Connect with us

Economy

Emerging Markets and Debt Recovery: What Creditors Should Know

Published

on

Debt Recovery

Expanding into emerging markets offers businesses new revenue streams, access to growing consumer bases, and competitive advantages. However, it also presents heightened financial risks, especially when it comes to debt recovery. While these markets provide growth potential, they often come with legal, cultural, and operational complexities that make recovering overdue payments more difficult compared to established economies.

Inconsistent legal frameworks, political instability, fluctuating currencies, and a lack of transparency in credit information are just some of the barriers creditors face. Understanding these risks and developing a tailored approach to credit control is essential for protecting financial interests when operating in regions such as Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and parts of Eastern Europe.

Understanding the Risk Landscape

Emerging markets are attractive because they offer opportunities for businesses to scale quickly. But these markets are also more vulnerable to economic shocks, regulatory changes, and enforcement challenges. Legal systems in many of these countries are underdeveloped or biased toward domestic businesses, making cross-border debt collection a slow and uncertain process.

Creditors must also deal with limited availability of reliable financial data. Many businesses in emerging markets operate with minimal disclosure, making it difficult to assess creditworthiness accurately. Traditional credit reporting agencies may not have sufficient coverage or updated records, forcing creditors to rely on informal references or local partnerships.

Legal Barriers to Enforcement

Enforcing debt collection in emerging markets is complicated by jurisdictional differences. Many countries require foreign creditors to re-litigate their claims locally, even if a judgment has already been secured in the creditor’s home country. Recognition of foreign judgments is not guaranteed unless supported by bilateral or multilateral treaties, which are often lacking or ineffective.

Even when legal action is possible, local courts may be slow, inefficient, or influenced by corruption. Navigating these systems requires specialized knowledge of local laws, court procedures, and enforcement mechanisms.

Currency and Payment Risks

Another critical factor is currency risk. Emerging markets frequently experience currency fluctuations and inflation, making it harder for debtors to pay in stable currencies like the US dollar or Euro. Some governments impose capital controls that limit the ability to transfer funds abroad, trapping foreign creditors in long delays or forcing them to accept payment in devalued local currencies.

To mitigate these risks, creditors often price contracts in stable currencies and include currency adjustment clauses to protect against volatility. However, even well-drafted contracts can be difficult to enforce if local laws favor domestic businesses over foreign suppliers.

Cultural and Commercial Practice Differences

Debt collection strategies that work in developed economies may not be suitable for emerging markets. Business practices in these regions often rely on personal relationships, trust-building, and informal negotiation rather than strict contractual enforcement. Aggressive collection tactics can damage relationships and reputations, making future business difficult.

Successful creditors typically adopt a relationship-based approach, working through local intermediaries or partners who understand the cultural context and can negotiate payment terms effectively without escalating disputes too quickly.

Strategic Risk Management Approaches

Mitigating debt recovery risks starts with preventative measures. Comprehensive due diligence, including background checks, financial reviews, and credit assessments, should be standard practice. Contract terms should be clear, specifying jurisdiction, governing law, payment currency, and dispute resolution methods such as arbitration.

Credit insurance and trade finance solutions can offer additional protection, especially for large or high-risk deals. These financial products help transfer risk away from the creditor and ensure partial recovery even in the event of default.

Monitoring client behavior throughout the relationship is equally important. Early warning signs—such as delayed payments, changing order patterns, or communication breakdowns—should trigger internal reviews and proactive collection efforts before the situation deteriorates further.

Leveraging Local Expertise

Working with local debt collection agencies or law firms is often the most practical way to navigate complex recovery processes in emerging markets. These partners have the local knowledge and networks necessary to apply the right pressure, negotiate settlements, and enforce claims through appropriate legal channels.

While local partners come with added costs, their expertise often increases the likelihood of successful recovery and reduces the risk of missteps that could harm the business relationship or lead to legal complications.

Emerging markets present a compelling opportunity for business growth, but creditors must approach them with caution and a well-defined risk management strategy. Debt recovery in these regions is rarely straightforward, and success depends on understanding local legal systems, currency risks, and cultural practices.

By adopting a proactive approach that combines thorough due diligence, strong contract management, and local expertise, businesses can protect their financial interests while continuing to benefit from the opportunities these markets offer.

For businesses seeking professional support in navigating these challenges, partnering with an experienced international debt collection agency like cisdrs.com can provide the legal and operational expertise needed to recover debts effectively across diverse and complex markets.

Economy

LIRS Shifts Deadline for Annual Returns Filing to February 7

Published

on

Annual Tax Returns

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

The deadline for filing of employers’ annual tax returns in Lagos State has been extended by one week from February 1 to 7, 2026.

This information was revealed in a statement signed by the Head of Corporate Communications of the Lagos State Internal Revenue Service (LIRS), Mrs Monsurat Amasa-Oyelude.

In the statement issued over the weekend, the chairman of the tax collecting organisation, Mr Ayodele Subair, explained that the statutory deadline for filing of employers’ annual tax returns is January 31, every year, noting that the extension is intended to provide employers with additional time to complete and submit accurate tax returns.

According to him, employers must give priority to the timely filing of their annual returns, noting that compliance should be embedded as a routine business practice.

He also reiterated that electronic filing through the LIRS eTax platform remains the only approved method for submitting annual returns, as manual filings have been completely phased out. Employers are therefore required to file their returns exclusively through the LIRS eTax portal: https://etax.lirs.net.

Describing the platform as secure, user-friendly, and accessible 24/7, Mr Subair advised employers to ensure that the Tax ID (Tax Identification Number) of all employees is correctly captured in their submissions.

Continue Reading

Economy

Airtel on Track to List Mobile Money Unit in First Half of 2026—Taldar

Published

on

Airtel Money

By Adedapo Adesanya 

The chief executive of Airtel Africa Plc, Mr Sunil Kumar Taldar, has disclosed that the company is still on track to list its mobile money business, Airtel Money, before the end of June 2026.

Recall that Business Post reported in March 2024 that the mobile network operator was considering selling the shares of Airtel Money to the public through the IPO vehicle in a transaction expected to raise about $4 billion.

The firm had been in talks with possible advisors for a planned listing of the shares from the initial public offer on a stock exchange with some options including London, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), or Europe.

However, so far no final decisions have been made regarding the timing, location, or scale of the IPO.

In September 2025, the telco reportedly picked Citigroup Incorporated as advisors for the planned IPO which will see Airtel Money become a standalone entity before it can attain the prestige of trading on a stock exchange.

Mr Taldar, noted that metrics continued to show improvements ahead of the listing with its customer base hitting 52 million, compared to around 44.6 million users it had as of June 2025.

He added that the subsidiary processed over $210 billion in a year, according to the company’s nine-month financial results released on Friday.

“Our push to enhance financial inclusion across the continent continues to gain momentum with our Mobile Money customer base expanding to 52 million, surpassing the 50 million milestone. Annualised total processed value of over $210 billion in Q3’26 underscores the depth of our merchants, agents, and partner ecosystem and remains a key player in driving improved access to financial services across Africa.

“We remain on track for the listing of Airtel Money in the first half of 2026,” Mr Taldar said.

Estimating Airtel Money at $4 billion is higher than its valuation of $2.65 billion in 2021. In 2021, Airtel Money received significant investments, including $200 million from TPG Incorporated at a valuation of $2.65 billion and $100 million from Mastercard. Later that same year, an affiliate of Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund also acquired an undisclosed stake in the unit.

The mobile money sector in Africa is expanding rapidly, driven by a young population increasingly adopting technology for financial services, making the continent a key market for fintech companies.

Continue Reading

Economy

Crypto Investor Bamu Gift Wandji of Polyfarm in EFCC Custody

Published

on

Bamu Gift Wandji of Polyfarm

By Dipo Olowookere

A cryptocurrency investor and owner of Polyfarm, Mr Bamu Gift Wandji, is currently cooling off in the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

He was handed over to the anti-money laundering agency by the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) on Friday, January 30, 2026, after his arrest on Monday, January 12, 2026.

A statement from the EFCC yesterday disclosed that the suspect was apprehended by the NSCDC in Gwagwalada, Abuja for running an investment scheme without the authorisation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is the apex capital market regulator in Nigeria.

It was claimed that Mr Wandji created a fraudulent crypto investment platform called Polyfarm, where he allegedly lured innocent Nigerians to invest in Polygon, a crypto token that attracts high returns.

Investigation further revealed that he also deceived the public that his project, Polyfarm, has its native token called “polyfarm coin” which he sold to the public.

In his bid to promote the scheme, the suspect posted about this on social media platforms, including WhatsApp, X (formally Twitter) and Telegram. He also conducted seminars in some major cities in Nigeria including Kaduna, Lagos, Port Harcourt and Abuja where he described the scheme as a life-changing programme.

Further investigation revealed that in October, 2025, subscribers who could not access their funds were informed by the suspect that the site was attacked by Lazarus group, a cyber attacking group linked to North Korea.

Further investigations showed that Polyfarm is not registered and not licensed with SEC to carry out crypto transactions in Nigeria.  Also, no investment happened with subscribers’ funds and that the suspect used funds paid by subscribers to pay others in the name of profit.

Investigation also revealed that native coin, polyfarm coin was never listed on coin market cap and that the suspect sold worthless coins to the general public.

Contrary to the claim of the suspect that his platform was attacked, EFCC’s investigations revealed that the platform was never attacked or hacked by anyone and that the suspect withdrew investors’ funds and utilized the same for his personal gains.

The EFCC, in the statement, disclosed that Mr Wandji would be charged to court upon conclusion of investigations.

Continue Reading

Trending