World
BRICS+ and G20: Competing or Collaborating for Global South
By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh
South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa heads G20, an intergovernmental forum comprising 19 sovereign countries, the European Union, and the African Union, while Brazil’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva chairs BRICS+, an association made of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa with four new members and 13 partner states in a category mostly from developing countries.
At a quick glance, the G20 and BRICS+ are respectively chaired this year 2025 by South Africa and Brazil, both BRICS+ members, which makes it distinctively important development for the changing geopolitical world. In 2025, G20 and BRICS+ agenda features a pivotal role and pledge to continue making concerted strides, either in keen competition for economic revitalization or in close collaboration as development players, in the Global South.
Historically, G20 was created back in 1999 as a group of twenty of the world’s largest economies to deal primarily with multifaceted aspects of existing global economic, trade, health, climate change and political issues. Dissatisfied with the global dominance of the United States and the stack failure of leaders of developing countries, especially in Africa, to raise their economic status to an appreciable levels and improve standards of living for the largely impoverished population, BRIC appeared in 2009, in city of Yekaterinburg, Russia.
South Africa ascended in 2010, transforming it into BRICS. As popularly now referred to as BRICS+, its key objective aspiration is to support building a better economic architecture for the Global South. In addition, BRICS+, as a non-western association, operates against western hegemony and uni-polar, rules-based system. Its key priority aims at shaping a more equitable and a more balanced global order while collaborating with developing countries in raising their economic status in the Global South.
An insight into G20 and BRICS+ including its “partner states” category shows the huge economic structure, the natural and human resources necessary for the future of mankind. We have observed several discussions, at highest levels these several years, on intensifying whatever political dialogue and exchange of views, economic collaborations and interactions on bilateral and multilateral mechanisms for developing better conditions in the Global South. Bridging the economic and standards of living gap have been on the agenda for both G20 and BRICS+ during previous years.
Every year, the leaders of G20 members meet to discuss mainly economic and financial matters and coordinate policy on some other issues of mutual interest. Every year, BRICS+ members summit features extensive deliberations on the United States global dominance and hegemony, without adequately addressing economic lapses in the developing Global South. Several summit declarations have adopted in that directions, but remain purely as collective declarations.
G20 and BRICS+ agenda in 2025?
As geopolitical situation heightens, G20 and BRICS+ are championing its a fresh version of governance reforms in their ways, and further reviewing the current operations of multilateral institutions such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF)and the World Bank for developing countries in the Global South. Despite these common goals, G20 and BRICS+ still have the main points of discontention. BRICS+ shares, in its declarations, dissatisfaction over over-exploitation of resources in and rules-based approach towards developing world.
In the Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation’s media release in January 2025, titled “The G20 is made up of 13 Engagement Groups”, stated that “South Africa fully supports the approach of strengthening partnerships and expanding dialogue with a wide range of actors; including States, international organizations and civil society; to collectively shape the G20’s approach to issues requiring international cooperation.” (South Africa’s chairmanship of G20, Jan. 2025)
It further recognizes the significant strides made by the Brazilian G20 presidency (2024) in enhancing the G20 as a site of democratic global engagement. The South African presidency will continue this trajectory. In South Africa’s G20 presidency, further modalities will be developed to involve a wide range of stakeholders throughout the year, particularly on priority initiatives. Until the G20 Leaders’ Summit in November 2025, South Africa is expected to bring together representatives of the existing engagement groups and other segments of civil society that may offer meaningful contributions to the G20.
For the BRICS+ agenda, focus is placed on the need to reform the current international financial architecture to meet the global financial challenges. As already explained, the measures are to facilitate the development of the economy, international trade, and the achievement of the sustainable development goals.
In addition to the financial architecture, BRICS+ has agreed to discuss and study the feasibility of establishment of an independent cross-border settlement and depositary infrastructure, an initiative to complement the existing financial market infrastructure, as well as independent reinsurance capacity and the possibility of expanding innovative financial practices and approaches for projects and programmes, including finding acceptable mechanisms of financing in local currencies.
BRICS+ has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining a strong and effective Global Financial Safety Net with a quota-based and adequately resourced IMF at its centre. On G20, BRICS+ recognized the importance of the continued and productive functioning of the G20, based on consensus with a focus on result-oriented outcomes. In other words, both would play complimentary role in the global economy, and appreciating efforts with a focus on development trends in the Global South.
South Africa Driving Development Goals
In accepting G20 chairmanship early December in Cape Town, South Africa explicitly indicated a number of practical ways forward in consolidating G20 on the world stage as it strives to gain additional significant momentum in 2025.
South Africa, however, insisted that G20’s relations have to be compatible with development gaols of the Global South. The main argument here is that the G20 comprises many of the world’s largest developing and developed economies. Therefore, G20 has to play a critical role in influencing policies and foster economic stability to have a direct impact on the lives of all members of the global community.
It has a wide agenda that now includes trade sustainable development, health, agriculture, energy, the environment, climate change and anti-corruption. These agenda initiatives are not only to drive economic progress but also to accelerate and support long-term investment opportunities across the continents especially in Africa.
The outlook for global economic growth remains unpredictable, and many economies carry the burden of unsustainable levels of debt. Geopolitical instability, conflict and war are causing further hardship and suffering. Across the world, billions of people are affected by under-development, inequality, poverty, hunger and unemployment.
Strengthening Economic Partnership
Working together with G20 members and building partnerships across society is one the surest pathways to confront the development challenges. Exploring the development pathways, without any geopolitical discrimination but with caution, to achieve more rapid, inclusive and economic growth for future generations.
The G20 provides us with a platform to pursue these collective goals. South Africa has adopted the theme ‘Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability’ for its G20 Presidency. Through solidarity, we can create an inclusive future that advances the interests of people at the greatest risk of being left behind.
Under South Africa’s leadership, the G20 leaders have to work seriously with African Union and European Union, through this year, until its final summit which will take place in Johannesburg in November 2025. South Africa’s presidency, for the first time an African country has presided over the G20, in line with above-mentioned theme, there is the necessity to strengthen and advance consistent efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.
Africa’s Noticeable Challenges
Until today, Africa faces multitude of challenges. The continent, comprising 55 States, was declared as politically independent in 1963 and yet is confronted with challenges of an excellent model of governance and exemplary leadership. Basic tenets of transfers as stipulated within framework of constitutions are usually marked by conflicts, opposition groups are frequently banned from operating in the country.
This is further simply compounded by economic under-development which impact heavily on living standards of majority of the population across the Africa. Despite huge untapped natural resources, tackling the economy requires finances which many African countries lack primarily due to inability to design national priority actions. Urban-rural development disparities have taken its characteristic shape in many geographic parts of Africa.
The local African, multilateral financial institutions, development banks and the private sector need to scale up, with a fairer and appropriate lending conditions to ensure debt sustainability for low-income countries.
In fact, Africa still needs more investment in infrastructure, healthcare, education and finance for sustaining many other development needs, and as well as to consider extending debt relief to developing economies. These are challenges for G20 and BRICS+ to champion their critical positions as engines for growth and development in Africa, and Global South.
In 2025, there is unshakeable (amplified) hope that both South Africa’s G20 directorship and Brazil’s BRICS+ chairmanship, focus would be on pursuing remarkable progress on cross-cutting development issues throughout Africa and across Global South.
Logical Expectations
In this fast-changing landscape characterized by forging new alliances, the practical implementation of the Russia’s initiatives, against the backdrop of escalated tensions, fostering cooperation not confrontation, will rather help effectively in addressing challenges. One more significant point is that there may be important linkages emerging between BRICS+ and G20. Undoubtedly, Brazil in 2025 is likely to base its priorities on some of the themes that were pursued in 2024 during its chairmanship in G20.
BRICS and G20, critical over global political developments and economic growth, but both could complement efforts as partners in tackling existing challenges, coordinate approaches and strategies. Particularly, Africa, as part of the developing Global South, has increasingly become the subject of deliberations at high-level summits and conferences, noting that more 60% of its population still wallow in abject poverty.
Understanding the puzzling paradox that Africa has huge untapped natural resources and adequate human capital to engage in development. Often asked rhetorical question why ‘the Asian tigers’ developed while ‘the African lions’ declined these past several years. South Africa, as the current G20 president, has to set the platform this 2025 for practical dialogue at G20, which includes BRICS members, to adopt collective towards Africa’s development goals including those in energy, industrialization, infrastructure and agriculture.
Logical Conclusion
As we mark the end of this first quarter century in 2025, it behoves on individual leaders, states and their stakeholders to act rather than engage in persistent criticisms and trading geopolitical rhetoric. On one hand, BRICS+ bloc is rapidly evolving as an alternative platform for global cooperation. For substantive continuity, BRICS+ apparently has to ensure that the initiatives raised during Russia’s presidency, and previous summits, members and the “partner states” maintain unwavering commitment towards their realization.
But on the other hand, G20 has to readjust and adapt its collective approach towards diverse perspectives, reform its models of operations to compliment and support development initiatives of the Global South. While appreciating in the final summary that G20 and BRICS+ platforms are created for driving global development and expected optimal economic growth, and further to engage in tackling challenges in order to register visible impact, it is highly necessary to emphasize the importance of trust and collaboration.
Moreover, the geopolitical implications are already known. But this, as a whole, becomes ultimately the greatest interest in their current deliberations. It is really a defining moment for Africa, and in general, for the Global South. Both G20 and BRICS+ have to subsequently demonstrate strategic steps in actualizing the aspirations as we move forward into the future.
World
Middle East War: World Trade Facing Worst Disruptions Since World War II
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Director-General (DG) of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Mrs Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has said the global trading system is experiencing the worst disruptions in the past 80 years.
The trade body chief warned about the consequences as the WTO ministerial conference opened Thursday in Cameroon.
“The world order and the multilateral system we know has irrevocably changed,” she said, adding: “We cannot deny the scale of the problems confronting the world today.”
The organisation’s 166 members appear deeply divided as trade ministers gather in the Cameroonian capital for the WTO’s top conference, amid global economic turmoil linked to the Middle East war.
Over four days in Yaounde, WTO members will try to revitalise an institution weakened by geopolitical tensions, stalled negotiations, and rising protectionism — against the backdrop of the war in the Middle East, which poses a serious threat to international trade.
“The scale of the problems confronting the world today, even before the conflict in the Gulf, destabilised trade in energy, fertiliser and food,” Mrs Okonjo-Iweala said.
“National governments and international institutions alike have been struggling to navigate rising geopolitical tensions, intensifying climate pressures, and rapid technological change.
“Accompanying these shifts has been an increasingly loud questioning of multilateralism,” she added.
Mrs Okonjo-Iweala said these disruptions were just one symptom of broader upheavals shaking the international order created after World War II to prevent a repeat of the disasters of the first half of the 20th century.
“It feels appropriate that at the moment when the world is in turmoil with conflict in the Middle East, Sudan, Ukraine, and elsewhere, at this time of great disruption and uncertainty, we have gathered in Africa to discuss the road ahead for the global trading system,” she said.
“Africa is the continent of the future.”
WTO ministerial conferences are typically held every two years. The current edition in Yaounde is the second to be held in Africa, after Nairobi (Kenya) in 2015.
World
France Ensuring Africa’s Partnership Sustainability
By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh
The United States-Israeli war in the Islamic Republic of Iran is shattering Africa’s economic landscape and leaving emotional devastation. Europe is fractured, but completely. France has taken the initiative to create a platform in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya, located in East Africa. More than 2,500 corporate executives from across the continent, spanning 55 African countries, would take up the challenge during a two-day in-depth discussion on the existential threat of the Middle East conflict. Participating business leaders’ engagement over geopolitics, finding new paths to massive new investment, would be the central theme, while expressing commitment to forge new mechanisms for economic cooperation between Africa and France. The high-ranking guests from regional economic blocs are expected to join, teaming up to share practical thoughts and build awareness beyond the current Middle East conflicts and their impact on Europe and Africa.
The common goal: new perspectives on innovation, new business directions in the context of geopolitical threats. Based on Africa’s untapped natural resources and human capital, communicating clearly with business executives and political leaders, high-ranking speakers plan to dissect and design the future. Strengthening Africa’s and France’s economic cooperation forms the irreversible target and will ultimately be incorporated into the conference declaration. Cautious reflection indicated that the relationship between Africa and France is still pragmatic, as both agreed to renew and thoroughly review the existing economic potentials at the two-day conference in Nairobi.
Experts and Conference coordinators told this article’s author that the French government and business circles involved in trade and economic cooperation with African countries were invited to participate, lay out their comprehensive business architecture. Africa and France will focus on the developing manufacturing and extractive industries, setting up special economic zones, energy and transport infrastructure, digitalisation, and the agro-industrial complex—education and training in the sphere of entrepreneurship.
France has already worked out a financial mechanism to support joint business across Africa, while Africa’s financial institutions pledge their commitment, plan corporate strategies and support for joint investments in the localisation of production chains in Africa, which covers both agricultural and mineral processing.
President William Ruto and French President Emmanuel Macron both acknowledged that the strategic pathway should focus on unlocking Africa’s potential, driving sustainable industrialisation, and targeting economic growth across Africa. Harnessing the untapped resources and utilising the huge human resources is France’s priority in consolidating the current bilateral engagement and collaboration.
In a statement, President Ruto underlined tthat he summit reflects a shared commitment to strengthening bilateral ties and deepening multilateral cooperation to advance global goals. The agenda will focus on key areas, including reform of the international financial architecture, energy transition, green industrialisation, the blue economy and connectivity, artificial intelligence, sustainable agriculture, and health. It will spotlight the role of young entrepreneurs, civil society, and international organisations in shaping solutions to pressing global and regional challenges. The May summit is described as part of the renewal of relations between France and Africa, emphasising genuine partnerships and shared progress.
The agenda will focus on key areas, including reform of the international financial architecture, energy transition, green industrialisation, the blue economy and connectivity, artificial intelligence, sustainable agriculture, and health.
In addition to the May summit by France, the European Union countries are increasingly strong economic partners for many African countries. It therefore beholds African leaders and business people to necessarily explore available possibilities and windows that have been opened. The EU has unveiled €300 billion ($340 billion) alternative to China’s Belt and Road initiative — an investment programme the bloc claims will create links, not dependencies.
In an official document, it said the European Commission is examining:
– Support AfCFTA implementation and the green transition;
– Improve trade and investment climate between the EU and Africa;
– Reinforce high-level public-private dialogue;
– Enhance long-term dialogue structures between the EU and African Business Associations;
– Unlock new business and investment opportunities, including in the areas of manufacturing and agro processing, as well as regional and continental value chains development.
It is further included in the joint communication of the European Commission (EC) entitled “Toward a Comprehensive Strategy with Africa”, which sets forth what the EU plans with Africa. The Joint EU-Africa Strategy takes into cognisance the most common interests such as climate change, global security and the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Just as China, India and the United States, so also France, and other European countries are exploring emerging opportunities offered by the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which provides a unique and valuable access to an integrated African market of 1.5 billion people. In practical reality, it aims at creating a continental market for goods and services, with free movement of business people and investments in Africa.
Looking ahead, France intends to capitalise on Africa’s most transformative economic sectors and make strategic moves by collaborating, as a mutual partnership remains dynamic and adaptable. Despite growing geopolitical tensions, France’s approach and its long-standing ties still offer an alternative partnership model that many African leaders find very appealing.
The challenge for the future will be to ensure these ties evolve in ways that serve Africa’s development needs, while navigating the increasingly complex global politics. As Africa is indiscriminately open for business, on May 11-12, 2026, African and French Heads of State and Government meet together to chart a new path for innovation, growth, and cooperation. Kenya will hold this investment summit for France to position Africa as a key partner in global innovation and economic development while strengthening bilateral ties with France and advancing Africa’s collective agenda on the international stage.
World
Multiple Prospects of Russian-African Partnership
By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh
In an increasingly struggle for Russia’s influence in Africa, including political, economic and humanitarian spheres, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov started 2026 with a pack of invitations for African foreign ministers, strategically as part of preliminary preparations for the next Russia-Africa summit. Armed with Russia’s policy intentions in Africa (Strategic Action Plan 2023-2026), Lavrov interacted with the same group of foreign ministers in December 2025, in Cairo, the capital of Egypt.
In pursuit of strengthening ‘political dialogue’ which features prominently, Lavrov’s high-ranking guests since the beginning of this year included the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Burkina Faso, Karamoko Traore, with whom several bilateral documents were signed in February. In the same month, Tanzania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation, Mahmoud Thabit Kombo, visited with a special focus on expanding cooperation in trade, economic, and investment spheres.
On January 14, the Minister of International Relations and Trade of the Republic of Namibia, Selma Ashipala-Musavyi, went on a working visit to Russia, held comprehensive discussions raising bilateral relations. Ashipala-Musavyi, who serves as Co-Chair of the Intergovernmental Russian-Namibian Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation, was received by Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation and Plenipotentiary Presidential Envoy to the Far Eastern Federal District Yury Trutnev, who heads the Russian side of the IGC. The conversation focused primarily on the substantive content of the 11th IGC meeting in Windhoek.
Firstly, Russia is one of the world’s largest grain producers. And developing the port infrastructure of the Far East and the Arctic is a potential window for supplies to African countries. Secondly, with the application of state support measures, private investors are creating new large-scale fertiliser production plants. One such enterprise is the Nakhodka Mineral Fertiliser Plant in Primorye Territory, which is scheduled to reach its design capacity in 2027.
“Namibia has rich marine resources and a strategic location. Russia has the fleet, technology and experience. Together, we could maximise catch levels and expand processing. At the same time, Russian companies strive for responsible fishing, paying close attention to marine ecology and the reproduction of key fish stocks,” Zapryagayev said at the business forum that was held in mid-March, as part of the 11th meeting of the Russian-Namibian intergovernmental commission on trade and economic cooperation.
Updated Russia-Kenya’s Experiences
On March 16, Foreign Minister Lavrov held talks with the Prime Cabinet Secretary and Cabinet Secretary for Foreign and Diaspora Affairs of the Republic of Kenya, Mudavadi, who was in Moscow on a working visit on March 15-18. There were detailed discussions on the current state and prospects for Russia–Kenya relations, while both parties outlined practical steps to strengthen political dialogue, and determine pathways for expanding mutually beneficial partnership in trade and the broad economic areas.
An engaged exchange of views resulted in signing a multitude of documents, updated policy interest in Russia’s experience in developing painstaking initiative projects in Kenya. It was described as being in the framework context of Russian foreign policy. In a speech boosting relations, Lavrov, with unrestrained rhetoric, underlined sectors such as energy, including nuclear, telecommunications, geological prospecting, mineral resources mining and high technologies, including space exploration, as promising areas.
Lavrov foresaw Russia’s delay in cooperating with Kenya and suggested speeding up preparations of the agreement on the establishment of a bilateral commission on economic cooperation, an instrument through which to implement economic projects. “We agreed today to expedite the work carried out for rather a long time thus far on preparation of the intergovernmental agreement for the establishment of the Russian-Kenyan commission for economic cooperation,” the minister said.
The visit of Kenya’s foreign minister to Moscow gives a new impetus to the political dialogue between the two parties and makes it possible to outline the path for further deepening of trade and economic relations, agreeing on further conscious efforts in the promising area of bilateral cooperation, at least, as a summary result after Lavrov’s talks with his Kenyan counterpart, Mudavadi.
For now, prospects remain on the table, as Russia shows readiness to offer partnership at a qualitatively new level with Kenya, so also with many African countries. The demand for Russian university education is high in the East African nation. Besides education and training, both Kenyan and Russian officials highly recognise the great potential for increasing trade and economic cooperation, which has not been realised yet. Plans to establish an intergovernmental commission to deal with these matters were announced during Lavrov’s visit to Kenya in 2023. The issue was brought up once again at a meeting between Georgy Karasin, the chairman of the Russian Federation Council’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, and Kathuri Murungi, the Deputy Speaker of Kenya’s Senate.
Notably, the Africa Centre for the Study of Russia (ACSOR), aimed at strengthening scientific, cultural and political ties between Russia and Kenya, opened at the University of Nairobi on February 25, according to local Russian media reports. Western-trained dominates African politics. Russia has under-leveraged its Russian-trained African professionals and specialists, compared to the extent to which the United States and China support theirs in employment structures.
Far ahead of the arrival of the Kenya delegation, Dr. Peter Mutuku Mathuki, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Kenya in the Russian Federation, told this article author that Russia’s multifaceted cooperation with Kenya has, steadily, taken on a new dimension, emphasizing the two countries look forward to concluding trade agreements under negotiation, which will open up more economic opportunities both at public and private sector levels. Kenya’s priority in the Russian Federation is to implement the objectives of our foreign policy hinged on deepening the Kenya-Russia bilateral relations across the board. However, Kenya’s economic presence in the Russian Federation is currently minimal, as manifested by a limited range of export products to the market in the Russian Federation.
Incredible Lessons from Summits
Nonetheless, before the 2019 summit, trade volume between Russia and Kenya was $397 million in 2018, compared to $625 million in 2023 and $638 million in 2024. Russia still has an opportunity to leverage the untapped potential in the continent to drive sustainable development. Investors can benefit from the diverse government incentives existing across Africa. As Africa is indiscriminately open for business, so in May 2026, Kenya will hold an investment summit for France, to position Africa as a key partner in global innovation and economic development while strengthening bilateral ties with France and advancing Africa’s collective agenda on the international stage.
Today, Russia’s engagement is largely noticeable in politics, while there is little impact on Africa’s economy, except reaping huge revenues from military and weaponry sales to African countries in persistent and endless conflicts, and raising exports of agricultural products such as grains to the continent. In addition, African leaders are excited about the emotional solidarity and harbour nostalgic Soviet-style romanticism. Over the years, African leaders’ negotiations have been one-sided, only considering Russia’s investment in Africa. Thus, until today, Africa’s economic presence is extremely low in the Russian Federation.
Policy experts and academic researchers review the current Russia-Africa relations, portraying it as a threat to Africa’s sovereignty or an opportunity to exploit resources. In the French-Speaking African countries, Russia’s agreements seek uninterrupted access to natural resources in exchange for military cooperation, maintaining security and even providing security guards to African leaders, such as in the Central African Republic (CAR). Since 2017, when Russia operated in CAR, it has hardly undertaken any infrastructure projects or invested in any productive sectors in that country, headed by Faustin-Archange Touadéra.
Russia to Study Africa’s Investment Landscape
Perhaps, and precisely, the Director of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Irina Abramova, described Russia’s connectivity with Africa explicitly, in her interview with local media African Initiative in February, first pointing to the historical fact that after the collapse of the Soviet era, Russia slammed the door on Africa. She further argued that Russia’s policy is currently full of symbolism, highly-toned rhetoric and little action on implementing agreements signed with several African countries. For now, Africa opens up the broadest economic opportunities for any external player—primarily the Chinese, followed by Indians, and now players from the Arab Gulf region, who picked up this “baton” and are strategically active on the continent.
That, however, simply means Russia has to study the investment landscape. But, constantly referring to reasons such as the lack of money is an ineffective way to deal with Africa, according to Professor Abramova. She suggested to ministry officials to “discard reciting administrative rules and regulations; make way for flexibility. And finally, the most important thing is coordination.”
But in reality, if Russia had built a normal new financial mechanism, it would not have cared. In practical terms, Russia has little foresight. Russia, simply, lacks interconnectedness with Africa and with Africans. That is, elements of psychology and elements of faith are involved. And this is an absolutely new phenomenon that is spreading across the entire world.
For approximately 15 years, Professor Abramova has reiterated that Africa must be approached in a comprehensive and coordinated way. Coordination is the most important thing. First and foremost, it is people, because personnel decide everything. Africans’ attitude towards Russia is, generally, very positive. This is genuinely felt when travelling a great deal around Africa.
Focus on Security over Development
According to researched academic reports, Russia’s weak economic presence in Africa has become research topic in educational institutions, with the Federal Committee on Economic Policy, Association of Economic Cooperation with African States (AECAS) established under the auspices of the Secretariat of the Russia-Africa Partnership Forum (RAPF) and the Coordinating Committee on Economic Cooperation with Africa, pointing to conditions of pressure from sanctions imposed by United States. Finding excuses to cover policy weaknesses. This sole reason has prominently featured in official reports since the start of the Russia-Ukraine crisis in late February 2022. With renewed rising interests in Africa, experts also cited Russia’s weak structures in establishing effective ways of entry into the huge continent full of opportunities.
Russia has only 1% of its direct investment, due to limited financial resources, a lack of investment mechanisms, and severe competition from Chinese and Western investors. Russia focuses on arms and the export of grains to generate revenue for its budget. While Russia has forgotten billions, over 30 years ago, in Soviet-era debts to foster goodwill, this often links to new arms deals, which do not absolutely build diversified, sustainable economic integration in Africa.
Against the backdrop of intensifying relations with Africa, the percentage of collective influence (politics, economy and social, combined) varies: China holds 65%, the US – 53%, the EU – 49%, India – 38% and Russia – 29%. Trade with Africa also varies largely: China has now offered zero-tariff treatment to 52 African countries, and its trade has already reached $348 billion in 2025. India has $58 billion, and the United States has extended its AGOA agreement with Africa. Russia has nothing; at least the trade preferences that were promised over the years have remained meaningless for Africa.
A Few Significant Steps Forward
In this analysis, Russia and Africa have historically come a long way. One significant step forward is to seriously prioritise its policy architecture and turn over a new page in the history of mutually beneficial cooperation, with special attention on the development of corporate business, technology and agro-industrial complex. It has placed concrete emphasis on the importance of the active participation of Russian companies in the implementation of infrastructure projects on the African continent. Building modern distribution centres, developing port complexes and organising joint logistics solutions will be key areas of cooperation.
These ambitious steps will allow us to strengthen Russia’s ultimate position on the market, further outlining practical measures to boost dialogue in economic, trade and other fields, and to establish stable economic relations with African countries. Together, Russia will be able to realise the potential of both regions and ensure the prosperity of Africa and its people.
For multilateralism, and what Foreign Minister Lavrov has frequently mentioned, in the framework of multipolar architecture, Africa has to, without discrimination, interact and hold regular meetings with any external states it seriously considers important for its development. In practical terms, Russia has to demonstrate its preparedness to engage Africa. One fact is clear—Africa, as of today, remains a critical arena for key global powers, balancing the great-power competition and rivalry. African leaders are prepared for this so long as these players truly have adequate funds to invest, not just political rhetoric and a show of symbolism. In a continental context, that is broadly referred to as Africa’s Agenda 2063.
-
Feature/OPED6 years agoDavos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism10 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz3 years agoEstranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking8 years agoSort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy3 years agoSubsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking3 years agoSort Codes of UBA Branches in Nigeria
-
Banking3 years agoFirst Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports3 years agoHighest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn









