Connect with us

Health

More Woes for Evans Medical, to Pay N71m in 30 Days

Published

on

Evan Medical Plc

By Modupe Gbadeyanka

It is not the best of times for Evan Medical Plc, a company on the stock exchange battling for survival because of some issues staring at it.

To compound its woes, a Lagos Judicial Division of the National Industrial Court has asked the healthcare firm to pay the sum of N71 million within 30 days.

The amount, precisely N70.977 million, is outstanding salaries, allowances, gratuity and pension contributions of eight former employees of the company for their years of service.

Justice Ikechi Nweneka, who ordered Evans Medical to make the payment, held that the various documentary evidence tendered by the ex-employees were not disputed and the sums claimed were equally not seriously contested and the evidence of their entitlements remains largely unchallenged.

Business Post gathered that from facts, the claimants had submitted that the 2nd-defendant, FBNQuest Trustees appointed the first defendant, Mr Seyi, as receiver/manager and took over the assets, liabilities and undertakings of the firm on October 9, 2017; which assets were subsequently sold to the fourth defendant and promised to pay their outstanding salaries, entitlements and other benefits which promise remains unfulfilled.

The defendants denied any indebtedness to the claimants and stated that assuming without conceding, the firm was indebted to the claimants that such claims are unsecured and cannot be enforced against the firm until the secured lenders realize their indebtedness from the assets of the firm and urged the court to discountenance the submission for not supported by any credible evidence.

The 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants filed a preliminary objection that the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the suit on the grounds that the 3rd defendant was under receivership, that the question relating to who or whether the receiver can pay them is within the rubric of operations of the Companies and Allied Matters Act and does not lie within the powers of the court to adjudicate.

Counsel to the defendants also objected that the 1st and 3rd defendants, Evans Medical Plc are not proper and/or necessary parties before the court, given that there was no employer/employee relationship between the claimants and the 2nd and 4th defendants.

In response, counsel for the claimants, Mr Olaniran Obele, submitted that the argument that the court lacks jurisdiction because the subject matter borders on the operation of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, bankruptcy and insolvency is not only wrong but an attempt to mislead the court.

It was also argued that the mere fact that 3rd defendant was under receivership does not mean it is dead or has lost its legal personality, urging the court to dismiss the preliminary issues.

Delivering judgment, Justice Nweneka affirmed the court jurisdiction and held that the thrust of the suit was not receivership, insolvency or winding up of the 3rd defendant, but strictly for payment of earned salaries and benefits which, owing to the mutation of the 3rd defendant, that the 1st defendant is a receiver/manager does not take the matter out of the competence of the court.

The judge thereafter, struck out the 2nd and 4th defendants as they were improperly joined in the suit.

“The terms of sale of the assets and liabilities of the 3rd defendant to the 4th defendant are not before me to determine if the entitlements of the claimants were transferred to the 4th defendant. There is, therefore, no basis to hold the 4th defendant liable for the debts of the 3rd defendant.

“It is the law that appointment of a receiver/manager does not annihilate the company, the company does not lose its legal personality and title to the goods in receivership and does not terminate the contract of the employees.

“I equally found that the 1st and 5th claimants were still in the employment of the 3rd defendant when the 1st defendant took over the 3rd defendant and their employment did not terminate automatically,” Justice Nweneka ruled.

The court declared that the Evans Medical Plc is liable to pay the claimants their outstanding salaries, allowances, gratuity and all pension contributions for their years of service in the employment of the firm.

The judge then directed Evans Medical Plc to pay 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th claimants the sum of N15,447,346.68; N2,275,182.49; N4,503,915.27; N16,192,746.74; N16,471,043.99; N3,303,283.53; N3,866, 388.53; and N8,916,639.00 respectively with cost of N500,000 within 30 days.

Modupe Gbadeyanka is a fast-rising journalist with Business Post Nigeria. Her passion for journalism is amazing. She is willing to learn more with a view to becoming one of the best pen-pushers in Nigeria. Her role models are the duo of CNN's Richard Quest and Christiane Amanpour.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health

Adichie Demands Documentation of Late Son’s Treatment as Euracare Suspends Doctor

Published

on

ngozi adichie propofol

By Adedapo Adesanya

Nigerian author, Ms Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, via her solicitors, has written to Euracare Multi-Specialist Hospital, Lagos, over the death of her 21-month-old son, Nkanu Nnamdi, seeking documentation of treatment before his untimely demise.

In a legal notice dated January 10, 2026, solicitors acting for the renowned author and her partner, Dr Ivara Esege, alleged that the hospital, its anaesthesiologist, and attending medical personnel breached the duty of care owed to their son, who died in the early hours of Wednesday, January 7, 2026.

The notice was issued on behalf of the parents by Pinheiro LP and signed by the founding partner, Prof Kemi Pinheiro (SAN).

According to the notice, the child was referred to the hospital on January 6, 2026, from Atlantis Pediatric Hospital for a series of diagnostic and preparatory procedures. These included an echocardiogram, a brain MRI, the insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line), and a lumbar puncture.

The procedures were reportedly part of preparations for an imminent medical evacuation to the United States, where a specialist medical team was said to be on standby to receive him.

The solicitors stated that intravenous sedation was administered using propofol.

However, it was alleged that during transportation to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory following the MRI procedure, the child allegedly developed sudden and severe complications.

Despite being under sedation, he was said to have been transferred between clinical areas under conditions that raised “serious and substantive concerns” about compliance with patient-safety protocols.

He was later pronounced dead in the early hours of January 7, 2026.

The legal notice outlines multiple alleged lapses in paediatric anaesthetic and procedural care.

These include concerns about the appropriateness and cumulative dosing of propofol in a critically ill child, inadequate airway protection during deep sedation, and an alleged failure to ensure continuous physiological monitoring.

The parents further alleged that their son was transferred without supplemental oxygen, without adequate monitoring, and without sufficient accompanying medical personnel.

They also raised concerns over the availability of basic resuscitation equipment, delayed recognition and management of respiratory or cardiovascular compromise, and an overall failure to comply with established paediatric anaesthesia, patient-transfer, and safety protocols.

Another major grievance cited was the alleged failure of the hospital to adequately disclose the risks and potential side effects of propofol and other anaesthetic agents, thereby undermining the legal requirement for informed consent.

According to the solicitors, these alleged lapses amount to prima facie breaches of the duty of care and render the hospital and all medical personnel involved liable for medical negligence resulting in the child’s death.

As part of their next legal steps, the parents demanded certified copies of all medical records relating to their son’s treatment within seven days of receipt of the notice.

The requested documents include admission notes, consent forms, pre-anaesthetic assessments, anaesthetic charts, drug administration records, monitoring logs, procedural notes, nursing observations, ICU records, incident reports, and the identities of all medical staff involved.

The demand also covers internal reviews, safety logs from the MRI suite, and any other documentation connected to the child’s care.

The hospital was also formally placed on notice to preserve all relevant evidence, whether physical or electronic.

This includes CCTV footage from procedure rooms and corridors, electronic monitoring data, pharmacy and drug inventory records, crash-cart and emergency equipment logs, as well as internal communications and any morbidity and mortality reviews.

The solicitors warned that “any destruction, alteration, or loss of such evidence after receipt of this letter shall be regarded as suppression or concealment of evidence and obstruction of the course of justice, and will be relied upon accordingly, with attendant legal consequences.”

The letter concluded with a warning that failure or refusal by the hospital to comply with the demands within the stipulated timeframe would leave the parents with no option but to pursue all available legal, regulatory, and judicial remedies against the hospital and all medical personnel involved.

Euracare Hospital had noted in a Saturday statement that it had commenced “a detailed investigation” into the incident in line with its clinical governance standards and best practices, while pledging to engage transparently and responsibly with all relevant clinical and regulatory processes.

Also, the Lagos State Government on Saturday said it began an investigation into the incident, vowing to ensure the full weight of the law is applied.

Speaking yesterday, the Special Adviser to the Lagos State Governor on Health, Dr Kemi Ogunyemi, said the doctor involved in the child’s procedure had been suspended by the hospital’s management, noting that the hospital was cooperating with the government in the investigation.

“The hospital itself is also doing its own internal investigation, and as far as we know, the anaesthesiologist involved has been suspended by the hospital,” she revealed.

Continue Reading

Health

Chinamanda Ngozi Adichie Blames Medical Negligence for Son’s Death

Published

on

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

By Adedapo Adesanya

Renowned Nigerian author, Ms Chinamanda Ngozi Adichie, has alleged that medical negligence was responsible for the death of her 21-month-old child.

The child, Nkanu, reportedly passed away on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, after a brief illness.

More details have emerged detailing the circumstances surrounding his death.

According to a leaked internal message sent privately to family members and close friends, Ms Adichie blamed a staff of Euracare Multi-Specialist Hospital, located in Victoria Island, Lagos, for causing the demise of the lad.

“My son would be alive today if not for an incident at Euracare Hospital on January 6th.

“We were in Lagos for Christmas. Nkanu had what we first thought was just a cold, but soon turned into a very serious infection and he was admitted to Atlantis hospital.

“He was to travel to the US the next day, January 7th, accompanied by Travelling Doctors. A team at Johns Hopkins was waiting to receive him in Baltimore. The Hopkins team had asked for a lumbar puncture test and an MRI. The Nigerian team had also decided to put in a ‘central line’ (used to administer iv medications) in preparation for Nkanu’s flight. Atlantis hospital referred us to Euracare Hospital, which was said to be the best place to have the procedures done.

“The morning of the 6th, we left Atlantis hospital for Euracare, Nkanu carried in his father’s arms. We were told he would need to be sedated to prevent him from moving during the MRI and the ‘central line’ procedure.

“I was waiting just outside the theater. I saw people, including Dr M, rushing into the theater and immediately knew something had happened.

“A short time later, Dr M came out and told me Nkanu had been given too much propofol by the anesthesiologist, had become unresponsive and was quickly resuscitated. But suddenly Nkanu was on a ventilator, he was intubated and placed in the ICU. The next thing I heard was that he had seizures. Cardiac arrest. All these had never happened before. Some hours later, Nkanu was gone

“It turns out that Nkanu was NEVER monitored after being given too much propofol. The anesthesiologist had just casually carried Nkanu on his shoulder to the theater, so nobody knows when exactly Nkanu became unresponsive.

“How can you sedate a sick child and neglect to monitor him? Later, after the ‘central line’ procedure, the anesthesiologist casually switched off Nkanu’s oxygen and again decided to carry him on his shoulder to the ICU!

“The anesthesiologist was CRIMINALLY negligent. He was fatally casual and careless with the precious life of a child. No proper protocol was followed.

“We brought in a child who was unwell but stable and scheduled to travel the next day. We came to conduct basic procedures. And suddenly, our beautiful little boy was gone forever. It is like living your worst nightmare. I will never survive the loss of my child.

“We have now heard about two previous cases of this same anesthesiologist overdosing children. Why did Euracare allow him to keep working? This must never happen to another child,” she wrote.

As of press time, it is not clear what the next line of action will be with the revelation.

Continue Reading

Health

SUNU Health Named Most Customer Focused HMO of the Year

Published

on

SUNU Health --logo

By Modupe Gbadeyanka

The decision of the management of SUNU Health Nigeria Limited to adopt the strategy of placing the enrollee and customer at the heart of its operations has started to pay off.

The company was recently announced as Most Customer-Focused Health Insurance Company of the Year at the Customer Service Standard Magazine Awards 2025.

The recognition underscored the company’s success in translating its dedication into tangible enrollee satisfaction and superior market service at the Nigerian Health Maintenance Organisation (HMO) landscape.

It also highlights the organisation’s dedicated efforts in streamlining claims processing, enhancing access to quality healthcare providers, and maintaining transparent, responsive communication channels with its diverse client base across Nigeria.

The accolade further serves as a powerful testament to the successful integration of digital solutions and human-centric service models at SUNU Health.

It positions the firm as a leader not only in providing robust health plans but also in delivering the supportive, personalized care that enrollees truly value.

“Clinching the Most Customer-Focused Health Insurance Company of the Year award is not just an honour; it is a validation of the core philosophy that drives every member of the SUNU Health team.

“We believe that healthcare is fundamentally a service industry, and our success is measured by the well-being and satisfaction of our enrollees,” the chief executive of SUNU Health, Mr Patrick Korie, commented.

“This award reinforces our resolve to continuously innovate and set new benchmarks for customer experience in the Nigerian health insurance sector.

“Our commitment to providing accessible, high-quality, and seamless healthcare solutions remains our top priority as we move into the new year (2026),” he added.

Continue Reading

Trending