Connect with us

Feature/OPED

Development: Africa Maybe Has a Colossal Originality Drought

Published

on

African desert

By Nneka Okumazie

Some Africans often say that when some Africans go abroad, they act better than they do in Africa. Some others say some Africans excel abroad than when they are at home.

There is something obvious in these observations that is hardly stated, which is that those Africans are simply doing what others are doing wherever they are, having nothing original of themselves.

There are several things that have been adopted in Africa that are meaningful elsewhere but are meaningless in Africa because it was simply copied, then many others in the same era copied, and other generations too copied. So what became obtained were bad copies, far removed from what it should have been.

Education, for example, which should be a tool for transformation, is almost meaningless in Africa. There is no sector in Africa where educated Africans have themselves transformed. All progress continues to be those adopted. There are many Africans with some education who are no better than if they did not have an education.

Many of the so-called new things that proceed from many Africans, as some form of project or business, are derivations of new things elsewhere, lacking originality and capability to make any mass progress or change much beyond limited cases. There are so many contrasts that Africa presents in its own society that makes it plausible that without adopting some progress, Africa may miss nothing.

There are Africans, who complain about bad governance in their countries, saying also that government officials often send their children abroad.

Then some of these Africans often seek nothing else than to go abroad themselves, when they can, showing that Africans seem to want the same things, whether government officials or citizens.

But what is really elsewhere for Africans, better than what is back home? Can infrastructure be bad or education or health or food or water, if they are not made well, or the general users, after the things are made not misuse them? Is the problem in Africa a people problem, not a problem of things or just the government? What are the common outcomes for most of those who leave in terms of achievement? What does success or doing well mean to Africans, for those abroad or those at home? What do Africans really want because it appears not to be development?

All that seems to matter to most Africans is how similar they are to others or how much they can copy, especially a copy of a copy of millions of copies.

It may seem that Africans have forgotten that for a society to make great progress, each sector requires a good percentage of real and intense originality, seeking out new and different approaches so that if some are found, they change the existing paths and benefit society.

But what Africa seems to have is to copy within, then wait until others make progress, then copy, leading nothing, hardly learning and seeming incapable of transforming their own place.

The copying problem of Africa resulted in some being so sure they are right about some ways of life when what they claim to be right about is what they copied. Africans are also blinded to their copying problem, and it is no longer obvious that they are copying. Africans also fight themselves or sabotage each other, not for originality purposes or in originality, but to copy and in copying.

Africans may have gotten shaped by copying; many do not recognize what is original. There are things that were copied that modern society has made unnecessary, but there is persistence in doing them. Some countries in Africa are better at copying, helping them to move really slowly. Others do not even know what, when or how to copy, prompting others to show them.

Originality in Africa seems to exist in how badly the people treat themselves, as well as how indifferent many become to the unprecedented volume of human suffering of their own people.

What Africans should be asking themselves is, where did this originality famine come from? How can several places in modern-day Africa look like what it was centuries ago if a few things were removed?

There are external problems that were brought against Africans by foreigners and continuous exploitations of the people and continent to date. However, what does Africa lack that makes it seem vulnerable to these problems or makes other places seem better than theirs?

Ancient Africa did not make substantial progress in the standard of living. Most of the communities were similar in the way that things pervaded across all their activities, but there was no differential or exponential jump in quality. They had arts, were able to survive in some ways, and were creative in some spheres but failed to explore or transform themselves meaningfully.

Copying or lack of originality, or the ability for exponential transformation, may not even be a huge problem if there are no seeming character deficiencies, which others within see and seem to copy.

There is an absence of certain values that are evident in African societies that are more problematic than a lack of originality. Courage, fairness, selflessness, exploration for collective progress, sincerity, trust, etc. are so few—if at all they exist, that the dominance of the opposite and how people copy the opposite gave what Africa was and still is.

There are many efforts towards progress in Africa that have become corrupted by unyielding low attitudes, which many cannot seem to help. It is possible to guarantee that in Africa, no matter how wrong things are, some would choose those similar to them, tribes, etc. than to do what is right as part of the copying problem.

Other than pleasure, status, same this or that, nothing much is expected from Africans collectively, no matter what it seems has been adopted that brought progress to others.

Africa has an originality famine. This a problem with an old source that should be fought against thoroughly, assuming Africans are serious. The fight, too, should be original and the approach not a fake one or with the appearance of it, as part of the ways many Africans often do their things.

Many Africans are fine, so long things for them and their own people are fine. But if all that is fine for them are things that they copied, told or shown to be what it means to be fine, how are those Africans sure they are not being played or playing themselves?

Of course, there are nations and organizations in Africa who would say or try to show what they have done, but they are either measuring the wrong things or measuring the right things in the wrong units.

[Psalm 124:5, Then the proud waters had gone over our soul.]

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature/OPED

Building 234 Solutions: A Response to Everyday Workforce Challenges

Published

on

Owoloye Emmanuel 234 Solutions

By Owoloye Emmanuel

Every business starts with a problem. For us, that problem was hiding in plain sight.

Across organisations, we kept seeing HR professionals, payroll teams, and business leaders spend significant time navigating processes that should be simpler. Employee records sat across multiple systems, payroll processes required manual intervention, and routine workforce tasks often became more complicated than they needed to be.

As businesses grow, workforce operations naturally become more complex. Yet many organisations still rely on disconnected tools and workflows that create unnecessary friction for both employers and employees.

The consequence is more than operational inefficiency. HR teams spend valuable time managing systems instead of supporting people. Business leaders struggle to access timely workforce insights, while employees experience delays in processes that should be seamless.

These weren’t isolated challenges. They were recurring realities across workplaces, regardless of industry or size.

That observation led us to a simple question: what if workforce management could be easier?

What if HR, payroll, and workforce operations could work together within a single, connected experience?

That question became the foundation for 234 Solutions.

We are building 234 Solutions with a clear belief that workplace technology should reduce complexity, not add to it. Our goal is to help organisations spend less time navigating processes and more time focusing on productivity, growth, and people.

As we prepare for launch, our focus remains simple: building practical solutions for real workplace challenges and helping organisations create better experiences for the people who power them every day.

Owoloye Emmanuel is the founder of 234 Solutions

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

The Role of TV in Preserving African Stories and Identity

Published

on

Preserving African Stories

Scroll through social media today, and you will notice something interesting: everyone is either reacting to a series, quoting a movie line, or debating a character as though they personally know them. Beneath the memes and binge-watch culture, however, lies something deeper. Television remains one of the most powerful tools shaping how Africans see themselves, remember their history, and tell their own stories. In a continent as diverse and expressive as Africa, that matters more than ever.

TV as a Cultural Archive, Not Just Entertainment

Long before streaming algorithms began shaping our viewing habits, television was already preserving African identity. From Nollywood dramas that capture the rhythm of everyday Lagos life to documentaries exploring Maasai traditions and Ghanaian folklore, TV has served as a living archive of the continent’s stories.

It preserves more than entertainment; it preserves language, culture, humour, values, and shared experiences. Unlike fleeting social media content, television allows stories to unfold with depth, exploring the realities of family, tradition, ambition, and modern African life without reducing them to stereotypes. That is the power of TV: preserving not just stories, but perspective.

Why Representation on TV Still Matters

There is a subtle but important truth: if people do not see themselves on screen, they may begin to believe their stories are not worth telling. This is why African TV content is more than entertainment; it is affirmation.

Seeing a character who speaks like you, struggles like you, or celebrates like your community does something powerful. It validates identity and challenges outdated narratives that have historically defined Africa through external lenses.

This is where MultiChoice Group, through platforms such as DStv and GOtv, plays an important role. They do not simply broadcast content; they help distribute cultural memory at scale.

GOtv, DStv, and the Everyday African Viewer

Think about a typical evening in many African homes: the TV is on in the background, someone is laughing at a comedy show, another person is watching a local series, and someone else is catching up on the news. That shared viewing experience remains very real.

Through platforms such as DStv and GOtv, African households are exposed to a blend of local storytelling and global content. More importantly, they have helped amplify African-produced content by bringing Nollywood films, African reality shows, talk shows, and documentaries into mainstream rotation.

It is not just about access. It is about visibility.

A young filmmaker in Lagos today is more likely to believe their story matters because they have seen similar stories broadcast widely. A child in Accra grows up hearing familiar accents and seeing environments that look like their own on screen, not as exceptions, but as the norm.

TV Is Also Shaping Modern African Identity

African identity is not static; it is evolving. Television reflects that evolution in real time.

Today, audiences see:

  • Young Africans balancing tradition and modern dating culture

  • Stories tackling mental health in African households

  • Fashion and music influences spreading through TV series

  • Political satire shaping public conversation

Conversations that were once confined to homes are now being explored on screen, giving audiences the language to discuss issues that were previously unspoken.

In many ways, television is doing what oral tradition has always done: passing stories, values, humour, warnings, and history from one generation to the next. The difference is that today’s griots are writers, directors, and broadcasters.

The Future: From Watching to Owning Our Narratives

The next stage of African storytelling is not just about being seen; it is about ownership.

As more African creators produce content and platforms continue to invest in regional storytelling, television becomes more than a mirror. It becomes a tool for shaping how Africa is represented to itself and to the world.

While streaming continues to grow, television, particularly accessible platforms such as GOtv, remains one of the most effective ways to reach everyday audiences across different income levels and regions. After all, storytelling only matters if people can access it.

African stories are not new. They have always existed in families, on streets, in markets, in history books, and through oral traditions. What television has done, and continues to do, is give those stories a stage wide enough for millions to experience them at once.

The next time you watch a local series or documentary on DStv or GOtv, remember that you are not just being entertained. You are participating in the preservation of African identity itself.

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

The Future of AI in Nigerian SMEs: Overcoming Barriers to Implementation

Published

on

Kehinde Ogundare 2025

By Kehinde Ogundare

Ask a tech entrepreneur in San Francisco what AI means for their business, and they are likely to talk about competitive advantage, product differentiation, and scale. Ask a small business owner in Kano or Onitsha the same question, and the conversation shifts entirely.

For many Nigerian SMEs, the priority is keeping the lights on, managing costs, and finding sustainable ways to grow in a challenging economic environment. This difference in perspective explains why the global AI conversation, often shaped by assumptions about stable infrastructure, deep capital, and abundant technical talent, frequently fails to address the realities facing Nigerian SMEs.

This matters because Nigerian SMEs are not a peripheral concern. In 2024 alone, MSMEs contributed 46.32% to Nigeria’s GDP, accounting for 96.9% of businesses and 87.9% of employment. These businesses are the backbone of the Nigerian economy, and if AI is going to mean anything for Nigeria’s development, it has to work for them in the daily conditions they actually operate in.

However, research drawing on empirical data from 144 Nigerian SMEs found that inadequate infrastructure, low digital literacy, skills shortages, and regulatory gaps are collectively preventing them from meaningfully engaging with AI. Awareness of AI is high and growing. What is missing is a clear and honest conversation about what adoption actually requires in this specific context. The barriers are real, but none of them are insurmountable. The question is whether the tools, pricing models, and support structures being offered to Nigerian SMEs are designed with those barriers in mind, or whether they have been built for another market entirely.

Subscription models making AI affordable for small businesses

When most small business owners hear “AI,” they imagine expensive software, specialist consultants, and a hefty upfront bill.

That assumption is not entirely wrong, but it describes a particular way of buying technology, not AI itself. The shift that makes AI genuinely accessible at the SME level is the move away from large, one-time capital purchases towards tools that charge a predictable monthly subscription. Businesses can pay for what they use, scale back when necessary, and avoid the debt that a major technology investment can create.

The deeper opportunity here is consolidation. Many SMEs are already spending money across multiple disconnected tools—one for invoicing, another for customer records, another for stock tracking—none of which talk to each other. An integrated platform that handles several of these functions together, with AI built in, can actually cost less than the sum of those separate subscriptions while giving business owners a clearer picture of their operations.

With margins already under pressure, any technology a business adopts needs to visibly show an increase in productivity or bottom line. Subscription-based, integrated platforms, priced transparently and honestly, are the model that best fits this reality.

Infrastructure challenges demand a mobile-first approach

No conversation about technology in Nigeria is complete without confronting the infrastructure problem, and AI is no exception. Nigeria continues to face major infrastructure barriers, including limited broadband access, unreliable power supply, and high data costs, all of which constrain deeper AI adoption. These are structural features of the operating environment that any sensible technology strategy must account for today.

The electricity situation alone is significant. The World Bank estimates that the lack of stable electricity costs Nigeria’s economy approximately $26.2 billion annually, equivalent to about 2% of GDP, forcing many businesses to run on expensive diesel generators. That cost ripples outward.

In practical terms, AI tools built for Nigeria cannot assume a stable broadband connection or a computer that is always powered on. The tools that will actually get used are the ones that work on a smartphone, consume minimal data, and can function offline when connectivity drops, syncing back up when it returns. The mobile phone is already how many Nigerian SME owners run their businesses. AI that meets them there, rather than demanding infrastructure they do not have, is AI that has a genuine future in this market.

The direction is clear: build capability from within, using tools that make that possible. Recent AI performance research reveals that 64% of African workers are already actively using AI at work, signalling massive grassroots readiness and driving forward-thinking organisations across Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa to aggressively prioritise internal upskilling frameworks to bridge the talent gap.

As the policy groundwork is being laid, the commercial ecosystem is beginning to respond. What remains is a clear-eyed acceptance that AI tools built for this market need to look different from those built for markets with different realities. Low cost, low bandwidth, and usability for non-technical people are not modest ambitions; they are the actual requirements. Build for those realities, and AI has a real future in Nigeria’s SME economy.

Continue Reading

Trending