Connect with us

Feature/OPED

SMEs: Market Entry Strategies and Applicability in a Pandemic

Published

on

Customer Satisfaction Timi Olubiyi

By Timi Olubiyi, Ph.D

The business environment is currently going through radical changes globally due to the damaging effect of the novel coronavirus (COVID19).

Therefore, to cope with this situation, businesses need to adjust and develop strategies to rise to the occasion.

A typical decision businesses’ particularly Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) can make at the moment to achieve sustainability, and valuable competitiveness is by considering new market entry strategies.

Many firms expand their business geographic scope from domestic to nationwide or even foreign markets through this means.

With the harsh impact of COVID19 and the limitations in financial and human resources, companies can still leverage on a new market entry strategy to stem the tides.

Market entry strategy is a planned distribution and delivery method of goods or services to a new target market.

In simple terms, a market entry strategy refers to a detailed plan of how to successfully berth and run a profitable business in a new region.

Market entry strategy will help companies to assess markets’ readiness for new offerings and gain detailed insights into the new market. In short, it allows businesses to gather comprehensive insights into lucrative opportunities, industry developments, and competitive scenarios of an unknown market. This strategy makes it easier for companies to successfully establish their foothold and gain a leading edge in the new market and gain good market access.

With a market entry strategy, companies get access to important information and thus, they can increase their productivity and competitive position. It is important to note that the market entry strategy will help businesses at this time to efficiently enter new markets.

For example, a business located and operating in Ikeja, Lagos State can conduct market entry research and gather data from other states of the country (Kano, Enugu, Kwara, Osun, Rivers, Nasarawa, Taraba)  or around the West Africa region (Republic of Benin, Togo, Ghana   Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal) or beyond for market expansion and new market entry strategy.

With adequate research to guide the decision, businesses can achieve increased sales, improved brand awareness and business sustainability with a new market strategy to gain market expansion.

The new market entry strategy, when implemented, can sustain the success of a proactive business due to the negative challenges created by the COVID-19.

In building a market entry strategy, time is a crucial factor, and consequently, in my opinion, the pandemic has provided good timing for new market entry and the opportunity for companies to expand easily.

It is much easier now for cross-border expansion or at the least expansion beyond the geographical location of business operation because governments are encouraging and supporting businesses to stabilize due to COVID-19 impact.

More so, we are likely to see policy responses to decrease trade barriers and improve globalization. Therefore considering new market entry strategy at this time is one of the most important ways for businesses to grow profitability and sustain competitive advantage.

By entering into new markets, businesses, particularly SMEs, can enjoy several benefits, including broadening their customer base and improving market share beyond the business location.

Consequently, if a domestic business is willing to go nationwide and/or across the globe with world-class products and services, the best option is through a new market strategy and the time is now.

Invariably, these following benefits can be achieved: economies of scale, earning foreign currency, gaining global customers, increasing brand awareness and improving market share.

Further to this, it is important to state that the ease of entry into a new market is characterised by the available financial resources, the ownership structure, managerial styles and managerial resources of the domestic businesses.

However, the relevant factors that must be considered when deciding the viability of entry into a particular market include trade barriers, customer preference, pricing, competition, and export guidelines and restrictions.

The liability of newness is another hindrance, as a new business in a new market could encounter difficulties, and this can lead to increased risk, as there is usually a lack of legitimacy in any new market.

For this reason, vigorous brand awareness and advertainment need to be accounted in other to legitimizing the business in a new market.

Significantly, the entry mode choice is one of the most important decisions a business has to make in the effort of new market entry strategy because it determines the number of resources to be committed.

Therefore, businesses have to find an entry mode that allows them to deal effectively with the risks that arise in the target destination.

There is no one specific mode of entry an organization can adopt to enter into a new market or go internationally. Businesses can consider some of the most common market entry modes, which are: directly by the setting up of an entity in the new market, directly exporting products to the new market, indirectly exporting using a reseller or distributor, and producing products in the target market.

The most common modes, however, to go into a foreign market entry are licensing, joint venture, partnering and strategic alliances, acquisitions, exporting or establishing new, wholly-owned subsidiaries, also known as greenfield ventures.

For SMEs, the option is usually to start transferring/exporting via an agent or a foreign representative. This option is a non-equity mode that requires fewer resources and provides flexibility, but the target market knowledge may be lacking.

Entry Mode Profile   Benefit
Exporting/trasferring Fast-entry, low risk   Low control, low local knowledge, the potential negative environmental impact of transportation is high
Licensing and Franchising Fast-entry, low cost, low risk   Less control, the licensee may become a competitor, legal and regulatory environment (IP and contract law) must be sound
Partnering and Strategic Alliance Shared costs reduce investment needed, reduced risk, seen as the local entity   Higher cost than exporting, licensing, or franchising; integration problems between two corporate cultures
Acquisition Fast-entry; known, established operations   High cost, integration issues with home office
Greenfield Venture (Launch of a new, wholly-owned subsidiary) Gain local market knowledge; can be seen as an insider who employs locals; maximum control   High cost, high risk due to unknowns, slow entry due to setup time

Each mode of market entry has advantages and disadvantages. Firms need to evaluate their options to choose the entry mode that best suits their strategy and goals.

Significantly, the mode of entry is a crucial factor to be considered for a business entity to be successful in a new market.

However, all the modes of market entry involve resource commitments of some kind. Because entering the market properly is one of the most important steps a business must consider.

From context observation, business expansion starts with the movement of goods and services to neighbouring states or countries that are close to business facilities. This is usually because of the lower transportation costs involved and the often greater similarity between geographic neighbours.

To be effective and successful, with new market entry strategy, businesses need to support the decision with a well-thought-out plan. One that is based on the analysis of potential competitors, understanding of the focus market environment and its inner workings, the regulatory expectations, consumer behaviour, and possible customer base, among other key factors.

A typical market entry strategy can take a few months to implement due to intensive preparation. However, it worths the effort because it will reduce business failure risk. It will also ensure an informed decision on the launch of the right product or services that align with the expectations of the customers.

More so, with new market entry strategy, adequate attention should be paid to the political and institutional environment of the target market, where businesses are likely to encounter different market conditions different from the home market.

That said, the context of digitalization has evolved over the last years and pushed further communication technologies much easier, such as the internet and mobile telecommunication. Therefore, digitalization can also be leveraged upon when considering the market entry options.

Besides the impact of the COVID-19 on businesses globally has encouraged the effective use of technological innovations. Innovation in the context of this article can be defined as ‘the introduction of something new that positively impacts businesses and mankind in meaningful and contextually specific ways.

Therefore, introducing new market entry modes to business operations at this time might just be the innovative move required to stem the impact of the pandemic on business operations. By so doing, market innovativeness, behavioural innovativeness, and strategic innovativeness would have been achieved. This will greatly improve the performance, market expansion and logistics method of businesses.

To have a winning market entry strategy plan, businesses need to set clear goals, study the target market and the competition, know the customer needs and preference.

Extant literature suggests barriers of entry to new markets, particularly foreign markets to include lack of financial, physical or technological resources; the lack of opportunities and insufficiency of managerial skills.

Another is inadequate useful information to analyse the target market and also identify business opportunities. It has also been observed that a strong brand identity or customer loyalty, and high customer switching costs can be barriers of entry to new markets.

Others include the need for new companies to obtain proper licenses or regulatory clearance before the operation. Some of the risks incurred when entering a new market and start domestic or international trade include weather risk, foreign exchange risk, and cultural risk

While the idea of entering a new market might seem viable on paper, when put to practice, organizations are challenged by several uncertainties and barriers aforementioned.

Though some companies prefer to develop their market entry plans, other outsource to specialized individuals or companies.

The engagement of knowledgeable professionals can mitigate trade risk in the target market and also improve the chances of discovering adequate market opportunities. Good luck!

How may you obtain advice or further information on the article? 

Dr. Timi Olubiyi is an Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management expert. He is a prolific investment coach, Chartered Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment (CISI), and a financial literacy specialist. He can be reached on the twitter handle @drtimiolubiyi and via email: [email protected], for any questions, reactions, and comments.

Feature/OPED

Preventing Financial Crimes Amid Mounting Insecurity: Why Following the Money is Now a Survival Imperative

Published

on

Preventing Financial Crimes

By Blaise Udunze

Nigeria today faces a sobering dual reality: a deepening security crisis and an entrenched financial-crime ecosystem that quietly feeds, sustains, and normalises that crisis. Across the North, Middle Belt, and parts of the South, kidnappers, bandits, insurgent cells, political actors, compromised security agents, and a complex chain of financial facilitators operate within a shadow economy of violence, one that generates billions, claims thousands of lives, and steadily erodes the authority of the state.

For over a decade, security experts and Nigeria’s international partners have warned that no meaningful progress will be made against insecurity unless the financial oxygen sustaining violence is cut off. Yet the country continues to prosecute its anti-terrorism efforts largely through military responses, as though the conflict could be resolved solely on the battlefield. What remains missing is a decisive, transparent, and politically courageous confrontation with the economic networks that make insecurity profitable.

This war is not only about guns and bullets. It is about money.

Money moves fighters.

Money buys weapons.

Money fuels political desperation.

Money underwrites chaos.

Until Nigeria addresses the financial pipelines behind its insecurity, the crisis will continue to reproduce itself.

Kidnapping: The Lucrative ‘War Fund’ Sustaining Insurgency

The rise in mass kidnappings is neither accidental nor spontaneous. It has evolved into a rational, structured, revenue-generating enterprise.

Appearing on Channels TV’s Politics Today in October 2025, Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed warned that insurgent and bandit groups now treat ransom payments as reliable “war funds.” The data support his claim.

A 2024 survey by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) found that Nigerians paid N2.2 trillion in ransom between May 2023 and April 2024. This astonishing sum does not account for unreported payments made through informal negotiators, mobile transfers, or unregulated community channels.

Kidnapping has matured into a fully formed economy with well-defined roles: negotiators, informants, logistics providers, cash couriers, and security collaborators. Proceeds are reinvested in weapons, motorcycles, communication devices, safe houses, and even land acquisitions.

In the words of a security analyst, “Every successful kidnapping is a fundraiser.”

Sabotage from Within: Keffi’s Explosive Memo and a System Built to Fail

If Nigeria’s external security threats are troubling, the internal compromises are even more alarming.

A leaked memo by Major General Mohammed Ali Keffi accused senior government and military officials of diverting billions of naira earmarked for arms procurement under former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai. Keffi’s allegations included:

–       Weapons paid for but never delivered

–       Falsified battlefield reports

–       Civilian casualties mislabelled to justify inflated expenditures

–       Political interference obstructing investigations into terror financing

His claims echoed the earlier warning by Gen. T.Y. Danjuma, who accused sections of the military of working in concert with armed groups and abandoning vulnerable communities.

Keffi’s memo became even more consequential following the 2025 detention of former Attorney General Abubakar Malami by the EFCC over allegations of money laundering, terrorism financing and suspicious financial activity linked to 46 bank accounts.

Together, these revelations paint a disturbing picture: even as Nigerians endure mass abductions, elements within the political and security elite appear to be enabling or shielding the financial networks behind the violence.

Why the Crisis Persists: A Financial Crime Lens

Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be divorced from the environment in which illicit finance thrives. Key enablers include:

  1. Informal Economies and Unregulated Cash Flows

With over 70 percent of rural transactions still cash-based, terror groups exploit:

–       Hawala networks

–       POS and mobile-money agents

–       Cattle markets and mining sites

–       Barter systems centred on livestock and grains

These channels operate beyond the reach of AML/CFT systems.

  1. Identity Fraud and Weak KYC Enforcement

–       Criminal networks routinely open accounts with:

–       Fake NINs

–       Compromised SIM cards

–       Recycled BVNs

–       Mule identities

  1. Collusion within Financial Institutions

The EFCC estimates that up to 70 percent of financial crimes involve bank personnel, primarily through:

–       Unauthorised cash withdrawals

–       Suppressed Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs)

–       Manipulated internal alerts

  1. Weak Prosecution and Political Interference

Cases drag on for years, and many evaporate entirely before reaching court often due to political considerations.

  1. Ungoverned Spaces

Large territories across the North serve as hubs for:

–       Arms trafficking

–       Illegal mining

–       Kidnap-for-ransom camps

–       Cross-border smuggling

Public Patience Thins: NLC Moves to the Streets

Public frustration is reaching a boiling point. On December 10, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) announced a nationwide protest scheduled for December 17, citing the “degenerating security situation” and the rise in mass abductions.

The NLC condemned the November 17 abduction of female students in Kebbi, noting that security personnel had been withdrawn from the school shortly before the attack. The union called the act “dastardly and criminal” and directed all affiliates and civil-society partners to fully mobilise for the protest.

This marks a significant shift. For the first time in years, Nigeria’s most influential labour body is placing insecurity at the centre of national mobilization, further underscoring the argument that the current crisis is not simply a security failure but a systemic breakdown of governance, accountability, and financial integrity.

The Financial Engine of Terror: The 23 Suspects Who Moved Billions

A Sahara Reporters investigation uncovered a network of 20 Nigerians and three foreign nationals allegedly linked to the financing of Boko Haram and ISWAP. Their transactions, running into hundreds of billions, were quietly channeled through personal and corporate accounts.

Among those named:

–       Alhaji Saidu Ahmed, Zaria businessman: N4.8bn inflows

–       Usaini Adamu, Kano trader with 111 accounts: N43bn inflows, N50bn outflows

–       Muhammad Sani Adam, forex and precious stones dealer: N54bn across 41 accounts

–       Yusuf Ghazali, a forex trader linked to UAE-convicted terrorists, operated 385 accounts

–       Ladan Ibrahim, a Sokoto official, is accused of diverting public funds

–       Foreign actors included the late Tribert Ayabatwa (N67bn inflows) and Nigerien arms dealer Aboubacar Hima, who moved over $1.19 million.

Strikingly, several of the suspects arrested in 2021 were quietly released without trial, continuing a pattern of impervious investigations and political bottlenecks.

This network confirms a painful truth: Nigeria’s insecurity is not driven solely by men wielding rifles in the bush. It is sustained by individuals in cities, businesses, and bureaucracies, people with access, influence, and remarkable financial mobility.

The Political Dimension: Irabor’s Revelation and the Unnamed Sponsors

The political undertone of Nigeria’s insecurity was reinforced by the former Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Lucky Irabor (rtd), who admitted that politicians were among those financing terror groups. According to him, some trials were conducted “away from public consumption.”

His statement revived key questions:

–       Why is the state shielding the identities of terror sponsors?

–       Who benefits from the secrecy?

–       What political consequences are being avoided?

Security sources told TruthNigeria that Nigeria’s published list of 19 terror financiers in 2024 represented only a fraction of the full network.

Baba-Ahmed’s accusation that former Kaduna Governor Nasir El-Rufai was part of the political forces that aggravated Northern insecurity, an accusation the former governor has previously denied, adds further urgency to demands for transparency.

The Human Cost: Expanding Killing Fields

Despite repeated assurances, violence continues to spread:

–       303 students and 12 teachers abducted in Niger State

–       38 worshippers kidnapped in Kwara

–       Simultaneous raids across Plateau, Kaduna, Benue, and Niger

–       Whole communities uprooted by weekly attacks

As Amnesty International observed, “In many rural communities, only the graveyards are expanding.”

SBM Intelligence now describes large portions of the North as “open killing fields,” areas where the state’s influence has collapsed, and community vigilantes have become the default security providers.

Expert Voices: Why Nigeria Must Finally Follow the Money

Security experts converge on a single message: Nigeria cannot defeat terrorism without dismantling its financial infrastructure. Dr. Friday Agbo, a security researcher, disclosed, “Terror groups survive because their financial lifelines remain untouched.”

Jonathan Asake, analyst and former SOKAPU president, said, “Publish the full Dubai list. Without transparency, impunity will remain the norm.”

Gen. Irabor (rtd.) revealed, “There are politicians involved. The conflict is multi-layered: ideology, criminality, and political manipulation.”

These assessments underscore one reality: ideology is secondary. Money is primary. It is the oxygen of Nigeria’s terror landscape.

What Must Change

Nigeria must elevate financial crime to the level of a national-security emergency. Key reforms include:

–       Integrating BVN-NIN-SIM identity databases and upgrading real-time monitoring

–       Targeting illicit markets: illegal mining hubs, cattle markets, unregulated border posts

–       Deploying AI-driven analytics to detect layered transactions, mule networks, and ransom flows

–       Strengthening bank compliance units and protecting whistleblowers

–       Improving inter-agency intelligence sharing (EFCC, NFIU, DSS, NDLEA, Police, CBN)

–       Criminalising unexplained wealth, especially in conflict zones

–       Investing in safe-school infrastructure, rural policing, and local reporting channels

Choosing Truth Over Convenience

Nigeria’s two-front war is neither mysterious nor new. It is a well-documented, financially engineered crisis protected by silence, vested interests, and institutional decay. The NLC’s mobilisation signals a turning point; citizens are unwilling to accept official evasions while insecurity intensifies. To end this crisis, Nigeria must:

–       Expose and prosecute terror financiers

–       Purge corrupt insiders in the security system

–       Dismantle ransom economies

–       Strengthen financial intelligence

–       End political protection for criminal networks

Until these reforms are pursued with integrity, billions will continue to move, weapons will continue to flow, and Nigeria will continue to bleed.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos, can be reached via: [email protected]

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

Championing Ethical Sourcing Within Dairy Communities

Published

on

Arla Nigeria

Human Rights Day often centres on themes of dignity, equity, and freedom. Yet for many Nigerians, these rights are not debated in courtrooms they are expressed in the ability to access nutritious food, build meaningful livelihoods, and secure a healthy future for their families. Nutrition, in this sense, becomes a fundamental human right.

Despite a growing population and rising nutrition needs, Nigeria faces a pressing dairy reality. The country remains heavily dependent on dairy imports, leaving nutritional access vulnerable and local capacity underdeveloped. This is not just an economic concern; it is a human one. When families cannot easily access affordable, high-quality dairy, the foundations of health and development are weakened.

It is within this context that Arla Nigeria operates not merely as a dairy company, but as a nutrition powerhouse committed to nourishing a nation. Our ambition extends beyond selling products. We are working to build the foundations of a stronger, more resilient local dairy sector that supports food security, economic participation, and national progress.

At the heart of our efforts is the Damau Integrated Dairy Farm in Kaduna Statea fully operational modern farm designed to demonstrate what responsible, efficient, and scalable dairy production can look like in Nigeria. Arla Nigeria produces its own milk on-site, ensuring quality, safety, and consistency as we continue building the systems required for a sustainable local value chain. In fact, until our yoghurt factory launches, the reverse is true: some stakeholders purchase milk from us.

But infrastructure alone is not the story. What truly matters is the human impact surrounding the farm.

Arla Nigeria has been intentional about engaging and empowering the communities around Damau. By creating employment opportunities for local residents, providing skills development, and contributing to community growth, we are ensuring that the benefits of dairy development extend beyond production lines. This is development rooted in people where progress is measured in livelihoods improved and opportunities created.

As Arla Nigeria continues to expand operations, our long-term commitment remains clear: to contribute meaningfully to local milk sourcing and value chain development, strengthening Nigeria’s capacity to feed itself. Backward integration is not a slogan for Arla Foods; it is a structured pathway with building responsibly and sustainably. From farm systems to future household milk initiatives, the goal is to create a model that supports farmers, enhances productivity, and drives economic inclusion in the years ahead.

On Human Rights Day, the conversation often revolves around preventing harm avoiding exploitation, ensuring fair labour, and upholding ethical standards. These are essential, but they are only the beginning. True respect for human rights means creating enabling systems that allow people to thrive.

With Arla Foods, that begins with nutrition. Milk is a super food, rich in essential nutrients that support growth and development. Ensuring access to such nutrition contributes directly to national well-being and productivity. When we help secure a healthier population, we strengthen the foundation for education, economic participation, and long-term prosperity.

This is why Arla believes that dairy is not just food it is nutrition, livelihood, and progress. By investing in sustainable production, community development, and future local sourcing capabilities, Arla Nigeria is contributing to food security and economic growth in a tangible, measurable way.

Ultimately, ethical business is not defined by corporate language or labels. It is defined by the stability, nourishment, and dignity it brings to people’s lives. As Nigeria celebrates Human Rights Day, let us recognise that the right to nutrition and the opportunity to build a better future are among the most powerful rights we can help protect.

Continue Reading

Feature/OPED

In Praise of Nigeria’s Elite Memory Loss Clinic

Published

on

memory loss clinic Busayo Cole

By Busayo Cole

There’s an unacknowledged marvel in Nigeria, a national institution so revered and influential that its very mention invokes awe; and not a small dose of amnesia. I’m speaking, of course, about the glorious Memory Loss Clinic for the Elite, a facility where unsolved corruption cases go to receive a lifetime membership in our collective oblivion.

Take a walk down the memory lane of scandals past, and you’ll encounter a magical fog. Who remembers the details of the N2.5 billion pension fund scam? Anyone? No? Good. That’s exactly how the clinic works. Through a combination of political gymnastics, endless court adjournments, and public desensitisation, these cases are carefully wrapped in a blanket of vagueness. Brilliant, isn’t it?

The beauty of this clinic lies in its inclusivity. From the infamous Dasukigate, which popularised the phrase “arms deal” in Nigeria without actually arming anything, to the less publicised but equally mystifying NDDC palliative fund saga, the clinic accepts all cases with the same efficiency. Once enrolled, each scandal receives a standard treatment: strategic denial, temporary outrage, and finally, oblivion.

Not to be overlooked are the esteemed practitioners at this clinic: our very own politicians and public officials. Their commitment to forgetting is nothing short of Nobel-worthy. Have you noticed how effortlessly some officials transition from answering allegations one week to delivering keynote speeches on accountability the next? It’s an art form.

Then there’s the media, always ready to lend a hand. Investigative journalists dig up cases, splash them across headlines for a week or two, and then move on to the next crisis, leaving the current scandal to the skilled hands of the clinic’s erasure team. No one does closure better than us. Or rather, the lack thereof.

And let’s not forget the loyal citizens, the true heroes of this operation. We rant on social media, organise a protest or two, and then poof! Our collective short attention span is the lifeblood of the Memory Loss Clinic. Why insist on justice when you can unlook?

Take, for example, the Halliburton Scandal. In 2009, a Board of Inquiry was established under the leadership of Inspector-General of Police, Mike Okiro, to investigate allegations of a $182 million bribery scheme involving the American company Halliburton and some former Nigerian Heads of State. Despite Halliburton admitting to paying the bribes to secure a $6 billion contract for a natural gas plant, the case remains unresolved. The United States fined the companies involved, but in Nigeria, the victims of the corruption: ordinary citizens, received no compensation, and no one was brought to justice. The investigation, it seems, was yet another patient admitted to the clinic.

Or consider the Petroleum Trust Fund Probe, which unraveled in the late 1990s. Established during General Sani Abacha’s regime and managed by Major-General Muhammadu Buhari, the PTF’s operations were scrutinised when Chief Olusegun Obasanjo assumed office in 1999. The winding-down process uncovered allegations of mismanagement, dubious dealings, and a sudden, dramatic death of a key figure, Salihijo Ahmad, the head of the PTF’s sole management consultant. Despite the drama and the revelations, the case quietly faded into obscurity, leaving Nigerians with more questions than answers.

Then there is the colossal case of under-remittance of oil and gas royalties and taxes. The Federal Government, through the Special Presidential Investigatory Panel (SPIP), accused oil giants like Shell, Agip, and the NNPC of diverting billions of dollars meant for public coffers. Allegations ranged from falsified production figures to outright embezzlement. Despite detailed accusations and court proceedings, the cases were abandoned after the SPIP’s disbandment in 2019. As usual, the trail of accountability disappeared into thin air, leaving the funds unaccounted for and the public betrayed yet again.

Of course, this institution isn’t without its critics. Some stubborn Nigerians still insist on remembering. Creating spreadsheets, tracking cases, and daring to demand accountability. To these radicals, I say: why fight the tide? Embrace the convenience of selective amnesia. Life is easier when you don’t worry about where billions disappeared to or why someone’s cousin’s uncle’s housemaid’s driver has an oil block.

As World Anti-Corruption Day comes and goes, let us celebrate the true innovation of our time. While other nations are busy prosecuting offenders and recovering stolen funds, we have mastered the fine art of forgetting. Who needs convictions when you have a clinic this efficient? Oh, I almost forgot the anti-corruption day as I sent my draft to a correspondent very late. Don’t blame me, I am just a regular at the clinic.

So, here’s to Nigeria’s Memory Loss Clinic, a shining beacon of how to “move on” without actually moving forward. May it continue to thrive, because let’s face it: without it, what would we do with all these unsolved corruption cases? Demand justice? That’s asking a lot. Better to forget and focus on the next election season. Who knows? We might even re-elect a client of the clinic. Wouldn’t that be poetic?

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have a new scandal to ignore.

Busayo Cole is a Branding and Communications Manager who transforms abstract corporate goals into actionable, sparkling messaging. It’s rumored that 90% of his strategic clarity is powered by triple-shot espresso, and the remaining 10% is sheer panic. He can be reached via busayo@busayocole.com. 

Continue Reading

Trending