Economy
Emerging Markets and Debt Recovery: What Creditors Should Know
Expanding into emerging markets offers businesses new revenue streams, access to growing consumer bases, and competitive advantages. However, it also presents heightened financial risks, especially when it comes to debt recovery. While these markets provide growth potential, they often come with legal, cultural, and operational complexities that make recovering overdue payments more difficult compared to established economies.
Inconsistent legal frameworks, political instability, fluctuating currencies, and a lack of transparency in credit information are just some of the barriers creditors face. Understanding these risks and developing a tailored approach to credit control is essential for protecting financial interests when operating in regions such as Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and parts of Eastern Europe.
Understanding the Risk Landscape
Emerging markets are attractive because they offer opportunities for businesses to scale quickly. But these markets are also more vulnerable to economic shocks, regulatory changes, and enforcement challenges. Legal systems in many of these countries are underdeveloped or biased toward domestic businesses, making cross-border debt collection a slow and uncertain process.
Creditors must also deal with limited availability of reliable financial data. Many businesses in emerging markets operate with minimal disclosure, making it difficult to assess creditworthiness accurately. Traditional credit reporting agencies may not have sufficient coverage or updated records, forcing creditors to rely on informal references or local partnerships.
Legal Barriers to Enforcement
Enforcing debt collection in emerging markets is complicated by jurisdictional differences. Many countries require foreign creditors to re-litigate their claims locally, even if a judgment has already been secured in the creditor’s home country. Recognition of foreign judgments is not guaranteed unless supported by bilateral or multilateral treaties, which are often lacking or ineffective.
Even when legal action is possible, local courts may be slow, inefficient, or influenced by corruption. Navigating these systems requires specialized knowledge of local laws, court procedures, and enforcement mechanisms.
Currency and Payment Risks
Another critical factor is currency risk. Emerging markets frequently experience currency fluctuations and inflation, making it harder for debtors to pay in stable currencies like the US dollar or Euro. Some governments impose capital controls that limit the ability to transfer funds abroad, trapping foreign creditors in long delays or forcing them to accept payment in devalued local currencies.
To mitigate these risks, creditors often price contracts in stable currencies and include currency adjustment clauses to protect against volatility. However, even well-drafted contracts can be difficult to enforce if local laws favor domestic businesses over foreign suppliers.
Cultural and Commercial Practice Differences
Debt collection strategies that work in developed economies may not be suitable for emerging markets. Business practices in these regions often rely on personal relationships, trust-building, and informal negotiation rather than strict contractual enforcement. Aggressive collection tactics can damage relationships and reputations, making future business difficult.
Successful creditors typically adopt a relationship-based approach, working through local intermediaries or partners who understand the cultural context and can negotiate payment terms effectively without escalating disputes too quickly.
Strategic Risk Management Approaches
Mitigating debt recovery risks starts with preventative measures. Comprehensive due diligence, including background checks, financial reviews, and credit assessments, should be standard practice. Contract terms should be clear, specifying jurisdiction, governing law, payment currency, and dispute resolution methods such as arbitration.
Credit insurance and trade finance solutions can offer additional protection, especially for large or high-risk deals. These financial products help transfer risk away from the creditor and ensure partial recovery even in the event of default.
Monitoring client behavior throughout the relationship is equally important. Early warning signs—such as delayed payments, changing order patterns, or communication breakdowns—should trigger internal reviews and proactive collection efforts before the situation deteriorates further.
Leveraging Local Expertise
Working with local debt collection agencies or law firms is often the most practical way to navigate complex recovery processes in emerging markets. These partners have the local knowledge and networks necessary to apply the right pressure, negotiate settlements, and enforce claims through appropriate legal channels.
While local partners come with added costs, their expertise often increases the likelihood of successful recovery and reduces the risk of missteps that could harm the business relationship or lead to legal complications.
Emerging markets present a compelling opportunity for business growth, but creditors must approach them with caution and a well-defined risk management strategy. Debt recovery in these regions is rarely straightforward, and success depends on understanding local legal systems, currency risks, and cultural practices.
By adopting a proactive approach that combines thorough due diligence, strong contract management, and local expertise, businesses can protect their financial interests while continuing to benefit from the opportunities these markets offer.
For businesses seeking professional support in navigating these challenges, partnering with an experienced international debt collection agency like cisdrs.com can provide the legal and operational expertise needed to recover debts effectively across diverse and complex markets.
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Nigerian government on Wednesday dismissed reports suggesting that it has adopted or is considering new taxes on telecommunications services and petroleum products following the publication of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Article IV Consultation Report on Nigeria.
The clarification followed reports that the IMF recommended that Nigeria may need to extend VAT to fuel products and introduce excise duties on telecommunications services to raise revenue, fund development, and social spending, a development that sparked outrage from Nigerians.
In a statement by the Head of Information and Public Relations Unit of the Ministry of Finance, Mr Efe Ovuakporie, it was clarified that the reports misrepresented the content of the IMF report and did not reflect its policy direction.
“The IMF Article IV Consultation Report contains the Fund’s assessment of Nigeria’s economy as well as recommendations for consideration by the authorities.
“Those recommendations do not amount to government policy and are not binding on Nigeria. Decisions on tax matters are taken through established constitutional and legislative processes and are guided by national priorities and prevailing economic realities”.
The government clarified that the Value Added Tax (VAT) waiver on petroleum products remains in place and has not been withdrawn.
It also noted that although existing legislation provides for a fuel surcharge, such a measure can only take effect through a ministerial order and publication in the Official Gazette.
“No such process is under consideration.
“The continued suspension of these charges has helped cushion the effect of global energy price fluctuations on households and businesses while keeping domestic fuel prices relatively stable”.
The government further clarified that the telecommunications excise duty introduced before 2023 has been repealed under the new tax laws and is therefore no longer applicable.
Against this backdrop, the statement noted that reports claiming that new taxes are being planned for telecommunications services or petroleum products “are not factual and should be disregarded”.
The federal government said it remained focused on reforms that promote economic growth, improve revenue administration, and create a more competitive environment for investment and job creation.
“The emphasis remains on expanding economic activity, plugging leakages and improving efficiency rather than placing additional tax burdens on citizens.
“Any future tax measures will be announced through official channels and implemented in line with the law”, the statement added.
By Adedapo Adesanya
Nigeria’s natural gas production slid marginally by 0.12 per cent on a month-on-month basis to 7.93 billion standard cubic feet per day (bcf/d) in May 2026 from April’s 7.94bcf/d.
According to fresh data from the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), the figure represents a 0.63 per cent year-on-year increase from 7.88bcf/d recorded in May 2025.
Breakdown of the May data shows Associated Gas contributed 3.96 bcf/d, while Non-Associated Gas accounted for 3.98bcf/d, highlighting a near-even split in Nigeria’s production mix and the growing strength of dedicated gas developments.
Domestic utilisation continued to expand. Sales to the local market rose to 2.18bcf/d, up from 2.03bcf/d previously, representing 26.6 per cent of total gas usage, as demand from power generation and industrial users strengthened under the national gas expansion agenda.
Export sales, however, declined to 3.07bcf/d, accounting for about 40 per cent of utilisation, while 2.11bcf/d (26.5 per cent) was consumed for field operations. Gas flaring stood at 0.57bcf/d, or 6.9 per cent, reinforcing gradual progress toward Nigeria’s 2030 zero-flare target.
Production has maintained a steady upward trend over the year, rising from 7.80bcf/d in January to 7.94bcf/d in April, before stabilising in May. Year-to-date performance averaged 7.87bcf/d, slightly higher than the first-quarter average.
Between January and April 2026, Nigeria produced 947.78bcf of gas. Of this, 872.69bcf was utilised, while 57.34bcf was flared, translating to utilisation levels of about 92 per cent, according to NUPRC’s provisional data.
Monthly performance showed consistent utilisation above 90 per cent: January recorded 91.4 per cent, February 93 per cent, March 93.2 per cent, and April 93.1 per cent, underscoring improved efficiency in gas utilisation across the value chain.
Domestic supply remained stable throughout the period, averaging between 59bcf and 66bcf monthly, while exports fluctuated but remained significant, with volumes peaking at 98.69bcf in April.
The commission noted that the growing contribution of non-associated gas reflects ongoing investments in dedicated gas projects and aligns with government efforts under the Decade of Gas initiative to expand domestic utilisation, reduce flaring, and strengthen energy security.
Nigeria, which holds over 200 trillion cubic feet of proven gas reserves, continues to face infrastructure and investment constraints that limit full monetisation of its resources, despite improving production and utilisation trends.
By Dipo Olowookere
The Nigerian Exchange (NGX) Limited was further pulled back by 0.50 per cent on Tuesday as a result of profit-taking in some heavyweight stocks.
Like the preceding session, the key sectors of Customs Street were depressed yesterday, with the banking index down by 2.82 per cent. The consumer goods declined by 0.52 per cent, the insurance space lost 0.10 per cent, and the energy counter shrank by 0.03 per cent, while the industrial goods segment was flat.
Consequently, the All-Share Index (ASI) eased by 1,437.54 points to 241,984.80 points from 243,422.34 points, and the market capitalisation contracted by N922 billion to N155.204 trillion from N156.126 trillion.
The worst-performing stock was International Energy Insurance, which gave up 10.00 per cent to close at N5.76. Vitafoam dipped by 10.00 per cent to N189.00, Austin Laz crashed by 9.93 per cent to N3.90, SUNU Assurances depleted by 9.82 per cent to N3.58, and Sovereign Trust Insurance lost 8.37 per cent to finish at N2.30.
On the flip side, Conoil gained 9.79 per cent to trade at N213.00, Prestige Assurance also expanded by 9.79 per cent to N1.57, Neimeth jumped 9.74 per cent to N8.45, eTranzact chalked up 9.40 per cent to close at N16.30, and Cornerstone Insurance improved by 9.09 per cent to N5.40.
The bourse witnessed heavy sell-offs in some equities, with Sterling Holdings recording the sale of 100.9 million units worth N782.8 million to lead the activity log. UAC Nigeria transacted 49.4 million units valued at N9.1 billion, Access Holdings sold 28.8 million units for N699.3 million, Zenith Bank exchanged 29.4 million units worth N3.0 billion, and GTCO traded 20.2 million units valued at N2.7 billion.
At the close of transactions, market participants bought and sold 535.5 million shares worth N36.8 billion in 55,123 deals compared with 569.1 million shares valued at N31.4 billion traded in 77,652 deals on Monday. This implied that the trading value went up by 17.20 per cent, while the trading volume and the number of deals went down by 5.90 per cent and 29.01 per cent, respectively.
-
Feature/OPED6 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism10 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz3 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking8 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy3 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking3 years agoSort Codes of UBA Branches in Nigeria
-
Banking3 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports3 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn