Connect with us

Economy

Nigerian Importers Cry Over High Cargoes Fees by International Shippers

Published

on

shippers

By Adedapo Adesanya

Stakeholders in the import scene in Nigeria are lamenting the huge surcharge imposed on them by the international shipping firms on cargoes imported from across the world into the country.

The surcharge is adding to the high cost of doing business in the Nigerian ports, coupled with the challenges of infrastructure deficiency and cumbersome shipping process at the nation’s gateway.

Since late last year, a German shipping firm, Hapag-Lloyd, has imposed a revised Peak Season Surcharge (PSS) on all container types from across the world to Tin Can Island and Apapa ports.

According to reports, documents obtained by the media showed that about $1025 surcharge is slammed on 20 feet and 40 feet containers through cargoes coming from the United States and other US territories. Likewise, from China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau.

It was also disclosed by shippers that charges from cargoes from the rest of the world are also pegged at $1025 or an equivalent of ‎€930 accordingly.

Notably, they complained that the charges are different from the ocean tariff rates as well as bunker-related surcharges, security-related surcharges, terminal handling charges, among others that shore up the cost of shipping in Nigeria.

Coupled with the strain of the coronavirus pandemic, industries are complaining as these high prices will take a toll on its profit.

According to the Chairman, Shippers Association Lagos State, Mr Jonathan Nichol lamented the huge shipping costs and expressed the group’s readiness to take it up with appropriate agencies.

Mr Nichol said the surcharge could be linked to congestion at Lagos ports, but it is uncalled for, considering the negative effect of COVID-19, “we will certainly induce discussions on this with the Shippers Council”.

He stressed the need to review the costs of shipping in Nigeria, noting that “importers hardly make profits” due to excessive charges.

On the part of the Nigerian Shippers Council (NSC), the Executive Secretary and Chief Executive Officer, Mr Hassan Bello, described the charges as “economic sabotage”, saying the Council is against the action of the shipping firm.

He said, “We are protesting against it vehemently. There was no notice to us and the shippers that the charge was imminent. From our intelligence, these charges are over $1,000. It is discriminatory. It is insensitive. Just when the Nigerian economy is recovering a little bit from the effect of COVID-19, it is insensitive for anybody to slam such charges of over $1,000 on Nigeria’s trade.

“It is discriminatory because it is not happening in Togo, Benin or Ghana, why should it be in Nigeria.

“We have written a strong letter to the shipping association of Nigeria and we also wrote to their principals overseas, because this is not a local charge.

“Why should Nigeria be the recovery ground for shipping companies? We have three lines of action on the internal level; we are going to call on the Union of Africa’s Shippers’ Council; Global Shippers’ Association and Global Shippers Forum.

“On the national level, we are rallying around the organized private sector, I am already in talks with Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), I will talk to Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), as well as big time shippers like Dangote and Nigerian Breweries among others.

“We should all come together and fight against these unnecessary charges. The charges are unilateral and arbitral and we are going to protest against it because it is economic sabotage.

“It goes deep into Nigeria’s economic recovery. It is against our resolve to recover from the effect of COVID-19,” he said.

Also bemoaning the development, the President, Importers Association of Nigeria, Mr Kingsley Chikezie said the importers are not happy about the additional charges from the shipping firm, even at a time they were complaining about the high cost of shipping at the ports.

He explained that a lot of things are happening at the ports including the issue of transfer charges among others, appealing to the authorities to ensure urgent review of the charges.

However, some industrialists who were severely affected by the surcharge burden have urged the Federal Government to institute litigation against the erring shipping firm for operating against the rule of trade facilitation agenda of International Maritime Organisation (IMO) during the pandemic period.

Notwithstanding the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, German container shipping company Hapag-Lloyd closed the first six months of this year with a profit. The group profit stood at $314 million in H1 2020, compared to $165 million seen in the corresponding period a year earlier.

Adedapo Adesanya is a journalist, polymath, and connoisseur of everything art. When he is not writing, he has his nose buried in one of the many books or articles he has bookmarked or simply listening to good music with a bottle of beer or wine. He supports the greatest club in the world, Manchester United F.C.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

CBN Bars Loan Defaulters from New Credit, Banking Facilities

Published

on

external loan

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has moved to tighten credit discipline across the banking sector, directing all financial institutions to deny additional loans and banking facilities to large borrowers whose existing loan obligations are classified as non-performing.

The directive, issued in a circular dated March 12, 2026, was signed by Mrs Olubukola Akinwunmi, Director of Banking Supervision, and addressed to all deposit money banks operating in the country.

Under the new policy, any borrower whose loan facility is recorded as non-performing in the Credit Risk Management System (CRMS), the CBN’s centralised credit database, or flagged by any licensed private credit bureau, will be immediately ineligible for new credit.

The measure takes effect without transition, applying across all banks simultaneously.

The apex bank’s restrictions extend beyond direct lending. Affected borrowers will also be denied access to contingent banking facilities, including bankers’ confirmations, letters of credit, performance bonds, and advance payment guarantees, instruments commonly used in trade finance and large-scale commercial transactions.

Banks have additionally been directed to obtain further realisable collateral from affected obligors to adequately secure their existing exposures.

The apex bank did not specify a timeline within which this additional collateral must be obtained.

The CBN defines large-ticket obligors as borrowers whose combined exposures across all banks exceed the Single Obligor Limit, or whose outstanding obligations materially affect a bank’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) or otherwise pose systemic risks to the broader financial system.

The policy is grounded in Clause 3.2(d) of the Prudential Guidelines for Deposit Money Banks.

The identification of such obligors will be based on data captured in the CRMS and reports from licensed private credit bureaus, according to the circular.

In issuing the directive, the CBN cited the heightened risk that large non-performing obligors pose to individual banks and the wider financial system.

The regulator stated that the new framework is designed to limit contagion risks and reinforce responsible lending practices across the sector.

The move reflects a broader regulatory effort to address the rise in non-performing loans (NPLs) within Nigeria’s banking sector and to ensure that institutions with significant credit exposures to distressed borrowers are not further endangered by extending new facilities to the same counterparties.

Compliance is expected from all deposit money banks with immediate effect.

The CBN did not outline specific sanctions for non-compliance in the circular, though supervisory penalties under the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 2020 would ordinarily apply.

Continue Reading

Economy

Rise in Petrol, Diesel Prices in Nigeria Caused by FG’s Failure to Plan—Peter Obi

Published

on

Peter Obi Prioritize Economic Recovery

By Aduragbemi Omiyale

The presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 general elections, Mr Peter Obi, has blamed the federal government for the high energy costs in Nigeria.

In a post, the former Anambra State Governor said if the central government, led by President Bola Tinubu, had planned for the future, Nigerians would not be paying through their nose for premium motor spirit (PMS), otherwise known as petrol, and Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), also known as diesel.

Disruption in the supply of crude oil on the global market has caused consumers to pay more for petrol and diesel in the country.

The United States and Israel waged war against Iran, killing its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, about two weeks ago in airstrikes.

This has triggered tension in the Middle East, with Iran firing missiles at its neighbours, and closing the Strait of Hormuz, a small water path between Iran and Oman, where one-fifth of global crude oil supply passes through.

Before the crisis, PMS was selling at N835 per litre and crude oil was below $90 per barrel. But oil rose above $100 per barrel, causing the price of petrol in Nigeria to hit over N1,200 per litre.

Reacting to the development, Mr Obi said Nigeria felt the shock despite not being attacked because the government failed to plan.

“Many people wonder why any adverse development in the global economy quickly impacts Nigeria. A recent example is the tension involving Iran, which led to an increase in global oil prices and, subsequently, a rise in petroleum prices in Nigeria.

“A few weeks ago, petrol was selling for less than N1,000 per litre, but today it costs over N1,200 per litre. Diesel, which was also priced below N1,000 per litre, is now over N1,500 per litre. These rapid increases illustrate how quickly external shocks can affect the Nigerian economy.

“The reason for this is straightforward: most countries, whether they are oil-producing or non-oil-producing, maintain strategic petroleum reserves to cushion against supply or price shocks. This means that when there is a disruption in the global oil market, they can release part of these reserves to stabilise supply. However, Nigeria lacks such a buffer, so the impact is felt almost immediately.

“The underlying issue is a lack of planning. Countries that engage in planning create buffers against shocks, while those that do not remain vulnerable to them. The old maxim remains true: when a country fails to plan, it has already planned to fail,” he wrote.

Earlier this week, the Minister of Finance, Mr Wale Edun, said the country’s economy was strong enough to absorb external shocks, saying the over 4 per cent growth in the gross domestic product (GDP) in the fourth quarter of last year was a testament to that.

Continue Reading

Economy

New Tax Regime to Ease Burden on Workers, Small Businesses—Tegbe

Published

on

Withholding Tax

By Adedapo Adesanya

The Chairman of the National Tax Policy Implementation Committee (NTPIC), Mr Joseph Tegbe, has reiterated that Nigeria’s new tax regime is designed to ease the burden on workers and small businesses while strengthening the country’s fiscal sustainability and economic competitiveness.

Speaking at the BusinessDay Tax Reform Conference 2026, themed “Navigating the New Tax Regime: What It Means for Your Wallet,” Mr Tegbe described the reforms as the most comprehensive overhaul of Nigeria’s tax architecture in decades, aimed at simplifying taxation, improving fairness, and encouraging economic growth.

According to him, the reforms, anchored on four landmark legislations: the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025, Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025, Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025, and the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, 2025, introduce targeted reliefs for individuals and small businesses.

Under the new framework, individuals earning less than N800,000 annually will pay no personal income tax, while workers can claim rent relief of up to 20 per cent, capped at N500,000, among other reliefs.

He also said small businesses will benefit significantly, with companies earning below N100 million in annual revenue and with assets under N250 million exempted from Company Income Tax (CIT), while nano-enterprises earning below N12 million annually are exempted from income tax.

He, however, underscored the importance of proper documentation of earnings and subsequent filing of returns, even for those who fall within the threshold exempted from income tax.

“These reforms are designed to make taxation simpler, fairer, and more predictable for Nigerians,” he said, adding that “For most workers and small businesses, the new regime means paying the same or even lower taxes while operating within a more transparent system.”

The reforms also strengthen Nigeria’s tax administration through improved coordination among key institutions, including the Nigeria Revenue Service, the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria, the Tax Appeal Tribunal, and the Office of the Tax Ombudsman, while accelerating the digitalisation of tax processes.

Mr Tegbe noted that beyond improving revenue efficiency, the reforms aim to create a tax system that supports enterprise, investment, and long-term economic growth.

“The ultimate objective is to build a tax system that works for both government and citizens, one that supports development while protecting the pockets of ordinary Nigerians,” he concluded

Continue Reading

Trending