OAG Convicts SICPA SA of Corporate Criminal Liability
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
A Swiss security company, SICPA SA, has been convicted of corporate criminal liability in connection with acts of corruption and has been directed to pay CHF 81 million.
With the penalty order issued in accordance with Art. 102 para. 2 SCC in conjunction with Art. 322septies SCC, SICPA has acknowledged that it failed to take all necessary and reasonable organisational precautions to prevent bribes to foreign public officials.
It was gathered that SICPA and its former employee have declared that they will not be appealing against the penalty orders, which will be legally binding.
According to reports, a former sales manager of SICPA was also handed a conditional prison sentence of 170 days. The proceedings against the CEO and major shareholder of SICPA are being discontinued.
Business Post learned that the conviction was pronounced by the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (OAG), which ordered the firm to pay a fine of CHF 1 million and imposed an equivalent claim for compensation amounting to CHF 80 million under Art. 71 para. 1 SCC.
The proceedings identified organisational deficiencies that made it possible for employees of SICPA to bribe public officials in the conduct of business in Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela. Organisational deficiencies were particularly evident in the areas of corporate governance, risk management and compliance.
In the penalty order, the OAG finds the former sales manager of SICPA, who took advantage of the deficiencies, guilty of bribery of foreign public officials under Art. 322septies SCC. He is being sentenced to a conditional prison term of 170 days. The order states that he paid bribes to high-ranking officials in the Colombian and Venezuelan markets between 2009 and 2011.
The proceedings conducted against the same former sales manager on suspicion of embezzlement and money laundering are being discontinued pursuant to Art. 319 para. 1 lit. a Criminal Procedure Code (CrimPC), because suspicions justifying an indictment have not been corroborated.