Banking
Diamond Bank Shareholders Panic Over New Revelation
By Dipo Olowookere
In recent times, Diamond Bank Plc has been in the news mostly for the wrong reasons, which has left many people wondering what will happen to their investment in the financial institution.
This fear worsened yesterday when a reputable businessplatform, Proshare Nigeria, published a letter purportedly written by theformer Chairman of the bank, Mr Oluseyi, Bickerstheth, to key shareholders and stakeholdersin the industry.
The letter detailed how some directors, who were later forced out of the firm, kicked against alleged corporate governance abuse by some key elements of Diamond Bank, including its CEO, Mr Uzoma Dozie.
Mr Bickerstheth even said there was an initial agreement for Mr Dozie to resign from the company from January 3, 2019 to allow a new management team, but that he refused to honour this alleged agreement.
He further said contrary to the denials, there were actually moves to allow Access Bank takeover Diamond Bank.
Already, the revelations made by the Chairman has sparked new reactions from shareholders of Diamond Bank, who want the relevant authorities to quickly take decisive steps to avert another loss of investment like it happened few months ago with the defunct Skye Bank, which was nationalised to Polaris Bank.
Those who spoke with Business Post said the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must not allow the sweat of many investors to go down the drain again.
“The relevant agencies must act fast to avert another crisis,” an investor in the stock market told us on Tuesday.
“Though the chairman did not really say anything new to us, he only confirmed what some of us have been saying about the crisis in Diamond Bank,” another investor said.
Below is the unedited letter purportedly written by Mr Bickerstheth.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AT DIAMOND BANK PLC –NEED FOR URGENT ACTION
This letter is written without prejudice and is intended as an instructive, unvarnished, and factual rendition of the truth, for posterity sake. My overall and irrevocable interest remains ensuring the reversal of the declining fortunes of DIAMONDBNK, as well as ensuring that no party, however and wherever placed, threatens the survival of Diamond Bank and the integrity of the Nigerian financial system. It is my hope that all concerned remain faithful to the objective requirements and fiduciary obligations of their positions of stewardship.
I speak on behalf of myself as chairman of DIAMONDBNK and 3 other non-executive directors (NEDs) of the Bank namely Mr Rotimi Oyekanmi, Mrs Juliet Anammah and Mrs Aisha Oyebode. As individuals and as a group of professionals with direct knowledge of the events captured below, I state emphatically our dissociation from any dangerous abuses of office highlighted below, and insist that proper governance be maintained in this, and all other cases. I assume that the CBN did not have all the facts prior to now; if so, it is my assessment that it is not too late for the CBN to do the correct thing by insisting on the Board oversight of the underlying matters, as referenced in our prayer in this letter.
We are all technically independent directors of DIAMONDBNK as we do not represent the interest of any specific shareholder but the interest of all the stakeholders especially those whose investments have made Diamond Bank what it is today as a systemically important bank in Nigeria.
As Independent non-executive directors, we are all very concerned and motivated particularly by concerns of a bank that now appears to be adrift with no direction and leadership, exacerbated by misinformation and counter information within the media. The most recent being the assertions in the media on Monday November 12, 2018 that the bank is to be acquired by Access Bank only for that to be denied by Access Bank, which has now totally dissociated itself from any such transaction. Also DIAMONDBNK has also dissociated itself from the assertions in the media. I have elected to ignore comments from various quarters that the Access Bank transaction is favored by the CEO, and the very loud boasts by the CEO himself that the Access Bank transaction has been endorsed by our regulator, to the exclusion of all other options being considered by the board; as I have also chosen not to speculate on the incentives and motivation for his haste and the evident abuse that will be perpetuated if any such deal is allowed to go through without following due process.
1. Our Position
DIAMONDBNK’s performance has continued to decline. Current forecasts indicate the bank will close 2018 on significantly lower profit (or even a loss situation) than planned. Management was not able to attend the Q3 Analysts call and we are aware that S&P has downgraded the bank’s credit rating. The bank had neither declared nor paid any dividend since 2013 and the Bank was only meeting the CBN Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) by the grace of CBN forbearance and the current financial position of the Bank does not show any signs of improvement.
The Bank is in dire need of recapitalization. Nonetheless, the Board remains the foremost governing body of the bank with the fiduciary responsibility to protect the interests of all shareholders, thus, all recapitalization proposals including potential acquisitions can only be by a full Board for consideration and approval.
The Diamond Bank Board has 5 “independent” NEDs and the action of the CEO in now attempting to remove 4 of these 5 NEDs, after the fact, was prejudiced and selectively done to undermine the independence of the NEDs. The insertions and “acceptance” of their purported resignation, contrary to the decision of the full board in a meeting, to rescind the decision, was in bad faith and is ultra vires and of no consequence and effect. This attitude of the CEO in fact aligns with the CBN examiners’ observation referenced in paragraph 3 below regarding corporate governance where the management takes actions either without notifying the Board or without securing Board approval as has been seen even in matters concerning the investment vehicle of the CEO’s family.
Further, according to CAMA and SEC Rules, only the Board can accept/approve the resignation of a director. Thus, an acceptance by an executive such as the CEO being null and void and illegal suggests that an acceptance by the CBN based on this illegal action by the CEO appears to have been done hastily.
Indeed, the said resignation of the 4 NEDs never came into effect in law and the Bank through its Board at the meeting of October 22 2018 continued to hold them out as Directors with no dissent from any director. The 4 NEDs remain on the board of Diamond Bank unless and until they have tendered their valid letters of resignations and the Board has accepted same.
2. Background and Context
Following several directors reaching their expiration of tenor in 2016/2017, the board decided in alliance with international best practice to have a more professional and independent membership, and, therefore, brought in additional professionals to help steer the Bank. These board members are myself, Mr Rotimi Oyekanmi, Mrs Juliet Anammah, Mr. Dele Babade, Mr Idris Mohammed, Mr. Chris Ubosi and Mrs Aisha Oyebode. And the board recently recommended Mr. Oghogho Akpata to the board awaiting confirmation from the CBN
The board identified the need to inject equity into the bank. In addition, the bank had several financial obligations due in 2019, which the board insisted the funding should be in place by end 2018 (before the Nigerian elections). To improve the viability of the bank, the board had approved the sale of its subsidiaries outside Nigeria as this would be expecting to lead to, subject to the CBN approval, a reduction in the minimum CAR from 15% to 10% upon conversion of the bank to a National Bank (from International Bank).
The board then discussed the options for raising capital and one of the key shareholders indicated interest in injecting more equity into the bank but on condition of a change in management. Observing the issues of performance, the board then decided to first determine the capital requirement by appointing advisers to review the loan book. The result of this evaluation was expected at the end of October 2018 and we presume this has been received by the bank
The Central Bank examiners, in August 2018, had highlighted potential gaps in corporate governance based on transactions which, from their assessment, executive management had not disclosed to the board as it ought to have. Specifically, the examiners highlighted the new corporate head office which was under construction and observed that the progress in terms of cost and status of progress was not captured in any board minutes and indeed was not discussed nor was any budget approval for cost increase discussed or presented to the board.
With the examiners’ concerns, new capital being contemplated and declining performance of the bank in the past 4 years, the Non-executive directors (NEDs) critically assessed the quality of executive leadership of the Bank and the need to strengthen the leadership. A key shareholder CSSAF DBN Holdings demanded an immediate removal of management principally the CEO but the Board favored a less drastic approach to minimize disruption and also enable the Board secure new leadership.
After several discussions, the CEO, of the Bank who is also a representative of the second largest shareholder Kunoch Ltd agreed to resign effective January 3, 2019 but would not tender his letter to confirm his verbal notification. In response, the representative of CSSAF DBN Holdings therefore at the Board meeting held on October 18, 2018 put forward a motion for the removal of the CEO with immediate effect. This was despite continuous negotiations and attempts by members of the Board, to provide an amicable solution to this impending shareholder fight and reaching several tentative agreements, which were frustrated by both parties. Nonetheless due to technical reasons and reluctance of board members regarding an immediate removal of the CEO, the vote for the removal of the CEO was postponed, pending legal clarifications, which could not be provided by the Company Secretary.
The CEO, at the October 18 2018 meeting, had a financial adviser appointed by the executive management without reference to the board to present to the board various strategic options for recapitalization either through an internal rights issue or possible merger with other Tier 1 banks. While the board stated that this was to have been presented to the board capital raising committee, it allowed the presentation to be made. The presentation, though based on 2017 financials was still very high level and, was well received by the Board and the board directed that the recommendation be passed on to the capital raising committee of the bank to evaluate this along with all other options being considered – new injection of capital by the shareholders, merger with a local bank or position to partner with an international bank not currently operating in Nigeria
On Friday October 19, 2018, due to the lack of clarity on the motion for immediate removal of the CEO, the representative of CSSAF DBN Holdings informed board members that as a majority shareholder CSSAF DBN Holdings would call for an Extraordinary General Meeting to remove the CEO since the board had not voted on the matter. The 4 NEDs then decided that it was becoming a shareholder fight, which they felt could have been averted either by the CEO tendering a letter indicating his resignation effective January 3, 2019 or by CSSAF DBN Holdings accepting to give the Board the responsibility of ensuring the issue is resolved amicably. Purely on this basis, the 4 NEDs wrote to resign their appointments immediately by emails to the Company Secretary to allow the 2 shareholders resolve the impasse
The action of the 4 NEDs had the desired purpose of forcing the key shareholders, with the intervention of the CBN, to resolve the impasse. The CEO eventually wrote the letter indicating he would resign from the bank effective January 3, 2019. This letter was written on Diamond bank corporate letter head, addressed to the CBN Governor and forwarded to the Bank Chairman (who had purportedly resigned.). With the letter and the substantive matter seemingly resolved, the 4 NEDs, after tremendous pressure by all parties concerned to rescind their resignation including the representatives of CSSAF DBN Holdings, Kunoch Limited and the CEO himself, on Sunday October 21 2018 sent emails to the Company Secretary notifying her of their decision to rescind their resignation given that the impasse had been resolved.
Another positive and significant outcome was the delivery, by the majority shareholder, of its intent to inject further capital into the bank since their condition that the CEO be removed had been met (by his resignation notice)
The CEO then called for an emergency board meeting on Monday October 22, 2018 to request a mandate for the CEO and executive management to review and conclude on a potential strategic merger as an option for recapitalization. The company secretary sent formal notices to all the 13 board members and all 13 board members (including the 4 NEDs who had previously and purportedly resigned and rescinded their resignation) were on the call. It was most disturbing when the CEO, who was on his way out, vigorously sought exclusive powers to negotiate and conclude the terms for the alleged acquisition of Diamond Bank by Access Bank, a development that had never been tabled before the Board, and which, (if and whenever received) like other expressions of interest, should be subjected to objective evaluation by the Board and its Advisers. This sought mandate was not given to the CEO for the reasons stated above.
The CEO’s resignation letter was also discussed and the CEO stated his preference thatthe letter be regarded as a private letter and excluded from board minutes.
The Chairman stated that given the implications of its content for the bank which had been discussed by the Board, it had to be included in Board minutes. Immediately after the meeting the Chairman sought the legal advice of the Company secretary who confirmed that given the NSE listing rules, the letter was material and the NSE should be formally notified. The Chairman then asked the Company Secretary and the Chairman of the Board Governance and Personnel Committee to review the Rules, following which the Company Secretary was to proceed in compliance them. The further action of the CEO on October 24th truncated this process and as of writing, the minutes of the October 22nd meeting have not been circulated and it is not certain if the bank has formally notified the NSE of the CEO’s impending resignation on January 3rd 2019.
The strategic option was again referred to the Capital-Raising Committee, which met immediately after the board call; the committee is made of 4 NEDs and 3 Executive Directors (including the CEO).
The Capital-Raising Committee agreed to consider 5 Advisers. It was further agreed that the Terms of Reference would be drafted by one of the members and the Advisers were to be contacted within 48 hours of the meeting.
It came as a total surprise to all the NEDs of the bank to read in the media on October 24th that 4 NEDs had resigned to create room for a potential investor planning to invest in the bank. This was patently untrue. These deceptive and invalid media stories have amplified in volume and tone, with the latest being a convenient and self-serving story in the November 12th, 2018 edition of The Nation newspaper, wherein the position long canvassed by the outgoing CEO was portrayed as the position of the Board and Bank.
For emphasis, the Board has never received any expression of interest by Access Bank for any form of merger or acquisition involving both Diamond Bank and Access Bank. If and when that is received, our principled position remains that the criteria must be defined by the Board; all valid and competent interests objectively assessed, and a determination made in the transparent and fiduciary cause of protecting and preserving the legitimate interests of the shareholders, depositors, staff, and other stakeholders of the bank.
Further to this media article, on October 25th the CEO further sent letters to the 4 NEDs purporting to accept their resignation. The Company Secretary also posted a notification of the resignation of the 4 NEDs on the NSE issuers’ portal and finally the CEO sent a letter from the CBN which was addressed to him and in which the CBN accepted the resignation of the 4 NEDs and instructed the CEO to find replacements.
Since then there have been media reports with varying renditions of the facts.
This letter has been necessitated by the following:
The seeming lack of regulatory / procedural clarity regarding the purported resignation of four directors to which it is important that the three regulators; CBN, SEC and NSE jointly or severally make a pronouncement directly to the bank on these matters having now been apprised of the facts in the foregoing and other consultation they may have had.
The need to maintain corporate governance in the bank and protect the interest of all the shareholders of the bank.
Our Prayers
That all regulatory bodies copied in this letter objectively review the foregoing and address this matter promptly in a manner that restores confidence not only in Diamond bank as an entity but in the financial system as a whole.
That the said regulatory bodies continue to support the Board of Diamond Bank in discharging its fiduciary responsibility in protecting the interests of all shareholders and stakeholders.
That the Board be allowed to convene the Board strategic meeting as planned for Q4 2018 to discuss the above matters and decide the way forward.
We trust that at this particularly crucial time, the Central Bank of Nigeria and indeed all the regulatory bodies copied in this letter will take necessary steps to prevent the manifest erosion of corporate governance in any bank, as this could very easily have negative and far reaching systemic effects.
Yours Sincerely,
SEYI BICKERSTHETH
CHAIRMAN, DIAMOND BANK PLC
cc:
· President, Nigerian Stock Exchange
· Director General, Securities and Exchange Commission
· Chairman, CSSAF DB Holdings
· Chairman, Kunoch Limited
· Chairman, African Capital Alliance
Banking
LemFi Raises $53m in Series B Funding for Expansion, Service Offerings
By Adedapo Adesanya
Top remittances service firm, LemFi, has raised $53 million in Series B funding to further boost its efforts to acquire more customers and expand its footprint into more countries.
The funding round was led by Highland Europe, a London-based growth-stage investment firm that backs startups with more than €10 million in annualized revenues. Other participants in the deal included existing investors like Endeavor Catalyst, Left Lane Capital, Palm Drive Capital, and Y Combinator.
Lemfi, founded by Mr Ridwan Olalere, its chief executive officer (CEO), and Mr Rian Cochran, its Chief Financial Officer (CFO), closed the Series B round in four months, bringing LemFi’s total funding to $85 million, as per TechCrunch.
LemFi will use the funding to extend its offerings, scale its payment network licenses and partnerships to provide hyper-localized service and recruit talent for its next growth phase.
The firm, which generates revenue from transaction fees and foreign exchange spreads, currently has more than 300 employees across Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia.
Founded in 2020, the four-year-old company has seen massive increases in parameters and claims to have over one million active users who rely on its multi-currency accounts to transfer money to friends and family in countries like Nigeria, Kenya, India, China, Pakistan, and 15 others.
LemFi has undergone rapid growth by helping diaspora communities in North America and, more recently, Europe, send money to emerging markets across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. It currently has 27 send-from markets and 20 send-to countries on its roster.
As part of its expansion plans, the firm has also expanded into Europe by partnering with embedded finance provider Modulr and will help LemFi kickstart operations until it secures its license next month after acquiring a firm based in the Republic of Ireland.
“We intend to go to as many markets as we have a significant number of immigrants, starting now with Europe this year, which is going to be a big focus for us,” CEO, Mr Olalere told TechCrunch in an interview.
Banking
Ecobank Opens ‘Kong in a Cage’ Art Installation to Public Weekends
By Modupe Gbadeyanka
A new art installation, Kong in a Cage, made from recycled materials has been displayed by Ecobank Nigeria Limited at its headquarters in Lagos.
The piece, made by Mr Toyeeb Ajayi, is showcased at the Ecobank Pan African Centre (EPAC) in Lagos as part of the lender’s efforts to foster sustainability in the country.
This thought-provoking piece, which reflects on humanity’s confinement of nature, will be open to the public on Saturdays and Sundays, the financial institution said.
The Managing Director/Regional Executive of Ecobank Nigeria, Mr Bolaji Lawal, said the bank remains dedicated to offering a global platform for emerging Nigerian artists, especially in the fields of sustainability and the arts.
He disclosed that Kong in a Cage aligns with Ecobank’s broader mission to promote the creative sector across Africa.
“Our aim is to highlight the incredible talent of Nigerian artists, providing them with opportunities to showcase their work both locally and internationally.
“The creative sector is an essential driver of economic growth, well-being, and global interconnectedness. At Ecobank, we are committed to investing in the future of our youth, helping to shape a brighter future for Nigeria,” Mr Lawal stated.
On his part, Mr Ajayi said Kong in a Cage is a commentary on environmental sustainability, with the installation’s use of recycled materials reflecting this theme.
Situated in the midst of an urban business environment, the piece serves as both a warning and a call to action, offering a visual critique of humanity’s impact on the planet through the lens of art.
“By employing sustainable materials and practices, this installation does more than just entertain—it prompts a conversation about the intersection of art and environmental stewardship.
“Kong in a Cage is not just an artwork; it’s a dialogue—a visual plea for accountability, responsibility, and a renewed respect for the fragile balance between humanity and nature.
“I encourage everyone to reflect on humanity’s impact on the environment, consider the potential of reclaimed materials, and rethink our relationship with the planet,” he enthused.
Ecobank’s commitment to environmental sustainability is well-documented, with initiatives such as the Get Cash for Plastic Bottles campaign, which removed over four million plastic bottles from the streets and drains of Lagos. The bank is also actively involved in tree-planting efforts aimed at preserving and protecting the environment.
Banking
Bidvest Risks Moody’s Downgrade Over Access Bank Takeover
By Adedapo Adesanya
Ratings agency, Moody’s, has placed the ratings of Bidvest Bank on review for downgrade, raising worries of Access Bank to properly fund the bank amid takeover plans.
Access Bank Plc, the banking subsidiary of Access Holdings Plc, entered into a binding agreement for the acquisition of 100 per cent equity stake in Bidvest Bank Limited in December.
The deal for the 24-year-old South African lender is due to be completed in the second half of 2025, upon regulatory approval.
However, in its new rating, Moody’s flagged the capacity of the Nigerian lender to fund the bank, in comparison with that of its owner, the Bidvest Group.
Bidvest, valued at R88 billion on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) in December announced Access Bank as the preferred buyer of its banking unit, Bidvest Bank, in a deal worth R2.8 billion subject to the usual regulatory approvals.
The Bidvest Bank book, which mainly consists of leased assets, loans and advances, totalled R6 billion in December, funded by deposits of R8 billion.
Bidvest Bank generated a trading profit of R371 million and an operating income of R377 million in its most recent financial year.
After the finalisation of the acquisition, Bidvest Bank will be merged with Access Bank’s existing South African subsidiary to create an enlarged platform to anchor the regional growth strategy for the SADC region.
However, Moody’s has placed Bidvest Bank on review for downgrade to the following ratings: the Ba2 domestic-currency long-term issuer rating; the Aa2.za national scale domestic-currency long-term issuer rating; the P-1.za national scale short-term issuer rating; the ba3 Adjusted Baseline Credit Assessment (Adjusted BCA); and the b2 BCA.
The main reason for the potential downgrade is that Access Bank’s rating (long-term deposit ratings of Caa1 positive, Baseline Credit Assessment of caa1) is far lower than Bidvest Bank’s current rating (long-term Corporate Family Ratings of Ba2 stable).
Access Bank’s Caa1 rating is judged as poor quality and very high credit risk.
“The review for downgrade on the domestic-currency long-term issuer rating and the Adjusted BCA of Bidvest Bank will primarily focus on assessing the progress in the acquisition process, including the obtention of regulatory approvals, and the likelihood of the acquisition being completed,” said Moody’s.
“A successful completion of the acquisition by Access Bank could lead to a multi-notch downgrade of Bidvest Bank’s issuer rating due to the loss of two of the notches of parental support uplift from Bidvest Group.”
“This is because the potential new shareholder, Access Bank, has both a lower capacity than Bidvest Group to support the bank, as indicated by the lower rating of Access Bank in comparison to that of Bidvest Group; and a lower rating than Bidvest Bank itself.”
Moody’s said that Bidvest Bank’s current Ba2 domestic-currency long-term issuer rating benefits from two notches of uplift from its b2 BCA. This reflects the high chance of affiliate support from Bidvest Group if the need arises.
The Bidvest Group is expected to safeguard the bank’s financial health and operational stability despite the impending divestment.
The review for downgrade on the bank’s standalone BCA looks at the uncertainties regarding the future strategic direction of the bank post-disposal.
Moody’s said that this “includes the potential disruption to its activities during the disposal process as well as the bank’s post-acquisition financial fundamentals, which will depend on how it is combined with Access Bank’s existing South African operations.”
It added that the review will also assess whether the current positioning of Bidvest Bank’s b2 standalone BCA two notches above Access Bank’s caa1 standalone BCA would remain appropriate in case of successful completion of the acquisition.
Moody’s said a parent entity’s creditworthiness can directly and indirectly affect the credit standing of its bank subsidiaries.
“The bank’s b2 BCA reflects the bank’s solid capitalisation, high liquidity and improving profitability, underpinned by solid niche franchises in the fleet finance and management segment, as well as in the foreign exchange segment,” said Moody’s
“These strengths are moderated by the bank’s weak asset quality and relatively modest deposit-gathering franchise.”
“There is limited upside potential on the ratings given the review for downgrade.”
-
Feature/OPED5 years ago
Davos was Different this year
-
Travel/Tourism8 years ago
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
-
Showbiz2 years ago
Estranged Lover Releases Videos of Empress Njamah Bathing
-
Banking7 years ago
Sort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
-
Economy2 years ago
Subsidy Removal: CNG at N130 Per Litre Cheaper Than Petrol—IPMAN
-
Banking2 years ago
First Bank Announces Planned Downtime
-
Sports2 years ago
Highest Paid Nigerian Footballer – How Much Do Nigerian Footballers Earn
-
Technology4 years ago
How To Link Your MTN, Airtel, Glo, 9mobile Lines to NIN