To the support staff who deal with these customers‚ this reduces the number of “I don’t know where to start” help desk questions that pile up in the first few days after signing up․

Perhaps more considerably‚ walking users through the most important workflows has contributed to increased activation and retention rates

One of the most visible ways to use AI automation in support is by transitioning from firefighting to empowering customers and agents with self-service and insights․

7. Trigger proactive support with behavior signals

An even more advanced form of automation involves proactively reaching out to customers before they reach out to you by identifying usage trends or risk signals based on the way they are using the product․

For example‚ when a user repeats the same action‚ fails to complete a key workflow‚ or is beginning to disengage‚ a system could send a personalized message or offer assistance before the customer churns․

These models may be based on behavioral analytics and artificial intelligence models‚ which have tracked tens of thousands of data points‚ events‚ and user behaviors to identify signals that can be used in a support flow to prevent and surface issues before they arise to improve customer satisfaction․

As well‚ proactive messaging must be finely tuned so as not to be perceived as spam‚ and teams iterate based on feedback and response rates․

8. Automate feedback collection and analysis

Many teams capture this feedback automatically as part of their improvement processes‚ for example‚ automatically sending out a customer satisfaction survey once a ticket is closed or analyzing customer messages to understand the sentiment

This can also support testing‚ benchmarking‚ tracking performance versus targets‚ identifying trends and patterns to tackle, and prioritizing product or process changes․

For support leaders‚ this automation means raw interaction data is transformed into structured insights

Instead of manually reviewing tickets‚ they view dashboards containing information about common problems‚ emerging topics‚ agent performance‚ etc․

Another effective way to improve efficiency in support is through AI automation․

Every interaction can be a learning and improvement opportunity․

9. Integrate omnichannel experiences

Omnichannel integration is a common thread in customer support automation workflows

Customers do not care what channel they are in․

Customers expect the context to move with them as they continue the conversation via chat‚ email‚ phone‚ social media, or in an in-app message

Automation across channels offers the advantage that each interaction builds on prior interactions‚ instead of beginning with a blank slate․

For example‚ if a customer starts a chat conversation and later sends an email‚ we want to show the chat conversation in the history view for the email conversation‚ and vice versa‚ so that the agent doesn’t have to ask the customer for context each time․

This is a feature that differentiates fragmented support experiences from single-threaded experiences‚ and is a common area of focus for teams modernizing their support workflows․

10. Build a feedback‑driven automation roadmap

The best customer support automation is not a single project․

Top teams start by identifying manual activities that take the most time or happen most often‚ and then determine which of those can be fully or partially automated

They roll out gradual changes and analyze their effects in order to improve them based on real-world data․

This roadmap often includes:

  • Pinpointing the top 20% of support scenarios that consume the most time.
  • Designing workflows that combine bots, knowledge bases, and human agents.
  • Continuously monitoring metrics like resolution time, satisfaction scores, and agent workload.

By combining this with a full focus on AI automating support operations‚ your support function can be scaled better

There are options emerging like Ferndesk, which do seem to align with most of these points․

But the fundamental principle remains for any support teams the same: to automate support to be faster‚ smarter, and more human․

Continue Reading

Technology

Can Nigeria Build Enough Solar Panels? TechCartel Breaks Down the New Taxes on Imported Tech

Published

on

New Taxes on Imported Tech

There was a time when a solar panel on a Nigerian rooftop was a luxury, the kind of thing you saw at a hotel or a church with generous donors. That time has passed. Across the country, solar panels have become a defining feature of the skyline, appearing on rooftops and office blocks in nearly every neighborhood. Once viewed as a luxury, solar has transitioned into a fundamental necessity for millions of households and businesses. For many, it serves as the foundation of their daily power needs.

The Federal Government has now moved to change how those panels get into the country, and the implications are landing on an energy market that has quietly built its entire informal infrastructure around imported solar hardware.

According to a detailed breakdown published by TechCartel, one of Nigeria’s most closely watched tech publications for consumer technology, the government is not staging an overnight ban. What it is staging is a structured financial squeeze: higher import taxes on finished solar panels, lower duties on raw materials for local manufacturers, and a 2036 target for 100 percent local production.

The policy timeline started earlier than most people noticed. In March 2025, the Minister of State for Technology, Uche Nnaji, announced a Solar Import Phase-out Roadmap. The stated motivation was the import bill, which crossed ₦200 billion in a single year. By January 2026, the Rural Electrification Agency reported that local manufacturing capacity had grown from 120 MW to 300 MW. On April 1, 2026, the Minister of Finance signed the 2026 Fiscal Policy Measures, formally introducing Import Adjustment Taxes on finished solar goods. A Green Tax Surcharge follows on July 1, 2026.

For anyone who opened an import Form M before April 1, there is a 90-day window to clear goods at the old rate. After that, the new cost structure kicks in. The Secure Energy Project estimates a 15 to 25 percent rise in solar panel prices by late 2026.

New Taxes on Imported Tech

Can Nigerians Still Afford to Power Themselves?

To understand why this policy lands differently in Nigeria than it would elsewhere, you have to understand what the grid has done to Nigerian electricity habits. Years of erratic supply, multi-hour daily outages, and voltage fluctuations that destroy electronics did not produce a population waiting patiently for the government to fix things. It produced a population that fixed things itself.

First came generators, petrol then diesel then gas. Then came inverters with lead-acid batteries, then lithium batteries, and then solar panels added on top to charge them without spending on fuel. The 1 kWh solar generator, once considered a niche product, is now a completely ordinary fixture in small households and one-room businesses. Some call them power stations, and that name has started to feel accurate. Provisions shops, phone repair kiosks, tailoring studios, and barbing salons run on them every single day. They are small enough to sit on a balcony, affordable enough for a two-month savings plan, and powerful enough to run lights, DC fans, and a phone charger without touching a NEPA bill.

The scale goes well beyond individual homes. Petrol stations that once ran generators round the clock have converted their canopy roofs into solar arrays, running hybrid systems where solar handles daytime load and the generator only kicks in at night. Pharmacies, internet cafés, printing shops, and cold rooms powering perishables now run on solar. The solar transition in Nigeria has been market-driven and it has moved fast.

That context is what makes the arithmetic in TechCartel’s breakdown so pointed. Nigeria’s local solar manufacturing capacity stands at 300 MW as of April 2026. The country’s estimated demand for energy stability is 3.7 GW. The gap is over 3,400 MW. Local manufacturers currently price their panels about 16 percent above imported alternatives. As import taxes rise, that gap will narrow, but the timeline is vital. If local capacity grows faster than analysts expect, the transition could be orderly.

The government’s $425 million commitment to eight new manufacturing plants, and the 150 percent capacity growth achieved in a single year, suggest the industrial ambition is real. Nigerian-assembled panels are already being exported to Ghana and Burkina Faso, which signals a manufacturing base serious enough to serve regional demand. The 2036 target is a decade away, but the trajectory is being built now.

For Nigerians planning a solar installation in the coming months, the window is clear. The Form M grace period runs 90 days from April 1. The Green Tax Surcharge begins July 1. Any installation completed before that first wave of cost increases arrives will avoid the opening price shock. After that, the cost of running your own power in Nigeria, already a choice made out of necessity, gets a little harder to justify on a budget.

Continue Reading

Trending